The clinical relevance of ultra-widefield angiography findings in patients with central retinal vein occlusion and macular oedema receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

AIMS: To report, using ultra-widefield angiography (UWFA) the area, distribution, and change in retinal capillary nonperfusion (RCNP) at baseline and 100 weeks in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) receiving anti-VEGF for macula oedema. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort study. Adults with CRVO treated with anti-VEGF therapy for macular oedema underwent UWFA at baseline and week-100. The area, distribution, and change in total, peripheral and posterior pole RCNP were determined. RESULTS: Of 153 eyes at baseline, mean area of RCNP was 34.3DA and 12 (7.8%) had ≥75DA RCNP. More than 10DA RCNP was present in the temporal periphery in 75.8% of eyes vs. 10.5% in the nasal periphery. At week-100, mean RCNP was 42.1DA with a median change from baseline of 3.3DA 95% CI [0.4, 7.3]; p < 0.01. Of 146 eyes with ≤10DA of posterior pole RCNP at baseline, 16/146 (11.0%) progressed to >10DA at week-100. These eyes had a median increase in total RCNP of 69.7DA [95% CI 27.2-85.4] vs 0DA [0.0-1.4]; p < 0.001 for those who did not, and two developed neovascular glaucoma. Larger baseline area of RCNP and history of glaucoma were risk factors for posterior pole RCNP developing. CONCLUSIONS: With UWFA, significant baseline RCNP was identified in the majority of CRVO patients, notably in the temporal periphery, but large increases over 100 weeks were uncommon. Development of >10DA posterior pole RCNP is a marker for widespread RCNP and in such cases the risk of anterior segment neovascularisation is not abolished by concomitant anti-VEGF therapy.

One-year real-life results on effect of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular oedema switched from ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To assess visual and optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in patients switched from intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®). DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety eyes (of 67 patients) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. METHODS: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. Each patient had visual acuity measurements and optical coherence tomography scans performed at baseline and 12 months after the first injection of aflibercept was given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured visual acuities in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, central foveal thickness and macular volume at baseline and at 12 months after the first aflibercept injection was given. RESULTS: Ninety switched eyes were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation) visual acuity was 63 (15.78) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) central foveal thickness was 417.7 (158.4) µm and the mean macular volume was 9.96 (2.44) mm3. Mean change in visual acuity was +4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = 0.0053). The mean change in macular volume was -1.53 mm3 in SW group (p = 0.21), while the change in central foveal thickness was -136.8 µm (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in the switched group at 12 months after commencing treatment with aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema in real-world: 36-month visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess structural and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (®Eylea) for diabetic macular oedema in treatment-naïve patients. METHODS: Sixty-four eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in the data analysis of this retrospective, real-life study which follow-up was 3 years. Each patient had corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness and macular volume performed at baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months. Patients were initiated on a loading phase of five 1-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by injections if needed as per clinicians' discretion. RESULTS: The mean number of aflibercept injections received over 3 years was 12.59. At baseline, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 61.45 (16.30) (20/63) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, the mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 422 (138) µm, while the mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 9.51 (2.01) mm3. At 36 months, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 68.34 (13.66) (20/50) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = .0003). Mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 303 (106) µm (p < .0001) and mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 8.35 (1.62) mm3 (p = .0022) at 36 months. Sixteen (25%) eyes gained ≥15 ETDRS letters at month 36, and 33 (52%) eyes had a decrease in central foveal thickness of ≥ 100 µm at the same time. CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in aflibercept-treated eyes at 36 months after commencing treatment for diabetic macular oedema in real-life settings. The good vision and anatomical outcomes were maintained over second and third year of treatment with mean 2.93 and 2.57 intravitreal injections, respectively.

RANIBIZUMAB 0.5 MG TREATMENT IN ADOLESCENTS WITH CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS DATA FROM THE MINERVA STUDY.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adolescent patients with any choroidal neovascularization etiology enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study. METHODS: In the open-label, non-randomized study arm, ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered to five adolescents (aged 13-17 years). The findings were assessed descriptively as individual case reports at Month 12. Best-corrected visual acuity changes, central subfield thickness, treatment exposure, and safety were described over 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline choroidal neovascularization etiologies of the study eye included choroidal neovascularization secondary to Best disease (n = 2), idiopathic chorioretinopathy (n = 2), and optic disk drusen (n = 1). At Months 2, 6, and 12, the observed mean best-corrected visual acuity changes in the study eye from baseline were +9.2, +16.6, and +16.6 letters, respectively, and the observed mean central subfield thickness change from baseline was -31.4, -87.6, and -116.4 µm, respectively. Adolescent patients received a mean of three (range, 2-5) ranibizumab injections in the study eye. No adverse events or serious adverse events related to ranibizumab were reported. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treatment was beneficial in improving visual acuity and stabilizing or reducing central subfield thickness in five adolescents with differing choroidal neovascularization etiologies requiring infrequent injection. No new safety findings were observed over 12 months.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema: Moorfields' real-world 12-month visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess structural and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in treatment-naive patients. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In all, 92 diabetic patients (102 eyes) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. A total of 99 aflibercept-treated eyes were included in the statistical analysis. Each patient had corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness and macular volume performed at baseline and 12 months. Patients were initiated on a loading phase of five monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by injections if needed as per clinicians' discretion. RESULTS: The mean number of aflibercept injections received was 6.92. At baseline, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation; Snellen) was 59.7 (16.1) (20/63) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, the mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 431 (129) µm, while the mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 9.53 (1.79) mm3. At 12 months, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation; Snellen) was 69.6 (15.2; 20/40) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p < .0001). Mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 306 (122) µm (p < .0001) and mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 8.43 (1.58) mm3 (p < .0001) at 12 months; 33 (33.67%) eyes gained ⩾15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at month 12, and 50 (55.55%) eyes had a decrease in central foveal thickness of ⩾100 µm. CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in aflibercept-treated eyes at 12 months after commencing treatment for diabetic macular oedema in real-life settings.

Retinal Nonperfusion Characteristics on Ultra-Widefield Angiography in Eyes With Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: Threshold of retinal nonperfusion for the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is unclear. Objectives: To identify a threshold of retinal nonperfusion for the presence of retinal neovascularization and the distribution and area of retinal nonperfusion in eyes with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), PDR, neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD), and retinal neovascularization elsewhere (NVE). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional image analysis study was performed between September 24, 2018, and October 24, 2018, at a multicenter national study in the United Kingdom. Baseline images were obtained from 2 completed randomized clinical trials (Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Panretinal Photocoagulation [RDP] study and Clinical Efficacy of Intravitreal Aflibercept vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy at 52 Weeks [CLARITY] study). The RDP study recruited eyes with severe NPDR between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and the CLARITY study recruited eyes with PDR between August 22, 2014, and November 20, 2015. Ultra-widefield angiography images of eyes with no prior panretinal photocoagulation treatment were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total area of retinal nonperfusion, the area of posterior pole retinal nonperfusion, and the area of peripheral retinal nonperfusion were measured. Results: A total of 92 patients (92 eyes) were included in the study: 59 in the PDR group (mean [SD] age, 42 [15] years; 20 female [33.9%]) and 33 in the NPDR group (mean [SD] age, 63 [10] years; 3 female [9.1%]). Forty eyes had NVE and 19 had NVD with or without NVE. We identified a retinal nonperfusion threshold of 118.3 disc areas (DA) with a specificity of 84.9% (95% CI, 68.1% to 94.9%) for PDR. The median area of retinal nonperfusion was 67.8 DA (95% CI, 44.2 to 107.3 DA) in the NPDR eyes and 147.9 DA (95% CI, 127.4 to 173.5 DA) for eyes with proliferative changes, with a difference of 69.0 DA (95% CI, 42.2 to 97.7 DA; P < .001). No difference was found in the median area of posterior nonperfusion between NPDR and PDR, with a difference of 0 DA (95% CI, -6.7 to 5.2 DA; P = .56). As for peripheral nonperfusion, NPDR eyes measured 64.1 DA and PDR eyes measured 130.6 DA, with a difference of 70.8 DA (95% CI, 48.4 to 94.9 DA; P < .001). Eyes with NVD had the largest total area of retinal nonperfusion, with a difference of 65.1 DA (95% CI, 28.6 to 95.8 DA; P < .001) compared with eyes with only NVE. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest eyes with at least 107.3 DA of nonperfusion are at risk of proliferative disease, and eyes with NVD have the largest area of retinal nonperfusion.

Unilateral pigmentary retinopathy: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: To review the clinical characteristics and address the aetiology in a group of patients presenting with unilateral retinal pigmentary changes, best described as unilateral pigmentary retinopathy (UPR). METHODS: The cohort of 42 patients was identified retrospectively from the Moorfields Eye Hospital electrophysiology database. All had undergone full-field [electroretinography (ERG)] and pattern electroretinography (PERG), with 13 additionally having multifocal ERG (mfERG). The clinical findings, fundus photographs and fundus autofluorescence (AF) images were reviewed. RESULTS: All index eyes showed ERG evidence of generalized photoreceptor dysfunction with most showing a similar degree of rod and cone involvement. However, although the fellow eyes all had a normal fundus examination, there were bilateral but asymmetrical ERG abnormalities in eight patients and a further four patients had PERG evidence of macular dysfunction in the fellow eye. A relevant medical history or the diagnosis of an ophthalmologic entity that might be related to the unilateral fundus changes was ascertained in 15 cases (~36%) including acute zonal occult outer retinopathy, trauma, systemic malignancy or autoimmune disease, retinal vasculitis, presumed pregnancy-related choroidal ischaemia and meningitis. Two patients had a family history of retinitis pigmentosa (RP; 4.8%). CONCLUSION: The underlying aetiology in most cases of UPR cannot accurately be identified, but an heritable cause is unlikely. Aspects of the history clearly suggest an acquired disorder in some patients. Twenty-five patients (60%) with nongenetic UPR did not adhere to the pattern of rod greater than cone dysfunction that occurs in RP (rod-cone dystrophy), and the pattern of rod > cone dysfunction seen in true RP is thus not a feature of most patients with UPR.

Mechanistic Evaluation of Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Aflibercept in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: CLARITY Substudy.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to study the effects of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal aflibercept on retinal vessel oxygen saturations, area of retinal nonperfusion, and area of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: This is a prospective randomized single center study. Forty patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomized to PRP or intravitreal aflibercept treatment for 52 weeks. Retinal oximetry and ultra-widefield angiography were performed at baseline and week 52. Ultra-widefield color fundus imaging was performed at baseline, week 12, and week 52. The outcomes were retinal arterio-venous oximetry differences (AVD), area of retinal nonperfusion, and area of neovascularization in disc areas (DA). Results: The AVD in the PRP group increased from 36.7% at baseline to 39.7%, whereas it decreased from 33.4% to 32.5% in the aflibercept group. The difference in AVD between groups at week 52 was 4.0% (95% confidence interval, -0.08, 8.8; P = 0.10). The baseline mean area of retinal nonperfusion of 125.1 DA and 131.2 DA in the PRP and aflibercept groups increased to 156.1 DA and 158.4 DA, respectively, at week 52 (P = 0.46). The median baseline area of neovascularization decreased from 0.98 DA to 0.68 DA in the PRP group and from 0.70 DA to 0 DA in the aflibercept group at week 12 (P = 0.019). At week 52, this measured 0.24 DA in the PRP group and 0 DA in the aflibercept group (P = 0.45). Conclusions: Intravitreal aflibercept achieved an earlier and complete regression of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy compared with PRP. There were no significant differences in global change in intravascular oxygen saturation or areas of retinal nonperfusion between the two groups by 52 weeks.

Genome-wide association studies for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are sight-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus and leading causes of adult-onset blindness worldwide. Genetic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been described previously, but have been difficult to replicate between studies, which have often used composite phenotypes and been conducted in different populations. This study aims to identify genetic risk factors for DME and PDR as separate complications in Australians of European descent with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Caucasian Australians with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to compare 270 DME cases and 176 PDR cases with 435 non-retinopathy controls. All participants were genotyped by SNP array and after data cleaning, cases were compared to controls using logistic regression adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: The top ranked SNP for DME was rs1990145 (p = 4.10 × 10- 6, OR = 2.02 95%CI [1.50, 2.72]) on chromosome 2. The top-ranked SNP for PDR was rs918519 (p = 3.87 × 10- 6, OR = 0.35 95%CI [0.22, 0.54]) on chromosome 5. A trend towards association was also detected at two SNPs reported in the only other reported GWAS of DR in Caucasians; rs12267418 near MALRD1 (p = 0.008) in the DME cohort and rs16999051 in the diabetes gene PCSK2 (p = 0.007) in the PDR cohort. CONCLUSION: This study has identified loci of interest for DME and PDR, two common ocular complications of diabetes. These findings require replication in other Caucasian cohorts with type 2 diabetes and larger cohorts will be required to identify genetic loci with statistical confidence. There is considerable overlap in the patient cohorts with each retinopathy subtype, complicating the search for genes that contribute to PDR and DME biology.

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the Treatment of Macular Edema Resulting from Uncommon Causes: Twelve-Month Findings from PROMETHEUS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with macular edema (ME) resulting from any cause other than diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: A phase 3, 12-month, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-eight eligible patients aged ≥18 years. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 118) or sham (n = 60) at baseline and month 1. From month 2, patients in both arms received open-label individualized ranibizumab treatment based on disease activity. A preplanned subgroup analysis was conducted on the primary end point on 5 predefined baseline ME etiologies (inflammatory/post-uveitis, pseudophakic or aphakic, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) from baseline to month 2 (primary end point) and month 12 and safety over 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients (87.6%) completed the study. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Overall, ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to month 2 (least squares mean BCVA, +5.7 letters vs. +2.9 letters; 1-sided P = 0.0111), that is, a treatment effect (TE) of +2.8 letters. The mean BCVA gain from baseline to month 12 was 9.6 letters with ranibizumab. The TE at month 2 was variable in the 5 predefined etiology subgroups, ranging from >5-letter gain to 0.5-letter loss. The safety findings were consistent with the well-established safety profile of ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point was met and ranibizumab showed superiority in BCVA gain over sham in treating ME due to uncommon causes, with a TE of +2.8 letters versus sham at month 2. At month 12, the mean BCVA gain was high (9.6 letters) in the ranibizumab arm; however, the TE was observed to be variable across the different etiology subgroups, reaching a >1-line TE in BCVA in patients with ME resulting from inflammatory conditions/post-uveitis or after cataract surgery. Overall, ranibizumab was well tolerated with no new safety findings up to month 12.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO UNCOMMON CAUSE: Twelve-Month Results of the MINERVA Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with choroidal neovascularization because of an uncommon cause enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study. METHODS: In this Phase III, double-masked study, adult (≥18 years) patients (N = 178) were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab (n = 119) or sham (n = 59) at baseline and, if needed, at Month 1 and open-label individualized ranibizumab from Month 2. Best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to Month 2 (primary endpoint) and Month 12, treatment exposure, and safety over 12 months were reported. Subgroup analysis was conducted on five predefined choroidal neovascularization etiologies (angioid streak, postinflammatory, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). RESULTS: Ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to Month 2 (adjusted least-squares mean best-corrected visual acuity: +9.5 vs. -0.4 letters; P < 0.001). At Month 12, the mean best-corrected visual acuity change was +11.0 letters (ranibizumab) and +9.3 letters (sham). Across the 5 subgroups, the treatment effect ranged from +5.0 to +14.6 letters. The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 5.8 (ranibizumab arm) with no new ocular or nonocular adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg resulted in clinically significant treatment effect versus sham at Month 2. Overall, ranibizumab was effective in treating choroidal neovascularization of various etiologies with no new safety findings.

Real-World Outcomes of Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema in a United Kingdom National Health Service Setting.

PURPOSE: To determine visual acuity (VA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes with intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) in a United Kingdom National Health Service clinical setting. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with DME, treated with the first ranibizumab injection between August 2013 and March 2014 across 4 sites of Moorfields Eye Hospital, London. METHODS: Two hundred eyes of 164 consecutive patients with center-involving DME and VA ≤79 ETDRS letters, central subfield macular thickness (CST) ≥350 µm on Topcon 3D OCT 2000, initiated on a loading phase of 3 intravitreal ranibizumab injections and who had at least 6 months follow-up were reviewed. Subsequent retreatment was guided by VA and OCT with the aim of treating to stability. VA, OCT CST, and macular volume (MV) were recorded at baseline and monthly to 12 months. RESULTS: The mean VA, mean CST, and mean MV at baseline were 54.4 (± 15.26) letters, 490.16 (± 116.54) µm, and 10.46 (± 2.28) mm3. The mean VA change at 12 months was +6.6 (± 13.35) letters (P = .0003). A total of 40.3% of patients (n = 77) gained ≥10 letters and 25.1% (n = 48) gained ≥15 letters; 8.9% (n = 17) lost ≥10 letters and 6.3% (n = 12) lost ≥15 letters. At 12 months, the mean change in CST and MV were -133.9 (± 160.12) µm (P = .0001) and -1.5 (± 1.96) mm3 (P = .0001), respectively. An average of 7.2 (± 2.3) injections were given over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes with 3 loading injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab given monthly followed by pro re nata retreatment in a clinical setting are comparable with outcomes from clinical trials.

Posterior Segment Distortion in Ultra-Widefield Imaging Compared to Conventional Modalities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe posterior segment distortions in Optos ultra-widefield images (Optos 200TX; Optos, Dunfermline, United Kingdom) compared to Topcon retinal camera images (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) using optic disc dimensions and exploring a proposed method for correcting these distortions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparative image analysis study on 20 eyes with color fundus images from Optos and Topcon. A model eye with vertical and horizontal grids imaged with Optos in the conventional position and rotated 90° was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean vertical-to-horizontal disc diameter ratios were 0.956 [95% CI, 0.919-0.993] for Optos and 1.083 [95% CI, 1.045-1.121] for Topcon (P < .001). This was 0.910 in the conventional position and 1.072 with the object rotated 90° for the model eye with Optos and 1.008 and 0.999, respectively, using Topcon. The average of the measurements taken using both images from Optos yielded a ratio of 0.987. CONCLUSION: Optos incorporates a consistent horizontal stretch to images. Combining images taken at right angles reduces the distortion. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:644-651.].

A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing a combination of repeated intravitreal Ozurdex and macular laser therapy versus macular laser only in centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (OZLASE study).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combined repeated Ozurdex and macular laser therapy (MLT) compared with MLT monotherapy in participants with visual impairment due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: 80 patients with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 54 and 78 ETDRS letters due to centre-involving DMO were randomised to combination therapy with Ozurdex and MLT or MLT only. The combination arm received mandated Ozurdex injections at baseline and 16 weeks followed by retreatment criteria-guided pro-re-nata therapy at 32 and 48 weeks. Patients randomised to MLT only were treated every 16 weeks if clinically significant macular oedema was present. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in BCVA between arms at 56 weeks. RESULTS: The mean change in BCVA at 56 weeks was -0.3 (SD 11.4) ETDRS letters in the combination arm versus +0.4 (SD 9.6) ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study) letters in the MLT arm (effect estimate 1.15 (95% CI -3.32 to 5.61)). However, at 56 weeks, a post hoc comparison of central subfield thickness (CST) showed a decrease of -113 µm (IQR -218, -64) (combination) versus -17 µm (-128, 12) (MLT arm) (p<0.001). Elevated intraocular pressure requiring topical therapy was observed in 8 (20%) eyes in the combination versus 1 (2.5%) in the MLT arm. 33% (9/27) of phakic patients in the combination arm underwent cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcome following combination therapy did not differ from MLT alone in the centre-involving DMO despite a significant decrease in CST likely due to an entry visual acuity-related ceiling effect and cataract development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-003339-74.

A randomized trial to assess functional and structural effects of ranibizumab versus laser in diabetic macular edema (the LUCIDATE study).

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and structural effects of ranibizumab versus macular laser therapy in patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-masked clinical trial. SETTING: Single center. STUDY POPULATION: Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema, with best corrected visual acuity of 55 to 79 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at baseline, completing the 48-week study period. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomized 2:1 to 3 loading doses of ranibizumab then retreatment every 4 weeks as required; or macular laser therapy at baseline, repeated as required every 12 weeks. Exploratory Outcome Measures: Structural imaging studies included greatest linear dimension and area of foveal avascular zone, perifoveal capillary dropout grade, and presence of morphologic features of diabetic macular edema on Spectralis optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Functional measures: Visual acuity, retinal sensitivity in the central 4 and 12 degrees on microperimetry, color contrast sensitivity protan and tritan thresholds, pattern and full-field electroretinogram amplitudes and implicit times, and multifocal electroretinogram amplitude distribution. These were reported at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Ranibizumab-treated subjects gained 6.0 vs 0.9 letters lost for laser, demonstrated improved tritan and protan color contrast thresholds, and improved retinal sensitivity. Electrophysiologic function also improved after ranibizumab therapy. No safety issues were evident. Better retinal thickness reduction and structural improvement in optical coherence tomography features of diabetic macular edema were seen with ranibizumab therapy than in the laser group. There was no evidence of progressive ischemia with ranibizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema seems to improve retinal function and structure as demonstrated by this evaluation of different assessment methods.

Corticosteroid intravitreal implants vs. ranibizumab for the treatment of vitreoretinal disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three long-acting corticosteroid implants are now available for the treatment of retinal disease, offering control of macular edema and inflammation for between 6 months and up to 3 years. This review evaluates their efficacy and side-effect profile in comparison with the antivascular endothelial growth factor agent ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, pseudophakic macular edema, and uveitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Trials of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema have demonstrated excellent efficacy without serious safety concerns to date. Fluocinolone acetonide implants can be considered, but have a high risk of cataract and sequelae from intraocular pressure rise. In retinal vein occlusion, both ranibizumab and Ozurdex have been shown to be effective, although their relative efficacy has not been determined in head-to-head clinical trials. In pseudophakic and uveitic macular edema, steroid implants are probably the first choice therapy, although there is evidence that ranibizumab is effective. For choroidal neovascularization secondary to inflammatory disease, ranibizumab is indicated, whereas Retisert has been shown to reduce the risk of uveitis relapse. SUMMARY: In diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab has shown greater efficacy with fewer side-effects than steroid implants. Both ranibizumab and steroid implants can be considered in retinal vein occlusion, but trials are awaited to determine their relative efficacy.

Repeatability of Spectralis OCT measurements of macular thickness and volume in diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: We estimated coefficients of repeatability for Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived automated retinal thickness and volume measurements in subjects with center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: A total of 50 eyes of 50 consecutive patients with center-involving DME underwent four consecutive "fast" volume scans at a single session using one OCT device operated by one of two experienced operators. Bland-Altman coefficients of repeatability (CR) were calculated for automated retinal thickness measurements in the nine Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfields, center point thickness, and total macular volume. Scans were evaluated for significant automated retinal boundary detection error and revised estimates for CR calculated with these scans excluded. RESULTS: CR in the central subfield was 8.03 µm (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.70-8.35 µm). In other subfields, CR ranged from 6.54 to 18.25 µm. Scan sets from 13 subjects had significant boundary detection error; reanalysis with these excluded yielded a CR for the central subfield of 7.44 µm with CR for all other subfields <8 µm. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal thickness measurements in subjects with DME obtained using Spectralis OCT are considerably less variable than has been reported with other devices. Changes in central subfield thickness >8 µm can be considered more indicative of true clinical change rather than measurement variability. This finding informs clinical practice and clinical trial design.