Educating for success: ambulatory anesthesia training.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article explores the unique intersection of the challenges confronting ambulatory anesthesiology education and charts a trajectory forward. The proportion of ambulatory, nonoperating room (NORA), and office-based surgical cases continues to rise; however, the requirements for trainees in these settings have remained static. The rapid evolution of the field combined with a limited workforce also makes continuing education essential, and we discuss the current and future states of ambulatory anesthesia education. RECENT FINDINGS: Although numerous resources are available across an array of platforms to foster both trainee education and continuing education for practicing anesthesiologists, there is a paucity of current literature evaluating the impact of new curricula developed specifically for ambulatory, NORA, or office-based anesthesiology (OBA). SUMMARY: We begin with an appraisal of the current state of ambulatory anesthesiology training and evaluate the gap between current graduate medical education and trends in ambulatory surgery. We then develop a vision for an ideal state of future ambulatory education for residents as well as anesthesiologists in practice and highlight the priorities necessary to reach this vision.

Quality indicators and outcomes in ambulatory surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Quality indicators are used to monitor the quality and safety of care in ambulatory surgery, a specialty in which major morbidity and mortality remain low. As the demand for safe and cost-effective ambulatory surgical care continues to increase, quality indicators and metrics are becoming critical tools used to provide optimal care for these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Quality indicators are tools used by both regulatory agencies and surgical centers to improve safety and quality of ambulatory surgical and anesthetic care. These metrics are also being used to develop value-based payment models that focus on efficient, safe, and effective patient care. Patient reported outcome measures are a growing method of collecting data on the satisfaction and postoperative recovery period for ambulatory surgical patients. Monitoring of perioperative efficiency and utilization using quality metrics are important to the financial health of ambulatory surgical centers. SUMMARY: Quality indicators will continue to play a growing role in the monitoring of quality and safety in ambulatory surgery, especially with the trend towards value-based reimbursement models and efficient, cost-effective surgical care. Additionally, quality indicators are useful tools to monitor postoperative patient outcomes and recovery pathways and the efficiency of operating room utilization and scheduling.

Single-use versus reusable metallic laryngoscopes for non-emergent intubation: A retrospective review of 72,672 intubations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Increased regulatory requirements for sterilization in recent years have prompted a widespread transition from reusable to single-use laryngoscopes. The purpose of this study was to determine if the transition from metallic reusable to metallic single-use laryngoscopes impacted the performance of direct laryngoscopy at an academic medical center. DESIGN: Single-site retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General anesthetic cases requiring tracheal intubation. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing non-emergent procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Data were collected two years before and two years after a transition from metallic reusable to metallic single-use laryngoscopes. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was need for intubation rescue with an alternate device. Secondary outcomes were difficult laryngeal view (modified Cormack-Lehane grade ≥ 2b) and hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90% for >30 s) during direct laryngoscopy intubations. Subgroup analyses for rapid sequence induction, Macintosh blades, Miller blades, and patients with difficult airway risk factors (Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Mallampati ≥3, Body Mass Index >30 kg/m2) were performed. MAIN RESULTS: In total, 72,672 patients were included: 35,549 (48.9%) in the reusable laryngoscope cohort and 37,123 (51.1%) in the single-use laryngoscope cohort. Compared with reusable laryngoscopes, single-use laryngoscopes were associated with fewer rescue intubations with an alternate device (covariates-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.81 95% CI 0.66-0.99). Single-use laryngoscopes were also associated with lower odds of difficult laryngeal view (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.93). Single use laryngoscopes were not associated with hypoxemia during the intubation attempt (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.88-1.20). Similar results were observed for subgroup analyses including rapid sequence induction, Macintosh blades, Miller blades, and patients with difficult airway risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Metallic single-use laryngoscopes were associated with less need for rescue intubation with alternate devices and lower incidence of poor laryngeal view compared to reusable metallic laryngoscopes.

Comparison of electronic versus phone-based administration of the Quality of Recovery-40 survey after ambulatory surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Studies that track patient-centered outcomes are better suited to evaluate the relative benefits and harms of an intervention in ambulatory surgery as severe morbidity and mortality have become increasingly rare. This pilot study aimed to assess for differences in response rate and survey scores for phone-based and electronic administration of the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) survey in patients undergoing general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. DESIGN: A single-center prospective observational study. SETTING: Yale New Haven Hospital (September 22-November 2, 2021). PATIENTS: 100 consecutive patients undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive QoR-40 surveys via email or phone. MEASUREMENTS: The QoR-40 survey is a 40-item questionnaire that provides a global score across five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain. The primary outcome was the response rate following the administration of the QoR-40 survey on postoperative days 1, 2, and 7. The secondary outcome was the mean QoR-40 score during the study period. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 109 patients consented to participate and 100 patients were randomized in this study. A total of 76%, 72%, and 68% of patients completed the survey on POD 1, 2, and 7, respectively. There were no differences in the response rate of patients who completed the survey between phone (78%) versus electronic (74%) administration (difference 4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -13%, 21%, respectively) on POD 1, 2 (74% vs 70%, difference 4%, 95% CI -14%, 22%, respectively) or 7 (68% vs 68%, difference 0%, 95% CI -18%, 18%, respectively). The mean (standard deviation) QoR-40 score was 176.2 (18.1), 179.8 (19.4), 187.7 (13.1) on POD 1, 2, and 7, respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean QoR-40 scores between groups at any of the time points. CONCLUSION: The response rate following the electronic administration of the QoR-40 survey did not differ from the phone-based administration during the postoperative period following ambulatory surgery. The use of an electronic version of the survey may allow for larger sample sizes with fewer resources utilized in future interventional studies.

A Prospective Observational Study of Video Laryngoscopy Use in Difficult Airway Management.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Video laryngoscopy has grown tremendously in popularity over the last decade for management of the anticipated difficult airway. The use of video laryngoscopy has not been adequately studied in the head and neck pathology patient population, including those with masses, previous head and neck surgery, or radiation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: This study included 100 patients with head and neck pathology undergoing awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation for nonemergency surgery requiring general anesthesia. After the performance of awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation and induction of anesthesia, video laryngoscopy was performed with the CMAC D blade and Glidescope AVL. The primary outcome was the modified Cormack-Lehane view obtained on video laryngoscopy. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the study. After exclusions, 92 patients underwent video laryngoscopy with both the CMAC D blade and the Glidescope AVL. Thirty-seven patients (40.2%) had a Cormack-Lehane view ≥3 with the CMAC D blade, and 28 patients (30.4%) had a Cormack-Lehane view ≥3 with the Glidescope AVL. There were no complications from awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation or video laryngoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of inability to obtain a view of the glottis with video laryngoscopy in patients with head and neck pathology, particularly airway masses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:82-86, 2021.

Use of Provider Scorecards to Improve Early Postoperative Recovery-Initial Implementation Study.

ABSTRACT: Intraoperative anesthetic technique directly impacts immediate postoperative recovery, yet there are few opportunities for anesthesiologists to receive feedback and no easily available benchmarks, making it difficult to reflect on one's own practice. This initial implementation study used retrospective data from 5,712 ambulatory surgery cases with healthy adult patients undergoing general anesthesia in 2018 at a large tertiary care academic center. It examines variation in practice among anesthesiologists for eight surgical specialties. Scorecards assessing intraoperative and postoperative opioids, antiemetics, nonopioid analgesics, regional blocks, recovery time, and severe postoperative pain compared with peers were given to anesthesiologists with prefeedback and postfeedback surveys assessing their attitudes toward feedback. Before receiving their scorecard, 71% of providers predicted their performance was average, and 29% predicted their performance was above average. After receiving their scorecards, 42% rated their quality of recovery as worse than expected, 42% rated it as expected, and 16% rated it as better than expected. Thirteen percent disagreed, 44% were neutral, and 44% agreed that this feedback will change their practice. Implementing a scorecard of patient-centered measures that shows where an anesthesiologist stands in the distribution of their peers was well-received, provides a benchmark, and has the potential to change practice.

Olanzapine for the Prevention of Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting after Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery is a common problem that is not adequately addressed in current practice. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study was designed to test the hypothesis that oral olanzapine is superior to placebo at preventing postdischarge nausea and vomiting. METHODS: In a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the authors compared a single preoperative dose of olanzapine 10 mg to placebo, in adult female patients 50 years old or less, undergoing ambulatory gynecologic or plastic surgery with general anesthesia. All patients received standard antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron. The primary composite outcome was nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 h after discharge. Secondary outcomes included severe nausea, vomiting, and side effects. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were randomized and evaluable. The primary outcome occurred in 26 of 69 patients (38%) in the placebo group and in 10 of 71 patients (14%) in the olanzapine group (relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.72; P = 0.003). Severe nausea occurred in 14 patients (20%) in the placebo group and 4 patients (6%) in the olanzapine group (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.80). Vomiting occurred in eight patients (12%) in the placebo group and two patients (3%) in the olanzapine group (relative risk, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05 to 1.10). The median score for sedation (scale 0 to 10, with 10 being highest) in the 24 h after discharge was 4 (interquartile range, 2 to 7) in the placebo group and 6 (interquartile range, 3 to 8) in the olanzapine group (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: When combined with ondansetron and dexamethasone, the addition of olanzapine relative to placebo decreased the risk of nausea and/or vomiting in the 24 hafter discharge from ambulatory surgery by about 60% with a slight increase in reported sedation.