Continuous intradialytic amino acid infusion from the start of dialysis is better to avoid catabolism under the high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF.

It was reported that amino acid infusion during hemodialysis is useful for improving nutritional status. The optimal administration method of amino acid infusion under the high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF (HVPO-HDF) was analyzed in this study. Subjects were 10 patients on maintenance dialysis at our clinic. We performed high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF. We investigated two methods for administration of Neoamiyu® 200-ml total amino acid (TAA) infusion for patients with renal failure: (1) continuous infusion into the dialysis circuit for 4 h from the start of dialysis to its completion (infusion rate 50 ml/h) and (2) continuous infusion started 1 h before completion of dialysis (infusion rate 200 ml/h), and compared pre- and post-dialysis blood concentrations and leakage of TAA, essential amino acids (EAA), and nonessential amino acids (NEAA) between these methods. Pre-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. Post-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids were higher in all concentrations were significantly higher with continuous infusion starting 1 h before completion of dialysis. Leakage of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. The continuous intradialytic amino acid infusion from the start of dialysis is better to avoid catabolism under high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF.

Amino acid losses are lower during pre-dilution on-line HDF than HD of the same Kt/V for urea.

In this study, we investigated differences in amino acid losses between HD and pre-dilution on-line HDF with equal Kt/V for urea to determine which modality removes less amino acids from extravascular pools and ensures better nutrition. The subjects were patients receiving pre-dilution on-line HDF (n = 10) or HD (n = 10) at this hospital. Dialysis time was 4 h for all patients. In patients on HD, the blood flow rate was 200 mL/min and the dialysate flow rate was 463 ± 29.3 mL/min. In patients on pre-dilution on-line HDF, the blood flow rate was 240 ± 20 mL/min, the dialysate flow rate was 565.0 ± 42.5 mL/min, and the substitution flow rate (substitution volume) was 252.8 ± 26.4 mL/min (57.0 ± 6.0 L). Kt/V for urea was comparable between patients on HD and patients on pre-dilution on-line HDF (1.46 ± 0.25 vs. 1.46 ± 0.31). Amino acid loss and clear space were evaluated. Patients on pre-dilution on-line HDF lost significantly less glutamine and arginine (p < 0.01 and p = 0.032) and significantly less nonessential amino acids (NEAAs) than patients on HD (p = 0.013). They also had significantly lower clear space of total amino acids (TAAs), NEAAs, essential amino acids (EAAs), and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) than patients on HD (Total AA p = 0.019, NEAA p = 0.018, EAA p = 0.024, BCAA p = 0.042). When Kt/V for urea is equal, pre-dilution on-line HDF ensures better nutrition than does HD.

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study on Interleukin-6 Removal and Induction by a new Hemodialyzer With Improved Biocompatibility in Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Study.

We compared interleukin-6 (IL-6) removal and induction between conventional polysulfone (Con) and TORAYLIGHT NV (NV) dialyzers in hemodialysis patients. Twenty patients on Con with high IL-6 concentrations (2.7-8.5 pg/mL) were randomized to Con or NV group. Dialyzer performance was determined in NV group while patients were on Con and after being switched onto NV. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) response index (ERI) was assessed every 4 months for one year. IL-6 clearance was comparable between Con and NV. IL-6 removal rates were comparable for the first 1 h, but were higher with NV for the entire session (P = 0.03). Before-to-during-dialysis IL-6 concentration ratios were lower with NV on the venous side after the session (P = 0.03). During the one-year study, hemoglobin was lower in Con group than in NV group at month 8 (P = 0.046). ERI decreased in NV and increased in Con group, with a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.002). NV and Con are comparable in removing IL-6 and both induce IL-6. However, the data suggest that NV induces less IL-6, which may reduce the risk of ESA hyporesponsiveness.

Effect of sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders on coronary artery calcification and accumulation of circulating advanced glycation end products in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Some trials have indicated that coronary artery calcification progresses more slowly in sevelamer-treated dialysis patients than in those using calcium-based binders. Effects of phosphate binders on circulating advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial with parallel-group design. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 183 adult (aged >20 years) patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy at 12 dialysis facilities with a mean vintage of 118 ± 89 (median, 108) months. Dialysate calcium concentration was 2.5 mEq/L, and dietary calcium was not controlled. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to 12 months of treatment with sevelamer (n = 91) or calcium carbonate (n = 92). OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures were change from baseline in coronary artery calcification score (CACS) determined at study entry and completion using multislice computed tomography and the proportion of patients with a ≥ 15% increase in CACS. Blood parameters were determined at study entry and 2-week intervals, and levels of plasma pentosidine, a representative AGE, were determined at study entry, 6 months, and study completion. RESULTS: 79 (86.8%) and 84 (91.3%) patients in the sevelamer and calcium-carbonate arms completed the treatment, respectively. Both binders were associated with an increase in mean CACS: 81.8 (95% CI, 42.9-120.6) and 194.0 (139.7-248.4), respectively (P < 0.001 for both). After adjustment for baseline values, the increase in the sevelamer group was 112.3 (45.8-178) less (P < 0.001). Percentages of patients with a ≥ 15% increase in CACS were 35% of the sevelamer group and 59% of the calcium-carbonate group (P = 0.002). Plasma pentosidine levels increased with calcium carbonate but not [corrected] sevelamer treatment (P < 0.001). Sevelamer use was associated with decreased risk of a ≥ 15% increase in CACS regardless of baseline blood parameters, pentosidine level, and CACS. LIMITATIONS: Treatment duration was relatively short, some sevelamer-treated patients (7 of 79) received calcium carbonate, and washout could not be performed. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that sevelamer treatment slowed the increase in CACS and suppressed AGE accumulation.

[Clinical significance of risedronate for patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy].

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer is associated with bone loss. We investigated the effectiveness of risedronate about a decreasing bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer on ADT. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in Kitasato University Hospital from April 2004 to October 2006. A total of 69 men with prostate cancer were assigned to receive either oral risedronate or none during ADT (hormone naïve). The treatment group was 58 men and taking 2.5 mg risedronate per day. The control group was 11 men. At baseline, we assessed BMD (bone mineral density) by DEXA and urinary NTX, and measured for these changes every 6 months. RESULT: At baseline, each BMDs had no significant difference at the lumber and total hip. At the first 6-month stage, the change in BMD percentage between the 2 groups was statistically significantly different at lumber (p = 0.002) and total hip (p = 0.038). At the 12-month stage, the change in the BMD percentage between the 2 groups was statistically significantly different at the lumber (p = 0.038). And each difference made out that the risedronate group was preserving BMD. In urinary NTX, bone turn over was statistically significantly decreased with the risedronate group compared with the control group at the 12-month stage (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: We assure the beginning of bone loss at an early date (6 months) with ADT. Daily oral risedronate in patients with receiving ADT reduces bone mineral loss and maintain BMD.

Five years experience of transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound using the Sonablate device in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally invasive technique used in achieve coagulation necrosis. We evaluated biochemical disease-free survival rates, predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HIFU. METHODS: A total of 181 consecutive patients underwent HIFU with the use of Sonablate (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. The median age and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were 70 years (range 44-88) and 9.76 ng/mL (range 3.39-89.60). A total of 95 patients (52%) were treated with neoadjuvant hormones. The median follow-up period for all patients was 18.0 months (range 4-68). RESULTS: The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in all patients were 84%, 80% and 78%, respectively. The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 3 years for patients with pretreatment PSA less than 10 ng/mL, 10.01-20.0 ng/mL and more than 20.0 ng/mL were 94%, 75% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified pretreatment PSA (P<0.0001) as a independent predictor of relapse. CONCLUSION: High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy appears to be a safe and efficacious minimally invasive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer, especially those with a pretreatment PSA level less than 20 ng/mL.

Treatment of localized prostate cancer using high-intensity focused ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biochemical disease-free survival (DFS), predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), a noninvasive treatment that induces complete coagulative necrosis of a tumour at depth through the intact skin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 63 patients with stage T1c-2bN0M0 localized prostate cancer underwent HIFU using the Sonablate system (Focus Surgery, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA). None of the patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition, i.e. three consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after the nadir. The median (range) age, PSA level and follow-up were 71 (45-87) years, 8.5 (3.39-57.0) ng/mL and 22.0 (3-63) months, respectively. RESULTS: The overall biochemical disease-free rate was 75% (47 patients). The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA level before HIFU of <10, 10.01-20 and >20 ng/mL were 82%, 62% and 20% (P < 0.001), respectively. The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA nadir of <0.2, 0.21-1 and >1 ng/mL were 100%, 74% and 21% (P < 0.001), respectively. Final follow-up sextant biopsies showed that 55 (87%) of the patients were cancer-free. Multivariate analysis showed that the PSA nadir (P < 0.001) was a significant independent predictor of relapse. CONCLUSION: HIFU therapy appears to be a safe, effective and minimally invasive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer, and the PSA nadir is a useful predictor of clinical outcome.

[Treatment of adynamic bone disease with the complete replacement from calcium carbonate to sevelamer hydrochloride].

The aim of this study was to examine the therapeutic effect of hypocalcemic stimulation caused by sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) administration on adynamic bone disease (ABD). The subjects were 28 maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients who had remained in ABD state in spite of no administration of vitamin D(3) since HD induction (15 males and 13 females;12 diabetic patients and 16 non-diabetic patients). The mean age was 61.8+/-9.5 years and the mean HD duration was 5.5+/-3.9 years. The calcium concentration in the dialysate was 3.0 mEq/L. We made the final daily dose of SH after two months the same as the first daily dose of calcium carbonate (CC) in the following manner. At first we administered only CC at breakfast and lunch and SH at supper. And for the next two weeks we administered CC at breakfast and SH at lunch and supper. And for the final two weeks we administered only SH. After that we increased the dose of SH as much as possible. We evaluated the therapeutic effect of the above treatment on ABD using intact-osteocalcin (iOC) [Teijin. Tokyo] as a marker before and 6, 12 months after the beginning of the replacement. If iOC Ievel of 30 to 70 ng/mL showed normal tumover bone (NTB), 5 cases (17.9%) changed into NTB in 6 months. 9 cases (32.1%) changed into NTB in 12 months and one case (3.6%) changed into ostitis fibrosa in 12 months. It is thought that SH is effective for the treatment of ABD but we have to be careful for ostitis fibrosa.

[Sevelamer:hydrochloride].

The recent global breakthrough in the field of renal osteodystrophy is the inhibitory effect of sevelamer hydrochloride on the progression of coronary artery calcification, which was revealed with EBCT (Electron beam computed tomography) 1) approximately 3). It has been found that the degree of coronary artery calcification assessed with EBCT is proportional to the mortality risk by the coronary artery stenosis and by myocardial infarction in non-hemodialysis patients 4) approximately 10). In 2004 in Japan Matsuoka and Iseki et al showed for the first time in the world that coronary artery calcification assessed by EBCT was correlated with mortality 11). In Japan, however, it is difficult to administer sevelamer hydrochloride to many patients because of constipation as its side effect. Its prescription rate is 26.8% and its single administration rate is only 15.4% 12). We explained fully to the patients that sevelamer hydrochloride seldom caused coronary artery calcification. And we used sorbitol, an osmotic purgatives, with sevelamer hydrochloride. Moreover, we gradually replaced calcium carbonate with sevelamer hydrochloride in supper at first. With protocol above, we succeeded in having 86.7% of the patients take sevelamer hydrochloride 12). We think that it is important to increase the intake rate of sevelamer hydrochloride in order to prevent coronary artery calcification and to aim at the long survival of the patients.

Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of patients with stage T1b-2n0m0 localized prostate cancer: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVES: To present our preliminary clinical results of transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in Stage T1b-2N0M0 prostate cancer. Efforts are being made to provide minimally invasive alternative treatment options with equal efficacy and fewer side effects. HIFU delivers ultrasound energy with rapid thermal necrosis of tissue in the focal region without damaging the surrounding tissue. METHODS: We performed 28 HIFU treatments in 20 patients with biopsy-proven localized prostate cancer using a modified Sonablate-200 HIFU device. All patient characteristics and the clinical outcome of 20 patients followed up more than 6 months (mean 13.5) were analyzed. RESULTS: A complete response was obtained in 100% (20 of 20) of patients, as evidenced by a negative postoperative prostate biopsy and no elevation on three successive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations. Of the 20 patients, 13 (65%), 5 (25%), and 2 (10%) had PSA nadirs of less than 0.50 ng/mL, 0.50 to 1.00 ng/mL, and 1.01 to 2.00 ng/mL, respectively. Rectourethral fistula and urethral stricture were noted in 1 and 2 patients, respectively, and 1 patient underwent transurethral resection of the prostate because of prolonged urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that HIFU can be performed without an incision, with a less severe side effect profile, and, unlike most other prostate treatments, is repeatable. Transrectal HIFU may be a useful option for patients with localized prostate cancer. Its long-term efficacy will be determined by additional follow-up and a Phase II trial.