The Role of Methylation Analysis in Distinguishing Cellular Myxoma from Low-Grade Myxofibrosarcoma.

Cellular myxoma is a benign soft tissue tumor frequently associated with GNAS mutation that may morphologically resemble low-grade myxofibrosarcoma. This study aimed to identify the undescribed methylation profile of cellular myxoma and compare it to myxofibrosarcoma. We performed molecular analysis on twenty cellular myxomas and nine myxofibrosarcomas and analyzed the results using the methylation-based DKFZ sarcoma classifier. A total of 90% of the cellular myxomas had GNAS mutations (four loci had not been previously described). Copy number variations were found in all myxofibrosarcomas but in none of the cellular myxomas. In the classifier, none of the cellular myxomas reached the 0.9 threshold. Unsupervised t-SNE analysis demonstrated that cellular myxomas form their own clusters, distinct from myxofibrosarcomas. Our study shows the diagnostic potential and the limitations of molecular analysis in cases where morphology and immunohistochemistry are not sufficient to distinguish cellular myxoma from myxofibrosarcoma, particularly regarding GNAS wild-type tumors. The DKFZ sarcoma classifier only provided a valid prediction for one myxofibrosarcoma case; this limitation could be improved by training the tool with a more considerable number of cases. Additionally, the classifier should be introduced to a broader spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms, including benign tumors like cellular myxoma, whose distinct methylation pattern we demonstrated.

A comparative study assessing the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus surgical treatment for osteoid osteoma: retrospective analysis in a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical treatment in osteoid osteoma (OO) treated at the Medical University of Graz. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-institution study, we analysed data from January 2005 to January 2021 of patients with histological/radiological diagnosis of OO. CT and MRI scans were reviewed for typical findings. Means (with SD) and medians (with IQR) were reported for normally and non-normally distributed variables. Differences between groups were assessed using chi-squared tests and t-tests. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients (mean age: 21.6 ± 10.9 years; 63.9% males) with confirmed OO were retrospectively evaluated. 73 and 43 patients underwent RFA and surgery, respectively. In three cases, RFA combined with surgery was performed. Pre-intervention, 103 patients (88.8%) had undergone CT, and 101 had an MRI (87.1%). The nidus was confirmed in 82.5% of cases with CTs (85/103) and 63.4% with MRIs (64/101). The majority of nidi were located cortically (n = 96; 82.8%), most frequently in the femur (38 patients, 33.3%) with a median size of 8.0 mm (IQR: 5.0-12.0 mm). Median symptom duration before treatment was 6.0 (IQR: 4.0-13.0) months. The complication rate was 12.1% (14/116; 15.1% RFA vs. 7.0% surgery; p = 0.196). In total, 11.2% of patients had persistent symptoms after one week with clinical success rates of RFA and surgery, 86.3% and 90.7% (p = 0.647), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to surgical treatment, CT-guided percutaneous RFA is a safe, minimally invasive, reliable, and efficient treatment option for OO. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This article critically assesses the diagnosis and treatment of osteoid osteoma, emphasising accurate imaging, and detailing a non-invasive option for effective management. KEY POINTS: • This study analyses 116 cases of OO at one institution, focusing on symptom persistence, recurrence in short-term follow-up, and complications in two study groups. • Surgery showed higher, though not statistically significant, success despite comparable symptom persistence; CT displayed typical OO features more than MRI, regardless of the intramedullary, cortical and subperiosteal location as well as the site of the affected bone. • CT-guided RFA is an effective therapeutic alternative for OO compared to surgical intervention. In case of atypical OO appearance, RFA is not the first-line treatment.