Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Japan: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasingly diagnosed globally. However, there have been few general population-based studies in Asia. The aim of this study was to investigate EoE epidemiology in the Japanese general population. METHODS: We analyzed an employer-based health insurance claim database from January 2005 to September 2022. EoE cases were identified on the basis of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health-related Problems, 10th Revision code, K20.0. We calculated the incidence and prevalence of EoE using Poisson regression and binomial distribution, respectively. Using 10 matched controls for each EoE case, a nested case-control study was performed to identify potential risk factors for EoE. RESULTS: Of 15,200,895 individuals, 1010 EoE cases were identified. The incidence and prevalence of EoE were 2.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-3.26) per 100,000 person-years and 10.68 (95% CI, 10.01-11.37) per 100,000 people in 2022, nearly 3 and 8 times as high as those in 2017, respectively. Smoking was associated with decreased risk of EoE (odds ratio [OR], 0.45, 0.36-0.56, P < .001), whereas alcohol consumption (OR, 1.51, 1.21-1.88, P < .001) was associated with increased risk of EoE along with several allergic conditions and psychiatric disorders. EoE was not related to either body mass index or lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of EoE in Japan have steadily increased over the past 2 decades. Nevertheless, EoE remains less common in Japan compared with the United States and Western Europe. Factors contributing to the epidemiology of EoE on a global basis may improve our understanding of the contribution of genetic and environmental risk factors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Is Associated with Improved Survival in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Occurring in Patients with Autoimmune Disease.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, clinical trials often exclude those with a history of autoimmune diseases (ADs) because of concerns regarding immune-related adverse events. Therefore, the efficacy of ICIs in advanced NSCLC patients with ADs should be evaluated. This study used administrative claims data from advanced treatment centers in Japan and identified patients with advanced NSCLC who began chemotherapy between December 2016 and January 2023. The patients were divided into four groups based on the presence of ADs and types of chemotherapy received. The association between ICI therapy and overall survival in the subgroups with or without ADs, and the association between the presence of AD and overall survival in patients who received ICI therapy and conventional chemotherapy, were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression, including therapy and presence of ADs and their interaction as covariates. These results were obtained using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. ICI therapy had a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for death in the subgroup of AD and non-AD patients of 0.88 (0.84-0.92) and 0.83 (0.71-0.97), respectively (p = 0.459 for interaction). For some specific ADs, including type 1 diabetes mellitus, the association between ICI therapy and decreased mortality was not observed. In conclusion, our study showed comparable associations between ICI therapy and reduced mortality in AD and non-AD subgroups of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, therapy strategies tailored to each AD type and thorough discussions regarding the risk-benefit profile are crucial.

Lack of Association Between Immunotherapy and Improvement of Survival for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Hemodialysis: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients undergoing hemodialysis continues to increase globally, and the incidence of cancer is high among these patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in patients with advanced cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, their effectiveness in hemodialysis patients is poorly documented. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from a nationwide database. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC, undergoing hemodialysis, and who started chemotherapy between September 2008 and January 2023 were included. In the intention to treat (ITT) analysis, patients were divided into immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and conventional chemotherapy group, and in the chronological analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups before and after ICI approval. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards analyses. A propensity score approach was applied to address confounding factors, and analyses were performed by weighting each patient with the inverse of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We identified 322 and 389 patients in the ITT and chronological analyses respectively. In both analyses, there were no notable difference of OS between 2 groups (P values by log-rank test 0.933 and 0.248, respectively). The hazard ratios for OS were 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.678-1.415) in the ITT analysis and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.531-1.219) in the chronological analysis. CONCLUSION: The ICI treatment and approval were not significantly associated with improvement of survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing hemodialysis.

Treatment sequencing after failure to alectinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although some guidelines have recommended using other anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure, evidence for such regimens in patients who fail to respond to alectinib is limited. This study involved using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals in Japan. We extracted the data of 634 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2014, and January 31, 2023, who received alectinib treatment before treatment with another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. We assessed distributions of patients according to their treatment sequencing and prognosis among three periods defined based on the initial marketing dates of lorlatinib and brigatinib. The type of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure changed over time. In the most recent period, lorlatinib (58%) and brigatinib (40%) became predominant. Two-year overall survival improved over time (47%-84%), accompanied by an increased 2-year proportion of patients who continuously used anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure (13%-44%). The times to treatment discontinuation of the regimen between patients treated with lorlatinib and brigatinib were similar, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.64) in the period after marketing brigatinib. This study provides insights into the evolving treatment landscape for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who experience failed alectinib treatment and highlights the need for further studies and data accumulation to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are associated with improved paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in lung cancer: a study using administrative claims data.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported to reduce patients' quality of life and impair cancer treatment by causing anticancer drug withdrawal or interruption. However, there are currently no effective methods for the prevention of CIPN. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may be associated with a reduced risk of developing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, and it would be valuable to examine whether they have the same effect on CIPN caused by other anticancer drugs. Our study explored the potential preventive effects of RAAS inhibitors on preventing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). METHODS: An exploratory cohort study was conducted using commercially available administrative claims data on lung cancer patients treated with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Cumulative paclitaxel doses, RAAS inhibitor prescriptions, and incidences of PIPN were identified using patient medical records. Fine-Gray analyses with death as a competing risk were performed. A propensity score approach was applied to address the problem of confounding. RESULTS: Patients with lung cancer who received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were classified into users of RAAS inhibitor (n = 1320) and non-users of RAAS inhibitor (n = 4566). The doses of RAAS inhibitors in our study were similar to those commonly used to treat hypertension. The PIPN incidence was significantly lower in users of RAAS inhibitor than in the non-users of RAAS inhibitor (sub-distribution hazard ratio, 0.842; 95% confidence interval, 0.762-0.929). The result was consistent in various sensitivity analyses and important subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: RAAS inhibitors at doses commonly used for hypertension were associated with a reduced incidence of PIPN in patients with lung cancer.