Impact of cancer-associated mutations in CC chemokine receptor 2 on receptor function and antagonism.

CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), a G protein-coupled receptor, plays a role in many cancer-related processes such as metastasis formation and immunosuppression. Since âˆ¼ 20 % of human cancers contain mutations in G protein-coupled receptors, ten cancer-associated CCR2 mutants obtained from the Genome Data Commons were investigated for their effect on receptor functionality and antagonist binding. Mutations were selected based on either their vicinity to CCR2's orthosteric or allosteric binding sites or their presence in conserved amino acid motifs. One of the mutant receptors, namely S101P2.63 with a mutation near the orthosteric binding site, did not express on the cell surface. All other studied mutants showed a decrease in or a lack of G protein activation in response to the main endogenous CCR2 ligand CCL2, but no change in potency was observed. Furthermore, INCB3344 and LUF7482 were chosen as representative orthosteric and allosteric antagonists, respectively. No change in potency was observed in a functional assay, but mutations located at F1163.28 impacted orthosteric antagonist binding significantly, while allosteric antagonist binding was abolished for L134Q3.46 and D137N3.49 mutants. As CC chemokine receptor 2 is an attractive drug target in cancer, the negative effect of these mutations on receptor functionality and drugability should be considered in the drug discovery process.

Pan-cancer functional analysis of somatic mutations in G protein-coupled receptors.

G Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most frequently exploited drug target family, moreover they are often found mutated in cancer. Here we used a dataset of mutations found in patient samples derived from the Genomic Data Commons and compared it to the natural human variance as exemplified by data from the 1000 genomes project. We explored cancer-related mutation patterns in all GPCR classes combined and individually. While the location of the mutations across the protein domains did not differ significantly in the two datasets, a mutation enrichment in cancer patients was observed among class-specific conserved motifs in GPCRs such as the Class A "DRY" motif. A Two-Entropy Analysis confirmed the correlation between residue conservation and cancer-related mutation frequency. We subsequently created a ranking of high scoring GPCRs, using a multi-objective approach (Pareto Front Ranking). Our approach was confirmed by re-discovery of established cancer targets such as the LPA and mGlu receptor families, but also discovered novel GPCRs which had not been linked to cancer before such as the P2Y Receptor 10 (P2RY10). Overall, this study presents a list of GPCRs that are amenable to experimental follow up to elucidate their role in cancer.

Correlation between human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel inhibition and action potential prolongation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG; Kv 11.1) channel inhibition is a widely accepted predictor of cardiac arrhythmia. hERG channel inhibition alone is often insufficient to predict pro-arrhythmic drug effects. This study used a library of dofetilide derivatives to investigate the relationship between standard measures of hERG current block in an expression system and changes in action potential duration (APD) in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). The interference from accompanying block of Cav 1.2 and Nav 1.5 channels was investigated along with an in silico AP model. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Drug-induced changes in APD were assessed in hiPSC-CMs using voltage-sensitive dyes. The IC50 values for dofetilide and 13 derivatives on hERG current were estimated in an HEK293 expression system. The relative potency of each drug on APD was estimated by calculating the dose (D150 ) required to prolong the APD at 90% (APD90 ) repolarization by 50%. KEY RESULTS: The D150 in hiPSC-CMs was linearly correlated with IC50 of hERG current. In silico simulations supported this finding. Three derivatives inhibited hERG without prolonging APD, and these compounds also inhibited Cav 1.2 and/or Nav 1.5 in a channel state-dependent manner. Adding Cav 1.2 and Nav 1.2 block to the in silico model recapitulated the direction but not the extent of the APD change. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Potency of hERG current inhibition correlates linearly with an index of APD in hiPSC-CMs. The compounds that do not correlate have additional effects including concomitant block of Cav 1.2 and/or Nav 1.5 channels. In silico simulations of hiPSC-CMs APs confirm the principle of the multiple ion channel effects.

Kinetic binding and activation profiles of endogenous tachykinins targeting the NK1 receptor.

Ligand-receptor binding kinetics (i.e. association and dissociation rates) are emerging as important parameters for drug efficacy in vivo. Awareness of the kinetic behavior of endogenous ligands is pivotal, as drugs often have to compete with those. The binding kinetics of neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists have been widely investigated while binding kinetics of endogenous tachykinins have hardly been reported, if at all. Therefore, the aim of this research was to investigate the binding kinetics of endogenous tachykinins and derivatives thereof and their role in the activation of the NK1 receptor. We determined the binding kinetics of seven tachykinins targeting the NK1 receptor. Dissociation rate constants (koff) ranged from 0.026±0.0029min-1 (Sar9,Met(O2)11-SP) to 0.21±0.015min-1 (septide). Association rate constants (kon) were more diverse: substance P (SP) associated the fastest with a kon value of 0.24±0.046nM-1min-1 while neurokinin A (NKA) had the slowest association rate constant of 0.001±0.0002nM-1min-1. Kinetic binding parameters were highly correlated with potency and maximal response values determined in label-free impedance-based experiments on U-251 MG cells. Our research demonstrates large variations in binding kinetics of tachykinins which correlate to receptor activation. These findings provide new insights into the ligand-receptor interactions of tachykinins and underline the importance of measuring binding kinetics of both drug candidates and competing endogenous ligands.

Getting personal: Endogenous adenosine receptor signaling in lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Genetic differences between individuals that affect drug action form a challenge in drug therapy. Many drugs target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and a number of receptor variants have been noted to impact drug efficacy. This, however, has never been addressed in a systematic way, and, hence, we studied real-life genetic variation of receptor function in personalized cell lines. As a showcase we studied adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) signaling in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from a family of four from the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), using a non-invasive label-free cellular assay. The potency of a partial agonist differed significantly for one individual. Genotype comparison revealed differences in two intron SNPs including rs2236624, which has been associated with caffeine-induced sleep disorders. While further validation is needed to confirm genotype-specific effects, this set-up clearly demonstrated that LCLs are a suitable model system to study genetic influences on A2AR response in particular and GPCR responses in general.

Persistent GnRH receptor activation in pituitary αT3-1 cells analyzed with a label-free technology.

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor is a drug target for certain hormone-dependent diseases such as prostate cancer. In this study, we examined the activation profiles of the endogenous ligand, GnRH and a well-known marketed analog, buserelin using a label-free assay in pituitary αT3-1 cells with endogenous GnRH receptor expression. This whole cell impedance-based technology allows for the real-time measurement of morphological cellular changes. Both agonists dose-dependently decreased the impedance as a result of GnRH receptor activation with potencies of 9.3 ± 0.1 (pEC50 value, buserelin) and 7.8 ± 0.06 (pEC50 value, GnRH). Subsequently, GnRH receptor activation was completely abolished with a selective Gαq inhibitor, thereby confirming the Gαq-coupling of the GnRH receptor in pituitary αT3-1 cells. Additionally, we observed continued responses after agonist stimulation of αT3-1 cells indicating long-lasting cellular effects. Wash-out experiments demonstrated that the long-lasting effects induced by GnRH were most likely caused by rebinding since over 70% of the original response was abolished after wash-out. In contrast, a long receptor residence time was responsible for the prolonged effects caused by buserelin, with over 70% of the original response remaining after wash-out. In summary, we validated that impedance-based label-free technology is suited for studying receptor-mediated activation in cell lines endogenously expressing the target of interest. Moreover, this real-time monitoring allows the examination of binding kinetics and its influence on receptor activation at a cellular level.

Mass spectrometry-based ligand binding assays on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors.

Conventional methods to measure ligand-receptor binding parameters typically require radiolabeled ligands as probes. Despite the robustness of radioligand binding assays, they carry inherent disadvantages in terms of safety precautions, expensive synthesis, special lab requirements, and waste disposal. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a method that can selectively detect ligands without the need of a label. The sensitivity of MS equipment increases progressively, and currently, it is possible to detect low ligand quantities that are usually found in ligand binding assays. We developed a label-free MS ligand binding (MS binding) assay on the adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors (A(1)AR and A(2A)AR), which are well-characterized members of the class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. Radioligand binding assays for both receptors are well established, and ample data is available to compare and evaluate the performance of an MS binding assay. 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl-xanthine (DPCPX) and 4-(2-((7-amino-2-(furan-2-yl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]-[1,3,5]triazin-5-yl)amino)ethyl)phenol (ZM-241,385) are high-affinity ligands selective for the A(1)AR and A(2A)AR, respectively. To proof the feasibility of MS binding on the A(1)AR and A(2A)AR, we first developed an MS detection method for unlabeled DPCPX and ZM-241,385. To serve as internal standards, both compounds were also deuterium-labeled. Subsequently, we investigated whether the two unlabeled compounds could substitute for their radiolabeled counterparts as marker ligands in binding experiments, including saturation, displacement, dissociation, and competition association assays. Furthermore, we investigated the accuracy of these assays if the use of internal standards was excluded. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the MS binding assay, even in the absence of a deuterium-labeled internal standard, and provide great promise for the further development of label-free assays based on MS for other GPCRs.

Optogenetic activation of intracellular adenosine A2A receptor signaling in the hippocampus is sufficient to trigger CREB phosphorylation and impair memory.

Human and animal studies have converged to suggest that caffeine consumption prevents memory deficits in aging and Alzheimer's disease through the antagonism of adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs). To test if A2AR activation in the hippocampus is actually sufficient to impair memory function and to begin elucidating the intracellular pathways operated by A2AR, we have developed a chimeric rhodopsin-A2AR protein (optoA2AR), which retains the extracellular and transmembrane domains of rhodopsin (conferring light responsiveness and eliminating adenosine-binding pockets) fused to the intracellular loop of A2AR to confer specific A2AR signaling. The specificity of the optoA2AR signaling was confirmed by light-induced selective enhancement of cAMP and phospho-mitogen-activated protein kinase (p-MAPK) (but not cGMP) levels in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, which was abolished by a point mutation at the C terminal of A2AR. Supporting its physiological relevance, optoA2AR activation and the A2AR agonist CGS21680 produced similar activation of cAMP and p-MAPK signaling in HEK293 cells, of p-MAPK in the nucleus accumbens and of c-Fos/phosphorylated-CREB (p-CREB) in the hippocampus, and similarly enhanced long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Remarkably, optoA2AR activation triggered a preferential p-CREB signaling in the hippocampus and impaired spatial memory performance, while optoA2AR activation in the nucleus accumbens triggered MAPK signaling and modulated locomotor activity. This shows that the recruitment of intracellular A2AR signaling in the hippocampus is sufficient to trigger memory dysfunction. Furthermore, the demonstration that the biased A2AR signaling and functions depend on intracellular A2AR loops prompts the possibility of targeting the intracellular A2AR-interacting partners to selectively control different neuropsychiatric behaviors.

Kv 11.1 (hERG)-induced cardiotoxicity: a molecular insight from a binding kinetics study of prototypical Kv 11.1 (hERG) inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug-induced arrhythmia due to blockade of the Kv 11.1 channel (also known as the hERG K(+) channel) is a frequent side effect. Previous studies have primarily focused on equilibrium parameters, i.e. affinity or potency, of drug candidates at the channel. The aim of this study was to determine the kinetics of the interaction with the channel for a number of known Kv 11.1 blockers and to explore a possible correlation with the affinity or physicochemical properties of these compounds. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The affinity and kinetic parameters of 15 prototypical Kv 11.1 inhibitors were evaluated in a number of [(3) H]-dofetilide binding assays. The lipophilicity (logKW - C8 ) and membrane partitioning (logKW - IAM ) of these compounds were determined by means of HPLC analysis. KEY RESULTS: A novel [(3) H]-dofetilide competition association assay was set up and validated, which allowed us to determine the binding kinetics of the Kv 11.1 blockers used in this study. Interestingly, the compounds' affinities (Ki values) were correlated to their association rates rather than dissociation rates. Overall lipophilicity or membrane partitioning of the compounds were not correlated to their affinity or rate constants for the channel. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A compound's affinity for the Kv 11.1 channel is determined by its rate of association with the channel, while overall lipophilicity and membrane affinity are not. In more general terms, our findings provide novel insights into the mechanism of action for a compound's activity at the Kv 11.1 channel. This may help to elucidate how Kv 11.1-induced cardiotoxicity is governed and how it can be circumvented in the future.

Structure-activity relationships of pentamidine-affected ion channel trafficking and dofetilide mediated rescue.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug interference with normal hERG protein trafficking substantially reduces the channel density in the plasma membrane and thereby poses an arrhythmic threat. The chemical substructures important for hERG trafficking inhibition were investigated using pentamidine as a model drug. Furthermore, the relationship between acute ion channel block and correction of trafficking by dofetilide was studied. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: hERG and K(IR)2.1 trafficking in HEK293 cells was evaluated by Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy after treatment with pentamidine and six pentamidine analogues, and correction with dofetilide and four dofetilide analogues that displayed different abilities to inhibit IKr . Molecular dynamics simulations were used to address mode, number and type of interactions between hERG and dofetilide analogues. KEY RESULTS: Structural modifications of pentamidine differentially affected plasma membrane levels of hERG and K(IR)2.1. Modification of the phenyl ring or substituents directly attached to it had the largest effect, affirming the importance of these chemical residues in ion channel binding. PA-4 had the mildest effects on both ion channels. Dofetilide corrected pentamidine-induced hERG, but not K(IR)2.1 trafficking defects. Dofetilide analogues that displayed high channel affinity, mediated by pi-pi stacks and hydrophobic interactions, also restored hERG protein levels, whereas analogues with low affinity were ineffective. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Drug-induced trafficking defects can be minimized if certain chemical features are avoided or 'synthesized out'; this could influence the design and development of future drugs. Further analysis of such features in hERG trafficking correctors may facilitate the design of a non-blocking corrector for trafficking defective hERG proteins in both congenital and acquired LQTS.

The role of the second and third extracellular loops of the adenosine A1 receptor in activation and allosteric modulation.

The adenosine A1 receptor is a member of the large membrane protein family that signals through G proteins, the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs consist of seven transmembrane domains connected by three intracellular and three extracellular loops. Their N-terminus is extracellular, the C-terminal tail is in the cytoplasm. The transmembrane domains in receptor subfamilies that bind the same endogenous ligand, such as dopamine or adenosine, tend to be highly similar. In contrast, the loop regions can vary greatly, both in sequence and in length, and the role these loops have in the activation mechanism of the receptors remains unclear. Here, we investigated the activating role of the second and third extracellular loop of the human adenosine A1 receptor. By means of an (Ala)3 mutagenic scan in which consecutive sets of three amino acids were mutated into alanine residues in EL2 and a classical alanine scan in EL3, we revealed a strong regulatory role for the second extracellular loop (EL2) of the human adenosine A1 receptor. Besides many residues in the second and the third extracellular loops important for adenosine A1 receptor activation, we also identified two residues in EL2, a tryptophan and a glutamate, that affect the influence of the allosteric modulator PD81,723. These results, combined with a comparison of the different receptor loop regions, provide insight in the activation mechanism of this typical class A GPCR and further emphasize the unique pharmacological profile the loops can provide to individual receptors, even within subfamilies of GPCRs.

Interleukin-6 upregulates neuronal adenosine A1 receptors: implications for neuromodulation and neuroprotection.

The immunological response in the brain is crucial to overcome neuropathological events. Some inflammatory mediators, such as the immunoregulatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) affect neuromodulation and may also play protective roles against various noxious conditions. However, the fundamental mechanisms underlying the long-term effects of IL-6 in the brain remain unclear. We now report that IL-6 increases the expression and function of the neuronal adenosine A1 receptor, with relevant consequences to synaptic transmission and neuroprotection. IL-6-induced amplification of A1 receptor function enhances the responses to readily released adenosine during hypoxia, enables neuronal rescue from glutamate-induced death, and protects animals from chemically induced convulsing seizures. Taken together, these results suggest that IL-6 minimizes the consequences of excitotoxic episodes on brain function through the enhancement of endogenous adenosinergic signaling.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of blood-brain barrier transport of synthetic adenosine A1 receptor agonists.

A population pharmacokinetic model is proposed for estimation of the brain distribution clearance of synthetic A1 receptor agonists in vivo. Rats with permanent venous and arterial cannulas in combination with a microdialysis probe in the striatum received intravenous infusions of 8-methylamino-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (MCPA) and 2'-deoxyribose-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (2'-dCPA) (10 mg kg(-1)). The clearance for transport from blood to the brain was estimated by simultaneous analysis of the blood and extracellular fluid concentrations using a compartmental pharmacokinetic model. The proposed pharmacokinetic model consists of three compartments describing the time course of the concentration in blood in combination with three compartments for the brain extracellular fluid concentrations. The blood clearance was 7.4 +/- 0.5 for MCPA and 7.2 +/- 1.4 ml min(-1) for 2'-dCPA. The in vivo microdialysis recoveries determined by the dynamic-no-net-flux method were independent of time with values of 0.21 +/- 0.02 and 0.22 +/- 0.01 for MCPA and 2'-dCPA, respectively. The values of the intercompartmental clearance for the distribution from blood to brain were 1.9 +/- 0.4 versus 1.6 +/- 0.3 mul min(-1) for MCPA and 2'-dCPA, respectively. It is concluded that on basis of the novel six-compartment model precise estimates of the rate of brain distribution are obtained that are independent of eventual differences in systemic exposure. The low brain distribution rates of MCPA and 2'-dCPA were consistent with in vitro tests. Furthermore, a slow elimination from the brain compartment was observed, indicating that the duration of central nervous system effects may be much longer than expected on the basis of the terminal half-life in blood.

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors.

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

Allosteric modulation of A(3) adenosine receptors by a series of 3-(2-pyridinyl)isoquinoline derivatives.

Allosteric modulators of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors have been described; however, for the A(3) adenosine receptor, neither an allosteric site nor a compound with allosteric effects has been described. In this study, the allosteric modulation of human A(3) adenosine receptors by a series of 3-(2-pyridinyl)isoquinoline derivatives was investigated by examining their effects on the dissociation of the agonist radioligand, [(125)I]N(6)-(4-amino-3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (I-AB-MECA), from the receptor. Several 3-(2-pyridinyl)isoquinoline derivatives, including VUF5455, VUF8502, VUF8504, and VUF8507, slowed the dissociation of the agonist radioligand [(125)I]I-AB-MECA in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting an allosteric interaction. These compounds had no effect on the dissociation of the radiolabeled antagonist [(3)H]PSB-11 from the A(3) adenosine receptor, suggesting a selective enhancement of agonist binding. By comparison, compounds of similar structure (VUF8501, VUF8503, VUF8505), the classical adenosine receptor antagonist CGS15943 and the A(1) receptor allosteric enhancer PD81723 did not significantly influence the dissociation rate of [(125)I]I-AB-MECA. The effect of agonist on forskolin-induced cAMP production was significantly enhanced by VUF5455. When the subtype-selectivity of the allosteric enhancement was tested the compounds had no effect on the dissociation of either [(3)H]N(6)-[(R)-phenylisopropyl]adenosine from the A(1) adenosine receptor or [(3)H]CGS21680 from the A(2A) adenosine receptor. Probing of structure-activity relationships suggested that a carbonyl group is essential for allosterism but preferred only for competitive antagonism. The presence of a 7-methyl group decreased the competitive binding affinity without a major loss of the allosteric enhancing activity, suggesting that the structural requirements for allosteric enhancement might be distinct from those for competitive antagonism.

5'-O-alkyl ethers of N,2-substituted adenosine derivatives: partial agonists for the adenosine A1 and A3 receptors.

New N,5'-di- and N,2,5'-trisubstituted adenosine derivatives were synthesized in good overall yields. Appropriate 5-O-alkyl-substituted ribose moieties were coupled to 6-chloropurine or 2,6-dichloropurine via Vorbrüggen's glycosylation method. Subsequent amination and deprotection of the intermediates yielded compounds 18-35. Binding affinities were determined for rat adenosine A1 and A2A receptors and the human A3 receptor. The ability of compounds 18-35 to inhibit forskolin-induced (10 microM) cyclic AMP (cAMP) production and their ability to stimulate guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding, via either the adenosine A1 receptor or the adenosine A3 receptor, were assessed. N-Cyclopentyl-substituted adenosine derivatives displayed affinities in the low nanomolar range for the adenosine A1 receptor, whereas N-(3-iodobenzyl)-substituted derivatives had high affinity for the adenosine A3 receptor. Compound 22 had the highest affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor (K(i) value of 16 nM), and compounds 20 and 26 had the highest affinities for the adenosine A3 receptor (K(i) values of 4 and 3 nM, respectively). A chlorine substituent at the 2-position either did not affect or slightly increased the adenosine A1 receptor affinity, whereas the A3 receptor affinity was affected differently, depending on the N-substituent. Furthermore, the introduction of chlorine slightly increased the A3/A1 selectivity ratio. At the 5'-position, an O-methyl substituent induced the highest adenosine A1 receptor affinity, whereas an O-ethyl substituent did so for the A3 receptor. All compounds showed partial agonistic effects in both the cAMP and [35S]GTPgammaS assays, although more marked in the latter assay. In general, the 2-chloro derivatives seemed to have lower intrinsic activities compared to the 2-H-substituted compounds on both the adenosine A1 and the adenosine A3 receptors. The compounds with an N-(3-iodobenzyl) substituent displayed the lowest intrinsic activities. Finally, all compounds also showed partially antagonistic behavior in the [35S]GTPgammaS assay.

Substituted 4-phenyl-2-(phenylcarboxamido)-1,3-thiazole derivatives as antagonists for the adenosine A(1) receptor.

The synthesis and receptor binding of novel adenosine receptor antagonists is described. We found that non-xanthine 4-phenyl-2-(phenylcarboxamido)-1,3-thiazole derivatives may have high affinity and substantial selectivity for the adenosine A(1) receptor.

Thiazole and thiadiazole analogues as a novel class of adenosine receptor antagonists.

Novel classes of heterocyclic compounds as adenosine antagonists were developed based on a template approach. Structure-affinity relationships revealed insights for extended knowledge of the receptor-ligand interaction. We replaced the bicyclic heterocyclic ring system of earlier described isoquinoline and quinazoline adenosine A(3) receptor ligands by several monocyclic rings and investigated the influence thereof on adenosine receptor affinity. The thiazole or thiadiazole derivatives seemed most promising, so we continued our investigations with these two classes of compounds. The large difference between a pyridine and isoquinoline ring in binding adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptors showed the importance of the second ring of the isoquinoline ligands. We prepared several N-[4-(2-pyridyl)thiazol-2-yl]benzamides, and these compounds showed adenosine affinities in the micromolar range. Most surprising in the series of the N-[4-(2-pyridyl)thiazol-2-yl]amides were the retained adenosine affinities by introduction of a cylopentanamide instead of the benzamide. A second series of compounds, the thiadiazolobenzamide series of compounds, revealed potent and selective adenosine receptor antagonists, especially N-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)-4-hydroxybenzamide (LUF5437, 8h) showing a K(i) value of 7 nM at the adenosine A(1) receptor and N-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)-4-methoxybenzamide (LUF5417, 8e) with a K(i) value of 82 nM at the adenosine A(3) receptor. 4-Hydroxybenzamide 8h is the most potent adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist of this new class of compounds. Structure--affinity relationships showed the existence of a steric restriction at the para-position of the benzamide ring for binding adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptors. The electronic nature of the 4-substituents played an important role in binding the adenosine A(3) receptor. Cis- and trans-4-substituted cyclohexyl derivatives were made next to the 4-substituted benzamide analogues. We used them to study the proposed specific interaction between the adenosine A(1) receptor and the 4-hydroxy group of this class of thiadiazolo compounds, as well as a suggested special role for the 4-methoxy group in binding the A(3) receptor. Both the adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptor slightly preferred the trans-analogues over the cis-analogues, while all compounds showed low affinities at the adenosine A(2A) receptor. Our investigations provided the potent and highly selective adenosine A(1) antagonist N-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)-trans-4-hydroxycyclohexanamide (VUF5472, 8m) showing a K(i) value of 20 nM. A third series of compounds was formed by urea analogues, N-substituted with thiazolo and thiadiazolo heterocycles. The SAR of this class of compounds was not commensurate with the SAR of the previously described quinazoline urea. On the basis of these findings we suggest the existence of a special interaction between adenosine receptors and a region of high electron density positioned between the thia(dia)zole ring and phenyl(pyridyl) ring. Molecular electrostatic potential contour plots showed that for this reason the ligands need either a thiadiazole ring instead of a thiazole or a 2-pyridyl group instead of a phenyl. The derived novel classes of antagonists will be useful for a better understanding of the molecular recognition at the adenosine receptors.

Synthesis and use of FSCPX, an irreversible adenosine A1 antagonist, as a 'receptor knock-down' tool.

A new preparative synthetic route for the irreversible adenosine A1 antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-3-N-[3-((3-(4-fluorosulphonyl)benzoyl)-oxy)-propyl]-1-N-propyl-xanthine (FSCPX, 1) is described. The availability of ample amounts of the irreversible antagonist FSCPX allowed us to use FSCPX as a research tool for adenosine A1 receptors in in vivo experiments. After verification of the irreversible antagonistic function of FSCPX in in vitro experiments, FSCPX was used successfully as a 'receptor knock-down' tool in in vivo experiments on conscious rats.