Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Liver Lesions: Differences on the Sphericity Index of the Ablation Zone between Cirrhotic and Healthy Liver Parenchyma.

To compare different parameters of the sphericity index of the ablation zone following microwave ablation (MWA) on cirrhotic- and healthy-liver parenchyma in a series of patients treated with the same MWA system. Institutional database research identified 46 patients (77 lesions) who underwent MWA. "Cirrhotic liver group" (CLG) included 35 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions; "healthy liver group" (HLG) included 42 metastatic lesions. The long axis (LAD), short axis 1 (SAD-1) and 2 (SAD-2), the mean SAD-1 and SAD-2 (mSAD) diameter (in mm) and the mean sphericity (mSPH) index of the ablation zones were evaluated for each treated lesion in both groups from baseline to follow-up. A mixed model analysis of variance reported significant main effect of group on SAD-1 (p = 0.023), SAD-2 (p = 0.010) and mSAD (p = 0.010), with HLG showing lower values compared to CLG. No differences were detected on the LAD (pFDR = 0.089; d = 0.45), and mSPH (pFDR = 0.148, d = 0.40) between the two groups. However, a significant main effect of time was found on LAD (p < 0.001), SAD-1 (p < 0.001), SAD-2 (p < 0.001) and mSAD (p < 0.001), with decreased values in all indices at follow-up compared to baseline. A significant group by time interaction was observed on mSPH (p = 0.044); HLG had significantly lower mSPH at follow-up where CLG did not show any significant change. Our findings indicate that although in cirrhotic liver short axis diameter of the MWA zone seems to be significantly longer, this has no effect on the sphericity index which showed no significant difference between cirrhotic vs. healthy liver lesions. On the contrary, on one month follow-up ablation zones tend to become significant more ellipsoid in healthy whilst remains stable in cirrhotic liver.

Is There an Independent Role of TERT and NF1 in High Grade Gliomas?

BACKGROUND: High grade glioma molecular profiling is of particular interest in neurooncology. The role of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) varies dependent upon other molecular parameters. We explored the role of TERT in 101 high-grade gliomas. METHODS: A total of 101 patients (pts) with grade III-IV gliomas treated with standard of care and informative tumor genotypes were included in the present study. Of 55 genes targeted with the next-generation sequencing panel, mutations (muts) were found in 37; these were included in the analysis. TERT mut were tested with Sanger sequencing. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined by methylation specific PCR. RESULTS: 270 mut were detected in 92/101 tumors (91.1%). TERT was the most frequently mutated gene (74.3%). IDH1/2 mut were mutually exclusive with mut in the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) gene. Mutated TERT was associated with wild-type (wt) IDH1/2 (p = 0.025). The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 74.3% (median OS: 22 months). Pts with TERT and NF1 wt had a median OS of 40.8 months, while among pts with NF1 wt/TERT mutant, the median OS was 18.5 months. NF1 and TERT mut univariately conferred shorter OS (HR = 3.19; p = 0.004 and HR = 2.28; p = 0.002). Upon multivariate analysis, mutated TERT showed marginal unfavorable prognostic significance for OS (p = 0.049), while NF1 lost its unfavorable significance (p = 0.151). CONCLUSIONS: TERT is herein proven to confer poor prognosis in high grade gliomas, independent of IDH and MGMT. NF1 seems to also confer poor prognosis although our small numbers do not allow for firm conclusions.

Volumetric and MGMT parameters in glioblastoma patients: survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this study several tumor-related volumes were assessed by means of a computer-based application and a survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of pre- and postoperative volumetric data in patients harboring glioblastomas. In addition, MGMT (O6-methylguanine methyltransferase) related parameters were compared with those of volumetry in order to observe possible relevance of this molecule in tumor development. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 65 patients suffering from glioblastoma (GBM) who underwent radiotherapy with concomitant adjuvant temozolomide. For the purpose of volumetry T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences were used, acquired both pre- and postoperatively (pre-radiochemotherapy). The volumes measured on preoperative MR images were necrosis, enhancing tumor and edema (including the tumor) and on postoperative ones, net-enhancing tumor. Age, sex, performance status (PS) and type of operation were also included in the multivariate analysis. MGMT was assessed for promoter methylation with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), for RNA expression with real time PCR, and for protein expression with immunohistochemistry in a total of 44 cases with available histologic material. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis a negative impact was shown for pre-radiochemotherapy net-enhancing tumor on the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.023) and for preoperative necrosis on progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.030). Furthermore, the multivariate analysis confirmed the importance of PS in PFS and OS of patients. MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 13/23 (43.5%) evaluable tumors; complete methylation was observed in 3/13 methylated tumors only. High rate of MGMT protein positivity (> 20% positive neoplastic nuclei) was inversely associated with pre-operative tumor necrosis (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings implicate that volumetric parameters may have a significant role in the prognosis of GBM patients. Furthermore, volumetry could help not only to improve the prediction of outcome but also the outcome itself by identifying patients at high risk of treatment failure and, thus, seek alternative treatment for these patients. In this small series, MGMT protein was associated with less aggressive tumor characteristics.

The importance of tumor volume in the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma: comparison of computerized volumetry and geometric models.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The importance of tumor volume as a prognostic factor in high-grade gliomas is highly controversial and there are numerous methods estimating this parameter. In this study, a computer-based application was used in order to assess tumor volume from hard copies and a survival analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative volumetric data in patients harboring glioblastomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 50 patients suffering from glioblastoma were analyzed retrospectively. Tumor volume was determined by the various geometric models as well as by an own specialized software (Volumio). Age, performance status, type of excision, and tumor location were also included in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The spheroid and rectangular models overestimated tumor volume, while the ellipsoid model offered the best approximation. Volume failed to attain any statistical significance in prognosis, while age and performance status confirmed their importance in progression-free and overall survival of patients. CONCLUSION: Geometric models provide a rough approximation of tumor volume and should not be used, as accurate determination of size is of paramount importance in order to draw safe conclusions in oncology. Although the significance of volumetry was not disclosed, further studies are definitely required.