A randomised clinical trial of two docetaxel regimens (weekly vs 3 week) in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The DISTAL 01 study.

Docetaxel (75 mg m(-2) 3-weekly) is standard second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with significant toxicity. To verify whether a weekly schedule (33.3 mg m(-2) for 6 weeks) improved quality of life (QoL), a phase III study was performed with 220 advanced NSCLC patients, < or =75 years, ECOG PS < or =2. QoL was assessed by EORTC questionnaires and the Daily Diary Card (DDC). No difference was found in global QoL scores at 3 weeks. Pain, cough and hair loss significantly favoured the weekly schedule, while diarrhoea was worse. DDC analysis showed that loss of appetite and overall condition were significantly worse in the 3-week arm in the first week, while nausea and loss of appetite were more severe in the weekly arm in the third week. Response rate and survival were similar, hazard ratio of death in the weekly arm being 1.04 (95% CI 0.77-1.39). A 3-weekly docetaxel was more toxic for leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and hair loss; any grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was significantly more frequent in the standard arm (25 vs 6%). The weekly schedule could be preferred for patients candidate to receive docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, because of some QoL advantages, lower toxicity and no evidence of strikingly different effect on survival.

Supportive care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The present study describes supportive care (SC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), evaluating whether it is affected by concomitant chemotherapy, patient's performance status (PS) and age. Data of patients enrolled in three randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy, conducted between 1996 and 2001, were pooled. The analysis was limited to the first three cycles of treatment. Supportive care data were available for 1185 out of 1312 (90%) enrolled patients. Gastrointestinal drugs (45.7%), corticosteroids (33.4%) and analgesics (23.8%) were the most frequently observed categories. The mean number of drugs per patient was 2.43; 538 patients (45.4%) assumed three or more supportive drugs. Vinorelbine does not produce substantial variations in the SC pattern, while cisplatin-based treatment requires an overall higher number of supportive drugs, with higher use of antiemetics (41 vs 27%) and antianaemics (10 vs 4%). Patients with worse PS are more exposed to corticosteroids (42 vs 30%). Elderly patients require drugs against concomitant diseases significantly more than adults (20 vs 7%) and are less frequently exposed to antiemetics (12 vs 27%). In conclusion, polypharmacotherapy is a relevant issue in patients with advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy does not remarkably affect the pattern of SC, except for some drugs against side effects. Elderly patients assume more drugs for concomitant diseases and receive less antiemetics than adults.

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in pretreated patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are among the most active new agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are worth considering for second-line chemotherapy. In this phase I-II study, we combined gemcitabine and paclitaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine doses were kept fixed at 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and paclitaxel doses were escalated from 90 mg/m2 on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Thirty-seven patients were treated at six different dose levels. Grade 4 neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), since it occurred in two out of six patients treated at paclitaxel 240 mg/m2; the paclitaxel dose level just below (210 mg/m2) was selected for phase Il evaluation. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. One complete response (CR) (3%) and 13 partial responses (PR) (36%) were observed in 36 evaluable patients for an overall response rate of 39% (95% C.I., 23-57%). Median duration of response was 35 weeks (range, 8-102). All of the observed objective responses occurred in the 19 patients who had previously responded to the first-line therapy. Median survival was 40 weeks (range, 8-108 weeks). The combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active scheme for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC; further evaluation, at least in selected patients, such as those previously responding to first-line chemotherapy, is definitely warranted.

New triplet chemotherapy combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine plus amifostine support in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

New triplet chemotherapy combinations are under investigation in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Carboplatin, plus paclitaxel, plus gemcitabine is among the most active and promising regimens. The use of more aggressive chemotherapy in order to improve results can increase toxicity. Amifostine (WR-2721) reduces toxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy and protects selectively a number of normal, but not neoplastic, tissue. Based on this background, we performed a phase II study on carboplatin, plus paclitaxel, plus gemcitabine with amifostine support in advanced NSCLC. Patients received chemotherapy at the following dosage: carboplatin AUC 5, i.v., at day 1; paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, i.v. by 3-hour infusion, at day 1; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, i.v. by 3-hour infusion, at days 1 and 8; every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. Amifostine was administered at the dose of 740 mg/m2, i.v., at day 1 of each cycle. Seventeen patients entered the study. They were prevalently male, median age was 62 years, PS (ECOG) was 0 in 10 cases (58.8%), 1 in 6 (35.3%) and 2 in 1 (5.9%). Histology was epidermoid in 8 cases (47%) and adenocarcinoma in 9 (53%). We observed 8 (47.5%) objective responses with 2 (11.7%) complete responses. Median time to progression and median survival were 24 and 36 weeks, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. The main toxicity was as follows: grade 3 neutropenia, grade 2 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 anemia in one (5.8%) case; grade 2 peripheral neurologic toxicity in 3 (17.6%) patients; grade 2 cardiac toxicity (atrial fibrillation) in one case; and grade 3 respiratory toxicity (dispnoea) in one patient. These data indicate that this combination has promising activity and tolerability. A randomized trial comparing carboplatin plus paclitaxel, plus gemcitabine versus carboplatin, plus paclitaxel, plus gemcitabine, plus amifostine in advanced NSCLC is warranted.

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine is one of the most interesting agents currently in use in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and high response rates have been reported when it is administered in combination with cisplatin. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in a phase I-II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer received carboplatin at area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min and gemcitabine at an initial dose of 800 mg/m2, subsequently escalated by 100 mg/m2 per step. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin on day 8 of the 28-day cycle. Dose escalation proceeded up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Neutropenia was DLT, inasmuch as it occurred in three of five patients receiving gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Gemcitabine 1,100 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5 was recommended for phase II studies. An objective response was observed in 13 (50%) of 26 patients, including four complete responses (15%) and nine partial responses (35%). Median duration of response was 13 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Median overall survival was 16 months (range, 3 to 26 months). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is well tolerated and active. Neutropenia was DLT. The observed activity matches that observable in cisplatin-gemcitabine studies, whereas duration of response and survival are even higher. A phase II trial is under way.

Phase I study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine and paclitaxel interfere with mitotic spindle function through different mechanisms of action. Both of the drugs show antitumor activity in small-cell lung cancer when used as single agents; furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a synergistic activity between the two drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with small-cell lung cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I study in which vinorelbine was given at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m2 by 15-min intravenous infusion, whereas paclitaxel was given by 3-h infusion starting 1 h after vinorelbine at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, which was subsequently escalated by 30-mg/m2 steps. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Grade 3 neutropenia was observed only in three patients treated at the fifty dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three of five patients treated at the fifth dose level (paclitaxel 210 mg/m2). Other side effects were generally mild. The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was 32% (95% CI 13-51%); in particular, 1 complete response (4.5%) and 6 partial responses (27.3%) were observed. The maximally tolerated doses recommended for phase II studies are 180 mg/m2 for paclitaxel and 30 mg/m2 for vinorelbine. The observed myelosuppression was less severe than anticipated on the basis of the effects of each drug alone. CONCLUSIONS: The promising activity of this drug combination warrants a phase II study in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Survival rate after resection for bronchial carcinoma.

Among factors influencing long-term survival of patients how had undergone resection for carcinoma of the lung, the most important seems to be the extent of the cancer at the time of resection, determined by histopathological studies of the resected specimen.