Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review.

To establish the feasibility of robotic surgical procedures in urology in terms of the applications, merits, and demerits as well as the postoperative and oncological outcomes while comparing it with the conventional approaches. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort studies on Robot-Assisted urological surgical procedures in comparison with the conventional methods. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the revised Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. A qualitative narrative synthesis of the data extracted from the studies was performed and presented in tabulated form. After screening, 39 studies were included in our review (7 Randomized Controlled Trials and 32 Cohort studies). Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy appears to be associated with lower estimated blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay. For Robot-Assisted Cystectomy, the results suggest longer operative time and fewer complications. Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy was found to be associated with fewer perioperative complications and longer mean operative time while Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy was associated with less positive surgical margins and reduced need for postoperative analgesia. The mean operative time was longer while the length of stay was shorter for the robotic approach in inguinal lymphadenectomy and ureteral reimplantation. The feasibility of Robot-Assisted surgery varied for different outcome measures as well as for different procedures. Some common advantages were a shorter length of stay, lesser blood loss, and fewer complications while the drawbacks included longer operative time.Study protocol PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42021256623).

Frequency of migraine according to the ICHD-3 criteria and its association with sociodemographic and triggering factors in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Migraine is a primary headache disorder marked by episodes of moderate to severe headache that is unilateral, throbbing in character, having a duration of 4 h to three days, and associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Aims: Our study aims to determine the frequency of migraine in Pakistan, its association with sociodemographic variables and triggering factors, and the coping mechanisms used. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey from March 19, 2022, to June 15, 2022. The snowball sampling technique was used for data collection. The questions asked included those on sociodemographic information, screening questions, and questions on triggering factors and coping mechanisms. The screening was done using the ICHD-3 criteria and percentages were calculated using SPSS. Results: Of the 986 respondents, 393 suffered from migraine. The majority of them were female (78.1%), belonged to the age group 20-29 years (69.2%), and were students (76.1%). 32.8% of the migraineurs had a family history of migraine. Most frequent triggers included sleep disturbance (70.5%), stress (66.7%) and fatigue (64.4%). Of the female migraineurs, 31.8% had menstruation as a trigger. The coping mechanisms used included taking rest, medication, staying in a quiet and dark place, and doing massage. Conclusion: The findings suggest that young adults, especially females, with a stressful and sleep-deprived lifestyle are more vulnerable to migraine. However, further studies must focus on trigger synergy and interrelation of triggers that precipitate migraine so a better understanding can be developed for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of migraine.