Risk of Seizure Recurrence Due to Autoimmune Encephalitis With NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, and GABABR Antibodies: Implications for Return to Driving.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with ongoing seizures are usually not allowed to drive. The prognosis for seizure freedom is favorable in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with antibodies against NMDA receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), and the gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (GABABR). We hypothesized that after a seizure-free period of 3 months, patients with AIE have a seizure recurrence risk of <20% during the subsequent 12 months. This would render them eligible for noncommercial driving according to driving regulations in several countries. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed follow-up data from patients aged 15 years or older with seizures resulting from NMDAR-, LGI1-, CASPR2-, or GABABR-AIE, who had been seizure-free for ≥3 months. We used Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for the seizure recurrence risk at 12 months for each antibody group and tested for the effects of potential covariates with regression models. RESULTS: We included 383 patients with NMDAR-, 440 with LGI1-, 114 with CASPR2-, and 44 with GABABR-AIE from 14 international centers. After being seizure-free for 3 months after an initial seizure period, we calculated the probability of remaining seizure-free for another 12 months (KM estimate) as 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.92) for NMDAR, 0.84 (CI 0.80-0.88) for LGI1, 0.82 (CI 0.75-0.90) for CASPR2, and 0.76 (CI 0.62-0.93) for GABABR. DISCUSSION: Taking a <20% recurrence risk within 12 months as sufficient, patients with NMDAR-AIE and LGI1-AIE could be considered eligible for noncommercial driving after having been seizure-free for 3 months.

Non-discontinuation of antiseizure medication in seizure-free epilepsy patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with epilepsy and sustained seizure freedom, guidelines recommend considering discontinuation of antiseizure medication (ASM) based on shared decision-making. This study aims to identify factors associated with non-discontinuation of ASM in seizure-free patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from three sites of an academic outpatient clinic were analyzed. Adult patients with epilepsy who have been seizure-free for ≥24 months on ASM monotherapy were included. The primary end-point was non-discontinuation of ASM, defined as no discontinuation or no dose reduction of ≥25% at the last outpatient clinic visit in the ultimate seizure-free interval. Secondary end-points included frequency of discussion on discontinuation attempts between patients and physicians, adherence to ASM discontinuation decisions, and post-discontinuation seizure outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 338 included patients, 81.7% did not discontinue ASM and did not reduce its dose, 11.5% discontinued ASM and 6.8% had a significant dose reduction. Factors independently associated with non-discontinuation of ASM were history of focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (odds ratio [OR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-5.06), history of breakthrough seizures (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.10-10.04), history of failed attempts to discontinue or reduce the ASM dose (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.03-21.11) and higher ASM load at the index visit (OR 6.10, 95% CI 2.09-17.78). Discontinuation attempts were made during the entire period of seizure freedom and were most commonly undertaken ≥10 years after the last seizure. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into factors associated with the shared decision-making process regarding ASM discontinuation in seizure-free patients and highlights the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and seizure history.

Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is widely used in presurgical assessment in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) do not localize the seizure onset zone or are discordant. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study, we included consecutive patients with DRE who had undergone FDG-PET as part of their presurgical workup. We assessed the utility of FDG-PET, which was defined as contributing to the decision-making process to refer for resection or intracranial EEG (iEEG) or to conclude surgery was not feasible. RESULTS: We included 951 patients in this study; 479 had temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), 219 extratemporal epilepsy (ETLE), and 253 epilepsy of uncertain lobar origin. FDG-PET showed a distinct hypometabolism in 62% and was concordant with ictal EEG in 74% in TLE and in 56% in ETLE (p < .001). FDG-PET was useful in presurgical decision-making in 396 patients (47%) and most beneficial in TLE compared to ETLE (58% vs. 44%, p = .001). Overall, FDG-PET contributed to recommending resection in 78 cases (20%) and iEEG in 187 cases (47%); in 131 patients (33%), FDG-PET resulted in a conclusion that resection was not feasible. In TLE, seizure-freedom 1 year after surgery did not differ significantly (p = .48) between patients with negative MRI and EEG-PET concordance (n = 30, 65%) and those with positive MRI and concordant EEG (n = 46, 68%). In ETLE, half of patients with negative MRI and EEG-PET concordance and three quarters with positive MRI and concordant EEG were seizure-free postsurgery (n = 5 vs. n = 6, p = .28). SIGNIFICANCE: This is the largest reported cohort of patients with DRE who received presurgical FDG-PET, showing that FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool. MRI-negative and MRI-positive cases with concordant FDG-PET results (with either EEG or MRI) had a comparable outcome after surgery. These findings confirm the significance of FDG-PET in presurgical epilepsy diagnostics.

[Imaging in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy]. / Bildgebung in der prächirurgischen Epilepsiediagnostik.

While two thirds of patients with epilepsy become seizure-free with antiseizure medications, 30% remain drug-resistant. In drug-resistant focal epilepsy, epilepsy surgery offers an approximately 65% chance of becoming seizure-free; however, for a successful outcome of surgery a seizure focus must be precisely located, for which imaging techniques are essential. In recent years, the proportion of patients with apparently inconspicuous findings in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the presurgical evaluation has increased. The sensitivity of MRI can be increased using special MRI sequences and MRI postprocessing techniques. Ictal and interictal source localization based on electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetencephalography (MEG) aim at determining the onset of interictal discharges and seizures. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques such as interictal positron emission tomography (PET) and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can detect chronic or acute seizure-related changes in brain metabolism and can indicate an epileptogenic focus even if MRI is inconspicuous. The results of these techniques are used to plan invasive EEG recordings and subsequently surgery. Concordant findings are associated with better surgical outcomes and show significantly higher rates of seizure freedom in the long-term seizure outcome.