BK Viremia and Changes in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Children and Young Adults after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Kidney disease in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients is associated with increased mortality rates. BK virus (BKV) viremia has been associated with kidney dysfunction in pediatric HCT recipients; however, few studies have investigated longer-term kidney outcomes in association with BKV in this population. Here we assessed the relationship between BK viremia and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in children in the first year post-HCT. We selected 136 patients age ≤26 years who underwent HCT in 2007 to 2018 at a single center and had plasma BK viral load data available at 2 time points, weeks 4 to 7 post-HCT and weeks 10 to 13 post-HCT from prospectively collected stored plasma samples. A total of 272 samples were analyzed for BKV using quantitative PCR. We used multivariate linear models to determine the association of BK viremia and change in eGFR by 1 year post-HCT. Forty percent of the patients (54 of 136) had BKV detection in weeks 4 to 7, 13% of whom (7 of 54) had a BK viral load of ≥10,000 copies/mL, and 46% (62 of 136) had BKV detected in weeks 10 to 13, 34% (21 of 62) of whom had a BK viral load of ≥10,000 copies/mL. The mean decline in eGFR was 25.73 mL/min/1.73 m2 by 1 year post-HCT. In multivariate models, a BK viral load of ≥10,000 copies/mL during weeks 4 to 7 was associated with a mean decline in eGFR of 30.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval, -55.94 to -5.17; P = .019) compared with a BK viral load <10,000 copies/mL. In adjusted analyses, a high BK viral load in the blood (≥10,000 copies/mL) was associated with a significant decline in eGFR by 1 year post-HCT.

Developing statewide remdesivir use criteria.

PURPOSE: This report describes our process of 4 health systems coming together to agree on standard use criteria for remdesivir as a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment for patients in Utah. We hope our process provides a framework for remdesivir use in other states and insights on future use of other therapeutic agents that may also be in short supply, such as vaccines and monoclonal antibodies. SUMMARY: Emergency use authorization (EUA) criteria for COVID-19 treatments often allow for broad use of a treatment relative to limited supplies. Without national criteria, each health system must develop further rationing criteria. Health systems in Utah worked together as part of the state's crisis standards of care workgroup to develop a framework for how to limit the EUA criteria for remdesivir to match available supplies. The 4 largest health systems were represented by infectious diseases specialists, chief medical officers, and pharmacists. The group met several times online and communicated via email over a 9-day period to develop the criteria. The clinicians agreed to use this framework to develop criteria for future therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: The unique collaboration of the 4 health systems in Utah led to statewide criteria for use of remdesivir for patients with COVID-19, ensuring similar access to this limited resource for all patients in Utah.

Letermovir and Maribavir for the Treatment and Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ and Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Until recently, available drugs for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention and treatment in transplant patients included (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. Use of these drugs is limited by toxicity and the development of resistance. The 2017 approval of letermovir for prevention of CMV after stem cell transplant marked the first approval of an anti-CMV agent since 2003. The role of letermovir in treatment of established CMV infection or disease remains largely unstudied, although early reports suggest that a low barrier to resistance will likely limit efficacy as primary therapy for patients with refractory or resistant disease. The investigational agent maribavir has shown promise as preemptive treatment; in patients with refractory or resistant disease the emergence of resistance while on treatment has been observed and ongoing studies will define efficacy in this population. Both agents have unique mechanisms of action limiting cross resistance, and neither exhibit myelotoxicity or nephrotoxicity.