Clamping Cortisol and Testosterone Mitigates the Development of Insulin Resistance during Sleep Restriction in Men.

CONTEXT: Sleep loss in men increases cortisol and decreases testosterone, and sleep restriction by 3 to 4 hours/night induces insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: We clamped cortisol and testosterone and determined the effect on insulin resistance. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind, in-laboratory crossover study in which 34 healthy young men underwent 4 nights of sleep restriction of 4 hours/night under 2 treatment conditions in random order: dual hormone clamp (cortisol and testosterone fixed), or matching placebo (cortisol and testosterone not fixed). Fasting blood samples, and an additional 23 samples for a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), were collected before and after sleep restriction under both treatment conditions. Cytokines and hormones were measured from the fasting samples. Overall insulin sensitivity was determined from the OGTT by combining complementary measures: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance of the fasting state; Matsuda index of the absorptive state; and minimal model of both fasting and absorptive states. RESULTS: Sleep restriction alone induced hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and overall insulin resistance (P < 0.001 for each). Clamping cortisol and testosterone alleviated the development of overall insulin resistance (P = 0.046) and hyperinsulinemia (P = 0.014) by 50%. Interleukin-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, peptide YY, and ghrelin did not change, whereas tumor necrosis factor-α and leptin changed in directions that would have mitigated insulin resistance with sleep restriction alone. CONCLUSION: Fixing cortisol-testosterone exposure mitigates the development of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, but not hyperglycemia, from sustained sleep restriction in men. The interplay between cortisol and testosterone may be important as a mechanism by which sleep restriction impairs metabolic health.

Impact of Concurrent Posttraumatic Stress Disorder on Outcomes of Antipsychotic Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder With a Prior Failed Treatment: VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether concurrent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) should affect whether to augment or switch medications when major depressive disorder (MDD) has not responded to a prior antidepressant trial. METHODS: Patients at 35 Veterans Health Administration medical centers from December 2012 to May 2015 with nonpsychotic MDD (N = 1,522) and a suboptimal response to adequate antidepressant treatment were randomly assigned to 3 "next step" treatments: switching to bupropion, augmenting the current antidepressant with bupropion, and augmenting with the antipsychotic aripiprazole. Blinded ratings with the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (QIDS-C16) determined remission and response by 12 weeks and relapse after remission. Survival analyses compared treatment effects in patients with concurrent PTSD diagnosed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (n = 717, 47.1%) and those without PTSD (n = 805, 52.9%). RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with PTSD showed more severe depressive symptoms at baseline and were less likely to achieve either remission or response by 12 weeks. Augmentation with aripiprazole was associated with greater likelihood of achieving response (68.4%) than switching to bupropion (57.7%) in patients with PTSD (relative risk [RR] = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.59) as well as in patients without PTSD (RR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97) (78.9% response with aripiprazole augmentation vs 66.9% with switching to bupropion). Treatment comparisons with the group receiving augmentation with bupropion were not significant. There was no significant interaction between treatment group and PTSD on remission (P = .70), response (P = .98), or relapse (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Although PTSD was associated with poorer overall outcomes, the presence of concurrent PTSD among Veterans in this trial did not affect the comparative effectiveness of medications on response, remission, or relapse after initial remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01421342.

Age and time-of-day differences in the hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular, and adrenal, response to total overnight sleep deprivation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: In young men, sleep restriction decreases testosterone (Te) and increases afternoon cortisol (F), leading to anabolic-catabolic imbalance, insulin resistance, and other andrological health consequences. Age-related differences in the hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular/adrenal response to sleep restriction could expose older individuals to greater or lesser risk. We aimed to evaluate and compare the 24-h and time-of-day effect of sleep restriction on F, luteinizing hormone (LH), and Te in young and older men. METHODS: Thirty-five healthy men, aged 18-30 (n = 17) and 60-80 (n =18) years, underwent overnight sleep deprivation (complete nighttime wakefulness) or nighttime sleep (10 pm to 6 am) with concurrent 10-min blood sampling in a prospectively randomized crossover study. F, LH, and Te secretion were calculated by deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: Sleep deprivation had multiple effects on 24-h Te secretion with significant reductions in mean concentrations, basal, total and pulsatile secretion, and pulse frequency (each p < 0.05), in the absence of detectable changes in LH. These effects were most apparent in older men and differed according to age for some parameters: pulsatile Te secretion (p = 0.03) and Te pulse frequency (p = 0.02). Time-of-day analyses revealed that sleep restriction significantly reduced Te in the morning and afternoon, reduced LH in the morning in both age groups, and increased F in the afternoon in older men. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a time-of-day dependent uncoupling of the regulatory control of the testicular axis and of F secretion. Future studies will need to directly verify these regulatory possibilities specifically and separately in young and older men. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.

Effect of Antidepressant Switching vs Augmentation on Remission Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Antidepressant Treatment: The VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Less than one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) achieve remission with their first antidepressant. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of 3 common alternate treatments for MDD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From December 2012 to May 2015, 1522 patients at 35 US Veterans Health Administration medical centers who were diagnosed with nonpsychotic MDD, unresponsive to at least 1 antidepressant course meeting minimal standards for treatment dose and duration, participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatments and evaluated for up to 36 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Switch to a different antidepressant, bupropion (switch group, n = 511); augment current treatment with bupropion (augment-bupropion group, n = 506); or augment with an atypical antipsychotic, aripiprazole (augment-aripiprazole group, n = 505) for 12 weeks (acute treatment phase) and up to 36 weeks for longer-term follow-up (continuation phase). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was remission during the acute treatment phase (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated [QIDS-C16] score ≤5 at 2 consecutive visits). Secondary outcomes included response (≥50% reduction in QIDS-C16 score or improvement on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale), relapse, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Among 1522 randomized patients (mean age, 54.4 years; men, 1296 [85.2%]), 1137 (74.7%) completed the acute treatment phase. Remission rates at 12 weeks were 22.3% (n = 114) for the switch group, 26.9% (n = 136)for the augment-bupropion group, and 28.9% (n = 146) for the augment-aripiprazole group. The augment-aripiprazole group exceeded the switch group in remission (relative risk [RR], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.05-1.60]; P = .02), but other remission comparisons were not significant. Response was greater for the augment-aripiprazole group (74.3%) than for either the switch group (62.4%; RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29]) or the augment-bupropion group (65.6%; RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]). No significant treatment differences were observed for relapse. Anxiety was more frequent in the 2 bupropion groups (24.3% in the switch group [n = 124] vs 16.6% in the augment-aripiprazole group [n = 84]; and 22.5% in augment-bupropion group [n = 114]). Adverse effects more frequent in the augment-aripiprazole group included somnolence, akathisia, and weight gain. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among a predominantly male population with major depressive disorder unresponsive to antidepressant treatment, augmentation with aripiprazole resulted in a statistically significant but only modestly increased likelihood of remission during 12 weeks of treatment compared with switching to bupropion monotherapy. Given the small effect size and adverse effects associated with aripiprazole, further analysis including cost-effectiveness is needed to understand the net utility of this approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01421342.

Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis after a single epidural triamcinolone injection.

PURPOSE: To quantify adrenocorticotropin and cortisol secretion after epidural glucocorticoid injection. METHODS: Eight men (ages 25-63 year) were studied at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 weeks after triamcinolone (80 mg) injection epidurally. Adrenocorticotropin (pg/mL) and cortisol (µg/dL) were measured every 10 min for 4 h, and after Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) (1 µg/kg) injection. RESULTS: Epidural triamcinolone markedly suppressed: (1) pre-CRH injection ACTH (from 18 ± 3.1 to 4.8 ± 0.4: P < 0.01) and cortisol (from 12.2 ± 1.6 to 1.6 ± 0.3: P < 0.0001) at week 1, with recovery at 4 weeks, and (2) CRH-stimulated 3-h summed ACTH (from 633 ± 116 to 129 ± 10 pg/mL, P < 0.0001), and 3-h summed cortisol at week 1 (from 385 ± 29 to 56 ± 22 µg/dL, P < 0.0001) and 4 weeks (284 ± 53; P < 0.01). Serum cortisol was <18 µg/dL in eight of eight men at 4 weeks, and six of eight men at week 12. Urinary-free cortisol (µg/24 h) remained low at week 12: baseline (60 ± 6.5); week 1 (9.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.01); week 4 (36 ± 8.6) and week 12 (38 ± 4.1). Urinary cortisol/cortisone ratios rose at week 4 only. Serum triamcinolone peaked at week 1 (16/16 samples), declining at week 4 (13/16 samples) and week 12 (6/16 samples). LIMITATIONS: Relatively small group. CONCLUSION: Epidural triamcinolone suppresses unstimulated and CRH-stimulated ACTH and cortisol secretion for 1-4 weeks but urinary free cortisol ≥12 weeks. Suppression of ACTH and cortisol after glucocorticoid treatment is thus complex.

Characteristics of U.S. Veteran Patients with Major Depressive Disorder who require "next-step" treatments: A VAST-D report.

OBJECTIVE: Finding effective and lasting treatments for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) that fail to respond optimally to initial standard treatment is a critical public health imperative. Understanding the nature and characteristics of patients prior to initiating "next-step" treatment is an important component of identifying which specific treatments are best suited for individual patients. We describe clinical features and demographic characteristics of a sample of Veterans who enrolled in a "next-step" clinical trial after failing to achieve an optimal outcome from at least one well-delivered antidepressant trial. METHODS: 1522 Veteran outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD completed assessments prior to being randomized to study treatment. Data is summarized and presented in terms of demographic, social, historical and clinical features and compared to a similar, non-Veteran sample. RESULTS: Participants were largely male and white, with about half unmarried and half unemployed. They were moderately severely depressed, with about one-third reporting recent suicidal ideation. More than half had chronic and/or recurrent depression. General medical and psychiatric comorbidities were highly prevalent, particularly PTSD. Many had histories of childhood adversity and bereavement. Participants were impaired in multiple domains of their lives and had negative self-worth. LIMITATIONS: These results may not be generalizable to females, and some characteristics may be specific to Veterans of US military service. There was insufficient data on age of clinical onset and depression subtypes, and three novel measures were not psychometrically validated. CONCLUSIONS: Characterizing VAST-D participants provides important information to help clinicians understand features that may optimize "next-step" MDD treatments.

Impaired adrenergic- and corticotropic-axis outflow during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Exercise stimulates coordinated release of the sympathoadrenal hormones adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (Epi). The study hypothesis was that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is marked by heightened sympathoadrenal outflow at comparable relative workloads. The location of the study was at a clinical research unit. Eight healthy men and 9 men with stable COPD (forced expiratory volume at 1 second <75% predicted) were studied. Volunteers rested (baseline) or exercised at individual submaximal (35% ± 5%) or maximal oxygen consumption. Blood was sampled every 2 minutes for 40 minutes concurrently. Two-way analysis of covariance was applied to examine group (healthy/COPD) and exercise (3 levels) effects on ACTH, cortisol, NE, and Epi release and regularity (estimable by approximate entropy). The timing of peak hormone concentrations was Epi, 14 minutes; NE, 16 minutes; ACTH, 22 minutes; and cortisol, 34 minutes in both cohorts. Type of exercise regimen influenced all 4 hormones (each P < .001), and subject group (control vs COPD) affected cortisol (P < .001) and Epi (P = .048) responses. Exercise regimen and group together controlled ACTH, cortisol, and Epi (each P < .001), but not NE, responses. In particular, endocrine responses were attenuated in COPD compared with control subjects. Approximate entropy analysis also identified loss of maximal exercise-induced ACTH-secretory regularity in COPD patients (P = .042). These outcomes demonstrate impaired rather than augmented exercise-associated sympathocorticotropic-axis outflow in patients with COPD even when outcomes are normalized to maximal oxygen consumption, suggesting that factors other than fitness are at work.

Age in men does not determine gonadotropin-releasing hormone's dose-dependent stimulation of luteinizing hormone secretion under an exogenous testosterone clamp.

BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with a decline in incremental LH pulse amplitude, which could be due to decreased GnRH secretion or impaired GnRH action. HYPOTHESIS: Inconsistent published studies of GnRH action in older men may be due to disparate sex-steroid milieus. FACILITY: This study was conducted at a clinical translational-research unit. SUBJECTS: We studied 16 healthy men (8 young men and 8 older men). METHODS: An overnight transdermal testosterone (T) clamp was implemented before randomly ordered injections of 0, 2.5, 10, 25, 250, and 750 ng GnRH on separate days (96 study sessions). OUTCOMES: LH responses were quantified by variable-waveform deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: The T clamp maintained age-invariant mean concentrations of total, bioavailable, and free T, SHBG, LH, FSH, and prolactin. By two-way analysis of covariance, GnRH dose (P < 0.001) but not age (0.15 < or = P < or = 0.83) determined mean, peak, incremental, and pulsatile LH responses. Statistical power (median) was 95, 98, 90, and 99% to detect a 30% or greater age contrast at P < or = 0.05 in mean, peak, incremental, and pulsatile LH responses, and greater than 99% to detect a 30% or greater age contrast in bioavailable or total T concentrations. Higher GnRH doses (P < 0.001) abbreviated LH secretory bursts in both age groups. CONCLUSION: In the face of eugonadal concentrations of total, bioavailable, and free T, young and older men exhibit remarkably similar LH responses to a 300-fold dose range of exogenous GnRH. Accordingly, previously reported disparate effects of age on GnRH action may reflect in part age-discrepant sex-steroid milieus.

Secretagogue type, sex-steroid milieu, and abdominal visceral adiposity individually determine secretagogue-stimulated cortisol secretion.

DESIGN: While androgens and estrogens control glucocorticoid secretion in animal models, how the sex-steroid milieu determines cortisol secretion in humans is less clear. To address this issue, cortisol was measured in archival sera obtained at 10-min intervals for 5 h in 42 healthy men administered double placebo, placebo and testosterone, testosterone and dutasteride (to block 5alpha-reductases type I and type II), or testosterone and anastrozole (to block aromatase) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospectively randomized design. METHODS: Subjects received i.v. injection of saline, GHRH, GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2), somatostatin (SS), and GHRP-2/GHRH/l-arginine (triple stimulus) each on separate mornings fasting. Outcomes comprised cortisol concentrations, pulsatile cortisol secretion, and relationships with age or abdominal visceral fat (AVF). RESULTS: By ANCOVA, baseline (saline-infused) cortisol concentrations (nmol/l) did not differ among the sex-steroid milieus (overall mean 364+/-14). In contrast, stimulated peak cortisol concentrations were strongly determined by secretagogue type (P<0.001) as follows: triple stimulus (868+/-27)>GHRP-2 (616+/-42)>saline=SS=GHRH (grand mean 420+/-21). After GHRP-2 injection, pulsatile cortisol secretion increased with age (R(2)=0.16, P=0.012). After the triple stimulus, pulsatile cortisol secretion correlated i) inversely with serum 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentrations (R(2)=0.53, P=0.026) and ii) directly with computerized tomography-estimated AVF (R(2)=0.11, P=0.038). CONCLUSION: Age, DHT concentrations, AVF, and secretagogue type influence pulsatile cortisol secretion at least in men. Further studies should be performed to assess ACTH secretion and native ghrelin action in defined sex-steroid milieus.

A noninvasive measure of negative-feedback strength, approximate entropy, unmasks strong diurnal variations in the regularity of LH secretion.

The secretion of anterior-pituitary hormones is subject to negative feedback. Whether negative feedback evolves dynamically over 24 h is not known. Conventional experimental paradigms to test this concept may induce artifacts due to nonphysiological feedback. These limitations might be overcome by a noninvasive methodology to quantify negative feedback continuously over 24 h without disrupting the axis. The present study exploits a recently validated model-free regularity statistic, approximate entropy (ApEn), which monitors feedback changes with high sensitivity and specificity (both >90%; Pincus SM, Hartman ML, Roelfsema F, Thorner MO, Veldhuis JD. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 273: E948-E957, 1999). A time-incremented moving window of ApEn was applied to LH time series obtained by intensive (10-min) blood sampling for four consecutive days (577 successive measurements) in each of eight healthy men. Analyses unveiled marked 24-h variations in ApEn with daily maxima (lowest feedback) at 1100 +/- 1.7 h (mean +/- SE) and minima (highest feedback) at 0430 +/- 1.9 h. The mean difference between maximal and minimal 24-h LH ApEn was 0.348 +/- 0.018, which differed by P < 0.001 from all three of randomly shuffled versions of the same LH time series, simulated pulsatile data and assay noise. Analyses artificially limited to 24-h rather than 96-h data yielded reproducibility coefficients of 3.7-9.0% for ApEn maxima and minima. In conclusion, a feedback-sensitive regularity statistic unmasks strong and consistent 24-h rhythmicity of the orderliness of unperturbed pituitary-hormone secretion. These outcomes suggest that ApEn may have general utility in probing dynamic mechanisms mediating feedback in other endocrine systems.

Putative somatostatin suppression potentiates adrenocorticotropin secretion driven by ghrelin and human corticotropin-releasing hormone.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide, and CRH is a 41-amino-acid peptide, both of which stimulate ACTH secretion. In principle, actions of these agonists could be subject to inhibitory modulation by hypothalamic somatostatin (SS). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that endogenous SS restrains ghrelin and CRH-stimulated ACTH secretion, thereby linking all three, ghrelin, CRH, and SS, with ACTH secretion. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover interventional study at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy postmenopausal women participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included iv injection of saline, ghrelin, human CRH, or both after an infusion of saline vs. l-arginine to putatively inhibit SS outflow (eight visits per subject). OUTCOME MEASURES: ACTH concentrations quantified by repetitive blood sampling and immunochemiluminometry. RESULTS: Infusion of ghrelin induced peak ACTH concentrations [median (range)] of 21 (17-28) compared with 16 (11-20) ng/liter after saline (P = 0.037). CRH and l-arginine infusion evoked ACTH peaks of 23 (14-48) and 31 (21-286) ng/liter, respectively (P = 0.037 and P = 0.005 vs. saline). l-Arginine enhanced stimulation by ghrelin by 1.43-fold (P = 0.028) and that by CRH by 1.91-fold (P = 0.005). Triple stimulation with ghrelin, CRH, and l-arginine potentiated the effect of combined ghrelin/CRH by 1.45-fold (P = 0.028). Downstream cortisol responses mimicked those of ACTH but were time delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The present outcomes indicate that the peptide ensemble comprising ghrelin, CRH, and SS (inferred by l-arginine infusion) can regulate ACTH and cortisol secretion in healthy adults.

Estradiol potentiates ghrelin-stimulated pulsatile growth hormone secretion in postmenopausal women.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin and an estrogen-rich milieu individually amplify pulsatile GH secretion by increasing the amount of hormone released per burst. However, how these distinct agonists interact in controlling pulsatile GH output is not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that elevated estradiol (E(2)) concentrations potentiate hypothalamo-pituitary responses to a near-physiological ghrelin stimulus. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospectively randomized, parallel-cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one postmenopausal women participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Eleven subjects received placebo (Pl) and 10 others E(2) transdermally in escalating doses over 3 wk to mimic late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Saline or a submaximally stimulatory amount of ghrelin (0.3 microg/kg) was infused iv on separate randomly ordered mornings fasting after 17-21 d of Pl or E(2) administration. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included serum concentrations of E(2), ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3, and the estimated mass and waveform of stimulated GH secretory bursts. RESULTS: Administration of E(2) yielded late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Compared with Pl, E(2) did not alter ghrelin concentrations but reduced IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and elevated IGFBP-1 concentrations. Compared with saline, ghrelin infusion amplified pulsatile GH secretion by 7.1-fold (P < 0.01). The effect of E(2) alone was 2.0-fold placebo and that of combined ghrelin/E(2) 10.4-fold (P < 0.01). Ghrelin and E(2) accelerated initial GH release individually but nonadditively by more than 2-fold (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen augments ghrelin's near-physiological stimulation of pulsatile GH secretion and mimics ghrelin's acceleration of initial GH release. Thus, we hypothesize that estrogen and a GH secretagogue act via independent as well as convergent mechanisms.

An ensemble model of the male gonadal axis: illustrative application in aging men.

Testosterone (Te) production declines in the aging male, albeit for unknown reasons. Plausible mechanisms include reduced secretion of GnRH, less feedforward by LH, and/or altered feedback by systemic Te. The present study tests all three postulates in a cohort of 10 young (20-35 yr old) and eight older (50-72 yr old) men. The experimental paradigm comprised graded blockade of the GnRH receptor to create four distinct strata of LH and Te pulsatility in each subject. A novel analytical formalism was developed to reconstruct implicit dose-response functions linking 1) virtual GnRH outflow positively to LH secretion, 2) LH pulses positively to Te secretion, and 3) Te concentrations negatively to the size and number of LH secretory bursts. Validation was by direct pituitary sampling in the horse and sheep. Statistical comparisons disclosed that age decreased the efficacy of each of 1) virtual GnRH outflow (P < 0.01), 2) LH drive of Te secretion (P < 0.01), and 3) total, bioavailable and free Te feedback on GnRH-driven LH secretion (P = 0.015). In contrast, age increased the potency of virtual GnRH feedforward (P = 0.013) and did not affect Te's inhibition of LH pulse frequency. Unexplained variance was less than 10%. Robustness was shown by resampling techniques. Accordingly, competitive silencing of one locus of control and ensemble-based analyses identified triple regulatory deficits in the aging male gonadal axis. The generality of the present integrative model suggests utility in parsing interlinked adaptations in other physiological networks.

Ghrelin potentiates growth hormone secretion driven by putative somatostatin withdrawal and resists inhibition by human corticotropin-releasing hormone.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid, Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide that stimulates GH secretion in vivo and in vitro. Beyond the capability of ghrelin to synergize with GHRH, little is known about multipeptide modulation of ghrelin's actions in humans. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ghrelin can stimulate GH secretion in the absence or presence of somatostatin withdrawal (induced by l-arginine infusion) and stress-like drive by CRH. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over interventional study. SETTING: This study was performed at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine healthy postmenopausal women not receiving sex hormones were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were given an iv infusion of saline and/or l-arginine or human CRH, followed by a bolus iv injection of ghrelin. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were pulsatile GH secretion quantified by repetitive blood sampling, immunochemiluminometry, and deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: Consecutive saline/ghrelin infusion increased pulsatile GH secretion from 2.7 +/- 1.0 (saline/saline; mean +/- sem) to 20 +/- 5.0 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). The magnitude of the effect of l-arginine/saline was comparable at 20 +/- 4.5 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). In contrast, sequential l-arginine/ghrelin evoked true synergy of GH release (93 +/- 14 microg/liter.3 h; P = 0.003 vs. l-arginine alone and P = 0.008 vs. ghrelin alone). Human CRH did not affect GH responses to saline/saline (3.9 +/- 1.1 microg/liter.3 h), saline/ghrelin (19 +/- 3.3 microg/liter.3 h), l-arginine/saline (16 +/- 2.7 microg/liter.3 h), or l-arginine/ghrelin (90 +/- 13 microg/liter.3 h). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that l-arginine reduces somatostatin outflow, we infer that ghrelin can activate hypothalamo-pituitary pathways that are both dependent upon and independent of somatostatinergic restraint even in the face of a strong stress-related signal.

Aging attenuates both the regularity and joint synchrony of LH and testosterone secretion in normal men: analyses via a model of graded GnRH receptor blockade.

Testosterone (T) secretion declines in the aging male, albeit for unknown reasons. From an ensemble perspective, repeated incremental signaling among gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and T is required to maintain physiological androgen availability. Pattern-regularity statistics, such as univariate approximate entropy (ApEn) and bivariate cross-ApEn, provide specific and sensitive model-free measurement of altered multi-pathway control. The present study exploits partial muting of one pathway (GnRH drive) to appraise adaptive regulation of LH and T secretion in young and aging individuals. Analyses comprised 100 paired 18-h LH and T concentration time series obtained in 25 healthy men ages 20-72 yr each administered placebo and three graded doses of a specific GnRH-receptor antagonist. Graded blockade of GnRH drive increased the individual regularity of LH and T secretion and the synchrony of LH-T feedforward and T-LH feedback in the cohort as a whole (P<0.001 for each). However, age markedly attenuated ganirelix-induced enhancement of univariate T orderliness and bivariate LH-T feedback and T-LH feedback synchrony (P

Aging in healthy men impairs recombinant human luteinizing hormone (LH)-stimulated testosterone secretion monitored under a two-day intravenous pulsatile LH clamp.

CONTEXT: Testosterone (Te) depletion in aging men in principle could reflect deficits in the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, or testis. Available pharmacological studies of possible failure of Leydig cell steroidogenesis remain inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess Te secretion in older and young men in response to near physiological LH stimulation. INTERVENTION: Pulsatile i.v. infusion of recombinant human LH was administered for 2 d to stimulate Te secretion during suppression of endogenous LH concentrations with a potent selective GnRH receptor antagonist (ganirelix). SUBJECTS/CONTEXT: Healthy older (aged 60-73 yr, n = 8) and young (19-30 yr, n = 13) men were studied in an academic setting. MEASURES: Pulsatile LH and Te concentrations on the second day of exogenous LH stimulation were measured. RESULTS: Serum ganirelix concentrations and infused LH pulse increments were similar by age. In contrast, older subjects manifested: 1) reduced mean Te concentrations (P = 0.016), Te peak heights (P = 0.014), increments (P = 0.010), summed areas (P < 0.013), and interpeak Te concentrations (P = 0.023); 2) decreased Te to LH concentration ratios (P = 0.002); 3) diminished LH-Te feed-forward synchrony (P = 0.020); and 4) a blunted amplitude (P = 0.036) and advanced phase (P = 0.013) of diurnal Te rhythms. CONCLUSION: A novel regimen of pulsatile LH stimulation for 48 h during GnRH receptor blockade unmasks deficits in pulsatile, basal, synchronous, and nyctohemeral Te secretion in healthy older men. These findings do not exclude concomitant defects in GnRH outflow and/or Te-negative feedback in the aging male.

Age-specific changes in the regulation of LH-dependent testosterone secretion: assessing responsiveness to varying endogenous gonadotropin output in normal men.

Pulsatile and thus total testosterone (Te) secretion declines in older men, albeit for unknown reasons. Analytical models forecast that aging may reduce the capability of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses to stimulate Leydig cell steroidogenesis. This notion has been difficult to test experimentally. The present study used graded doses of a selective gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist to yield four distinct strata of pulsatile LH release in each of 18 healthy men ages 23-72 yr. Deconvolution analysis was applied to frequently sampled LH and Te concentration time series to quantitate pulsatile Te secretion over a 16-h interval. Log-linear regression was used to relate pulsatile LH secretion to attendant pulsatile Te secretion (LH-Te drive) across the four stepwise interventions in each subject. Linear regression of the 18 individual estimates of LH-Te feedforward dose-response slopes on age disclosed a strongly negative relationship (r = -0.721, P < 0.001). Accordingly, the present data support the thesis that aging in healthy men attenuates amplitude-dependent LH drive of burst-like Te secretion. The experimental strategy of graded suppression of neuroglandular outflow may have utility in estimating dose-response adaptations in other endocrine systems.

Combined inhibition of types I and II 5 alpha-reductase selectively augments the basal (nonpulsatile) mode of testosterone secretion in young men.

CONTEXT: Testosterone (Te) is metabolized in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, where untransformed steroid and activated products participate in feedback regulation of GnRH and LH secretion. Genetic inactivation of 5 alpha-reductase type I remains undescribed clinically, whereas deficiency of the type II isoenzyme elevates both LH and Te concentrations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the combined feedback contribution of 5 alpha-reduced steroids. SETTING/DESIGN/INTERVENTION: In a university setting, nine young men received placebo and a dual (type I/type II) 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride. METHODS/OUTCOMES: LH and Te dynamics were assessed by: 1) 10-min blood sampling for 26 h; 2) GnRH stimulation (100 ng/kg iv); 3) discrete peak detection; 4) deconvolution analysis; 5) cosinor analyses of 24-h rhythmicity; and 6) pattern regularity. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, dutasteride lowered 5 alpha-dihydro Te concentrations by 80% (P = 0.009), but did not alter any measure of LH dynamics. Conversely, dutasteride augmented: 1) total, bioavailable and free Te concentrations (0.002 < P < 0.032) without changing estradiol or SHBG concentrations; 2) nadir Te concentrations (P = 0.025); and 3) basal (P = 0.013) and thereby total (basal plus pulsatile) (P = 0.003) Te secretion. CONCLUSION: Combined antagonism of types I and II 5 alpha-reductase preferentially drives nonpulsatile Te secretion in healthy men. The concomitant stability of LH outflow could indicate that intragonadal 5 alpha-reduced androgens repress basal Leydig-cell steroidogenesis.

Graded inhibition of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion by a selective gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist in healthy men: evidence that age attenuates hypothalamic GnRH outflow.

Healthy older men manifest concomitant hypoandrogenemia and attenuation of LH pulse size. Because exogenous GnRH remains effective, a plausible intuition is that aging reduces hypothalamic GnRH secretion, thus mediating relative hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. To assess the impact of age on central GnRH outflow indirectly, we quantitated graded suppression of pulsatile LH secretion by saline and escalating doses of a potent and selective GnRH-receptor antagonist, ganirelix, in 18 healthy men ages 23-72 yr. The rationale is that ganirelix should reduce the amplitude of LH pulses in proportion to both drug concentration and endogenous GnRH feedforward. To this end, blood was sampled every 10 min for 2 h before and 16 h after sc administration of saline or ganirelix and for 3 additional hours after iv injection of a fixed dose of GnRH (100 ng/kg); concentrations of LH and ganirelix were measured by immunochemiluminometry and RIA, respectively; and pulsatile LH secretion was quantitated by a deconvolution procedure. Log-linear regression analysis was used to estimate the sensitivity of pulsatile LH secretion to inhibition by a unit increase in serum ganirelix concentrations in each subject. Statistical analyses revealed that increasing age markedly attenuated the capability of ganirelix to decrease LH pulse size (viz., r = -0.648; P = 0.004). In contrast, age did not modify the competitive interaction between injected GnRH and ganirelix. These joint outcomes support the clinical hypothesis that age diminishes hypothalamic GnRH outflow without impairing GnRH action in healthy men.