Loss of p16 Immunoexpression and Deletions of CDKN2A in the Progression of Extramammary Paget Disease: An Immunohistochemical and Genetic Study of 24 Invasive/Metastatic Cases.

ABSTRACT: Information regarding the genetic alterations in extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is scarce. This study investigated the significance of CDKN2A and MTAP alterations in EMPD progression using immunohistochemistry and panel DNA sequencing. In total, 24 invasive/metastatic EMPD cases were included in this study. The immunoexpression of p16 and MTAP in the primary in situ, primary invasive, and metastatic tumor components was evaluated. Panel DNA sequencing was performed for metastatic tumor components in 5 of the 24 cases. Immunoexpression of p16 in the in situ tumor component was at least partially preserved in all 19 tested cases (100%). By contrast, the invasive tumor component was diffusely or partially lost in 18 (81.8%) of 22 tested cases. Regarding the foci of lymph node metastasis, 13 (81.2%) of the 16 patients showed a significant loss of p16 expression. Loss of MTAP immunoexpression was observed less frequently compared with the loss of p16 expression. CDKN2A homozygous deletions were confirmed in all 5 tested cases by sequencing, whereas MTAP deletions were detected in only 2 cases. In conclusion, p16 expression loss and CDKN2A deletions can be frequently seen in invasive/metastatic cases of EMPD.

Safety and effectiveness of avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma in general clinical practice in Japan: Post-marketing surveillance.

Avelumab, a programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking antibody, was approved for its first indication in Japan in September 2017 to treat unresectable Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Given that the pivotal JAVELIN Merkel 200 study only included a few Japanese patients, this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) evaluated the safety and effectiveness outcomes of patients with MCC who received avelumab in general clinical practice in Japan. This prospective, non-comparative, multicenter PMS included data from all patients with unresectable MCC who received avelumab between November 22, 2017 (avelumab launch date) and October 31, 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate avelumab safety (i.e., adverse events [AEs], adverse drug reactions [ADRs], and ADRs of safety specifications). The secondary objective was to evaluate avelumab effectiveness (i.e., objective response rate and overall survival [OS] rate). Seventy-five evaluable patients were included, of whom 81.3% experienced AEs of any grade (57.3% experienced AEs of grade ≥ 3; 41.3% experienced AEs of grade 5) and 61.3% experienced ADRs (14.7% experienced ADRs of grade ≥ 3; no grade 5 ADRs were observed). The most common ADRs were pyrexia (18.7%), infusion related reaction (10.7%), and chills (6.7%). The most common ADRs of safety specifications were infusion reactions (any grade: n = 21 [28.0%]; grade 3 or 4: n = 3 [4.0%]), thyroid dysfunction (n = 7 [9.3%]), and hepatic function disorders (n = 4 [5.3%]). The median observation period was 51 weeks. An objective response was achieved by 34/75 patients (45.3%; complete response, 24.0%; partial response, 21.3%) and 6- and 12-month OS rates were 77.7% and 59.6%, respectively. This PMS confirmed the clinical tolerability and effectiveness of avelumab in patients with MCC, with no new safety concerns. The risk-benefit profile of avelumab was comparable with that observed in clinical trials and remains favorable for use in general clinical practice in Japan.

Efficacy of salvage therapies for advanced acral melanoma after anti-PD-1 monotherapy failure: a multicenter retrospective study of 108 Japanese patients.

Background: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy is one of the standard systemic therapies for advanced melanoma; however, the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies after PD-1 monotherapy failure (PD-1 MF), particularly in acral melanoma (AM), the main clinical melanoma type in Japanese patients, is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies in Japanese patients with AM after PD-1 MF. Patients and methods: The study included 108 patients with advanced AM (palm and sole, 72; nail apparatus, 36) who underwent salvage systemic therapy at 24 Japanese institutions. We mainly assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six (33%) patients received ipilimumab, 23 (21%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), 10 (9%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 4 (4%) received BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), and the remaining 35 (32%) continued with PD-1 monotherapy after disease progression. The ORRs in the ipilimumab, nivo/ipi, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and BRAFi/MEKi groups were 8, 17, 0, and 100%, respectively. The nivo/ipi group showed the longest OS (median, 18.9 months); however, differences in ORR, PFS, and OS between the groups were insignificant. The OS in the nivo/ipi group was higher in the palm and sole groups than in the nail apparatus group (median: not reached vs. 8.7 months, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that nail apparatus melanoma independently predicted unfavorable PFS and OS (p = 0.006 and 0.001). The total OS (from PD-1 monotherapy initiation to death/last follow-up) was insignificant between the groups. Conclusion: Nivo/ipi was not more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy and ipilimumab after PD-1 MF in patients with advanced AM. The prognosis after PD-1 MF would be poorer for nail apparatus melanoma than for palm and sole melanoma.

Systemic therapy for Asian patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma in a real-world setting: A multi-center retrospective study in Japan (B-CHECK-RWD study).

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy is considered a preferred first-line treatment for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, a recent international multi-center study suggested that the efficacy of immunotherapy is poorer in Asian patients in the non-acral cutaneous subtype. We hypothesized that the optimal first-line treatment for Asian patients may be different. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of Asian patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Anti-PD-1), and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (PD-1/CTLA-4) between 2016 and 2021 from 28 institutions in Japan. RESULTS: We identified 336 patients treated with BRAF/MEKi (n = 236), Anti-PD-1 (n = 64) and PD-1/CTLA-4 (n = 36). The median follow-up duration was 19.9 months for all patients and 28.6 months for the 184 pa tients who were alive at their last follow-up. For patients treated with BRAF/MEKi, anti-PD-1, PD-1/CTLA-4, the median ages at baseline were 62, 62, and 53 years (p = 0.03); objective response rates were 69%, 27%, and 28% (p < 0.001); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.7, 5.4, and 5.8 months (p = 0.003), and median overall survival (OS) was 34.6, 37.0 months, and not reached, respectively (p = 0.535). In multivariable analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS of Anti-PD-1 and PD-1/CTLA-4 compared with BRAF/MEKi were 2.30 (p < 0.001) and 1.38 (p = 0.147), and for OS, HRs were 1.37 (p = 0.111) and 0.56 (p = 0.075), respectively. In propensity-score matching, BRAF/MEKi showed a tendency for longer PFS and equivalent OS with PD-1/CTLA-4 (HRs for PD-1/CTLA-4 were 1.78 [p = 0.149]) and 1.03 [p = 0.953], respectively). For patients who received second-line treatment, BRAF/MEKi followed by PD-1/CTLA-4 showed poor survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of PD-1/CTLA-4 over BRAF/MEKi appears modest in Asian patients. First-line BRAF/MEKi remains feasible, but it is difficult to salvage at progression. Ethnicity should be considered when selecting systemic therapies until personalized biomarkers are available in daily practice. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment sequence for Asian patients.

Clinicopathologic and genetic characterization of invasive melanoma with BRAF V600K mutation: A study of 16 cases.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathologic and genetic features of cutaneous melanoma with a BRAF V600K mutation are not well-known. We aimed to evaluate these characteristics in comparison with those associated with BRAF V600E. METHODS: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or the MassARRAY® system were used to detect BRAF V600K in 16 invasive melanomas and confirm BRAF V600E in another 60 cases. Immunohistochemistry and panel next-generation sequencing were used to evaluate protein expression and tumor mutation burden, respectively. RESULTS: The median age of melanoma patients harboring the BRAF V600K mutation (72.5 years) was higher than those with the BRAF V600E (58.5 years). The two groups also differed in sex (13/16 [81.3%] male in the V600K group vs. 23/60 [38.3%] in V600E) and in the frequency of scalp involvement (8/16 [50.0%] in V600K vs. 1/60 [1.6%] in V600E). The clinical appearance was similar to a superficial spreading melanoma. Histopathologically, non-nested lentiginous intraepidermal spread and subtle solar elastosis were observed. One patient (1/13, 7.7%) had a pre-existing intradermal nevus. Diffuse PRAME immunoexpression was seen in only one (14.3%) of seven tested cases. Loss of p16 expression was observed in all 12 cases (100%) analyzed. The tumor mutation burden was 8 and 6 mutations/Mb in the two tested cases. CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma carrying the BRAF V600K mutation showed the predominance on the scalp of elderly men, lentiginous intraepidermal growth, subtle solar elastosis, possible existence of intradermal nevus component, frequent loss of p16 immunoexpression, limited immunoreactivity for PRAME, and intermediate tumor mutation burden.

Analyzing the relationship between the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors and cumulative sun damage in Japanese patients with advanced BRAF wild-type nonacral cutaneous melanoma: A retrospective real-world, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (PD1) or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (PD1 +CTLA4) for melanoma is affected by its clinical subtype. The amount of tumor mutation burden (TMB) caused by cumulative sun damage (CSD) is occasionally used to explain this; however, their relationship in Japanese nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM) is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the ICI efficacy and its relationship with CSD of the primary lesion in Japanese patients with NACM. METHODS: Japanese patients with advanced BRAF wild-type NACM who received first-line ICIs were recruited. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and the degree of solar elastosis (SE) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients (PD1 group 113 and PD1 +CTLA4 group 33) were included. No significant differences in ORR were observed between the PD1 and PD1 +CTLA4 groups (35 % vs. 36 %; P = 0.67) or PFS and OS (median PFS 6.1 months vs. 8.5 months; P = 0.46, median OS 28.1 months vs. not reached; P = 0.59). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that PD1 +CTLA4 did not prolong the PFS and OS. The SE score had no effect on either PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: ICI efficacy was not as high as those reported in Western countries, and PD1 +CTLA4 did not present better clinical efficacy compared to PD1. Indicators of CSD did not serve as a predictor for clinical advantage. These findings may partially support the theory that ICI efficacy is affected by CSD; however, other unrecognized factors may also exist.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in treating immune-related hepatitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor use: A retrospective study.

Background and Aim: To investigate the outcomes in eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-induced severe immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis) and the efficacy and safety of MMF. Methods: We retrospectively examined patient background, treatment course, as well as examination and imaging data using electronic medical records. Results: The ratio of male to female patients was 7:1, and the median age was 60 years (27-72 years). There were five and two cases of kidney cancer and malignant melanoma, respectively, and one case of lung cancer. The median number of days until MMF administration in addition to systemic corticosteroid therapy after the onset of ir-hepatitis was 14.5 (2-42). The patients were categorized as four "good responders" who showed an improvement in the liver function tests following MMF treatment and four "poor responders" who did not. Furthermore, the time from the onset of ir-hepatitis to initial MMF administration was significantly shorter in good responders (median 3 days, range 2-15 days) than in poor responders (median 25.5 days, range 14-42 days) (P = 0.042). No significant intergroup difference was observed in other clinical factors. No serious adverse events caused by MMF were observed in any case. Conclusions: According to these findings, early recognition of corticosteroid refractoriness and the use of MMF may be beneficial in patients with ir-hepatitis.

Prevalence and characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocardial damage: A prospective observational study.

An increasing number of patients with cancer are being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, the incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis has been increasing. Nonetheless, the diagnostic criteria for the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis have not been sufficiently established. Therefore, the real-world incidence or prevalence of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocardial damage remains unknown. This was a single-center cohort study that included 100 patients admitted for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for any type of cancer. The patients underwent monthly measurement of cardiac troponin I and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with electrocardiography. Additionally, echocardiography was performed every 3 months. Our protocol was continued until 6 months after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We defined immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocardial damage as an increase in cardiac troponin I levels by >0.026 ng/mL and/or a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction by >10% to <53% on echocardiography. The mean patient age was 64 years; 71% were men. The most commonly used immune checkpoint inhibitor was nivolumab (47%), followed by pembrolizumab (29%). Overall, 5% of patients received combination therapy. Among 100 patients, 10 (10%) were diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocardial damage. Among them, five patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy. Of these patients, four were histopathologically observed to have lymphocyte infiltration in their myocardium. In conclusion, serial cardiac troponin I measurement during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment could help detect early-phase myocardial damage. The prevalence of myocardial damage was much higher than previously expected.

Efficacy comparison between anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy as first-line immunotherapy for advanced acral melanoma: A retrospective, multicenter study of 254 Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: Although anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (PD-1) is commonly used to treat advanced acral melanoma (AM), its efficacy is limited. Further, data on the efficacy of PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibody (PD-1+CTLA-4) for the treatment of AM are limited. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 and PD-1 in the treatment of Japanese patients with advanced AM. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with advanced AM who were treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 as first-line immunotherapy in 24 Japanese institutions between 2014 and 2020. Treatment efficacy focussing on the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 254 patients (palm and sole melanoma [PSM], n = 180; nail apparatus melanoma [NAM], n = 74) were included. Among the patients with PSM, the ORR (19% vs. 31%; P = 0.44), PFS (5.9 vs. 3.2 months; P = 0.74), and OS (23.1 vs. not reached; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the PD-1 and PD-1+CTLA-4 groups. Among the patients with NAM, the ORR (61% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher and PFS was longer (6.4 vs. 3.8 months; P = 0.10) in the PD-1+CTLA-4 group than in the PD-1 group. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that PD-1+CTLA-4 is an independent predictor of a favourable PFS in patients with NAM (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 is not superior to that of PD-1 for the treatment of advanced PSM. However, PD-1+CTLA-4 may be more efficacious than PD-1 for the treatment of advanced NAM.

The expression of keratan sulfate in malignant melanoma enhances the adhesion and invasion activity of melanoma cells.

Mammals express a wide variety of glycans that include N-glycans, O-glycans, proteoglycans, glycolipids, etc. Glycan expression can modulate the cellular functions, and hence is strongly involved in the onset and progression of numerous diseases. Here, we report the relevance of the ectopic expression of keratan sulfate (KS) glycan chains in human malignant melanomas. Using a human melanoma cell line, we found that the KS enhanced the invasiveness of the cells but caused no change in the growth rate of the cells. The phosphorylation of paxillin, a focal adhesion-associated adaptor protein, was strong at the region where KS was expressed in the melanoma tissues, indicating that KS stimulated the phosphorylation of paxillin. We also observed that KS enhanced the adhesion of melanoma cells and this was accompanied by a greatly increased level of phosphorylation of paxillin. These data suggest that the expression of KS contributes to the development of malignant phenotypes such as strong cell adhesion and the invasiveness of melanoma cells.

A phase I study of the safety and efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is approved for the treatment of unresectable melanoma in the USA, Europe, and Australia. This phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose de-escalation study evaluated the safety and efficacy of T-VEC in Japanese patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. Eligible adult patients had histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IVM1c cutaneous melanoma, may have received prior systemic anticancer therapy, must have had ≥1 injectable lesion, serum lactate dehydrogenase ≤1.5x upper limit of normal, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. T-VEC was injected intralesionally (first dose, ≤4.0 ml of 106  PFU/ml; after 3 weeks and then every 2 weeks thereafter, ≤4.0 ml of 108  PFU/ml). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and durable response rate (DRR). Of 18 enrolled patients (72.2% female), 16 had received ≥1 prior line of therapy. Ten patients discontinued T-VEC due to disease progression. Median (range) follow-up was 20.0 (4-37) months. No DLTs were observed; 17 (94.4%) patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Fourteen (77.8%) patients had treatment-related AEs; the most frequent were pyrexia (44.4%), malaise (16.7%), chills, decreased appetite, pruritus, and skin ulcer (11.1% each). The primary efficacy endpoint was met: 2 (11.1%) patients had a durable partial response ≥6 months. The DRR was consistent with that observed in a phase III trial of T-VEC in non-Asian patients. The safety profile was consistent with the patients' underlying disease and the known safety profile of T-VEC.

Concordance in judgment of clinical borders of basal cell carcinomas in Japanese patients: A preliminary study of JCOG2005 (J-BASE-MARGIN).

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common type of skin cancer, and surgical excision with clear margins is the standard of care. Surgical margins are determined based on risk factors (high or low risk) for recurrence according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Japanese basal cell carcinoma guidelines. The clarity of the clinical tumor border (well-defined or poorly defined) is considered a risk factor, and significant discrepancies in the judgment of clinical tumor borders among dermato-oncologists may occur. Therefore, we analyzed the dermato-oncologists' concordance in judging the clinical tumor border of basal cell carcinoma. Forty-seven dermato-oncologists (experts: 37; young trainees: 10) participated in this study. The datasets of clinical and dermoscopic photographs of 79 Japanese cases of head and neck basal cell carcinoma were used to determine the concordance in the judgment of clinical tumor border. The probability of the border that was selected more often was used to calculate the rater agreement rate for each dataset. Correct judgment was defined as a more frequently selected border, and the concordance rate of clarity of clinical tumor border for each dermato-oncologist was calculated based on the definition of the correct judgment. A median concordance rate of 85% or higher for all dermato-oncologists was predefined as an acceptable rate for clinical use. Of the 79 datasets, rater agreement rates were 80-100%, 60-79%, and 51-59% for 55, 19, and five datasets, respectively. The median concordance rate for all dermato-oncologists was 86% (interquartile range: 82-89%). There was no significant difference in the concordance rate between the experts and the trainees (median, 87% vs. 85.5%; p = 0.58). The concordance rates of dermato-oncologists for all datasets were relatively high and acceptable for clinical use.

BRAF Immunoexpression Can Be Intralesionally Heterogeneous but BRAF V600E Mutation Status Is Intralesionally Homogeneous and Interlesionally Concordant in Melanoma: A Study of 140 Lesions From 98 Patients.

ABSTRACT: This study sought to confirm the homogeneity of BRAF V600E mutation status in melanoma. BRAF immunohistochemistry was performed on 102 lesions from 60 patients of melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation and 38 negative-control melanoma lesions from 38 patients, both of which were confirmed by real-time PCR or the MassARRAY System. In the positive-control lesions, 9 lesions from 7 patients with preceding BRAF-inhibitor therapy were included. Of the 102 BRAF-mutant lesions, 101 (99.0%) showed diffuse BRAF immunoexpression, but 39 (38.2%) of them showed various heterogeneous intensities. The heterogeneous intensity of immunostaining was due to necrosis (n = 10), minimal or clear cytoplasm (n = 5), tissue crush (n = 8), insufficient fixation (n = 24), or technical error (n = 4). Only 1 lesion (1.0%) with nondiffuse immunoexpression harbored 80% weakly BRAF-positive tumor area and 20% BRAF-negative area with tissue damage. Sanger sequencing performed on the weak or negative regions in 7 lesions revealed BRAF V600E mutation in all the tested lesions. By contrast, all 38 negative-control lesions demonstrated no BRAF immunoexpression. This study demonstrated intralesional homogeneity and interlesional concordance for BRAF V600E mutation status and intralesional frequent heterogeneity for BRAF immunoexpression. The abovementioned 5 phenomena caused substantial reduction in BRAF immunostaining intensity. In 9 lesions within this study, BRAF immunoexpression and BRAF V600E point mutation status were not affected by preceding BRAF inhibitor therapy. Our data would also support the position that it does not matter whether we select primary or metastatic samples for BRAF mutation analysis.

Sweat-gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND): a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases with genetic analysis.

Low-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin (LGNECS) was proposed in 2017 as a new primary cutaneous neoplasm with neuroendocrine differentiation; however, it is not yet well known due to its rarity. Herein, we perform a detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases as well as panel DNA sequencing in three cases. The study included 12 males and 1 female with a median age of 71 (43-85) years. All lesions occurred on the ventral trunk. The mean tumor size was 2.2 (0.8-11.0) cm. The histopathology resembled that of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in other organs, but intraepidermal pagetoid spreading was seen in 8 (61.5%) cases and stromal mucin deposits in 4 (30.8%). Immunoreactivity for CK7, CK19, EMA, BerEP4, CEA, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, INSM1, GCDFP15, GATA3, ER, and bcl-2 were present in varying degrees in all tested cases. PTEN c.165-1G>A splice site mutation was detected by panel sequencing in one case, and GATA3 P409fs*99 and SETD2 R1708fs*4 in another case. Lymph node metastasis was seen significantly in cases with tumor size >2.0 cm [8/8 (100%) vs. 1/5 (20%)]. All three cases with size >3.0 cm were in unresectable advanced-stage [3/3 (100%) vs. 1/10 (10%)], and two of the three patients succumbed to the disease. The two cases of death revealed mild nuclear atypia (mitosis: 1/10 HPFs) and moderate nuclear atypia (2/10 HPFs). Thus, tumor size would be a better prognostic factor than nuclear atypia, mitotic count, and Ki67 index, unlike in NETs. These clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features would represent the characteristics as skin adnexal tumors with apocrine/eccrine differentiation rather than NETs; therefore, we rename it as sweat-gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND).

Real-world efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody or combined anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, with or without radiotherapy, in advanced mucosal melanoma patients: A retrospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a lower efficacy in mucosal melanoma (MUM) than in cutaneous melanoma. The use of combination treatments with radiotherapy (RT) to improve the efficacy in MUM, however, requires further investigation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 225 advanced MUM patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD1; 115) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (PD1+CTLA4; 42) with or without RT (56 and 12, respectively). Treatment efficacy was estimated by determining the objective response rate (ORR) and survival rate with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics between the two groups in each ICI cohort were similar, except for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in the PD1 cohort. No significant differences in ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were observed between the PD1 alone and PD1+RT groups in the PD1 cohort (ORR 26% versus 27%, P > 0.99; median PFS 6.2 versus 6.8 months, P = 0.63; median OS 19.2 versus 23.1 months, P = 0.70) or between the PD1+CTLA alone and PD1+CTLA4+RT groups in the PD1+CTLA4 cohort (ORR 28% vs 25%, P = 0.62; median PFS 5.8 versus 3.5 months, P = 0.21; median OS 31.7 versus 19.8 months, P = 0.79). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that RT in addition to PD1 or PD1+CTLA4 did not have a positive impact on the PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged survival benefit with RT in combination with ICIs was not identified for advanced MUM patients, although RT may improve local control of the tumour and relieve local symptoms.

Signet-ring cell/histiocytoid carcinoma of the axilla: a clinicopathological and genetic analysis of 11 cases, review of the literature, and comparison with potentially related tumours.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the clinicopathological and genetic characteristics of axillary signet-ring cell/histiocytoid carcinoma (SRCHC) and the relationship between axillary SRCHC, eyelid SRCHC, and conventional apocrine carcinoma (AC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven cases of axillary SRCHC, four cases of eyelid SRCHC, eight cases of axillary AC and five cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) were retrieved. Additionally, 14 axillary and 43 eyelid SRCHC cases from the literature were reviewed. Male predominance was prominent for axillary SRCHC (24:1) and eyelid SRCHC (42:5). Axillary SRCHC formed a circumscribed plaque or nodule, unlike eyelid SRCHC. Lymph node metastasis was predominantly seen in axillary SRCHC cases (72%, 18/25), but not in eyelid SRCHC cases (19%, 9/47). Axillary SRCHC and eyelid SRCHC were histopathologically similar and showed rare tubular formations. Immunoexpression of cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 19, mucin 1, mucin 5AC, BerEP4 and androgen receptor was seen in all tested cases of the four diseases. Oestrogen and progesterone receptors were negative in both types of SRCHC and AC, but were strongly positive in ILCs. Complete loss of E-cadherin expression was seen in approximately one-quarter of both types of SRCHC and in all ILCs. PIK3CA mutations were detected in all three sequenced cases (two axillary SRCHCs and one eyelid SRCHC). CONCLUSION: The histopathological, immunohistochemical and genetic findings suggest that both types of SRCHC are phenotypic variants of AC, although there are differences in sex, macroscopic findings and the frequency of lymph node metastasis among the three. In contrast, ILC differs from the other three tumour types.