Prevalence and quantity of lymph nodes at mediastinal stations in patients with lung cancer: lessons from 181 bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomies.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prevalence and quantity of lymph nodes at particular stations of the mediastinum in patients with lung cancer. These data are important to radiologists, pathologists, and thoracic surgeons because they can serve as a benchmark when assessing the completeness of lymph node dissection. However, relevant data in the literature are scarce. METHODS: Data regarding the number of lymph nodes derived from two randomised trials of bilateral mediastinal lymph node dissection, the BML-1 and BML-2 study, were included in this analysis. Detectable nodes at particular stations of the mediastinum and the number of nodes at these stations were analysed. RESULTS: The mean number of removed nodes was 28.67 (range, 4-88). Detectable lymph nodes were present at stations 2R, 4R, and 7 in 93%, 98%, and 99% of patients, respectively. Nodes were rarely present at stations 9 L (33%), and 3 (35%). The largest number of nodes was observed at stations 7 and 4R (mean, 5 nodes). CONCLUSION: The number of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer may be greater than that in healthy individuals. Lymph nodes were observed at stations 2R, 4R, and 7 in more than 90% of patients with lung cancer. The largest number of nodes was observed at stations 4R and 7. Detectable nodes were rarely observed at stations 3 and 9 L. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 86,637,908.

Can postoperative complications be reduced by the application of ERAS protocols in operated non-small cell lung cancer patients?

Background: In our study, we aimed to evaluate the length of hospital stay and complication rate of patients before and after application o f t he E nhanced R ecovery A fter S urgery ( ERAS) protocols. Methods: Between January 2001 and January 2021, a total of 845 patients (687 males, 158 females; mean age: 55±11 years; range, 19 to 89 years) who were operated with the diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: patients between 2001 and 2010 were evaluated as pre-ERAS (Group 1, n=285), patients between 2011 and 2015 as preparation for ERAS period (Group 2, n=269), and patients who had resection between 2016 and 2021 as the ERAS period (Group 3, n=291). Results: All three groups were similar in terms of clinical, surgical and demographic characteristics. Smoking history was statistically significantly less in Group 3 (p=0.005). The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec/forced vital capacity and albumin levels were statistically significantly higher in Group 3 (p<0.001 and p=0.019, respectively). The leukocyte count and tumor maximum standardized uptake value were statistically significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.018 and p=0.014, respectively). Postoperative hospitalization day, complication rate, and intensive care hospitalization rates were statistically significantly lower in Group 3 (p<0.001). The rate of additional disease was statistically significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.030). Albumin level (<2.8 g/dL), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (<1.35), and hemoglobin level (<8.3 g/dL) were found to be significant predictors of complication development. Conclusion: With the application of ERAS protocols, length of postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, and the need for intensive care hospitalization decrease. Preoperative hemoglobin level, albumin level, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio are the predictors of complication development. Increasing hemoglobin and albumin levels before operation may reduce postoperative complications.

Retrospective Evaluation of Effects of Preoperative Anaemia Treatment in Gynaecological and Obstetric Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: In anemic patients undergoing surgery, there is an increase in the requirement of blood transfusion, longer hospital stay and higher intensive care unit adimission. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of iv iron treatment before elective obstetric or gynecological operations retrospectively. METHODS: After obtaining approval of ethics committee, records of 5688 patients underwent either obstetric or gynecological surgery between January 1st of 2016 to December 31st of 2018 were documented retrospectively and 241 anemic cases were identified. Eighty-one anemic patients who did not receive any iv iron treatment preoperatively were excluded and 160 cases treated with either iv iron (either sucrose or ferric carboxy maltose) were included. The laboratory results including haemoglobin (Hb), MCV,MCH and serum iron binding capacities, ferritin, iron and transferrin levels were documented before (preoperative) and after iv iron treatment (postoperative 10th day) were collected from files. Difference between preoperative and postoperative Hb, MCV, MCH, TIBC, serum ferritin, iron and transferrin levels of these cases were determined. RESULTS: In 97 obstetric cases, the differences of Hb, MCV, MCH, serum iron, ferritin, iron binding capacity values before surgery and postoperative 10th day were respectively found as 1.3 g dL-1 (p=0.000); 1.9 fL (p=0.000); 0.3 pg (p=0.01); 44.4 µg dL-1 (p=0.008); 85.9 µg L-1 (p=0.009); 211.7 µg dL-1 (p=0.001). In 63 gynecologic cases, same measurements were evaluated and similar differences in Hb, MCV, MCH, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation values were 1.25 g dL-1 (p=0.000); 2.2 fL (p=0.000); 0.8 pg (p=0.000); 215.6 µg L-1 (p=0.002); 41.5% (p=0.044). Two obstetric patients and 7 gynaecologic patients were transfused erytrocyte suspensions after surgery. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of preoperative iv iron therapy in gynaecologic-obstetric patients with IDA has been demonstrated and its importance has been revisited once again.

A cross-sectional study in non-anaemic pregnant women in Turkey to assess necessity of iron supplementation.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anaemia in pregnancy. Guidelines recommend different threshold values for iron supplementation. AIMS: To determine trimester-specific reference ranges for haematological values (haemoglobin, hematocrit and ferritin) in healthy pregnant women who have not used any iron supplementation during pregnancy to guide future iron treatment. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 168 pregnant women aged 18-45 years, with singleton pregnancies in the first trimester, Hb ≥ 11 g/dL and ferritin ≥ 12 µg/L, and not using iron supplementation. Multiple pregnancies, pregnancies with obstetric complications and smokers were excluded from the study. Mean haemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin values, trimester-specific reference ranges and percentile values of Hb and ferritin were determined for each trimester. The normality of the variables was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. RESULTS: Mean Hb decreased significantly between trimesters from 12.6 to 11.9 and then 11.5 g/dL. In addition, Hb, hematocrit and ferritin decreased significantly from the first to the second trimester (P < 0.001 for all) but stayed comparable between the second and third trimesters (P = 0.246, P = 0.575, P = 0.408, respectively). The lower reference value for Hb was calculated as 10.67, 10.08 and 9.18 g/dL for 10-14, 20-24 and 30-34 gestational weeks respectively. CONCLUSION: This pioneer study allows us to understand that iron supplementation may not be needed as any decrease is due to physiological haemodilution. These results may prevent unnecessary iron prescription during pregnancy.