Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(4): 674-684, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: More insight into the incidence of and factors associated with progression following a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) would offer opportunities for improvements in disease management and patient counseling. METHODS: A long-term post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with AP (2008-2015) was performed. Primary endpoints were recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer. Cumulative incidence calculations and risk analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 1184 patients with a median follow-up of 9 years (IQR: 7-11) were included. RAP and CP occurred in 301 patients (25%) and 72 patients (6%), with the highest incidences observed for alcoholic pancreatitis (40% and 22%). Pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 14 patients (1%). Predictive factors for RAP were alcoholic and idiopathic pancreatitis (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.51-4.82 and OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.40-3.02), and no pancreatic interventions (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Non-biliary etiology (alcohol: OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.94-14.16, idiopathic: OR 4.57, 95% CI 2.05-10.16, and other: OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.11-7.94), RAP (OR 4.93, 95% CI 2.84-8.58), prior pancreatic interventions (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.20-8.02), smoking (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.14-4.78), and male sex (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.05) were independently associated with CP. CONCLUSION: Disease progression was observed in a quarter of pancreatitis patients. We identified several risk factors that may be helpful to devise personalized strategies with the intention to reduce the impact of disease progression in patients with AP.


Assuntos
Pancreatopatias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatite Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Doença Aguda , Progressão da Doença , Seguimentos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/complicações , Pancreatopatias/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco
2.
BJS Open ; 4(1): 3-15, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32011822

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genetic risk factors can provide insight into susceptibility for acute pancreatitis (AP) and disease progression towards (infected) necrotizing pancreatitis and persistent organ failure. The aim of the study was to undertake a systematic review of the genetic evidence for AP. METHODS: Online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched to 8 February 2018. Studies that reported on genetic associations with AP susceptibility, severity and/or complications were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed of variants that were reported by at least two data sources. Venice criteria and Bayesian false-discovery probability were applied to assess credibility. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies reporting on 181 variants in 79 genes were identified. In agreement with previous meta-analyses, credible associations were established for SPINK1 (odds ratio (OR) 2·87, 95 per cent c.i. 1·89 to 4·34), IL1B (OR 1·23, 1·06 to 1·42) and IL6 (OR 1·64, 1·15 to 2·32) and disease risk. In addition, two novel credible single-nucleotide polymorphisms were identified in Asian populations: ALDH2 (OR 0·48, 0·36 to 0·64) and IL18 (OR 1·47, 1·18 to 1·82). Associations of variants in TNF, GSTP1 and CXCL8 genes with disease severity were identified, but were of low credibility. CONCLUSION: Genetic risk factors in genes related to trypsin activation and innate immunity appear to be associated with susceptibility to and severity of AP.


ANTECEDENTES: Los factores de riesgo genético pueden contribuir a determinar la susceptibilidad para desarrollar una pancreatitis aguda (acute pancreatitis, AP) y de su progresión a pancreatitis necrotizante (infectada) e insuficiencia orgánica crónica. Nuestro objetivo fue revisar de forma sistemática la evidencia genética de la pancreatitis aguda. MÉTODOS: Se revisaron las bases de datos electrónicas (MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) hasta febrero de 2018. Se incluyeron estudios que presentaban información de las asociaciones genéticas y la susceptibilidad de AP, gravedad y/o complicaciones. Se realizó un metaanálisis de las variantes genéticas descritas en al menos dos fuentes. Se aplicaron los criterios de Venecia y la probabilidad bayesiana de falsa alarma para la valoración de la credibilidad. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 96 estudios que analizaron 181 variantes en 79 genes. De acuerdo con un metaanálisis previo, se establecieron asociaciones creibles con el riesgo de enfermedad para SPINK1 (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 2,87, i.c. del 95% 1,89-4,34), IL1B (OR 1,23, i.c. del 95% 1,06-1,42) e IL6 (OR 1,64, i.c. del 95% 1,15-2,32). Además, en poblaciones asiáticas, se identificaron dos nuevos polimorfismos de nucleótico único (SNP) creibles en ALDH2 (OR 0,48, i.c. del 95% 0,36-0,64) e IL18 (OR 1,47, i.c. del 95% 1,18-1,82). En cuanto a la gravedad de la enfermedad se identificaron variantes en los genes TNF, GSTP1 y CXCL8, pero de baja credibilidad en función de nuestra evaluación. CONCLUSIÓN: Los factores de riesgo genéticos en genes relacionados con la activación de la tripsina y la inmunidad innata parecen ser estar asociados con la susceptibilidad y gravedad de la pancreatitis aguda.


Assuntos
Pancreatite/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Humanos , Interleucina-1beta/genética , Interleucina-6/genética , Fatores de Risco , Inibidor da Tripsina Pancreática de Kazal/genética
3.
Pancreatology ; 20(2): 149-157, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex inflammatory disease with pain as the predominant symptom. Pain relief can be achieved using invasive interventions such as endoscopy and surgery. This paper is part of the international consensus guidelines on CP and presents the consensus guideline for surgery and timing of intervention in CP. METHODS: An international working group with 15 experts on CP surgery from the major pancreas societies (IAP, APA, JPS, and EPC) evaluated 20 statements generated from evidence on 5 questions deemed to be the most clinically relevant in CP. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence available for each statement. To determine the level of agreement, the working group voted on the 20 statements for strength of agreement, using a nine-point Likert scale in order to calculate Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. RESULTS: Strong consensus was obtained for the following statements: Surgery in CP is indicated as treatment of intractable pain and local complications of adjacent organs, and in case of suspicion of malignant (cystic) lesion; Early surgery is favored over surgery in a more advanced stage of disease to achieve optimal long-term pain relief; In patients with an enlarged pancreatic head, a combined drainage and resection procedure, such as the Frey, Beger, and Berne procedure, may be the treatment of choice; Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the most suitable surgical option for patients with groove pancreatitis; The risk of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with CP is too low (2% in 10 year) to recommend active screening or prophylactic surgery; Patients with hereditary CP have such a high risk of pancreatic cancer that prophylactic resection can be considered (lifetime risk of 40-55%). Weak agreement for procedure choice in patients with dilated duct and normal size pancreatic head: both the extended lateral pancreaticojejunostomy and Frey procedure seems to provide equivalent pain control in patients. CONCLUSIONS: This international expert consensus guideline provides evidenced-based statements concerning key aspects in surgery and timing of intervention in CP. It is meant to guide clinical practitioners and surgeons in the treatment of patients with CP.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/terapia , Consenso , Humanos , Dor Intratável/etiologia , Dor Intratável/terapia , Pancreatectomia , Cisto Pancreático/complicações , Cisto Pancreático/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Pancreaticojejunostomia , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Tempo para o Tratamento
4.
Br J Surg ; 100(13): 1797-804, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24227367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic abdominal pain is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and may involve altered central pain processing. This study evaluated the relationship between pain processing and pain outcome after pancreatic duct decompression and/or pancreatic resection in patients with CP. METHODS: Patients with CP underwent quantitative sensory testing. Pain processing was measured via electrical pain detection (ePDT) and electrical pain tolerance (ePTT) thresholds in dermatomes C5 and L4. Inhibitory descending pain control mechanisms were assessed using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. Healthy controls and patients with CP were compared, and patients with CP and a poor pain outcome (visual analogue scale (VAS) score greater than 30) were compared with those with a good pain outcome (VAS score 30 or less). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with CP had lower ePDT, ePTT and CPM responses compared with values in 15 healthy controls (P < 0·030). The sum of ePDT values was lower in patients with a poor pain outcome than in those with a good outcome (median 7·1 versus 11·2 mA; P = 0·008). There was a correlation with the VAS score and the sum of ePDT values (rs = -0·45, P = 0·016) and ePTT values (rs = -0·46, P = 0·011), and CPM response (rs = -0·43, P = 0·006) in patients with CP. CONCLUSION: After pain-relieving pancreatic surgery, patients with CP exhibit altered central pain processing compared with that in healthy controls. Poor pain outcomes are associated with more central sensitization and more pronociceptive descending pain modulation, and this should be considered when managing persistent pain after pain-relieving surgery for CP.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Sistema Nervoso Central/fisiologia , Pancreatite Crônica/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Sensibilização do Sistema Nervoso Central/fisiologia , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Temperatura Baixa , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor/métodos , Limiar da Dor/fisiologia , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Dig Surg ; 30(1): 35-50, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23635532

RESUMO

Chronic pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas with abdominal pain as the most prominent symptom. Adequate treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis remains a major challenge, mainly because of the lack of evidence-based treatment protocols. The primary goal of treatment is to achieve long-term pain relief, control of the complications associated with the disease, and to restore the quality of life. Currently, a conservative step-up approach is often used for the treatment of pain; progression to severe and intractable pain is considered necessary before invasive treatment is considered. Recent studies, however, suggest that surgical intervention should not be considered only as last-resort treatment, since it can mitigate disease progression, achieve excellent pain control, and preserve pancreatic function. In this review, we present a state-of-the art overview of endoscopic and surgical treatment options for patients with painful chronic pancreatitis, and elaborate on the timing of surgery.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Manejo da Dor , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida
6.
Oncogene ; 27(9): 1281-9, 2008 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17952127

RESUMO

L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) is a transmembrane cell adhesion molecule involved in cell migration and axon guidance in the developing nervous system. L1 is also overexpressed in ovarian and endometrial carcinomas and is associated with a bad prognosis. In carcinoma cell lines, L1 overexpression augments cell motility, tumor growth in mice and induces expression of Erk-dependent genes. Here, we show that a mutation in the cytoplasmic portion of L1 (T1247A, S1248A) abrogates Erk activation, blocks cell migration on extracellular matrix proteins and did not augment tumor growth in non-obese diabetic/severe combined immuno-deficient mice. In cells expressing mutant L1, the induction of Erk-dependent genes such as beta3-integrin, cathepsin-B and several transcription factors is eliminated and the invasive phenotype is abrogated. L1 antibodies showed similar effects. They prevented Erk activation and interfered with the Erk-dependent gene expression pattern. These findings provide a rationale for the mode of action of L1 antibodies and suggest that interference with L1 function could become a valuable target for therapy.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Proliferação de Células , Citoplasma/fisiologia , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Molécula L1 de Adesão de Célula Nervosa/fisiologia , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Citoplasma/química , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/imunologia , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos NOD , Camundongos SCID , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patologia , Neoplasias Experimentais/genética , Neoplasias Experimentais/imunologia , Neoplasias Experimentais/patologia , Neoplasias Experimentais/terapia , Molécula L1 de Adesão de Célula Nervosa/química , Estrutura Terciária de Proteína
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15529127

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review the literature related to oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) and amalgam restorations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort and case-controlled studies (no randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials available) were reviewed with respect to inclusion criteria and data on patients with OLLs, treatment interventions, and the measurement of outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen cohort and 5 case-controlled trials met the criteria. The study population consisted of 1158 patients (27% male and 73% female; age range, 23-79 years). From 16% to 91% of patients had positive patch test results for at least 1 mercury compound. Of 1158 patients, 636 had to have their restorations replaced. The follow-up period ranged from 2 months to 9 1/2 years. Complete healing ranged from 37.5% to 100%. The greatest improvements were seen in lesions in close contact with amalgam. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols must be standardized to obtain valid results. The replacement of amalgam restorations can result in the resolution or improvement of OLLs. Patch testing seems to be of limited value. The topographic relationship between an OLL and an amalgam restoration is a useful--but not conclusive--marker.


Assuntos
Amálgama Dentário , Restauração Dentária Permanente , Líquen Plano Bucal/terapia , Erupções Liquenoides/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Amálgama Dentário/efeitos adversos , Restauração Dentária Permanente/efeitos adversos , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite de Contato/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Líquen Plano Bucal/induzido quimicamente , Erupções Liquenoides/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Compostos de Mercúrio/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Retratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologia
8.
Farmaco ; 58(8): 573-9, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12875888

RESUMO

A simple, accurate and sensitive spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of three pharmaceutical piperazine derivatives, namely ketoconazole (KC), trimetazidine hydrochloride (TMH) and piribedil (PD). This method is based on the formation of yellow orange complexes between iron(III) chloride and the investigated drugs. The optimum reaction conditions, spectral characteristics, conditional stability constants and composition of the water soluble complexes have been established. The method permits the determination of KC, TMH and PD over a concentration range 1-15, 1-12 and 1-12 microg ml(-1), respectively. Sandell sensitivity is found to be 0.016, 0.013 and 0.013 microg cm(-2) for KC, TMH and PD, respectively. The method was sensitive, simple, reproducible and accurate within +/-1.5%. The method is applicable to the assay of the three drugs under investigation in different dosage forms and the results are in good agreement with those obtained by the official methods (USP and JP).


Assuntos
Compostos Férricos/química , Cetoconazol/análise , Piribedil/análise , Trimetazidina/análise , Cloretos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Cetoconazol/química , Pomadas , Piribedil/química , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Solubilidade , Espectrofotometria/métodos , Comprimidos , Temperatura , Trimetazidina/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA