Evaluation of the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Mortality Risk in Preterm Infants with Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

INTRODUCTION: The neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score is a tool for calculating mortality risk of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. The utility of the nSOFA in determining the risk of mortality or the association with surgical intervention among infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has not been investigated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cohort study of preterm (<37 weeks) infants with NEC Bell's stage ≥ IIA at six hospitals from 2008 to 2020. An nSOFA score (range 0-15) was assigned to each patient at nine time points from 48 h before or after clinical illness was suspected. RESULTS: Of the 259 infants, nSOFA scores for infants who died (n = 39) or had the composite outcome of surgery or death (n = 114) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) early in the NEC course compared to nSOFA scores for infants who survived medical NEC. Twelve hours after evaluation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.93) to discriminate for mortality and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90) for surgery or death (p < 0.001). A maximum nSOFA score of ≥4 at -6, 0, 6, or 12 h following evaluation was associated with a 20-fold increase in mortality and 19-fold increase in surgery or death compared with a score of <4 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort, the nSOFA score was able to discriminate well for death as well as surgery or death among infants with NEC. The nSOFA is a clinical research tool that may be used in infants with NEC to improve classification by objective quantification of organ dysfunction.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Incidence of Pediatric Extracranial Embryonal Tumors.

Background: Few studies have comparatively assessed differences in the incidence of childhood cancer by race and ethnicity that could inform etiologic research. We aimed to identify disparities in the incidence of pediatric extracranial embryonal tumors by race and ethnicity in the United States using a population-based cancer registry. Methods: Cases of extracranial embryonal tumors among children age 0 to 19 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 18 (n = 8188). Age-standardized incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were obtained by race/ethnicity. Whites were the reference group. The percentage of families living below the poverty line by county was used to stratify by socioeconomic status (SES). Results: All minority groups had a lower incidence of neuroblastoma (Hispanics: IRR = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47 to 0.59; blacks: IRR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.81; Native-Hawaiian/Asian-Pacific-Islander (API): IRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.67; and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN): IRR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.48) while Hispanics had a higher incidence of retinoblastoma (IRR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.48). Incidence of nephroblastoma was lower among Hispanics (IRR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.91) and API (IRR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.56) while equivalent for blacks. Similarly, incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma was low among Hispanics (IRR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.98) and API (IRR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.79) while equivalent for blacks. However, incidence of hepatoblastoma was low among blacks (IRR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.68) while equivalent for Hispanics and API. Incidence of germ cell tumors was higher among Hispanics (IRR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.42) and lower among blacks (IRR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.61) and API (IRR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.93). No effect modification by SES was observed. Conclusions: Unique incidence patterns of childhood extracranial embryonal tumors exist by race and ethnicity in the United States. The interplay between race/ethnicity and genetics, epigenetics, and gene-environment interactions in the causation of these cancers deserves further investigation.

Determinants of Treatment Abandonment in Childhood Cancer: Results from a Global Survey.

BACKGROUND: Understanding and addressing treatment abandonment (TxA) is crucial for bridging the pediatric cancer survival gap between high-income (HIC) and low-and middle-income countries (LMC). In childhood cancer, TxA is defined as failure to start or complete curative cancer therapy and known to be a complex phenomenon. With rising interest on causes and consequences of TxA in LMC, this study aimed to establish the lay-of-the-land regarding determinants of TxA globally, perform and promote comparative research, and raise awareness on this subject. METHODS: Physicians (medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists), nurses, social workers, and psychologists involved in care of children with cancer were approached through an online survey February-May 2012. Queries addressed social, economic, and treatment-related determinants of TxA. Free-text comments were collected. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were performed. Appraisal of overall frequency, burden, and predictors of TxA has been reported separately. RESULTS: 581 responses from 101 countries were obtained (contact rate = 26%, cooperation rate = 70%). Most respondents were physicians (86%), practicing pediatric hematology/oncology (86%) for >10 years (54%). Providers from LMC considered social/economic factors (families' low socioeconomic status, low education, and long travel time), as most influential in increasing risk of TxA. Treatment-related considerations such as preference for complementary and alternative medicine and concerns about treatment adverse effects and toxicity, were perceived to play an important role in both LMC and HIC. Perceived prognosis seemed to mediate the role of other determinants such as diagnosis and treatment phase on TxA risk. For example, high-risk of TxA was most frequently reported when prognosis clearly worsened (i.e. lack of response to therapy, relapse), or conversely when the patient appeared improved (i.e. induction completed, mass removed), as well as before aggressive/mutilating surgery. Provider responses allowed development of an expanded conceptual model of determinants of TxA; one which illustrates established and emerging individual, family, center, and context specific factors to be considered in order to tackle this problem. Emerging factors included vulnerability, family dynamics, perceptions, center capacity, public awareness, and governmental healthcare financing, among others. CONCLUSION: TxA is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon. With increased recognition of the role of TxA on global pediatric cancer outcomes, factors beyond social/economic status and beliefs have emerged. Our results provide insights regarding the role of established determinants of TxA in different geographical and economic contexts, allow probing of key determinants by deliberating their mechanisms, and allow building an expanded conceptual model of established and emerging determinants TxA.

Magnitude of Treatment Abandonment in Childhood Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment abandonment (TxA) is recognized as a leading cause of treatment failure for children with cancer in low-and-middle-income countries (LMC). However, its global frequency and burden have remained elusive due to lack of global data. This study aimed to obtain an estimate using survey and population data. METHODS: Childhood cancer clinicians (medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists), nurses, social workers, and psychologists involved in care of children with cancer were approached through an online survey February-May 2012. Incidence and population data were obtained from public sources. Descriptive, univariable, and multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 602 responses from 101 countries were obtained from physicians (84%), practicing pediatric hematology/oncology (83%) in general or children's hospitals (79%). Results suggested, 23,854 (15%) of 155,088 children <15 years old newly diagnosed with cancer annually in the countries analyzed, abandon therapy. Importantly, 83% of new childhood cancer cases and 99% of TxA were attributable to LMC. The annual number of cases of TxA expected in LMC worldwide (26,166) was nearly equivalent to the annual number of cancer cases in children <15 years expected in HIC (26,368). Approximately two thirds of LMC had median TxA ≥ 6%, but TxA ≥ 6% was reported in high- (9%), upper-middle- (41%), lower-middle- (80%), and low-income countries (90%, p<0.001). Most LMC centers reporting TxA > 6% were outside the capital. Lower national income category, higher reliance on out-of-pocket payments, and high prevalence of economic hardship at the center were independent contextual predictors for TxA ≥ 6% (p<0.001). Global survival data available for more developed and less developed regions suggests TxA may account for at least a third of the survival gap between HIC and LMC. CONCLUSION: Results show TxA is prevalent (compromising cancer survival for 1 in 7 children globally), confirm the suspected high burden of TxA in LMC, and illustrate the negative impact of poverty on its occurrence. The present estimates may appear small compared to the global burden of child death from malnutrition and infection (measured in millions). However, absolute numbers suggest the burden of TxA in LMC is nearly equivalent to annually losing all kids diagnosed with cancer in HIC just to TxA, without even considering deaths from disease progression, relapse or toxicity-the main causes of childhood cancer mortality in HIC. Results document the importance of monitoring and addressing TxA as part of childhood cancer outcomes in at-risk settings.