Clinical characteristics and prognosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: A prospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: A definition of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) was published by European Society of Cardiology in 2016. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical profile and prognosis of these patients in a prospective single-center study and compare it with the literature data. METHODS: During a 3-year period, information from every consecutive MINOCA patient was gathered (n = 109). It was then compared with 412 contemporaneous patients with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Prognosis analysis was adjusted by age and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). RESULTS: MINOCA represented 16.9% of the total of patients admitted for myocardial infarction (MI). Compared with MIOCA, they had more psychosocial disorders (22.9% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.01) and more pro-inflammatory conditions (34.9% vs. 14.0%; p < 0.01). Atrial fibrillation was twice as frequent in MINOCA (14.7% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.016). Predictors of MINOCA were as follows: female gender, absence of diabetes, absence of tobacco use, tachycardia, troponin above 10 times the 99th percentile, and proinflammatory conditions. Median follow-up was 17.3 ± 9.3 months. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite of a recurrence of acute MI, transient ischemic attack/stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause and death from any cause) occurred in 10.8% of the MINOCA group as compared with 10.7% in the MIOCA group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-2.45; p = 0.645). Cardiovascular re-admission rates were higher in the MINOCA group: 19.8% vs. 13.9% (HR 1.85; CI 1.06-3.21; p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of MINOCA is high, with fewer CVRF, and it is linked to atrial fibrillation, psychosocial disorders, and pro-inflammatory conditions. Mid-term prognosis is worse than previously thought, with a similar proportion of MACE as compared to MIOCA, and even a higher rate of cardiovascular re-admissions.

Síndrome de Austrian: quien no sabe lo que busca, no entiende lo que encuentra / Austrian Syndrome: he who does not know what he is looking for will not understand what he finds

Resumen El síndrome de Austrian es una tríada que engloba neumonía, meningitis y endocarditis causadas por Staphylococcus pneumoniae. Dado el aumento en el uso de antibióticos, cada vez vemos esta enfermedad de forma menos frecuente en la práctica clínica diaria. No obstante, se debe recordar su existencia ya que el conocimiento de esta entidad puede ser crucial en el pronóstico de estos enfermos. Desconocer algunos síndromes por presentar una frecuencia menor en los tiempos actuales no exime de mantener la buena práctica clínica ya que de ello puede depender el devenir del paciente. Se presenta un caso de síndrome de Austrian en un paciente joven, quien tuvo evolución tórpida los primeros días de ingreso; finalmente, tras la realización de varias pruebas, se solicitó un ecocardiograma que fue la clave para el diagnóstico. Se trata de un caso de interés para reflexionar en que, a pesar de poseer nuevas tecnologías a nuestro alcance en la actualidad, es preciso recordar la importancia de una buena exploración física.

Abstract Austrian syndrome is a triad that includes pneumonia, meningitis, and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus pneumoniae. Given the increase in the use of antibiotics, it is becoming less common to see this disease in daily clinical practice. However, it should be remembered that it exists since knowledge of this condition could be crucial in the prognosis of these patients. To not recognise some syndromes due to currently having a lower frequency does not exempt maintaining good clinical practice, since the outcome of the patient may depend on this. A case of Austrian syndrome is presented in a young patient, who had a slow response in the first days of admission. Finally, after performing several tests, a cardiac ultrasound was requested, which was key for the diagnosis. It is an interesting case to reflect that, despite currently having new technologies within our reach, it is essential to remember the importance of a good physical examination.