Influence of Laser Trabeculoplasty on Combined Phacoemulsification/Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy.

Purpose: To investigate the influence of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) on subsequent surgery with combined phacoemulsification/Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy (phaco-KDB) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or intraocular hypertension. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing phaco-KDB between 2019 and 2021 were divided into previously LTP treated and previously non-LTP treated, and LTP-treatment included argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). The primary goal was to investigate if previous LTP influenced later surgical outcome of phaco-KDB. The secondary goal was to investigate if the outcome of LTP could be predictive of the outcome of subsequent phaco-KDB. We also compared IOP- and medication reductions between LTP and non-LTP treated patients. Results: A total of 111 LTP treated patients were compared to 139 non-LTP treated patients. In LTP treated patients, surgical success of phaco-KDB was 82.9%, compared to 88.5% in non-LTP treated patients (P=0.20). Reductions in IOP and medications were similar between groups. Furthermore, within the LTP group, patients with successful LTP-treatment had a subsequent surgical success of phaco-KDB in 80.7%, compared to 83.0% in patients with unsuccessful LTP-treatment (P=0.765). Conclusion: Previous LTP treatment does not predict the outcome of phaco-KDB. Furthermore, no correlation was found between the LTP effect and a later surgical success of phaco-KDB.

The Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS): A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intensive and Standard Treatment on 5 Years Visual Field Development.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of an intensive initial intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment strategy on the progression of visual field damage. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-label, 2-center clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 242 patients with newly detected early or moderate untreated open-angle glaucoma were enrolled at 2 university hospitals in Sweden. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either initial treatment with intensive IOP-lowering medications followed by 360° laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), or to traditional mono-therapy, which was increased when deemed necessary. The primary study outcome of interest was the predicted remaining visual field, as measured by the visual field index (VFI) at projected end of life. RESULTS: The median untreated IOP was 24 mm Hg in both treatment groups. During follow-up, median and mode IOP were 17 mm Hg in the mono- and 14 mm Hg in the multi-treatment group. In the mono-treatment group, the median VFI at projected end of life was 79.3% and in the multi-treatment group 87.1% (P = .15). The annual rate of progression of visual field damage was faster in mono-treatment than in multi-treatment participants; median losses per year were 0.65 and 0.25 percentage units, respectively (P = .09). Progression events occurred in 21% of the mono- and in 11% of the multi-treatment participants (P = .03). Adverse events, mostly mild, were reported in 25% of the mono- and in 36% of the multi-treatment participants. Differences in visual field outcomes between treatment groups were more pronounced in participants having higher baseline IOP, defined by median split of untreated IOP values. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall analysis, the visual field outcomes were not overwhelmingly better in the multi-treatment group, but post hoc analysis showed definite benefit in patients with higher untreated IOP. Based on the results of this study, initial intensive treatment may be considered in glaucoma patients with high untreated IOP at diagnosis, although we found no evidence that multi-therapy should be given routinely to all glaucoma patients.

Missed Opportunities in Screening for Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To create a holistic and realistic view regarding current knowledge, understanding, and challenges of screening in general and in glaucoma. METHODS/RESULTS: Based upon available literature, all systems suffer from the same challenges: huge variability of care practices (despite guidelines), simultaneous under care and over care, as well as the unsustainable increase of costs. While the magnitude of these challenges differs immoderately between well-off and developing countries, the Western world has already demonstrated that simply doing more than what we currently do is not the solution. System outcomes also matter in screening, that is, its benefits should outweigh any harms (over-care, false positives/negatives, uncertain findings, etc.) and be cost-effective. However, even when the evidence does not support screening (as is currently the case in glaucoma), it may feel justified as "at least we are doing something." Strong commercial interests, lobbying and politics star as well and will influence the control arm even in high-quality randomized screening trials (RCT). CONCLUSIONS: As resources will never be sufficient for all health care activities that providers wish to deliver and what people wish to receive, we need to ask big questions and adopt a public health perspective in glaucoma and eye care. How can we create and maintain a sustainable balance between finding and treating underserved high-risk patients without burdening the broader patient population and societies with over-diagnostics and treatments? Considering numerous biases related to screening, including the variability in care practices, a high-quality RCT for the screening of glaucoma would be very challenging to organize and evaluate its universal usefulness.

European Glaucoma Society research priorities for glaucoma care.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The goal of health research is to improve patients care and outcomes. Thus, it is essential that research addresses questions that are important to patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving stakeholders from different countries in Europe. METHODS: We used a three-phase method, including a two-round electronic Delphi survey and a workshop. The clinician and patient electronic surveys were conducted in parallel and independently. For phase I, the survey was distributed to patients from 27 European countries in 6 different languages, and to European Glaucoma Society members, ophthalmologists with expertise in glaucoma care, asking to name up to five research priorities. During phase II, participants were asked to rank the questions identified in phase I using a Likert scale. Phase III was a 1 day workshop with patients and clinicians. The purpose was to make decisions about the 10 most important research priorities using the top 20 priorities identified by patients and clinicians. RESULTS: In phase I, 308 patients and 150 clinicians were involved. In phase II, the highest-ranking priority for both patients and clinicians was 'treatments to restore vision'. In phase III, eight patients and four clinicians were involved. The top three priorities were 'treatments to stop sight loss', 'treatments to restore vision' and 'improved detection of worsening glaucoma'. CONCLUSION: We have developed a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving clinicians and patients from different European countries that will help guide research efforts and investment.

Long-term follow-up of laser trabeculoplasty in multi-treated glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effect of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) in patients randomized to multi-treatment in the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS). METHODS: Patients with untreated newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma were treated with three intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering substances for 1 week and then 360° argon or selective LTP was performed. IOP was measured just before LTP and repeatedly during the 60-month study period. Our previous report on 12 months follow-up data revealed no effect of LTP in eyes having an IOP <15 mmHg before the laser treatment. RESULTS: Before LTP, the mean IOP ± standard deviation in all 152 study-eyes of 122 multi-treated patients was 14.0 ± 3.5 mmHg. Three eyes of three deceased patients were lost to follow-up during the 60 months. After exclusion of eyes that received increased therapy during follow-up, the IOP was significantly reduced at all visits up to 48 months in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥15 mmHg; 2.6 ± 3.1 mmHg at 1 month and 1.7 ± 2.8 mmHg at 48 months, n = 56 and 48, respectively. No significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP <15 mmHg. Seven eyes, i.e., <13%, with pre-LTP IOP ≥15 mmHg at baseline had required increased IOP-lowering therapy at 48 months. CONCLUSION: LTP performed in multi-treated patients may provide a useful IOP reduction that is maintained over several years. This was true on a group level when the initial IOP was ≥15 mmHg, but if the pre-laser IOP was lower than that, chances of LTP success were small.

Outcomes of iStent Inject Versus Kahook Dual Blade Surgery in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

PRCIS: iStent Inject implantation (iStent) or Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy (KDB) in combination with phacoemulsification have a similar IOP-lowering effect in all stages of glaucoma, and medications are significantly reduced, especially after KDB. PURPOSE: To compare the 2-year efficacy and safety of iStent or KDB in combination with phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to advanced open angle glaucoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 153 patients that received iStent or KDB in combination with phacoemulsification at a single center between March 2019 and August 2020. The main outcome parameters at 2 years were: (1) intraocular pressure (IOP)-reduction ≥20%, with a postoperative IOP ≤18 mm Hg, and (2) a reduction of ≥1 medication. Results were stratified by glaucoma grade. RESULTS: After 2 years, mean IOP was reduced from 20.3±6.1 to 14.2±4.1 mm Hg in the phaco-iStent group ( P <0.001) and from 20.1±6.1 to 14.7±3.6 mm Hg in the phaco-KDB group ( P <0.001). The mean number of medications was reduced from 3.0±0.9 to 2.6±1.1 in the Phaco-iStent group ( P =0.001) and from 2.3±1.0 to 1.5±1.3 in the Phaco-KDB group ( P <0.001). Success regarding IOP-reduction ≥20% with a postoperative IOP ≤18 mm Hg was met by 46% in the phaco-iStent group and by 51% in the phaco-KDB group. A reduction of ≥1 medication was met by 32% in the phaco-iStent group and by 53% in the phaco-KDB group ( P =0.013). Eyes with mild to moderate and advanced glaucoma responded equally well to the success criteria. CONCLUSIONS: iStent and KDB, in combination with phacoemulsification, both lowered IOP effectively in all stages of glaucoma. More medications were reduced after KDB, suggesting that it may be a more effective procedure compared with iStent.

Kahook Dual-Blade Goniotomy with and without Phacoemulsification in Medically Uncontrolled Glaucoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy and safety of Kahook dual-blade (KDB) goniotomy in patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Methods: This was a retrospective case-series study of 90 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) that underwent KDB goniotomy alone (KDB-alone group) or KDB goniotomy in combination with phacoemulsification (KDB-phaco group) during 2019-2020. All patients were uncontrolled on three or more medications. Surgical success was defined as an IOP reduction ≥20% and/or a reduction of one or more medications at 24 months. We also report IOP levels and number of medications from baseline to 24 months, as well as the need for further glaucoma interventions. Results: At 24 months, mean IOP had reduced from 24.8±8.3 to 15.0±5.3 mmHg in the KDB-alone group (P<0.001) and from 22.3±5.8 to 13.9±3.0 mmHg in the KDB-phaco group (P<0.001). Medications had reduced from 3.5±0.6 to 3.1±0.9 in the KDB-alone group (P=0.047) and from 3.3±0.5 to 2.3±1.1 in the KDB-phaco group (P<0.001). An IOP reduction ≥20% and/or a reduction with one or more medications was achieved by 47% of eyes in the KDB-alone group and by 76% of eyes in the KDB-phaco group. Eyes with PEXG and POAG responded equally well to the success criteria. During the 24-month follow-up, additional glaucoma surgery or transscleral photocoagulation was performed in 28% of eyes in the KDB-alone group and in 12% of eyes in the KDB-phaco group. Conclusion: In patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma, KDB had a significant IOP-lowering effect after 24 months, but success rates were higher when KDB was performed in combination with cataract surgery compared to stand-alone treatment.

Widespread retina and optic nerve neuroinflammation in enucleated eyes from glaucoma patients.

Neuroinflammation is recognized as a key component of neurodegenerative disease. In glaucoma, a common neurodegenerative disease and the leading cause of irreversible blindness, the evidence for neuroinflammation in patients is lacking. Animal models have demonstrated significant pro-inflammatory activation of resident glia in the retina, as well as influx of blood-derived monocytes and pro-inflammatory factors. Confirmation of this in human donor tissue has been challenging due to a lack of well-preserved and well-characterized post-mortem tissue. To address this we utilize archived, wax embedded eyes fixed immediately following enucleation from living glaucoma patients. We compared glaucoma to control eyes (enucleated for uveal melanoma where the tumor did not impact the central retina or optic nerve). We performed immunolabelling for neurodegenerative and glial markers (CD45, CD163, IBA1, GFAP, Vimentin) which were quantified by high-resolution light microscopy and image analysis in FIJI. Glaucoma eyes demonstrated significant neural loss consistent with advanced neurodegeneration. IBA1 and GFAP were significantly increased in the retina and optic nerve head of the glaucomatous eyes indicating that significant neuroinflammation had occurred which support findings in animal models. Inflammation is a treatable symptom of many diseases and as such, identification of earlier inflammatory processes in glaucoma could be important for potential future treatment options.

Feasibility of MRI to assess differences in ophthalmic artery blood flow rate in normal tension glaucoma and healthy controls.

PURPOSE: To examine feasibility of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI) and to assess blood flow rate in the ophthalmic artery (OA) in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Sixteen patients with treated NTG and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent PCMRI using a 3-Tesla scanner and ophthalmological examinations. OA blood flow rate was measured using a 2D PCMRI sequence with a spatial resolution of 0.35 mm2 . RESULTS: The blood flow rate in the NTG group was 9.6 ± 3.9 ml/min [mean ± SD] compared with 11.9 ± 4.8 ml/min in the control group. Resistance Index (RI) and Pulsatility Index (PI) were 0.73 ± 0.08 and 1.36 ± 0.29, respectively, in the NTG group and 0.68 ± 0.13 and 1.22 ± 0.40, respectively, in the healthy group. The mean visual field index (VFI) was 46% ± 25 for the worse NTG eyes. The measured differences observed between the NTG group and the control group in blood flow rate (p = 0.12), RI (p = 0.18) and PI (p = 0.27) were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study, using PCMRI, showed a slight, but non-significant, reduction in OA blood flow rate in the NTG patients compared with the healthy controls. These results indicate that blood flow may be of importance in the pathogenesis of NTG. Considering that only a limited portion of the total OA blood flow supplies the ocular system and the large inter-individual differences, a larger study or more advanced PCMRI technique might give the answer.

Laser trabeculoplasty in newly diagnosed multi-treated glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) in eyes which IOP had been substantially reduced by intensive topical treatment for one week. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma were randomized to treatment with three IOP-lowering substances. One week later, 360° argon or selective LTP was performed. IOP was measured before LTP and at one-, three-, six- and 12-month post-LTP. The patients were part of the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS). RESULTS: Mean IOP (± SD) in 152 eyes of 122 patients was 14.0 (± 3.5) mmHg just before LTP. For every mmHg higher IOP prior to LTP, the IOP was reduced by an additional 0.6 mmHg at 12 months. The IOP was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits from -2.6 (± 3.1) mmHg at one month to -2.1 (± 3.8) mmHg at 12 months in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥ 15 mmHg, while no significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP < 15 mmHg. Older age, argon LTP and male sex were associated with larger IOP reduction after 12 months, whereas presence of exfoliation syndrome was associated with a smaller IOP reduction. No severe complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Success of LTP was highly dependent on the IOP level prior to LTP treatment. A sustained significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥ 15 mmHg whereas no such effect was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP < 15 mmHg. Thus, LTP can be considered in eyes with multi-treatment when target pressure of < 15 mmHg is not achieved.

Can postoperative dexamethasone nanoparticle eye drops replace mitomycin C in trabeculectomy?

PURPOSE: Compare (a) nonmitomycin C (MMC) trabeculectomy and 1.5% dexamethasone nanoparticle (DexNP) eye drops postoperatively with (b) trabeculectomy with MMC and Maxidex® eye drops postoperatively. METHODS: Randomized prospective single masked clinical trial with 20 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma undergoing primary trabeculectomy. The study group consisted of 10 patients without MMC intraoperatively and postoperative DexNP eye drops, and the control group consisted of 10 patients treated with MMC intraoperatively and postoperative Maxidex® . The drops were tapered out over 8 weeks. The main outcome measures were as follows: rates of complete success, that is intraocular pressure (IOP) within target pressures at different time-points without IOP-lowering medication, or reoperation. Secondary outcome measures included the following: relative success rate (with IOP-lowering medications), number of glaucoma medications and reoperations. Patients were followed for 36 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar postoperative course and IOP reduction. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the DexNP group and in the control group were 25.6 and 24.4 mmHg, respectively, at baseline. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) were reduced to 13.2 and 14.5 mmHg at 12 months, 11.7 and 12.6 mmHg at 24 months and 11.7 and 12.1 mmHg at 36 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in absolute (p = 0.36) or relative (p = 1.0) success rates, number of medications (p = 0.71) or reoperations (p = 1.0) between the groups at any time-point. CONCLUSIONS: DexNP eye drops are effective postoperative treatment following trabeculectomy. The potent anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effect of DexNP may offer an alternative to mitomycin C in glaucoma surgery.

Initial intraocular pressure reduction by mono- versus multi-therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma: results from the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study.

PURPOSE: To study newly diagnosed glaucoma patients given mono- or multi-therapy regarding differences in initial intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, target IOP levels reached and influence of untreated baseline IOP on IOP reduction. METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with manifest primary open-angle glaucoma and included in the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) were randomized to immediate intensive treatment with any of three different IOP-lowering substances supplied in two bottles plus 360° laser trabeculoplasty or to conventional stepwise treatment starting with a single-drug. Intraocular pressure reduction was analysed 1 month after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients (143 eyes) received mono-therapy and 122 patients (152 eyes) multi-therapy. Median baseline IOP was 24.0 (min: 9.7, max: 56.0) mmHg in mono-therapy eyes and 24.0 (min: 12.3, max: 48.5) mmHg in multi-therapy eyes (p = 0.56). After 1 month in the two groups, respectively, values for median IOP reduction were 6.3 (range: -5.3-31.0) and 11.0 (range: 0.7-34.5) mmHg, and for mean relative decline 26.8 (range: -32.0-55.4) and 46.0 (range: 4.6-81.6) % (p = 0.000). A larger proportion of the multi-therapy patients reached each target IOP level (p = 0.000). The higher the baseline IOP, the larger the observed pressure reduction, considering both absolute and relative figures. The effect was more pronounced in eyes with multi-therapy than in those with mono-therapy (p = 0.000). For every mmHg higher IOP at baseline, the IOP was reduced by an additional 0.56 (mono-therapy) or 0.84 (multi-therapy) mmHg. CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment led to considerably greater IOP reduction than mono-therapy. Among patients with IOP ≥30 mmHg at diagnosis an IOP of <16 was reached in 2/3 of those with multi-therapy but in none with mono-therapy. The IOP reduction was highly dependent on the untreated IOP level.

Topical dexamethasone γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops increase visual acuity and decrease macular thickness in diabetic macular oedema.

PURPOSE: To compare in a randomized, controlled trial topical 1.5% dexamethasone γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops (DexNP) with posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 22 eyes of 22 consecutive patients with DME were randomized to (i) topical treatment with DexNP ×3/day (4 weeks), ×2/day (4 weeks) and ×1/day (4 weeks) or (ii) one posterior subtenon injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Study visits were at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: The logMAR (Snellen) visual acuity (mean ± SD) improved significantly with DexNP from 0.41 ± 0.3 (Snellen 0.39) to 0.32 ± 0.25 (0.48) and 0.30 ± 0.26 (0.50) at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. One-third of the DexNP group improved more than 0.3 logMAR units. For triamcinolone, logMAR changed significantly from 0.42 ± 0.28 (0.38) at baseline to 0.32 ± 0.29 (0.48) at 4w and 0.33 ± 0.37 (0.47) at 12w. The central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly with DexNP from 483 ± 141 µm to 384 ± 142 µm at 4w and 342 ± 114 µm at 8w. For triamcinolone, CMT decreased significantly at all time-points: 494 ± 94 µm, 388 ± 120, 388 ± 145, 390 ± 136 and 411 ± 104 µm at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, respectively. There was a modest increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) at all time-points with DexNP while no increase was seen with triamcinolone. Serum cortisol was affected by both treatments. CONCLUSION: Topical DexNP significantly improve visual acuity and decrease macular thickness in patients with DME. The effect is similar to that from subtenon triamcinolone. A modest increase in IOP was seen with the nanoparticle eye drops, but IOP normalized after the discontinuation of treatment.

Topical dexamethasone-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops for non-infectious Uveitic macular oedema and vitritis - a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1.5% dexamethasone nanoparticle (DexNP) drops in eyes with non-infectious uveitic macular oedema and vitritis. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study, DexNP drops were administered four times a day for 4 weeks followed by drops tapering over a period of another 4 weeks. Follow-up time was 12 weeks. RESULTS: Five eyes with macular oedema and three eyes with vitritis were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from a median of 0.2 logMAR to a median of 0.15 logMAR at 4 weeks' time (p < 0.05). Median BCVA was 0.175 logMAR and 0.2 logMAR, at week 8 and 12, respectively (p > 0.05). Macular oedema significantly improved at all time-points as compared to baseline (p < 0.05) and resolved in all eyes during follow-up. One eye had macular oedema relapse at week 12. Vitritis improved in all eyes and resolved completely in two eyes. One eye had intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation which was well controlled with topical antihypertensive treatment, and one eye had cataract progression. CONCLUSION: This short pilot study demonstrates favourable effect of 1.5% DexNP eye drops on eyes with non-infectious uveitic macular oedema and vitritis. Further comparative long-term studies are warranted to assess this effect.

Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements 24 months after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) with 3 tonometry methods-Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), and applanation resonance tonometry (ART)-and to compare them with measurements taken preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. DESIGN: Prospective randomized single-center. METHODS: One randomized eye per person from myopic healthy individuals who had LASEK was included. Visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, and IOP were measured at all time points. Six IOP measurements were performed per method, with a 5-minute lapse between methods. RESULTS: The study evaluated 38 eyes. Two years after LASEK, dynamic ART was the only method that did not measure significantly lower IOP than before LASEK (mean -0.2 mm Hg ± 1.6 [SD]). The greatest difference was with GAT (mean -1.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg) followed by static ART (mean -1.2 ± 1.6 mm Hg) and then DCT (mean -0.9 ± 1.3 mm Hg). All methods measured significantly lower IOP at 3 months and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic ART, which analyses IOP measurement during indentation, showed no significant difference in measured IOP after 24 months. The convex tip of the ART device and the continuous sampling of data during corneal indentation seem to be factors in why dynamic ART was less affected by corneal properties and therefore more suitable for IOP measurement in LASEK-treated eyes, although this must be confirmed in larger trials.

Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate 3 tonometry methods--the gold standard, Goldmann applanation tonometry, a new method, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (PDCT), and a method under development, applanation resonance tonometry (ART)--with respect to intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements before, 3 and 6 months after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One randomly assigned eye of each of 53 healthy individuals, who underwent LASEK surgery for myopia was studied. Visual acuity, central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and IOP were measured at each visit. Six IOP measurements/methods with 5 minutes pause between methods were performed. RESULTS: All tonometry methods measured a significantly lower IOP after LASEK correction by a mean of -3.1 diopters. The IOP reduction was largest after 6 months for Goldmann applanation tonometry (-1.7 ± 1.8 mm Hg) followed by ARTstat (-1.2 ± 1.5 mm Hg), PDCT (-1.1 ± 1.6 mm Hg), and ARTdyn (-1.0 ± 1.5 mm Hg). The reduction of IOP did not differ significantly between different methods (P=0.11). There was a significant further reduction of measured IOP for PDCT between 3 and 6 months (-0.5 ± 1.0 mm Hg). Uncorrected visual acuity improved significantly between 3 and 6 months postoperatively from 1.32 ± 0.28 to 1.43 ± 0.27. CONCLUSIONS: All tonometry methods measured a significant, but low, reduction of IOP 3 and 6 months after LASEK. Further change in visual acuity and IOP measurements between 3 and 6 months suggest a still ongoing postoperative process.