Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 59(6): 1740-1746, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are frequently hospitalized for treatment of pulmonary exacerbation. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pulmonary Guidelines support the use of intravenous aminoglycosides with therapeutic drug monitoring for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Serum intravenous tobramycin concentrations are commonly collected by peripheral venipuncture (PV). Discomfort associated with collection of samples by PV prompts collection via PICC, but the accuracy of intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PICC has not been documented in adult PwCF. The primary study objective was to evaluate the difference between intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PV and PICC in adult PwCF. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective case-control study of adult PwCF admitted to University of Utah Health for a pulmonary exacerbation receiving tobramycin by a single lumen PICC. The authors compared tobramycin peak and random serum levels collected by PV and PICC using a detailed flush and waste protocol. RESULTS: The authors analyzed a total of 19 patients with peripheral and PICC samples. The mean tobramycin peak collected by PV (27.2 mcg/mL) was similar to the mean peak collected by PICC (26.9 mcg/mL) (paired samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = .94). The correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.85-0.91, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Tobramycin serum samples collected by PICC appear to be similar in value to PV collections. Collecting aminoglycoside levels by PICC rather than PV may reduce patient discomfort and improve quality of life. Additional multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Fibrose Cística , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Tobramicina , Humanos , Fibrose Cística/sangue , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/sangue , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tobramicina/sangue , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/sangue , Infecções por Pseudomonas/complicações , Cateterismo Periférico , Adulto Jovem , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Aminoglicosídeos/sangue , Aminoglicosídeos/administração & dosagem , Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
J Cyst Fibros ; 21(6): 1066-1069, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36088208

RESUMO

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX-TEZ-IVA) is a Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulator shown to improve lung function and reduce sweat chloride in people with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). The only commonly reported dermatologic adverse effect with CFTR modulators including ELX-TEZ-IVA is rash. In this case series, we describe 19 patients who reported new onset or worsening of acne after initiation of this drug to their CF pharmacist or another member of their CF care team. The mechanism and frequency of this adverse effect is unknown.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Fibrose Cística , Humanos , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/genética , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Cística/genética , Agonistas dos Canais de Cloreto/efeitos adversos , Aminofenóis/efeitos adversos , Benzodioxóis/efeitos adversos , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Acne Vulgar/induzido quimicamente , Mutação
3.
J Cyst Fibros ; 19(5): e39-e41, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471772

RESUMO

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (Trikafta) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in October 2019 for treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) in patients 12 years and older with at least one F508del mutation in the CFTR protein. There were no documented reports of testicular pain during clinical trials. In this case series, we discuss 7 males between 17 and 39 years of age who reported testicular pain or discomfort within the first two weeks of starting therapy. The precise mechanism of this side effect is unknown, but it may be related to restoration of CFTR function in the male reproductive tract. All patients experienced resolution of this side effect within a week after onset, regardless of the management, except for one. Further research is needed to determine short- and long-term impact of this drug on male fertility. Until more data is available, the authors recommend counseling patients on contraceptive options.


Assuntos
Aminofenóis/efeitos adversos , Benzodioxóis/efeitos adversos , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Dor/diagnóstico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Testículo , Adolescente , Adulto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA