Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Glob Health ; 2(6): e359-63, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25103304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a life-threatening infection affecting rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa. Large-scale population screening by antibody detection with the Card Agglutination Test for Trypanosomiasis (CATT)/Trypanosoma brucei (T b) gambiense helped reduce the number of reported cases of gambiense HAT to fewer than 10 000 in 2011. Because low case numbers lead to decreased cost-effectiveness of such active screening, we aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of a rapid serodiagnostic test (HAT Sero-K-SeT) applicable in primary health-care centres. METHODS: In our case-control study, we assessed participants older than 11 years who presented for HAT Sero-K-SeT and CATT/T b gambiense at primary care centres or to mobile teams (and existing patients with confirmed disease status at these centres) in Bandundu Province, DR Congo. We defined cases as patients with trypanosomes that had been identified in lymph node aspirate, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid. During screening, we recruited controls without previous history of HAT or detectable trypanosomes in blood or lymph who resided in the same area as the cases. We assessed diagnostic accuracy of three antibody detection tests for gambiense HAT: HAT Sero-K-SeT and CATT/T b gambiense (done with venous blood at the primary care centres) and immune trypanolysis (done with plasma at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium). FINDINGS: Between June 6, 2012, and Feb 25, 2013, we included 134 cases and 356 controls. HAT Sero-K-SeT had a sensitivity of 0·985 (132 true positives, 95% CI 0·947-0·996) and a specificity of 0·986 (351 true negatives, 0·968-0·994), which did not differ significantly from CATT/T b gambiense (sensitivity 95% CI 0·955, 95% CI 0·906-0·979 [128 true positives] and specificity 0·972, 0·949-0·985 [346 true negatives]) or immune trypanolysis (sensitivity 0·985, 0·947-0·996 [132 true positives] and specificity 0·980, 0·960-0·990 [349 true negatives]). INTERPRETATION: The diagnostic accuracy of HAT Sero-K-SeT is adequate for T b gambiense antibody detection in local health centres and could be used for active screening whenever a cold chain and electricity supply are unavailable and CATT/T b gambiense cannot be done.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/imunologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/sangue , Adulto , Testes de Aglutinação/normas , Animais , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Feminino , Gâmbia , Testes de Hemaglutinação/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Sorológicos/normas , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 70(1): 72-7, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14971701

RESUMO

We compared the validity of pancytopenia, the formol-gel test (FGT), the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT), the direct agglutination test (DAT), and the rK39 dipstick test as diagnostic criteria for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Nepal. Between September 2000 and January 2002, 310 clinical suspects had a bone marrow aspirate, and if negative, a spleen aspirate smear examined for Leishmania donovani. Sensitivity and specificity of all tests were determined compared with parasitology and by latent class analysis (LCA). Compared with parasitology, the sensitivities of the other tests were as follows: pancytopenia = 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.3-22.5%), FGT = 39.9% (95% CI = 32.7-47.4%), IFAT = 28.4% (95% CI = 22.0-35.5%), DAT = 95.1% (95% CI = 90.8-97.7%), and the rK39 dipstick test = 87.4% (95% CI = 81.7-91.9%). Sensitivity estimates obtained by LCA were similar, but specificity estimates were substantially higher (DAT = 93.7% versus 77.8%; rK39 dipstick test = 93.1% versus 77.0%). The DAT or the rK39 dipstick test can replace parasitology as the basis of a decision to treat VL in Nepalese peripheral health services.


Assuntos
Leishmania donovani/isolamento & purificação , Leishmaniose Visceral/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Testes de Aglutinação , Animais , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Medula Óssea/parasitologia , Feminino , Técnica Indireta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Formaldeído , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Estatísticos , Pancitopenia/parasitologia , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Baço/parasitologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA