Dental Infection Cause of Flap Loss in Cleft Palate Repair.

Flap necrosis is a very common complication encountered after cleft palate repair, especially in uni-pedicled flaps. Many causes have been attributed to this complication but very limited data is available in the literature on dental infection as the cause of flap necrosis. This report of a case describes loss of flap caused due to a periapical granuloma of dental origin impinging on the pedicle causing suspected thrombosis of the pedicle resulting in flap necrosis. Since this is an important cause that can be easily prevented, it is reported.

The efficacy of vomer flap for closure of hard palate during primary lip repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study presents the institutional experience of the use of vomer flap for early closure of hard palate during unilateral complete cleft-lip repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival rate of the vomer flap and to investigate its effect on the subsequent palatoplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 101 non-syndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip who received a vomer flap for the closure of the hard palate during cleft-lip repair. Patients were aged 6 months to 28 years (median 1 year). Success rates of the vomer flaps were assessed clinically and through pre-operative photographs taken at the time of subsequent palate repair. Ninety-two patients returned for second-stage palate repair, and 74 patients with adequate post-operative follow-up information were statistically analysed. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients who were operated with primary lip repair and simultaneous vomer flap, only 54 (52.4%) vomer flaps healed completely. Out of 92 patients who returned for subsequent palatoplasty, 71 (77.2%) were operated with the two-flap technique, and 19 (20.7%) received von Langenbeck repairs. Seven (9.1%) patients had a surgical complication. The failure of previous vomer repair and von Langenbeck surgical technique were identified as factors associated with post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that failed vomer flaps increased the risks of complications in the subsequent palate repair. Furthermore, efforts to use von Langenbeck technique rather than the two-flap technique also resulted in increased surgical complications. As a result, we have abandoned the use of the vomer flap with primary lip repair.

Early complications after cleft palate repair: a multivariate statistical analysis of 709 patients.

This study presents a large consecutive institutional experience with primary cleft palate repairs. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of early complications after cleft palate surgery in a series of nonsyndromic children treated at the authors' comprehensive cleft center. This retrospective analysis includes 709 consecutive patients with cleft palate treated by 6 different staff surgeons at Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center between April 2011 and December 2012. Secondary cases were excluded from this study. The patients were initially followed up between 1 week and 1 month after surgery. The overall incidence of early complications was determined, and the effect of the extent of clefting, the type of repair, the age at repair, and the operating surgeon were analyzed. Early complications in this study include dehiscence of the wound, fistula formation, hanging palate, and total or partial flap necrosis. There was a 2.4% rate (17/709) of take-back to the operating room in the immediate postoperative period for control of bleeding, although no blood transfusions were required. The incidence of postoperative fistulas in this series was 3.9% (20/512). There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cleft palatal fistula for Veau IV clefts, but there were no significant differences with respect to operating surgeon, patient sex, patient age, and type of palatoplasty. The complication and fistula rate is consistent with other published reports from developed countries and provides evidence for the value of this model for surgical delivery in the developing world.

Longitudinal treatment of cleft lip and palate in developing countries: dentistry as part of a multidisciplinary endeavor.

Cleft lip and palate affects roughly 1 in 600 children and predisposes patients to a lifetime of functional and esthetic discrepancies. Disparities in access as well as quality of care exist worldwide, with many children in developing countries unable to receive treatment. In the late 20th century, humanitarian medical missions emerged as a means of delivering surgical expertise to patients in resource-limited settings. These early missions took on a patient-centered approach focused solely on cleft repair, with little emphasis on treating the dental abnormalities that arose after the initial surgery. However, modern cleft care is characterized by a multidisciplinary, team-based approach with significant dental involvement. Recent cleft lip and palate endeavors have shifted from a mission-based approach to a developmental approach facilitating growth of an independent care center. This strategy focuses on creating an institution with expanded access to dental services, thus facilitating the long-term treatment inherent in modern cleft care. One clinic in a developing country that has experienced successful transitioning from a mission site to an independent craniofacial clinic is Operation Smile's Cleft Comprehensive Care Clinic in Guwahati, India. This article will summarize the rationale and planning of the clinic, underscore the team-based approach required in longitudinal treatment of cleft lip and palate, and demonstrate how treatment methodology may differ in resource-limited settings by outlining the therapeutic considerations of each provider in the Guwahati Clinic.