Diagnostic Utility of Restriction Spectrum Imaging in Head and Neck Tumors: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging is crucial in the assessment of head and neck cancers for site, extension, and enlarged lymph nodes. Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is a new diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that enhances the ability to differentiate aggressive cancer from low-grade or benign tumors and helps guide treatment and biopsy. Its contribution to imaging of brain and prostate tumors has been previously published. However, there are no prior studies using RSI sequence in head and neck tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing RSI in head and neck cancer. METHODS: An additional RSI sequence was added in the routine MRI neck protocol for 13 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer between November 2018 and April 2019. Restriction spectrum imaging sequence was performed with b values of 0, 500, 1500, and 3000 s/mm 2 and 29 directions on 1.5T magnetic resonance scanners.Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) images and RSI images were compared according to their ability to detect the primary malignancy and possible metastatic lymph nodes. RESULTS: In 71% of the patients, RSI outperformed DWI in detecting the primary malignancy and possible metastatic lymph nodes, whereas in the remaining cases, the 2 were comparable. In 66% of the patients, RSI detected malignant lymph nodes that DWI/apparent diffusion coefficient failed to detect. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of RSI in head and neck imaging and showed its superiority over the conventional DWI sequence. Because of its ability to differentiate benign and malignant lymph nodes in some cases, the addition of RSI to routine head and neck MRI should be considered.

Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine updated conversion factors (k-factors) that would enable accurate estimation of radiation effective dose (ED) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and calcium scoring performed on 12 contemporary scanner models and current clinical cardiac protocols and to compare these methods to the standard chest k-factor of 0.014 mSv·mGy-1cm-1. BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of ED from cardiac CT scans is essential to meaningfully compare the benefits and risks of different cardiac imaging strategies and optimize test and protocol selection. Presently, ED from cardiac CT is generally estimated by multiplying a scanner-reported parameter, the dose-length product, by a k-factor which was determined for noncardiac chest CT, using single-slice scanners and a superseded definition of ED. METHODS: Metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor radiation detectors were positioned in organs of anthropomorphic phantoms, which were scanned using all cardiac protocols, 120 clinical protocols in total, on 12 CT scanners representing the spectrum of scanners from 5 manufacturers (GE, Hitachi, Philips, Siemens, Toshiba). Organ doses were determined for each protocol, and ED was calculated as defined in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103. Effective doses and scanner-reported dose-length products were used to determine k-factors for each scanner model and protocol. RESULTS: k-Factors averaged 0.026 mSv·mGy-1cm-1 (95% confidence interval: 0.0258 to 0.0266) and ranged between 0.020 and 0.035 mSv·mGy-1cm-1. The standard chest k-factor underestimates ED by an average of 46%, ranging from 30% to 60%, depending on scanner, mode, and tube potential. Factors were higher for prospective axial versus retrospective helical scan modes, calcium scoring versus coronary CTA, and higher (100 to 120 kV) versus lower (80 kV) tube potential and varied among scanner models (range of average k-factors: 0.0229 to 0.0277 mSv·mGy-1cm-1). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac k-factors for all scanners and protocols are considerably higher than the k-factor currently used to estimate ED of cardiac CT studies, suggesting that radiation doses from cardiac CT have been significantly and systematically underestimated. Using cardiac-specific factors can more accurately inform the benefit-risk calculus of cardiac-imaging strategies.