Protocol Biopsies on de novo Renal-Transplants at 3 Months after Surgery: Impact on 5-Year Transplant Survival.

BACKGROUND: In many centers, a protocol kidney biopsy (PKB) is performed at 3 months post-transplantation (M3), without a demonstrated benefit on death-censored graft survival (DCGS). In this study, we compared DCGS between kidney transplant recipients undergoing a PKB or without such biopsy while accounting for the obvious indication bias. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2007 and 2013, we compared DCGS with respect to the availability and features of a PKB. We built a propensity score (PS) to account for PKB indication likelihood and adjusted the DCGS analysis on PKB availability and the PS. RESULTS: A total of 615 patients were included: 333 had a PKB, 282 did not. In bivariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, adjusting for the availability of a PKB and for the PS, a PKB was associated with a better 5-year DCGS independently of the PS (p < 0.001). Among the PKB+ patients, 87 recipients (26%) had IF/TA > 0. Patients with an IF/TA score of 3 had the worst survival. A total of 144 patients (44%) showed cv lesions. Patients with cv2 and cv3 lesions had the worst 5-year DCGS. CONCLUSIONS: A M3 PKB was associated with improved graft survival independently of potential confounders. These results could be explained by the early treatment of subclinical immunological events. It could be due to better management of the immunosuppressive regimen.

Characteristics of T- and NK-cell Lymphomas After Renal Transplantation: A French National Multicentric Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) encompass a spectrum of heterogeneous entities. Because the vast majority of cases PTLD arise from B cells, available data on PTLD of T or NK phenotype (T/NK-cell PTLD) are scarce, which limits the quality of the management of these patients. METHODS: All adult cases of PTLD diagnosed in France were prospectively recorded in the national registry between 1998 and 2007. Crosschecking the registry data with 2 other independent national databases identified 58 cases of T/NK-cell PTLD. This cohort was then compared with (i) the 395 cases of B-cell PTLD from the registry, and of (ii) a cohort of 148 T/NK-cell lymphomas diagnosed in nontransplanted patients. RESULTS: T/NK-cell PTLD occurred significantly later after transplantation and had a worse overall survival than B-cell PTLD. Two subtypes of T/NK-cell PTLD were distinguished: (i) cutaneous (28%) and (ii) systemic (72%), the latter being associated with a worse prognosis. Compared with T/NK-cell lymphomas of nontransplanted patients, overall survival of systemic T/NK-cell PTLD was worse (hazard ratio: 2.64 [1.76-3.94]; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This difference, which persisted after adjustment on tumoral mass, histological subtype, and extension of the disease at diagnosis could be explained by the fact that transplanted patients were less intensively treated and responded less to chemotherapy.

Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection Post Kidney Transplantation: Clinical and Histological Monitoring.

Introduction: Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) has very few effective therapeutic options. Interleukin-6 is an attractive target because it is involved in inflammation and humoral immunity. Therefore, the use of tocilizumab (anti-IL6 receptor, TCZ) is a potential valuable therapeutic option to treat cABMR in kidney-transplant (KT) recipients. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all KT recipients that received monthly TCZ infusions in the setting of cABMR, between August 2018 and July 2021. We assessed 12-month renal function and KT histology during follow-up. Results: Forty patients were included. At 12-months, eGFR was not significantly different, 41.6 ± 17 vs. 43 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.102) in patients with functional graft. Six patients (15%) lost their graft: their condition was clinically more severe at the time of first TCZ infusion. Histological follow-up showed no statistical difference in the scores of glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA). Chronic glomerulopathy score however, increased significantly over time; conversely arteritis and inflammation in IFTA ares improved in follow-up biopsies. Conclusion: In our study, the addition of TCZ prevented clinical and histological worsening of cABMR in KT recipients, except for more severely ill patients. Randomized studies are needed to clarify the risk/benefit of TCZ in cABMR.

Cytomegalovirus disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients: comparison of everolimus-based immunosuppression without prophylaxis with mycophenolic acid-based immunosuppression with prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: To compare everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose tacrolimus (TAC) with mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus standard-dose TAC with regards to rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 187 de novo KTRs; 59 patients (31.6%) received EVR/low-dose TAC (group 1); 128 patients (68.4%) received MPA with standard-dose TAC (group 2). All received anti-thymocyte globulins as the induction therapy, and steroid-sparing strategy. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was mandatory for CMV D+/R- KTRs (seronegative recipients of a seropositive donor) in both groups and for R+ seropositive recipients (only in group 2). RESULTS: The 2-year incidence of CMV disease was low and comparable between groups: 6.8% and 7.0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.94). There was no statistical difference in CMV serostatus (p = 1). However, CMV disease tended to be less frequent, though not statistically different, in R+ KTRs receiving EVR without prophylaxis (3.7% vs. 8.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and in patients without EVR discontinuation (2.6% vs. 6.9% in patients who did not discontinue MPA (p = 0.29). Two-year graft function was good and comparable between groups (median eGFR of 54.2 and 53.0 mL/min in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.47); incidence of immunological events was low. Significantly more patients in group 1 discontinued EVR because of adverse events than patients that discontinued MPA in group 2 (35.6% in group 1 vs. 10.2% in group 2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus plus low-dose TAC given to de novo KTRs was associated with low rates of CMV disease, especially in R+ patients with no CMV prophylaxis.

Early Prediction of Graft Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Circulatory Death: Biomarkers and Transplantation Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify transplantation characteristics and biomarkers that predict outcomes for kidney transplant (KT) patients from donors after circulatory death (DCDs). METHODS: Consecutive patients receiving a KT from a DCD in our center between 2014 and 2016 were included; the reference population was recipients with a living donor KT. The urinary tubular injury biomarker-to-creatinine ratio and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured at post-transplant days 1 and 3. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF). Descriptive and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included in the analysis: 15 (36.59%) DCD KTs (9 of which suffered from DGF) and 26 (63.41%) living donor KTs. For the primary endpoint, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, urinary tubular injury biomarker-to-creatinine ratio, and LDH areas under the curve were 1 and 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.0), 1 and 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.0), respectively. Among the transplant characteristics, only the 30-minute resistive index on the perfusion machine was significantly higher in DCD KTs with DGF vs those without DGF (0.26 mm Hg/mL/min [0.20; 0.32] vs 0.14 mm Hg/mL/min [0.12; 0.16], P = .05). Median 3-month creatinine clearance among DGF DCD KTs was 49 mL/min/1.73 m2 [IQR: 42; 65] and 65 mL/min/1.73 m2 [IQR: 62; 66] among DCD KTs without DGF (P = .22). CONCLUSION: In the DCD KT population, clinical and biological markers were identified that provided predictive tools for DGF. Thus, systematic measurement of these biomarkers, particularly LDH, could improve the management of kidney graft recipients' immunosuppressive therapy.

Belatacept in kidney transplantation and its limitations.

INTRODUCTION: Since the approval of belatacept in 2011 for use in the setting of de novo kidney transplantation, this CD80/86 - CD28 co-stimulation blocker has been shown to be a valuable treatment option for maintenance immunosuppression. Areas covered: In this setting, belatacept has been associated with superior glomerular filtration rate as compared to calcineurin inhibitor-based treatments because of the absence of nephrotoxicity. Additionally, belatacept avoids the cardiovascular side effects (e.g. hypertension and dyslipidemia) caused by a CNI-based-regimen. Nevertheless, belatacept-treated recipients have a higher rate of acute rejections and a higher risk of lymphoproliferative disorders. Expert opinion: Data suggest a benefit from early conversion vs. late conversion of belatacept in a conversion setting following CNI-related toxicity. Randomized studies are currently comparing belatacept to tacrolimus, instead of cyclosporine, as was done in the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as a First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT). The benefits and limitations of belatacept seem to be the same when tacrolimus is used instead of cyclosporine. Finally, we also report in this review on the immunological data available so far that explain belatacept's limitations and the higher rate of acute rejection. The goal is to find the optimal immunosuppressive strategy to improve efficacy and safety at post-transplantation.

Aortic bypass surgery for asymptomatic patients awaiting a kidney transplant: A word of caution.

INTRODUCTION: In the presence of severe aorto-iliac calcification, aortic bypass surgery can be mandatory to allow kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of this strategy among asymptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of all patients that had undergone vascular bypass surgery prior to kidney transplantation between November 2004 and March 2016. All patients undergoing aortic bypass surgery prior to kidney transplantation without any vascular-related symptoms were included. RESULTS: Twenty-one asymptomatic patients were included. Ten patients (48%) have not received a kidney transplant. Four patients died before kidney transplantation, including 2 deaths related to the bypass surgery (9.5%). Early post-operative morbidity involved 11 cases. Eleven patients (52%) were transplanted. Transplanted patients were significantly younger (median age 60 [56-61] vs 67 [60-72] years, P = .04) at the time of bypass and were less frequently treated for coronary heart disease (9% vs 50%, P = .06). CONCLUSION: Aortic bypass surgery performed prior to kidney transplantation among asymptomatic patients has significant mortality and morbidity rates. When transplantation is possible, the results are satisfying. Larger studies are required to define the selection criteria, such as age and coronary heart disease.

A French Cohort Study of Kidney Retransplantation after Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders arising after kidney transplantation portend an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Retransplantation of patients who had developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder remains questionable owing to the potential risks of recurrence when immunosuppression is reintroduced. Here, we investigated the feasibility of kidney retransplantation after the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We reviewed the data from all patients who underwent kidney retransplantation after post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in all adult kidney transplantation centers in France between 1998 and 2015. RESULTS: We identified a total of 52 patients with kidney transplants who underwent 55 retransplantations after post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. The delay from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder to retransplantation was 100±44 months (28-224); 98% of patients were Epstein-Barr virus seropositive at the time of retransplantation. Induction therapy for retransplantation was used in 48 patients (i.e., 17 [31%] patients received thymoglobulin, and 31 [57%] patients received IL-2 receptor antagonists). Six patients were also treated with rituximab, and 53% of the patients received an antiviral drug. The association of calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was the most common maintenance immunosuppression regimen. Nine patients were switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. One patient developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder recurrence at 24 months after retransplantation, whereas post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder did not recur in 51 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder among patients who underwent retransplantation in France is a rare event.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after kidney transplantation: report of a nationwide French registry and the development of a new prognostic score.

PURPOSE: Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is associated with significant mortality in kidney transplant recipients. We conducted a prospective survey of the occurrence of PTLD in a French nationwide population of adult kidney recipients over 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A French registry was established to cover a nationwide population of transplant recipients and prospectively enroll all adult kidney recipients who developed PTLD between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007. Five hundred patient cases of PTLD were referred to the French registry. The prognostic factors for PTLD were investigated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. RESULTS: Patients with PTLD had a 5-year survival rate of 53% and 10-year survival rate of 45%. Multivariable analyses revealed that age > 55 years, serum creatinine level > 133 µmol/L, elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, disseminated lymphoma, brain localization, invasion of serous membranes, monomorphic PTLD, and T-cell PTLD were independent prognostic indicators of poor survival. Considering five variables at diagnosis (age, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, PTLD localization, and histology), we constructed a prognostic score that classified patients with PTLD as being at low, moderate, high, or very high risk for death. The 10-year survival rate was 85% for low-, 80% for moderate-, 56% for high-, and 0% for very high-risk recipients. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study highlights the prognostic factors for PTLD and enables the development of a new prognostic score. After validation in an independent cohort, the use of this score should allow treatment strategies to be better tailored to individual patients in the future.

Profiling sirolimus-induced inflammatory syndrome: a prospective tricentric observational study.

BACKGROUND: The use of the immunosuppressant sirolimus in kidney transplantation has been made problematic by the frequent occurrence of various side effects, including paradoxical inflammatory manifestations, the pathophysiology of which has remained elusive. METHODS: 30 kidney transplant recipients that required a switch from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus-based immunosuppression, were prospectively followed for 3 months. Inflammatory symptoms were quantified by the patients using visual analogue scales and serum samples were collected before, 15, 30, and 90 days after the switch. RESULTS: 66% of patients reported at least 1 inflammatory symptom, cutaneo-mucosal manifestations being the most frequent. Inflammatory symptoms were characterized by their lability and stochastic nature, each patient exhibiting a unique clinical presentation. The biochemical profile was more uniform with a drop of hemoglobin and a concomitant rise of inflammatory acute phase proteins, which peaked in the serum 1 month after the switch. Analyzing the impact of sirolimus introduction on cytokine microenvironment, we observed an increase of IL6 and TNFα without compensation of the negative feedback loops dependent on IL10 and soluble TNF receptors. IL6 and TNFα changes correlated with the intensity of biochemical and clinical inflammatory manifestations in a linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus triggers a destabilization of the inflammatory cytokine balance in transplanted patients that promotes a paradoxical inflammatory response with mild stochastic clinical symptoms in the weeks following drug introduction. This pathophysiologic mechanism unifies the various individual inflammatory side effects recurrently reported with sirolimus suggesting that they should be considered as a single syndromic entity.