Real-world outcome of crizotinib for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer: Multicenter retrospective analysis in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: About 3%-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents positive anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Recently, several target agents have been approved as a treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. This study aimed to analyze the real-world efficacy and outcome when administered crizotinib, the first approved target agent for ALK-positive NSCLC, according to first- or late-line treatment. METHODS: A total of 290 patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were treated with crizotinib in 15 institutions in South Korea from January 2009 to December 2018 were enrolled. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 57.0 years, and 50.3% were male. The median follow-up duration was 29.3 months. Among them, 113 patients received crizotinib as first-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60.1% (57.0% for first-line recipients, 61.8% for second-/later-line). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 (11.6-17.0) months. For first-line recipients, overall survival (OS) was 26.3 (17.6-35.0) months. No significant difference in ORR, PFS and OS, according to the setting of crizotinib initiation, was observed. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, old age, male gender, initially metastatic, and number of metastatic organs were associated with poor PFS and OS. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting, and severe adverse event leading to dose adjustment was hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: ORR, PFS, OS, and adverse event profiles were comparable to previous clinical trials. Our findings could aid in the efficient management of ALK-positive lung cancer patients.

Strategies to Improve Smoking Cessation for Participants in Lung Cancer Screening Program: Analysis of Factors Associated with Smoking Cessation in Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS).

PURPOSE: Smoking cessation intervention is one of the key components of successful lung cancer screening program. We investigated the effectiveness and related factors of smoking cessation services provided to the participants in a population-based lung cancer screening trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS) is a nationwide, multi-center lung cancer screening trial that evaluates the feasibility of implementing population-based lung cancer screening. All 5,144 current smokers who participated in the K-LUCAS received a mandatory smoking cessation counseling. Changes in smoking status were followed up using a telephone survey in 6 months after lung cancer screening participation. The lung cancer screening's impact on smoking cessation is analyzed by variations in the smoking cessation interventions provided in screening units. RESULTS: Among 4,136 survey responders, participant's motivation to quit smoking increased by 9.4% on average after lung cancer screening. After 6 months from the initial screening, 24.3% of participants stopped smoking, and 10.6% of participants had not smoked continuously for at least 6 months after screening. Over 80% of quitters stated that participation in lung cancer screening motivated them to quit smoking. Low-cost public smoking cessation program combined with lung cancer screening increased the abstinence rates. The smokers were three times more likely to quit smoking when the smoking cessation counseling was provided simultaneously with low-dose computed tomography screening results than when provided separately. CONCLUSION: A mandatory smoking cessation intervention integrated with screening result counselling by a physician after participation in lung cancer screening could be effective for increasing smoking cessation attempts.

Real-world analysis of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: survival and prognostic factors.

Background: Overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) is poor. We aimed to identify prognostic factors and ascertain treatment outcomes of first-line afatinib for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC with BM in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective observational study reviewed electronic records of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-line afatinib treatment between October 2014 and October 2019 in 16 hospitals across South Korea. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated time on treatment (TOT) and OS; multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. Results: Among 703 patients who received first-line afatinib, 262 (37.3%) had baseline BM. Of 441 patients without baseline BM, 92 (20.9%) developed central nervous system (CNS) failure. Compared with patients without CNS failure, those with CNS failure during afatinib treatment were younger (P=0.012), had a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (P<0.001), increased metastatic site involvement (P<0.001), advanced stage disease (P<0.001), with liver metastasis (P=0.008) and/or bone metastasis (P<0.001) at baseline. Cumulative incidence of CNS failure in years 1, 2 and 3 was 10.1%, 21.5% and 30.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, cumulative incidence was significantly higher in patients with ECOG PS ≥2 (P<0.001), uncommon EGFR mutations (P=0.001), and no baseline pleural metastasis (P=0.017). Median TOT was 16.0 months (95% CI: 14.8-17.2) and, in patients with CNS failure, without CNS failure, and with baseline BM was 12.2, 18.9, and 14.1 months, respectively (P<0.001). Median OS was 52.9 months (95% CI: 45.4-60.3) and, in patients with CNS failure, without CNS failure, and with baseline BM was 29.1, 67.3 and 48.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: First-line afatinib in the real-world setting showed clinically meaningful effectiveness in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and BM. CNS failure was a poor prognostic factor for TOT and OS correlating with younger age, poor ECOG PS, higher metastatic number, advanced disease stage, uncommon EGFR mutations, and baseline liver and/or bone metastases.

Lung Cancer Screening in Asia: An Expert Consensus Report.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence and mortality of lung cancer are highest in Asia compared with Europe and USA, with the incidence and mortality rates being 34.4 and 28.1 per 100,000 respectively in East Asia. Diagnosing lung cancer at early stages makes the disease amenable to curative treatment and reduces mortality. In some areas in Asia, limited availability of robust diagnostic tools and treatment modalities, along with variations in specific health care investment and policies, make it necessary to have a more specific approach for screening, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with lung cancer in Asia compared with the West. METHOD: A group of 19 advisors across different specialties from 11 Asian countries, met on a virtual Steering Committee meeting, to discuss and recommend the most affordable and accessible lung cancer screening modalities and their implementation, for the Asian population. RESULTS: Significant risk factors identified for lung cancer in smokers in Asia include age 50 to 75 years and smoking history of more than or equal to 20 pack-years. Family history is the most common risk factor for nonsmokers. Low-dose computed tomography screening is recommended once a year for patients with screening-detected abnormality and persistent exposure to risk factors. However, for high-risk heavy smokers and nonsmokers with risk factors, reassessment scans are recommended at an initial interval of 6 to 12 months with subsequent lengthening of reassessment intervals, and it should be stopped in patients more than 80 years of age or are unable or unwilling to undergo curative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Asian countries face several challenges in implementing low-dose computed tomography screening, such as economic limitations, lack of efforts for early detection, and lack of specific government programs. Various strategies are suggested to overcome these challenges in Asia.

Final Report on Real-World Effectiveness of Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib in EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Analysis of the RESET Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the final analysis of time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib and to compare the outcomes with other second-line regimens (comparator group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this updated report, the existing medical records were reviewed and rechecked. TOT and OS were updated and analyzed according to clinical features using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. TOT and OS were compared with those of the comparator group, in which most patients received pemetrexed-based treatments. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate features that could affect survival outcomes. RESULTS: The median observation time was 31.0 months. The follow-up period was extended to 20 months. A total of 401 patients who received first-line afatinib were analyzed (166 with T790M+ and second-line osimertinib, and 235 with unproven T790M and other second-line agents). Median TOTs on afatinib and osimertinib were 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.0 to 16.1) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 14.6), respectively. The median OS in the osimertinib group was 54.3 months (95% CI, 46.7 to 61.9), much longer than that in the comparator group. In patients who received osimertinib, the OS was longest with Del19+ (median, 59.1; 95% CI, 48.7 to 69.5). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest real-world studies reporting the encouraging activity of sequential afatinib and osimertinib in Asian patients with EGFR+ NSCLC who acquired the T790M mutation, particularly Del19+.

Real-World Study of Osimertinib in Korean Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Although osimertinib is the standard-of-care treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, real-world evidence on the efficacy of osimertinib is not enough to reflect the complexity of the entire course of treatment. Herein, we report on the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who had previously received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with confirmed EGFR T790M after disease progression of prior EGFR-TKI were enrolled and administered osimertinib 80 mg daily. The primary effectiveness outcome was progression-free survival, with time-to-treatment discontinuation, treatment and adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival being the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 558 individuals were enrolled, and 55.2% had investigator-assessed responses. The median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0 to 16.4), and the median time-to-treatment discontinuation was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.1 to 15.9). The median overall survival was 36.7 months (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached). The benefit with osimertinib was consistent regardless of the age, sex, smoking history, and primary EGFR mutation subtype. However, hepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis, the presence of plasma EGFR T790M, and the shorter duration of prior EGFR-TKI treatment were poor predictors of osimertinib treatment. Ten patients (1.8%), including three with pneumonitis, had to discontinue osimertinib due to severe adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib demonstrated its clinical effectiveness and survival benefit for EGFR T790M mutation-positive in Korean patients with no new safety signals.

Clinical Prognosis of Lung Cancer in Patients with Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.

The clinical outcomes of patients with lung cancer coexisting with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are reported to have been conflicting. There is insufficient evidence for treatment and prognosis of lung cancer according to renal function in patients with CKD. We evaluate clinical course and prognostic factors of lung cancer according to the renal function of moderate CKD patients. A retrospective, multicenter study of lung cancer patients with moderate CKD was performed. Moderate CKD was defined as having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. CKD was classified as stage 3, stage 4, and stage 5 according to eGFR. The cumulative mortality of lung cancer was calculated by competing risks survival analysis, and the risk factors were evaluated by the Cox-proportional hazards model. Among the lung cancer patients with moderate CKD (n = 181), median overall survival (OS) was 11.1 (4.2−31.3) months for stage 3 CKD patients, 6.0 (1.8−16.3) months for stage 4 CKD patients, and 4.7 (2.1−40.1) months for stage 5 CKD patients (p = 0.060), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, CKD stage was associated with an increased mortality in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cox regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 75 years (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.581; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.082−2.310), Charlson comorbidity index (aHR, 1.669; 95% CI, 10.69−2.605), and stage IV NSCLC (aHR, 2.395; 95% CI, 1.512−3.796) were associated with increased mortality risk, whereas adenocarcinoma (aHR, 0.580; 95% CI, 0.352−0.956) and stage 3 CKD (aHR, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.399−0.895) were associated with decreased mortality risk. In conclusion, the mortality risk of patients with lung cancer was lower in stage 3 CKD compared with stage 4 or 5 CKD. In addition, in the early stages of NSCLC, the CKD stage affected the prognosis, but not in the advanced stage NSCLC.

Incidence and outcomes of adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs and their effects on the quality of life: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In tuberculosis (TB) treatment, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can interrupt treatment and decrease the quality of life (QoL). We aimed to prospectively investigate the incidence of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs and related outcomes and QoL. METHODS: Adult patients with TB who had been treated with first-line anti-TB drugs in five Korean hospitals were enrolled. ADR questionnaire surveys and blood tests were performed four times serially, and QoL was assessed on the fourth TB treatment week (±2 weeks). RESULTS: Of 410 enrolled patients with TB (males, 62%; mean age, 52.1 ± 18.1 years [those aged ≥65 years, 26.6%]), 67.8% experienced any ADRs (≥ grade 2) to TB drugs. The most common ADR was fatigue (53.2%), followed by itching (42.7%) and anorexia (41.7%). Older adult patients experienced relatively more ADRs, including anorexia, dyspepsia, rash, dizziness, anemia, abnormal hepatic/renal function tests, and increased uric acid levels (p < 0.05). Treatment regimens changed for 9.5% of patients owing to ADRs to anti-TB drugs. Patients with any ADRs and older adult patients had significantly lower QoL than their counterparts (p < 0.05). Old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02) and being male (OR 2.65) were independently associated with ADRs, whereas active smoking (OR 4.73) and a relatively long treatment phase (OR 5.13) were independently associated with hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs were common and related to relatively low QoL, especially among older adults. Although 9.5% of patients had ADR-related regimen changes, most patients with ADRs completed treatments successfully.

Prognostic outcome of treatment modalities for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced lung cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer cases has shown remarkable development in the past two decades. However, there have been limited studies comparing the prognostic effects of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and other treatment modalities. Therefore, we compared the survival outcomes of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs versus those treated with other treatment modalities. METHODS: Patient data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Database, National Health Insurance Service- National Sample Cohort 2002 to 2015, which was released by the Korean National Health Insurance Service in 2015. The lung cancer group included patients (n = 2,003) initially diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2013. The main outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to calculate the relative risk of mortality. RESULTS: Among the newly diagnosed lung cancer cases, 1,004 (50.1%) were included in the analysis. A 15.1-month median survival benefit was observed in the EGFR-TKI group than that of the multimodality therapy group. The risk of mortality was as follows: EGFR-TKI treatment group (n = 142; hazard ratio [HR], 5.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.57 to 7.86) and multimodality therapy group (n = 326; HR, 7.42; 95% CI, 5.19 to 10.63) compared to surgery only (n = 275). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKIs showed better median survival and lower risk of mortality than those in the multimodality therapy group. In the case of EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer, there is room for downstaging in the TNM classification.

First-line Afatinib in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Mutations in South Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are heterogeneous and show variable prevalence and clinical responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We investigated the characteristics of uncommon EGFR mutations and the clinical efficacy of afatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we analyzed patients with NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations in 16 South Korean institutes. Mutations were categorized according to their incidence: 1) major uncommon mutations (G719X and L861Q), 2) compound mutations, and 3) minor uncommon mutations (exon 20 insertion, S768I, and de novo T790M). RESULTS: Of 703 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, 64 (9.1%) had uncommon EGFR mutations. Afatinib demonstrated activity against tumors harboring major uncommon mutations [median time of treatment (TOT): 20.3 months, 95% confidence interval (CI)=15.1-25.5; overall survival (OS): 30.6 months, 95% CI=26.3-34.8] and compound mutations (median TOT: 12.3 months, 95% CI=7.7-17.0; OS: 29.1 months, 95% CI=20.4-37.7) but not against tumors harboring minor uncommon mutations (median TOT: 3.8 months, 95% CI=1.7-6.0; OS: 8.5 months, 95% CI=5.2-11.7). The S768I mutation was present in 14 patients (1.99%). The median TOT and OS were not significantly different between S768I mutations and resistant exon 20 mutations. CONCLUSION: Afatinib is effective in patients with NSCLC harboring major uncommon and compound EGFR mutations.

Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Smoking History as Prognostic Factors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Osimertinib.

BACKGROUND: The remarkable efficacy of osimertinib in non‒small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired T790M mutation has been widely documented in clinical trials and real-world practice. However, some patients show primary resistance to this drug. Even patients who initially show a favorable response have inconsistent clinical outcomes later. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify additional clinical predictive factors for osimertinib efficacy. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with acquired T790M positive stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated with osimertinib salvage therapy in Hallym University Medical Center were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-one eligible patients were analyzed, including 38 (62%) women and 39 (64%) who never smoked. Their mean age was 63.3 years. The median follow-up after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was 36.0 months (interquartile range, 24.7-50.2 months). The majority (n=45, 74%) of patients were deceased. Based on univariate analysis, low baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR), age ≥50 years, never-smoking history, stage IVA at osimertinib initiation, and prolonged response to previous TKIs (≥10 months) were associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis showed that never-smoking status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.98; p=0.041) and a baseline NLR less than or equal to 3.5 (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.45; p-lt;0.001) were independently associated with a prolonged PFS with osimertinib. CONCLUSION: Smoking history and high NLR were independent negative predictors of osimertinib PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC developing EGFR T790M resistance after the initial EGFR-TKI treatment.

Pulmonary Tuberculosis and the Incidence of Lung Cancer among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rationale: Although a history of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a risk factor for developing both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer, it remains unclear whether a history of PTB affects lung cancer development in patients with COPD. Objectives: To investigate whether a history of PTB is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer development in a population with COPD. Methods: This cohort study included a nationwide representative sample of 13,165 Korean men and women with COPD, aged between 50 and 84 years. In addition, to assess whether the relationship between PTB and lung cancer risk differs between participants with and without COPD, a matched cohort without COPD was included. Participants were matched 1:3 for age, sex, smoking history, and PTB status based on the index health screening examination of corresponding participants with COPD. The two cohorts were followed up for 13 years (January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2015). PTB was diagnosed on the basis of the results of chest radiography, and incident lung cancer was identified from hospitalization and outpatient visit claims (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis code C33 or C34). Results: During 370,617 person-years (PY) of follow-up (median follow-up, 7.7 yr) in the COPD group, we observed 430 incident cases of lung cancer in participants without a history of PTB (incidence rate, 524 per 100,000 PY) and 148 cases in those with a history of PTB (incidence rate, 931 per 100,000 PY). Compared with participants without a PTB history, the fully adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for lung cancer in those with a history of PTB was 1.24 (1.03-1.50). The association of PTB history and lung cancer development was more evident in never-smokers with COPD. In contrast, among participants without COPD, the corresponding hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.98 (0.78-1.22). There was no interaction among PTB, smoking status, and COPD. Conclusions: A history of PTB was associated with an increased risk of developing lung cancer among patients with COPD in our country with an intermediate tuberculosis burden. Patients with COPD with a history of PTB, particularly never-smokers, might benefit from periodic screening or assessment for lung cancer development.

Multicenter real-world data of patients harboring rare mutations other than EGFR or ALK in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the application of targeted therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor rare genetic mutations are ongoing. In the present study, we investigated the real-world data of NSCLC patients who harbor rare mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC aged >20 years with confirmed rare mutations (BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, HER2, FGFR, and NTRK) from January 2015 to September 2020 at nine tertiary hospitals. In addition, we validated the lung cancer PCR panel kit in patients with confirmed mutations by NGS. RESULTS: Among 118 patients included, 88 received platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line chemotherapy. The progression-free survival of patients with BRAF, ERBB2, MET, RET, and ROS1 mutations was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-20.5), 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.0-7.5), 7.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-10.9), 11.4 months (95% CI: 9.2-13.6), and 10.0 months (95% CI: 3.7-16.4) respectively (p = 0.041). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in patients with ROS1 mutations; however, in BRAF, ERBB2, MET, and RET mutant patients, median OS was 14.1 months (95% CI: 10.1-14.1), 34.5 months (95% CI: 13.2-36.9), 22.7 months (95% CI: 1.7-24.0), and 29.8 months (95% CI: 28.9-61.3), respectively (p = 0.006). Of the 27 tissue samples, 26 (96.3%) showed the same PCR panel kit result with NGS. CONCLUSIONS: First-line platinum-based chemotherapy showed durable benefit in patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring rare genetic mutation other than EGFR or ALK.

Sequential treatment of afatinib and osimertinib or other regimens in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations: Results from a real-world study in South Korea.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal sequence for the administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, who were administered afatinib and osimertinib (group A) or other chemotherapy (group B) between October 2014 and 2019, across 16 hospitals in South Korea were reviewed. The primary outcome, time on treatment (TOT), secondary outcome, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 737 patients who received frontline afatinib treatment, 324 with complete records were selected (group A: 126, group B: 198). All patients in group A were T790M positive after afatinib, while patients in group B were all negative or unknown. The median TOT was 35.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7-45.6) in group A and 20.8 months (95% CI: 19.4-24.0) in group B. The median TOT with afatinib was 13.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-13.9) overall and 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.9-17.3) in group A. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 86.0 and 69.3% in group A and 75.9 and 55.3% in group B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment resulted in better survival rates than treatment with afatinib followed by other chemotherapies.

Revised Korean Cough Guidelines, 2020: Recommendations and Summary Statements.

Cough is the most common respiratory symptom that can have various causes. It is a major clinical problem that can reduce a patient's quality of life. Thus, clinical guidelines for the treatment of cough were established in 2014 by the cough guideline committee under the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. From October 2018 to July 2020, cough guidelines were revised by members of the committee based on the first guidelines. The purpose of these guidelines is to help clinicians efficiently diagnose and treat patients with cough. This article highlights the recommendations and summary of the revised Korean cough guidelines. It includes a revised algorithm for the evaluation of acute, subacute, and chronic cough. For a chronic cough, upper airway cough syndrome (UACS), cough variant asthma (CVA), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) should be considered in differential diagnoses. If UACS is suspected, first-generation antihistamines and nasal decongestants can be used empirically. In cases with CVA, inhaled corticosteroids are recommended to improve cough. In patients with suspected chronic cough due to symptomatic GERD, proton pump inhibitors are recommended. Chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis, lung cancer, aspiration, intake of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, intake of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, habitual cough, psychogenic cough, interstitial lung disease, environmental and occupational factors, tuberculosis, obstructive sleep apnea, peritoneal dialysis, and unexplained cough can also be considered as causes of a chronic cough. Chronic cough due to laryngeal dysfunction syndrome has been newly added to the guidelines.

Feasibility of implementing a national lung cancer screening program: Interim results from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS).

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening conducted in high-risk group using low-dose computer tomography (LDCT) has been reported as an effective method to reduce lung cancer mortality in two large randomized-control trials. However, the effectiveness is uncertain when lung cancer screening is expanded to a nationwide population-based program. METHODS: The Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS) is a single-arm cohort study that was conducted from February 2017 to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an organized national lung cancer screening program in Korea. High-risk population aged 55-74 years with more than a 30-pack-year smoking history was recruited. Smoking history was obtained from administering questionnaires at national health screening programs or public smoking cessation programs which are already established programs in Korea. The screening results were reported using the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS), suggested by the American College of Radiology. K-LUCAS was performed by a network-based diagnosis supporting system using a computer-aided detection (CAD) program to maintain screening quality. Current smokers were provided with mandatory smoking counseling. RESULTS: Among 71,829 participants aged 50 years or older in the national health screening program, 5,975 (8.3%) were eligible for lung cancer screening. Among them, 1,062 (17.8%) refused to participate in K-LUCAS. Additionally, 779 participants were recruited in the smoking cessation program. Thus, a total of 5,692 eligible high-risk participants were recruited in this study. Among them, 865 (15.2%) had positive screening results, which requires a further examination; 529 (9.3%) had Lung-RADS category 3 (indeterminate), and 336 (5.9%) had category 4 (suspicious of lung cancer); 42 (0.7%) had confirmed lung cancer. Approximately 66.7% had early-stage lung cancer: 24 (57.1%), stage I and 4 (9.5%), stage II. Six (1.1%) patients developed complications at the time of diagnosis, including one death. The anxiety level related to cancer screening was low. Participation in screening encouraged motivation to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: K-LUCAS provided promising evidence supporting the implementation of a national lung cancer screening program to detect early stage lung cancer and promote smoking cessation for participants in Asian population.

Clinical impact of rebiopsy among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinoma in a real-world clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the risk factors of acquired T790M mutation among patients with lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine mutation who were treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The aim was to identify the clinical impact of rebiopsy. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in South Korea from January 2007 to June 2017. Patients with adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation who underwent rebiopsy and were treated with EGFR-TKIs were included. RESULTS: Of a total of 352 patients, T790M mutation was identified in 156 (41.9%) at the time of rebiopsy. The median duration from initial biopsy to rebiopsy was 17 months. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed associations of exon 19 deletion (odds ratio [OR], 1.643; p = 0.026), absence of L858R (OR, 0.627; p = 0.042), and previous EGFR-TKI treatment duration (OR, 1.039; p < 0.001) with T790M mutation. Previous EGFR-TKI treatment duration (OR, 3.580; p < 0.001) was independently associated with T790M mutation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that brain metastasis at initial diagnosis (hazard ratio, 1.390; p = 0.050) tended to be associated with T790M mutation. Among the patients with T790M mutation at rebiopsy, the osimertinib user group (n = 90) had a better one-year survival (68.7 vs. 58.3%, p = 0.048) than the osimertinib nonuser group (n = 66). CONCLUSIONS: Rebiopsy might affect the clinical course of patients with EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma who receive EGFR-TKIs.

Risk-based prediction model for selecting eligible population for lung cancer screening among ever smokers in Korea.

BACKGROUND: This study developed a new lung cancer risk prediction model for the Korean population and evaluated the performance, compared to the previously reported risk models developed in Western countries. METHODS: Among the 6,811,893 people who received health examinations from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, 969,351 ever-smokers (40-79 years) were included. Performance of Bach, Lung Cancer Risk Models for Screening, PLCOM2012, Pittsburgh, and Liverpool Lung Project models were evaluated. The ever-smokers were divided into the training and validation datasets by random sampling. The lung cancer risk model was developed and validated in the Korean population. The efficiency of model-based selection for lung cancer screening was compared with the eligible criteria of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). RESULTS: The Korean lung cancer risk model showed the area under the curve and expected/observed (E/O) ratio of 0.816 and 0.983 in the training dataset and 0.816 and 0.988 in the validation dataset. The Korean lung cancer risk model included age-mean of age, square of age-mean of age, sex, square root of pack-years of smoking, years since cessation, physical activity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and medical history of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, emphysema, pneumoconiosis, and interstitial pulmonary disease. Compared with the NLST criteria, the Korean lung cancer risk model's cut-off criteria (>2.1%) had more improved sensitivity (61.4% vs. 44.3%) and positive predictive value (4.1% vs. 2.9%). The Korean lung cancer risk model showed better discrimination and calibration than previously developed models in Western population. CONCLUSIONS: The Korean lung cancer risk model can select eligible population for low-dose computed tomography screening among the Asian population. The efficiency of risk model-based selection for lung cancer screening is superior to that of fixed criteria-based selection.

Awareness and Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Korean Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been used frequently, and its use continues to increase in lung cancer patients, despite insufficient scientific of its efficacy. To investigate this situation, we analyzed the current awareness and use of CAM in Korean lung-cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective survey-based study was performed at seven medical centers in South Korea between August and October 2019. The survey assessed general patient characteristics and the awareness and use of CAM. We analyzed differences in the clinical parameters of patients aware and not aware of CAM and of CAM non-users and users. RESULTS: Of the 434 patients included in this study, 68.8% responded that they were aware of CAM and 30.9% said they had experienced it. In univariate analysis, the patients aware of CAM were younger with poor performance status, had advanced-stage lung cancer, received more systemic therapy, and received concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). By multiple logistic regression, younger age, poor performance status, advanced stage, and prior CCRT were identified as independent risk factors for CAM awareness. There were no significant differences in the general characteristics and cancer-associated clinical parameters of CAM non-users and users. CONCLUSION: Specific clinical parameters were associated with patients' awareness of CAM, although there were no significantly different characteristics between CAM users and non-users.

Collateral effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on lung cancer diagnosis in Korea.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is predicted to significantly affect patients with lung cancer, owing to its rapid progression and high mortality. Studies on lung cancer diagnosis and treatment during an epidemic are lacking. We analyzed the impact of COVID-19 on lung cancer diagnosis in Korea, where lung cancer incidence continues to rise. METHODS: The number of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases in three university-affiliated hospitals during the pandemic and their clinical features were compared with lung cancer cases diagnosed during the same period in the past 3 years. The effectiveness of measures taken by the study hospitals to prevent nosocomial transmission was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 612 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer from February through June, 2017-2020. During the pandemic, the number of patients who sought consultation at the division of pulmonology of study hospitals dropped by 16% from the previous year. Responding to the pandemic, the involved hospitals created physically isolated triage areas for patients with acute respiratory infection symptoms. Wide-range screening and preventive measures were implemented, thus minimizing the delay in lung cancer diagnosis. No patient acquired COVID-19 due to hospital exposure. The proportion of patients with stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly increased (2020: 74.7% vs. 2017: 57.9%, 2018: 66.7%, 2019: 62.7%, p = 0.011). The number of lung cancers diagnosed during this period and the previous year remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.