News on infantile haemangioma. Part 2: therapy and evaluation.

Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most frequently occurring tumour of childhood. While benign, in more than half of the cases, less or more severe sequelae can be observed. In Part 1 of this review, we discussed the clinical course and pathomechanism of IHs. In Part 2 of this state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the current management of IH and focus on the working mechanism of ß-blockers in IHs. Furthermore, we will discuss options for the evaluation of patients and their families (quality of life and family burden), as well as for the evaluation of IHs by healthcare providers, such as assessments of activity and severity. This review will update the reader on the working mechanism of propranolol in IHs and offer an oversight of tools (questionnaires and scoring systems) that can be used in clinical practice or for research.

News on infantile haemangioma. Part 1: clinical course and pathomechanism.

Currently, there is no doubt that the first choice of treatment for alarming infantile haemangiomas (IHs) is oral beta-blockers. However, research in this field remains active, as the pathogenesis of IH is still not completely elucidated. Furthermore, there are different approaches to the management of IHs with beta-blockers. In Part 1 of this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art evidence for IH with regard to (i) the definition, epidemiology, course, risk factors and sequelae, and (ii) the pathogenesis, focusing on genetic studies. This review will update the reader on the latest developments in the pathogenesis of IH. Furthermore, we hope this review will give more insight into risk factors and sequelae of IH, thereby contributing to better decisions in the clinical management of patients with IH. The therapy and evaluation of IHs will be discussed in Part 2 of this review.

Propranolol in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: lessons from the European Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce survey.

BACKGROUND: Oral propranolol is widely prescribed as first-line treatment for infantile haemangiomas (IHs). Anecdotally, prescribing practice differs widely between centres. OBJECTIVES: The Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce was founded to establish patterns of use of propranolol in IHs. METHODS: Participating centres entered data on all of their patients who had completed treatment with oral propranolol for IHs, using an online data capture tool. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 1097 children from 39 centres in eight European countries. 76·1% were female and 92·8% had a focal IH, with the remainder showing a segmental, multifocal or indeterminate pattern. The main indications for treatment were periocular location (29·3%), risk of cosmetic disfigurement (21·1%) and ulceration and bleeding (20·6%). In total 69·2% of patients were titrated up to a maintenance regimen, which consisted of 2 mg kg(-1) per day (85·8%) in the majority of cases. 91·4% of patients had an excellent or good response to treatment. Rebound growth occurred in 14·1% upon stopping, of whom 53·9% were restarted and treatment response was recaptured in 91·6% of cases. While there was no significant difference in the treatment response, comparing a daily maintenance dose of < 2 mg kg(-1) vs. 2 mg kg(-1) vs. > 2 mg kg(-1) , the risk of adverse events was significantly higher: odds ratio (OR) 1 vs. adjusted OR 0·70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·33-1·50, P = 0·36 vs. OR 2·38, 95% CI 1·04-5·46, P = 0·04, Ptrend < 0·001. CONCLUSIONS: The PITCH survey summarizes the use of oral propranolol across 39 European centres, in a variety of IH phases, and could be used to inform treatment guidelines and the design of an interventional study.

Support for the hypoxia theory in the pathogenesis of infantile haemangioma.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of infantile haemangioma (IH) is unknown. Several mechanisms have been proposed, including hypoxia, which triggers upregulation and stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)1α. HIF1α stimulates downstream transcription of target genes that enhance angiogenesis. AIM: To identify possible involvement of hypoxia in the pathogenesis of IH, as hypoxia signalling constitutes a potential therapeutic target. METHODS: IH tissue samples collected during the period 1991-2011 (preserved in paraffin wax) were immunohistochemically analysed for HIF1α and the known HIF1α targets: BCL2/adenovirus E1B kD-interacting protein family member 3 (BNIP3), carbon anhydrase (CA)-IX, glucose transporter (GLUT)-1, phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAKT), phosphorylated S6 protein (pS6) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Four observers independently assessed the findings. RESULTS: Of the 10 IH samples, 2 appeared to be in the growth phase. In all samples, GLUT-1, BNIP3, pAKT and VEGF were positive, CA-IX was weakly positive, and HIF1α was negative. pS6 was positive in 9/10 cases and negative in 1/10. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors implicated in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis may be involved in IH development. However, the small sample size and retrospective approach of the study preclude definitive conclusions. Prospective studies are needed to conclusively determine which of the factors involved in the (hypoxia) cascade are required for an IH to grow, and could thus be a possible target of drugs for IH treatment.

Treatment of small superficial haemangioma with timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: a series of 20 cases.

BACKGROUND: Haemangioma of infancy (HOI) on the face may be disfiguring and alarming for parents. Usually they are not treated when they are small. Treatment of HOI with propranolol is a breakthrough. Timolol (topical treatment) and propranolol are closely related. METHODS: We considered topical treatment with timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution 3-4 times daily in patients with small HOI. Twenty patients with small mostly superficial HOI were included. RESULTS: A series of 20 patients with HOI treated with timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution are described. The treatment was effective in all superficial HOIs after 1-4 months. A quick direct inhibitory effect on the growth of the HOI followed by slower regression was observed. The children had to be treated during the whole proliferative phase. Deep HOIs on the nose (2 cases) and lower eyelid (1 case) showed no response. CONCLUSION: Topical timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution is effective in HOI. Safety and effectiveness of drugs like topical timolol and topical propranolol require further investigation but they seem very safe when used in small HOIs. We recommend that small superficial HOIs should be treated in an early proliferative phase.

Haemangioma of infancy: two case reports with an overdose of propranolol.

An 8-week-old infant was treated with oral propranolol for a haemangioma of infancy. The standard dose (according to protocol) is 2 mg/kg/day but, because of a mistake by the pharmacist, the child was treated with 8 mg/kg/day without any side effects (pulse, blood pressure and glucose stayed normal).

Scoring the proliferative activity of haemangioma of infancy: the Haemangioma Activity Score (HAS).

BACKGROUND: Haemangioma of infancy (HOI) is the most frequently occurring benign tumour of infancy. A good, reliable and objective scoring system for haemangioma activity is not yet available. AIM: We have developed a simple system called the Haemangioma Activity Score (HAS) for scoring the (disease) proliferative activity of haemangiomas. The current study was undertaken to validate this system. METHODS: We validated the HAS in a comparative study of photographs taken during consultations from 2000 until 2008 (n = 78). Agreement between three observers was assessed at two different time points (t(0) and t(1)) with a minimum interval of 6 months between them, using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Agreement between observers was good. The average ICC of the HAS at t(0) and t(1) was 0.72 and 0.76, respectively. The average ICC of the HAS for the changes from baseline (HAS at t(0) minus HAS at t(1) ) was 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the HAS is a good system for scoring the proliferative activity of haemangiomas, and believe it to be useful in future investigations. The number of studies comparing different therapies for treating haemangiomas is steadily increasing, and the HAS (before and after treatment) may provide a valuable scoring system for evaluating such therapies.