Metabolic phenotypes and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: The association of obesity with colorectal cancer (CRC) may vary depending on metabolic status. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the combined impacts of obesity and metabolic status on CRC risk. METHODS: The Scopus, PubMed, and web of sciences databases were systematically searched up to Jun 2021 to find all eligible publications examining CRC risk in individuals with metabolically unhealthy normal-weight (MUHNW), metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO) phenotypes. RESULTS: A total of 7 cohort studies with a total of 759,066 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with healthy normal-weight people, MUHNW, MHO, and MUHO individuals indicated an increased risk for CRC with a pooled odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI = 1.09-1.31) in MUHNW, 1.14 (95% CI = 1.06-1.22) in MHO, and 1.24 (95% CI = 1.19-1.29) in MUHO subjects. When analyses were stratified based on gender, associations remained significant for males. However, the elevated risk of CRC associated with MHO and MUHO was not significant in female participants. CONCLUSIONS: The individuals with metabolic abnormality, although at a normal weight, have an increased risk for CRC. Moreover, obesity is associated with CRC irrespective of metabolic status.

Effects of Pre/Probiotic Supplementation on Breast Milk Levels of TGF-b1, TGF-b2, and IgA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Background: Previous studies have proposed that the maternal intake of pre/probiotics may affect the immune composition of breast milk. Nevertheless, the available findings are contradictory. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of maternal supplementation with pre/probiotics on the levels of total immunoglobulin A (IgA), secretory IgA (SIgA), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-ß1), and TGF-2 in breast milk. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched using a comprehensive search strategy for eligible randomized-controlled trials published up to February 2021. A random-effects model was applied to pool weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect size. Cochran's Q statistic and the I2 statistic were used to measure the between-study variance. Egger's regression test was used to assess publication bias. Results: A total of 12 different studies, with a total sample size of 1722 individuals (probiotic group: 858, placebo group: 864), were included in this meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, compared with placebo, maternal supplementation with pre/probiotics had no significant effect on concentrations of total IgA, SIgA, TGF-ß1, and TGF-ß2 in the breast milk. In the subgroup analysis, pre/probiotics did not affect total IgA, TGF-ß1, and TGF-ß2 in both colostrum/transitional and mature milk. However, a significant increase in SIgA was found in colostrum/transitional milk following pre/probiotic administration (WMD = 19.33, 95% CI: 0.83-37.83; p = 0.04), without evidence for remarkable heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0, p = 0.57). Conclusions: Maternal supplementation with pre/probiotics may increase SIgA in colostrum/transitional milk, without any effect on total IgA, TGF-ß1, and TGF-ß2.

The association between psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with the risk of osteoporosis, osteopenia and bone fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The possible association between psoriatic/psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and bone loss has been observed; however, studies have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is an increase in the risk of osteoporosis, osteopenia and fractures in patients with psoriasis/PsA, compared with healthy individuals. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to September 2020 to identify relevant studies. Relative risk, hazard ratio or odds ratio (OR), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 12 different studies, with a total of 199 389 296 participants, were included. Overall, no significant relationship was observed between psoriasis/PsA and the risk of osteoporosis (psoriasis: OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.86-1.90; PsA: OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 0.79-2.19) and osteopenia (psoriasis: OR = 1.50, 95%CI = 0.75-3.02; PsA: OR = 1.61, 95%CI = 0.67-3.85). However, in the subgroup analysis, psoriasis was significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis in men (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.02-1.59) and studies with cohort design (OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 1.003-1.09). Psoriasis was also related to the risk of osteopenia in studies on a combination of both genders (OR = 2.86, 95%CI = 2.70-3.02). The pooled analysis demonstrated a significantly higher risk of fractures among patients with psoriasis (OR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.02-1.63) and PsA (OR = 2.88, 95%CI = 1.51-5.48), compared with participants without psoriasis/PsA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with psoriasis/PsA have an increased risk of fractures. There is little evidence supporting the relation of psoriasis to osteoporosis/osteopenia.

Melatonin supplementation and pro-inflammatory mediators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory processes are involved in chronic diseases. It has been suggested that melatonin reduces inflammation by its radical scavenging properties; however, the results of the previous studies are inconclusive. The objective of the present meta-analysis is to determine the direction and magnitude of melatonin supplementation effect on inflammatory biomarkers. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochran Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to April 2019. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were also carried out. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible studies with 22 datasets with total sample size of 749 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Melatonin supplementation significantly decreased TNF-α and IL-6 levels [(WMD = - 2.24 pg/ml; 95% CI - 3.45, - 1.03; P < 0.001; I2 = 96.7%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001) and (WMD = - 30.25 pg/ml; 95% CI - 41.45, - 19.06; P < 0.001, I2 = 99.0%; Pheterogeneity < 0.001)], respectively. The effect of melatonin on CRP levels was marginal (WMD = - 0.45 mg/L; 95% CI - 0.94, 0.03; P = 0.06; I2 = 96.6%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present meta-analysis support that melatonin supplementation could be effective on ameliorating of inflammatory mediators.

Comparison of Energy and Food Intake Between Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

AbstractObesity is a developed nutritional problem, and today, surgery is one of the approaches to cure it. A good understanding of the variations in food intake will be beneficial for sustaining long-term weight loss post-surgery and for improving nutrition care strategies. The purpose of this review was the comparison of the impact of two methods of gastric bypass (GBP) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on dietary intake. Databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of science were used for the literature search up to June 2018. We concluded the studies that measured mean daily energy intake and the percent of macronutrients from total calorie intake of before and after GBP and SG. A total of 18 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis for the effect of bariatric surgery on food intake. Bariatric surgery significantly decreased energy intake by 1050.04 kcal/day (p < 0.001) compared with the baseline values of energy intake. The pooled effect of bariatric surgery on protein intake was 0.82 g/day (p = 0.004) compared with the baseline values. The pooled analysis found no significant impact of bariatric surgery on carbohydrate intake (WMD = 0.56 g/day; p = 0.40) compared with the baseline values. The pooled estimate of effect for bariatric surgery on fat intake was - 1.34 g/day (p = 0.006). This study demonstrates that bariatric surgery might be effective on energy and fat intake; however, there was no effect on carbohydrate intake.