Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37061410

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a mucosal variant of lichen planus. Lichen sclerosus (LS) is an inflammatory disorder with a predilection for genital skin. We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients with both mucosal diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study included 86 women with both OLP and vulvar LS diagnosed from June 1, 1991 through November 30, 2020 at a Mayo Clinic campus in Rochester, Minnesota; Scottsdale, Arizona; or Jacksonville, Florida. Data included treatments, other cutaneous diagnoses, comorbidities, and information on patch testing and malignant transformation. RESULTS: The median patient age at diagnosis was 64.5 years for OLP and 65.6 years for vulvar LS. A diagnosis of OLP before vulvar LS was most common (50.0%). The most frequently used treatment for both conditions was topical corticosteroids. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) did not develop in any patient, but vulvar SCC developed in 2 (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: OLP and vulvar LS may coexist, commonly beginning in the patient's seventh decade. Topical corticosteroids are often used to manage both conditions. The coexistence of both diseases did not seem to portend a greater malignancy risk.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Líquen Plano Bucal , Líquen Plano , Neoplasias Bucais , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar , Humanos , Feminino , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/complicações , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/tratamento farmacológico , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/patologia , Líquen Plano Bucal/complicações , Líquen Plano Bucal/tratamento farmacológico , Líquen Plano Bucal/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicações , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Líquen Plano/complicações , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico
2.
Clin Immunol ; 245: 109152, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243347

RESUMO

Orthopedic implants heal well without complications in most patients but fail for unclear reasons in some individuals. This study determined the relevance of metal hypersensitivity in patients with failed orthopedic implants and those requiring orthopedic implant surgery. The study included 35 patients with failed orthopedic implants and 15 subjects scheduled for orthopedic implant surgery. The production of selected pro-inflammatory cytokines was measured in patients with failed orthopedic implants. Metal hypersensitivity was measured in all subjects using the MELISA® test. Of common metals in orthopedic alloys, the patients with failed orthopedic implants responded most frequently to nickel, chromium, titanium, iron, and molybdenum. Hypersensitivity to metals found in implants was measured in 40% of patients with failed implants. The study also showed that titanium exposure in patients with titanium hypersensitivity might lead to implant failure. Metal hypersensitivity testing should be offered to patients before surgery to minimize the risk of implant failure.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade , Titânio , Humanos , Titânio/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Metais/efeitos adversos , Citocinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA