Increased vascular inflammation on PET/CT in psoriatic arthritis patients in comparison with controls.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly due to a chronic inflammatory state. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to investigate the difference in vascular inflammation, measured with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), in PsA patients and controls. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess the association between clinical parameters of disease activity with vascular inflammation in PsA. METHODS: We included a total of 75 PsA patients with active peripheral arthritis (defined as ≥2 tender and swollen joints) from an ongoing clinical trial (EudraCT 2017-003900-28) and a retrospective group of 40 controls diagnosed with melanoma, without distant metastases and not receiving immunotherapy. The main outcome measure was aortic vascular inflammation which was measured on PET/CT scans using target-to-background ratios. Clinical disease activity in PsA was assessed with joint counts, body surface area and the Disease Activity index for PsA. Laboratory assessments included C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Vascular inflammation was increased in patients with PsA in comparison with controls (mean target-to-background ratio for entire aorta, respectively, 1.63±0.17 vs 1.49±0.16; p=<0.001). This association remained significant after correction for gender, age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure and aortic calcification (p=0.002). Vascular inflammation was not associated with disease-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic vascular inflammation was significantly increased in patients with active PsA compared with controls. This evidence supports the theory that inflammation in PsA is not limited to the skin and joints but also involves the vascular system.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based bone imaging of the lower limb: Strategies for generating high-resolution synthetic computed tomography.

This study aims at assessing approaches for generating high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging- (MRI-) based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images suitable for orthopedic care using a deep learning model trained on low-resolution computed tomography (CT) data. To that end, paired MRI and CT data of three anatomical regions were used: high-resolution knee and ankle data, and low-resolution hip data. Four experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of low-resolution training CT data on sCT generation and to find ways to train models on low-resolution data while providing high-resolution sCT images. Experiments included resampling of the training data or augmentation of the low-resolution data with high-resolution data. Training sCT generation models using low-resolution CT data resulted in blurry sCT images. By resampling the MRI/CT pairs before the training, models generated sharper images, presumably through an increase in the MRI/CT mutual information. Alternatively, augmenting the low-resolution with high-resolution data improved sCT in terms of mean absolute error proportionally to the amount of high-resolution data. Overall, the morphological accuracy was satisfactory as assessed by an average intermodal distance between joint centers ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm and by an average intermodal root-mean-squared distances between bone surfaces under 0.7 mm. Average dice scores ranged from 79.8% to 87.3% for bony structures. To conclude, this paper proposed approaches to generate high-resolution sCT suitable for orthopedic care using low-resolution data. This can generalize the use of sCT for imaging the musculoskeletal system, paving the way for an MR-only imaging with simplified logistics and no ionizing radiation.

Machine-learning predicted and actual 2-year structural progression in the IMI-APPROACH cohort.

In the Innovative Medicine's Initiative Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) knee osteoarthritis (OA) study, machine learning models were trained to predict the probability of structural progression (s-score), predefined as >0.3 mm/year joint space width (JSW) decrease and used as inclusion criterion. The current objective was to evaluate predicted and observed structural progression over 2 years according to different radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based structural parameters. Radiographs and MRI scans were acquired at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Radiographic (JSW, subchondral bone density, osteophytes), MRI quantitative (cartilage thickness), and MRI semiquantitative [SQ; cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes] measurements were obtained. The number of progressors was calculated based on a change exceeding the smallest detectable change (SDC) for quantitative measures or a full SQ-score increase in any feature. Prediction of structural progression based on baseline s-scores and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades was analyzed using logistic regression. Among 237 participants, around 1 in 6 participants was a structural progressor based on the predefined JSW-threshold. The highest progression rate was seen for radiographic bone density (39%), MRI cartilage thickness (38%), and radiographic osteophyte size (35%). Baseline s-scores could only predict JSW progression parameters (most P>0.05), while KL grades could predict progression of most MRI-based and radiographic parameters (P<0.05). In conclusion, between 1/6 and 1/3 of participants showed structural progression during 2-year follow-up. KL scores were observed to outperform the machine-learning-based s-scores as progression predictor. The large amount of data collected, and the wide range of disease stage, can be used for further development of more sensitive and successful (whole joint) prediction models. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT03883568.

TOFA-PREDICT study protocol: a stratification trial to determine key immunological factors predicting tofacitinib efficacy and drug-free remission in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory, musculoskeletal disease that affects up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Current challenges in clinical care and research include personalised treatment, understanding the divergence of therapy response and unravelling the multifactorial pathophysiology of this complex disease. Moreover, there is an urgent clinical need to predict, assess and understand the cellular and molecular pathways underlying the response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The TOFA-PREDICT clinical trial addresses this need. Our primary objective is to determine key immunological factors predicting tofacitinib efficacy and drug-free remission in PsA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this investigator-initiated, phase III, multicentre, open-label, four-arm randomised controlled trial, we plan to integrate clinical, molecular and imaging parameters of 160 patients with PsA. DMARD-naïve patients are randomised to methotrexate or tofacitinib. Additionally, patients who are non-responsive to conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs continue their current csDMARD and are randomised to etanercept or tofacitinib. This results in four arms each with 40 patients. Patients are followed for 1 year. Treatment response is defined as minimal disease activity at week 16. Clinical data, biosamples and images are collected at baseline, 4 weeks and 16 weeks; at treatment failure (treatment switch) and 52 weeks. For the first 80 patients, we will use a systems medicine approach to assess multiomics biomarkers and develop a prediction model for treatment response. Subsequently, data from the second 80 patients will be used for validation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee in Utrecht, Netherlands, is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database and is carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study's progress is monitored by Julius Clinical, a science-driven contract research organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT: 2017-003900-28.

Return to Sport and Work after Randomization for Knee Distraction versus High Tibial Osteotomy: Is There a Difference?

Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a novel technique for relatively young knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. With KJD, an external distraction device creates temporary total absence of contact between cartilage surfaces, which results in pain relief and possibly limits the progression of knee OA. Recently, KJD showed similar clinical outcomes compared with high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Yet, no comparative data exist regarding return to sport (RTS) and return to work (RTW) after KJD. Therefore, our aim was to compare RTS and RTW between KJD and HTO. We performed a cross-sectional follow-up study in patients <65 years who previously participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing KJD and HTO. Out of 62 eligible patients, 55 patients responded and 51 completed the questionnaire (16 KJDs and 35 HTOs) at 5-year follow-up. The primary outcome measures were the percentages of RTS and RTW. Secondary outcome measures included time to RTS/RTW, and pre- and postoperative Tegner's (higher is more active), and Work Osteoarthritis or Joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ) scores (higher is better work ability). Patients' baseline characteristics did not differ. Total 1 year after KJD, 79% returned to sport versus 80% after HTO (not significant [n.s.]). RTS <6 months was 73 and 75%, respectively (n.s.). RTW 1 year after KJD was 94 versus 97% after HTO (n.s.), and 91 versus 87% <6 months (n.s.). The median Tegner's score decreased from 5.0 to 3.5 after KJD, and from 5.0 to 3.0 after HTO (n.s.). The mean WORQ score improvement was higher after HTO (16 ± 16) than after KJD (6 ± 13; p = 0.04). Thus, no differences were found for sport and work participation between KJD and HTO in our small, though first ever, cohort. Overall, these findings may support further investigation into KJD as a possible joint-preserving option for challenging "young" knee OA patients. The level of evidence is III.

Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.

Joint distraction, the prolonged mechanical separation of the bones at a joint, has emerged as a joint-preserving treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, with the gradually growing promise of implementation in regular clinical practice. Joint distraction of the knee has been most extensively studied, with these studies showing prolonged symptomatic improvement in combination with repair of cartilage tissue in degenerated knee joints, supporting the concept that cartilage repair can translate into real clinical benefit. The reversal of tissue degeneration observed with joint distraction could be the result of one or a combination of various proposed mechanisms, including partial unloading, synovial fluid pressure oscillation, mechanical and biochemical changes in subchondral bone, adhesion and chondrogenic commitment of joint-derived mesenchymal stem cells or a change in the molecular milieu of the joint. The overall picture that emerges from the combined evidence is relevant for future research and treatment-related improvements of joint distraction and for translation of the insights gained about tissue repair to other joint-preserving techniques. It remains to be elucidated whether optimizing the biomechanical conditions during joint distraction can actually cure osteoarthritis rather than only providing temporary symptomatic relief, but even temporary relief might be relevant for society and patients, as it will delay joint replacement with a prosthesis at an early age and thereby avert revision surgery later in life. Most importantly, improved insights into the underlying mechanisms of joint repair might provide new leads for more targeted treatment options.

Knee Joint Distraction Compared with High Tibial Osteotomy and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Two-Year Clinical, Radiographic, and Biochemical Marker Outcomes of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Both, knee joint distraction (KJD) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are joint-preserving surgeries that postpone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Here we evaluate the 2-year follow-up of KJD versus TKA and KJD versus HTO in 2 noninferiority studies. DESIGN: Knee OA patients indicated for TKA were randomized to KJD (n = 20; KJDTKA) or TKA (n = 40). Medial compartmental knee OA patients considered for HTO were randomized to KJD (n = 23; KJDHTO) or HTO (n = 46). Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed over 2 years of follow-up. The radiographic joint space width (JSW) was measured yearly. In the KJD groups, serum-PIIANP and urinary-CTXII levels were measured as collagen type-II synthesis and breakdown markers. It was hypothesized that there was no clinically important difference in the primary outcome, the total WOMAC, when comparing KJD with HTO and with TKA. RESULTS: Both trials were completed, with 114 patients (19 KJDTKA; 34 TKA; 20 KJDHTO; 41 HTO) available for 2-year analyses. At 2 years, the total WOMAC score (KJDTKA: +30.4 [95% CI 23.0-37.9] points; TKA: +42.4 [95% CI 38.1-46.8]; KJDHTO: +21.6 [95% CI 13.8-29.4]; HTO: +29.2 [95% CI 23.6-34.8]; all: P < 0.05) and radiographic minimum JSW (KJDTKA: +0.9 [95% CI 0.2-1.6] mm; KJDHTO: +0.9 [95% CI 0.5-1.4]; HTO: +0.6 [95% CI 0.3-0.9]; all: P < 0.05) were still increased for all groups. The net collagen type-II synthesis 2 years after KJD was increased (P < 0.05). Half of KJD patients experienced pin tract infections, successfully treated with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained improvement of clinical benefit and (hyaline) cartilage thickness increase after KJD is demonstrated. KJD was clinically noninferior to HTO and TKA in the primary outcome.

Cohort profile: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) study: a 2-year, European, cohort study to describe, validate and predict phenotypes of osteoarthritis using clinical, imaging and biochemical markers.

PURPOSE: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (APPROACH) consortium intends to prospectively describe in detail, preselected patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), using conventional and novel clinical, imaging, and biochemical markers, to support OA drug development. PARTICIPANTS: APPROACH is a prospective cohort study including 297 patients with tibiofemoral OA, according to the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Patients were (pre)selected from existing cohorts using machine learning models, developed on data from the CHECK cohort, to display a high likelihood of radiographic joint space width (JSW) loss and/or knee pain progression. FINDINGS TO DATE: Selection appeared logistically feasible and baseline characteristics of the cohort demonstrated an OA population with more severe disease: age 66.5 (SD 7.1) vs 68.1 (7.7) years, min-JSW 2.5 (1.3) vs 2.1 (1.0) mm and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain 31.3 (19.7) vs 17.7 (14.6), except for age, all: p<0.001, for selected versus excluded patients, respectively. Based on the selection model, this cohort has a predicted higher chance of progression. FUTURE PLANS: Patients will visit the hospital again at 6, 12 and 24 months for physical examination, pain and general health questionnaires, collection of blood and urine, MRI scans, radiographs of knees and hands, CT scan of the knee, low radiation whole-body CT, HandScan, motion analysis and performance-based tests.After two years, data will show whether those patients with the highest probabilities for progression experienced disease progression as compared to those wit lower probabilities (model validation) and whether phenotypes/endotypes can be identified and predicted to facilitate targeted drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03883568.

Knee joint distraction in regular care for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with clinical trial data.

OBJECTIVES: Knee joint distraction (KJD) has been evaluated as a joint-preserving treatment to postpone total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients in three clinical trials. Since 2014 the treatment is used in regular care in some hospitals, which might lead to a deviation from the original indication and decreased treatment outcome. In this study, baseline characteristics, complications and clinical benefit are compared between patients treated in regular care and in clinical trials. METHODS: In our hospital, 84 patients were treated in regular care for 6 weeks with KJD. Surgical details, complications, and range of motion were assessed from patient hospital charts. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated in regular care before and one year after treatment. Trial patients (n = 62) were treated and followed as described in literature. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were not significantly different between groups, except for distraction duration (regular care 45.3±4.3; clinical trials 48.1±8.1 days; p = 0.019). Pin tract infections were the most occurring complication (70% regular care; 66% clinical trials), but there was no significant difference in treatment complications between groups (p>0.1). The range of motion was recovered within a year after treatment for both groups. WOMAC questionnaires showed statistically and clinically significant improvement for both groups (both p<0.001 and >15 points in all subscales) and no significant differences between groups (all differences p>0.05). After one year, 70% of patients were responders (regular care 61%, trial 75%; p = 0.120). Neither regular care compared to clinical trial, nor any other characteristic could predict clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: KJD as joint-preserving treatment in clinical practice, to postpone arthroplasty for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patient below the age of 65, results in an outcome similar to that thus far demonstrated in clinical trials. Longer follow-up in regular care is needed to test whether also long-term results remain beneficial and comparable to trial data.