RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefits of physical activity in cancer survivors, adherence to exercise guidelines remains low. Known barriers to adhering to guidelines include a lack of time and an unwillingness to return to treatment facilities. Virtual exercise programming could assist in mitigating these barriers. This protocol presents a single arm pilot study exploring the feasibility of personalized Zoom-delivered exercise training for breast and prostate cancer survivors. A secondary objective is to determine the preliminary efficacy of participation on body composition, estimated VO2max, hand grip, one repetition maximum leg press, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, exercise self-efficacy, and intentions to remain active. METHODS: Breast (n = 10) and prostate (n = 10) cancer survivors will participate in a 24-week feasibility study, including (1) 12 weeks of one-on-one virtual personal training with an exercise physiologist (EP) via Zoom, and (2) individual exercise for a 12-week follow-up period using recordings of Zoom sessions for guidance. Physical assessments and surveys will be implemented at baseline, 12 weeks, and at the end of the study (24 weeks from baseline). CONCLUSIONS: While virtual exercise programming became popularized during the pandemic, evidence is still required to understand whether it can successfully address barriers and promote participation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Prior studies suggest that certain foods exacerbate interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome symptoms. However, these studies were limited in size and demographics. We assessed the presence of diet sensitivities among patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and compared them with patients with other pelvic pain conditions and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified Veterans Affairs patients nationwide by querying ICD-9/10 codes for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Patients were assigned to interstitial cystitis, other pelvic pain, or healthy control cohorts after chart review. We mailed all patients the Shorter-Moldwin Food Sensitivity Questionnaire to evaluate the self-perceived effects of specific foods/beverages on urinary symptoms and/or bladder pain. RESULTS: In the interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome cohort, 70% had ≥1 food sensitivity vs 37% of the other pelvic pain cohort and 32% of healthy controls (P < .001). The average number of sensitivities were similar between other pelvic pain conditions and healthy control cohorts, which were significantly less than in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients. Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients were more sensitive to acidic, spicy foods, and certain beverages vs other cohorts (all P < .001). Within the interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome cohort, Black patients had significantly higher sensitivity to alcoholic and noncaffeinated beverages than Whites. Black patients did report significantly worsened urinary urgency than Whites (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse population of veterans, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients had significantly more food sensitivities than those without interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. This suggests that food sensitivities could be suggestive of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, which could make the Shorter-Moldwin Food Sensitivity Questionnaire a helpful diagnostic tool and aid in distinguishing interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome from conditions often confused with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.
Assuntos
Cistite Intersticial , Humanos , Cistite Intersticial/diagnóstico , Cistite Intersticial/epidemiologia , Dor PélvicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Both weight loss and low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) without weight loss prolong survival in prostate cancer models. Few human trials have tested weight loss or LCD on prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site randomized 6-month trial of LCD versus control on PSA doubling time (PSADT) in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after local treatment. Eligibility included body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2 and PSADT 3 to 36 months. The LCD arm was instructed to eat [Formula: see text]20 g/carbs/day; the control arm instructed to avoid dietary changes. Primary outcome was PSADT. Secondary outcomes included weight, lipids, glucose metabolism, and diet. RESULTS: Of 60 planned patients, the study stopped early after an interim analysis showed futility. Twenty-seven LCD and 18 control patients completed the study. At 6 months, although both arms consumed similar protein and fats, the LCD arm reduced carbohydrates intake (-117 vs. 8 g, P < 0.001) and lost weight (-12.1 vs. -0.50 kg, P < 0.001). The LCD arm reduced HDL, triglycerides, and HbA1c with no difference in total cholesterol or glucose. Mean PSADT was similar between LCD (21 months) and control (15 months, P = 0.316) arms. In a post hoc exploratory analysis accounting for prestudy PSADT, baseline PSA, primary treatment, and hemoconcentration, PSADT was significantly longer in LCD versus control (28 vs. 13 months, P = 0.021) arms. Adverse events were few, usually mild, and returned to baseline by 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among BCR patients, LCD induced weight loss and metabolic benefits with acceptable safety without affecting PSADT, suggesting LCD does not adversely affect prostate cancer growth and is safe. Given exploratory findings of longer PSADT, larger studies testing LCD on disease progression are warranted.