RESUMO
Background and Aim: To identify demographic factors associated with tobacco use in Crohn's disease (CD) patients in the US Medicaid population and examine how tobacco use affects disease outcomes. Methods: We included Medicaid-eligible patients who had ≥1 ICD code for CD, and 1 year of eligibility before and after the initial encounter. We used ICD codes to identify tobacco use with respect to the time of diagnosis and used logistic regression to identify the association between age, sex, and race with tobacco use at any point before diagnosis and after diagnosis, and determine the association of tobacco use before and after diagnosis on disease outcomes. Results: We identified 98 176 eligible patients; 74.5% had no documented use of tobacco and 25.5% used tobacco at some point; 21.1% had used tobacco before their CD diagnosis and 11.8% had used tobacco after diagnosis. The population that used tobacco had a higher proportion of women, those who were White, non-Hispanic, and those in their middle ages (21-60) than the group that did not use tobacco. Tobacco use before diagnosis resulted in higher risk of hospitalization and surgery (OR: 1.85 and 1.36, respectively). Conclusion: Within the CD Medicaid population, tobacco use is more common in women than men, which differs from the general population, which is possibly a result of using diagnostic codes rather than survey data. Smoking cessation efforts should especially be directed at younger people who are at risk for CD, due to increased risk for more adverse outcomes among those who use tobacco before diagnosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We sought to review Crohn's disease (CD) case definitions that use diagnosis, procedure, and medication claims. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase from inception through January 31, 2022, using terms related to CD, inflammatory bowel disease, administrative claims, or validity. Each article was scrutinized by 2 authors independently screening and abstracting data. Collected data included participant characteristics, case definition characteristics, and case definition validity. When diagnostic accuracy was provided for multiple case definitions, we extracted the case definition selected by the authors. All diagnostic accuracy characteristics were captured. RESULTS: We identified 30 studies that evaluated a case definition using claims data to identify CD patients. The most common case definition included counts of diagnosis codes (57%) followed by a combination of diagnosis codes and medications (20%). All but 1 study validated the case definition with a medical chart review. In 2 studies, the patient's primary care provider completed a survey to confirm disease status. The positive predictive value of the case definitions ranged from 18% (≥1 code at a single U.S. health plan) to 100% (≥1 code plus a relevant prescription at a U.S. hospital). More complex case definitions (eg, ≥1 code + prescription or ≥2 codes) had lower variability in positive predictive value (≥80%) and specificity (≥85%) than the ≥1 code requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Health services researchers should validate case definitions in their research cohorts. When such validation cannot be performed, we recommend using a more complex case definition. Studies without a validated CD case definition should use sensitivity analyses to confirm the robustness of their results.
This systematic review of Crohn's disease (CD) case definitions identified that complex case definitions such as ≥1 diagnosis code + ≥1 prescription had desirable diagnostic accuracy properties.