Prospective Margin Estimates Predict Local Tumor Progression Following Microwave Ablation of Small Renal Masses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between prospectively generated ablative margin estimates and local tumor progression (LTP) among patients undergoing microwave ablation (MWA) of small renal masses (SRMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2020, patients who underwent MWA for SRM were retrospectively identified. During each procedure, segmented kidney and tumor shapes were coregistered with intraprocedural helical CT images obtained after microwave antenna placement. Predicted ablation zone shape and size were then overlaid onto the resultant model, and a model-to-model distance algorithm was employed to calculate multiple ablative margin estimates. LTP was modeled as a function of each margin estimate by hazard regression. Models were evaluated using hazard ratios and Akaike information criterion. Receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve was also estimated using Harrell's and Uno's C indices (HI and UI, respectively). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were evaluated (median age 72.1 years). Mean tumor diameter was 2.4 ± 0.9 cm. LTP was observed in nine (7%) patients. Analysis showed that decreased estimated margin size as measured by first quartile (Q1; 25th percentile), maximum, and average ablative margin metrics was significantly associated with risk of LTP. For every one millimeter increase in Q1, maximum, and mean ablative margin, the hazard of LTP increased 67% (HR: 1.67; 95% CI = 1.25-2.20, UI = 0.93, HI = 0.77), 32% (HR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.09-1.60; UI = 0.93; HI = 0.76), and 48% (HR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.18-1.85; UI = 0.83; HI = 0.75), respectively. CONCLUSION: Prospectively generated ablative margin estimates can be used to predict the risk of local tumor progression following microwave ablation of small renal masses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Retrospective cohort study.

A Pilot Study of Accelerometer-Based Biometric Data Collection among Patients Undergoing Locoregional Therapies.

This study evaluated the feasibility of measuring patient recovery after locoregional therapies (LRTs) using a wearable activity tracker (WAT). Twenty adult patients with cancer were provided with a WAT device to wear for a minimum of 7 days prior to their procedure (baseline) and for up to 30 days after their procedure (recovery). Daily step counts were continuously recorded. Patient responses to the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) were also collected before and after LRT. Analysis of WAT data demonstrated a mean of 4,850 daily steps taken at baseline, which decreased to 2,000 immediately after LRT and then rapidly increased to approximately 4,300 daily steps over an average of 10 days (P < .001). No significant changes were observed in SF-36 responses between baseline and follow-up assessments (P > .10). These results suggest that WAT devices capture dynamic periprocedural data not reflected in survey-based assessments and may be used to monitor patient recovery after interventional oncologic procedures.

Impact of laser fiber design on outcome of endovenous ablation of lower-extremity varicose veins: results from a single practice.

The design of laser fibers used for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the management of lower-extremity varicose vein disease may affect treatment success. The purpose of this investigation is to report our experience using the gold-tip NeverTouch VenaCure laser fiber (AngioDynamics, Queensbury, NY) and to compare that to our experience with standard bare-tip fibers. A retrospective chart review of 363 consecutive EVLA treatments using the gold-tip laser fiber was performed. Demographic data including patient age, sex, history of previous varicose vein stripping, vein identity, laterality, treatment length, total applied energy in joules (J), use of adjuvant sclerotherapy and ambulatory phlebectomy, treatment-related complications, and treatment failure, which was defined as recanalization of any portion of the treated vein during follow-up as assessed by duplex ultrasound examination-were entered into a spreadsheet. These data were compared with a control group of 471 EVLA treatments performed with a standard bare-tip laser fiber. Data were analyzed using independent-samples Student's t test, chi-square test, and multivariate analysis. Demographic data were similar between the two groups. Treatments with the gold-tip fiber had a failure rate of 11.1%, whereas treatment with a bare-tip fiber had a failure rate of 2.3% during a similar follow-up period. This difference was highly statistically significant (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed fiber type as the most significant factor associated with treatment failure. We conclude that laser fiber design has a significant effect on treatment success in the performance of EVLA.