Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FAR-RMS) Clinical Trial: A Report from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG).

The Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS) clinical trial is an overarching, multinational study for children and adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The trial, developed by the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), incorporates multiple different research questions within a multistage design with a focus on (i) novel regimens for poor prognostic subgroups, (ii) optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and (iii) optimal use of radiotherapy for local control and widespread metastatic disease. Additional sub-studies focusing on biological risk stratification, use of imaging modalities, including [18F]FDG PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as prognostic markers, and impact of therapy on quality of life are described. This paper forms part of a Special Issue on rhabdomyosarcoma and outlines the study background, rationale for randomisations and sub-studies, design, and plans for utilisation and dissemination of results.

Reappraisal of prognostic factors used in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group RMS 2005 study for localized rhabdomyosarcoma to optimize risk stratification and generate a prognostic nomogram.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the role of clinical factors together with FOXO1 fusion status in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) to develop a predictive model for event-free survival and provide a rationale for risk stratification in future trials. METHODS: The authors used data from patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study (EpSSG RMS 2005; EudraCT number 2005-000217-35). The following baseline variables were considered for the multivariable model: age at diagnosis, sex, histology, primary tumor site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies group, tumor size, nodal status, and FOXO1 fusion status. Main effects and significant second-order interactions of candidate predictors were included in a multiple Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram was generated for predicting 5-year event-free survival (EFS) probabilities. RESULTS: The EFS and overall survival rates at 5 years were 70.9% (95% confidence interval, 68.6%-73.1%) and 81.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.9%-82.8%), respectively. The multivariable model retained five prognostic factors, including age at diagnosis interacting with tumor size, tumor primary site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies clinical group, and FOXO1 fusion status. Based on each patient's total score in the nomogram, patients were stratified into four groups. The 5-year EFS rates were 94.1%, 78.4%, 65.2%, and 52.1% in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very-high-risk groups, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 97.2%, 91.5%, 74.3%, and 60.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here provide the rationale to modify the EpSSG stratification, with the most significant change represented by the replacement of histology with fusion status. This classification was adopted in the new international trial launched by the EpSSG.

Quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI response assessment in rhabdomyosarcoma: an international retrospective study on behalf of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group Imaging Committee.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as a predictive imaging marker after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study group III/IV, treated according to the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 or MTS2008 studies. DW-MRI was performed according to institutional protocols. We performed two-dimensional single-slice tumor delineation. Areas of necrosis or hemorrhage were delineated to be excluded in the primary analysis. Mean, median and 5th and 95th apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were extracted. RESULTS: Of 134 included patients, 82 had measurable tumor at diagnosis and response and DW-MRI scans of adequate quality and were included in the analysis. Technical heterogeneity in scan acquisition protocols and scanners was observed. Mean ADC at diagnosis was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.2) (all ADC expressed in * 10-3 mm2/s), versus 1.6 (1.5-1.6) at response assessment. The 5th percentile ADC was 0.8 (0.7-0.9) at diagnosis and 1.1 (1.0-1.2) at response. Absolute change in mean ADC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 0.4 (0.3-0.5). Exploratory analyses for association between ADC and clinical parameters showed a significant difference in mean ADC at diagnosis for alveolar versus embryonal histology. Landmark analysis at nine weeks after the date of diagnosis showed no significant association (hazard ratio 1.3 [0.6-3.2]) between the mean ADC change and event-free survival. CONCLUSION: A significant change in the 5th percentile and the mean ADC after chemotherapy was observed. Strong heterogeneity was identified in DW-MRI acquisition protocols between centers and in individual patients.

Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of "maintaining" tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% (p = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions.

Biological Role and Clinical Implications of MYOD1L122R Mutation in Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Major progress in recent decades has furthered our clinical and biological understanding of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with improved stratification for treatment based on risk factors. Clinical risk factors alone were used to stratify patients for treatment in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 protocol. The current EpSSG overarching study for children and adults with frontline and relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS NCT04625907) includes FOXO1 fusion gene status in place of histology as a risk factor. Additional molecular features of significance have recently been recognized, including the MYOD1L122R gene mutation. Here, we review biological information showing that MYOD1L122R blocks cell differentiation and has a MYC-like activity that enhances tumorigenesis and is linked to an aggressive cellular phenotype. MYOD1L122R mutations can be found together with mutations in other genes, such as PIK3CA, as potentially cooperating events. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, ten publications in the clinical literature involving 72 cases were reviewed. MYOD1L122R mutation in RMS can occur in both adults and children and is frequent in sclerosing/spindle cell histology, although it is also significantly reported in a subset of embryonal RMS. MYOD1L122R mutated tumors most frequently arise in the head and neck and extremities and are associated with poor outcome, raising the issue of how to use MYOD1L122R in risk stratification and how to treat these patients most effectively.

Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children and Adolescents: Overall Results of the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group RMS2005 Study.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The RMS2005 study included two phase III randomized trials for high-risk (HR) and observational trials for low (LR), standard (SR), and very high-risk (VHR) patients who have been partially reported. Herein, we present a comprehensive report of results achieved for the complete unselected nonmetastatic cohort and analyze the evolution of treatment in comparison with previous European protocols. After a median follow-up of 73.1 months, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 1,733 patients enrolled were 70.7% (95% CI, 68.5 to 72.8) and 80.4% (95% CI, 78.4 to 82.3), respectively. The results by subgroup: LR (80 patients) EFS 93.7% (95% CI, 85.5 to 97.3), OS 96.7% (95% CI, 87.2 to 99.2); SR (652 patients) EFS 77.4% (95% CI, 73.9 to 80.5), OS 90.6% (95% CI, 87.9 to 92.7); HR (851 patients) EFS 67.3% (95% CI, 64.0 to 70.4), OS 76.7% (95% CI, 73.6 to 79.4); and VHR (150 patients) EFS 48.8% (95% CI, 40.4 to 56.7), OS 49.7% (95% CI, 40.8 to 57.9). The RMS2005 study demonstrated that 80% of children with localized rhabdomyosarcoma could be long-term survivors. The study has established the standard of care across the European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group countries with the confirmation of a 22-week vincristine/actinomycin D regimen for LR patients, the reduction of the cumulative ifosfamide dose in the SR group, and for HR disease, the omission of doxorubicin and the addition of maintenance chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy quality assurance in paediatric clinical trials: first report from six QUARTET-affiliated trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: SIOP Europe's QUARTET project launched in 2016; aiming to improve access to high-quality radiotherapy for children and adolescents treated within clinical trials across Europe. The aim of this report is to present the profile of institutions participating in six QUARTET-affiliated trials and a description of the initial individual case review (ICR) outcomes. METHODS: This is a two-part analysis. Firstly, using facility questionnaires, beam output audit certificates, and advanced technique credentialing records to create a profile of approved institutions, and secondly, collating trial records for ICRs submitted prior to 31/10/2022. Trials included are: SIOPEN HR-NBL1, SIOPEN-LINES, SIOPEN- VERITAS, SIOP-BTG HRMB, EpSSG-FaR-RMS, and SIOPEN HR-NBL2. RESULTS: By 31/10/2022, a total of 103 institutions had commenced QUARTET site approval procedures to participate in QUARTET-affiliated trials; 66 sites across 20 countries were approved. These participating institutions were often paediatric referral sites with intensity modulated radiotherapy or proton beam therapy, designated paediatric radiation oncologists, and paediatric adapted facilities and imaging protocols available. In total, 263 patient plans were submitted for ICR, 254 ICRs from 15 countries were completed. ICRs had a rejection rate of 39.8%, taking an average of 1.4 submissions until approval was achieved. Target delineation was the most frequent reason for rejection. CONCLUSION: The QUARTET facility questionnaire is a valuable tool for mapping resources, personnel, and technology available to children and adolescents receiving radiotherapy. Prospective ICR is essential for paediatric oncology clinical trials and should be prioritised to reduce protocol violations.

Patient Reported Outcomes and Measures in Children with Rhabdomyosarcoma.

In addition to optimising survival of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), more attention is now focused on improving their quality of life (QOL) and reducing symptoms during treatment, palliative care or into long-term survivorship. QOL and ongoing symptoms related to the disease and its treatment are outcomes that should ideally be patient-reported (patient-reported outcomes, PROs) and can be assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). This commentary aims to encourage PRO and PROM use in RMS by informing professionals in the field of available PROMs for utilisation in paediatric RMS and provide considerations for future use in research and clinical practice. Despite the importance of using PROMs in research and practice, PROMs have been reported scarcely in paediatric RMS literature so far. Available literature suggests lower QOL of children with RMS compared to general populations and occurrence of disease-specific symptoms, but a lack of an RMS-specific PROM. Ongoing developments in the field include the development of PROMs targeted at children with RMS specifically and expansion of PROM evaluation within clinical trials.

Shedding a Light on the Challenges of Adolescents and Young Adults with Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a typical tumour of childhood but can occur at any age. Several studies have reported that adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with RMS have poorer survival than do younger patients. This review discusses the specific challenges in AYA patients with pediatric-type RMS, exploring possible underlying factors which may influence different outcomes. Reasons for AYA survival gap are likely multifactorial, and might be related to differences in tumor biology and intrinsic aggressiveness, or differences in clinical management (that could include patient referral patterns, time to diagnosis, enrolment into clinical trials, the adequacy and intensity of treatment), as well as patient factors (including physiology and comorbidity that may influence treatment tolerability, drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy). However, improved survival has been reported in the most recent studies for AYA patients treated on pediatric RMS protocols. Different strategies may help to further improve outcome, such as supporting trans-age academic societies and national/international collaborations; developing specific clinical trials without upper age limit; defining integrated and comprehensive approach to AYA patients, including the genomic aspects; establishing multidisciplinary tumor boards with involvement of both pediatric and adult oncologists to discuss all pediatric-type RMS patients; developing dedicated projects with specific treatment recommendations and registry/database.

Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results of the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group MTS 2008 Study and Pooled Analysis With the Concurrent BERNIE Study.

PURPOSE: Outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is poor. This study presents the results of the MTS 2008 study with a pooled analysis including patients from the concurrent BERNIE study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In MTS 2008, patients with metastatic RMS received four cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine, and actinomycin D (IVA) plus doxorubicin, five cycles of IVA, and 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy (low-dose cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine). The BERNIE study randomly assigned patients to the addition or not of bevacizumab to the same chemotherapy. Local therapy (surgery/radiotherapy) was given to the primary tumor and all metastatic sites when feasible. RESULTS: MTS 2008 included 270 patients (median age, 9.6 years; range, 0.07-20.8 years). With a median follow-up of 50.3 months, 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 34.9% (95% CI, 29.1 to 40.8) and 47.9% (95% CI, 41.6 to 53.9), respectively. In pooled analyses on 372 patients with a median follow-up of 55.2 months, 3-year EFS and OS were 35.5% (95% CI, 30.4 to 40.6) and 49.3% (95% CI, 43.9 to 54.5), respectively. Patients with ≤ 2 Oberlin risk factors (ORFs) had better outcome than those with ≥ 3 ORFs: 3-year EFS was 46.1% versus 12.5% (P < .0001) and 3-year OS 60.0% versus 26.0% (P < .0001). Induction chemotherapy and maintenance appeared tolerable; however, about two third of patients needed dose adjustments during maintenance. CONCLUSION: Outcome remains poor for patients with metastatic RMS and multiple ORFs. Because of the design of the studies, it was not possible to determine whether the intensive induction regimen and/or the addition of maintenance treatment resulted in apparent improvement of outcome compared with historical cohorts. Further studies, with novel treatment approaches are urgently needed, to improve outcome for the group of patients with adverse prognostic factors.

Linking EORTC QLQ-C-30 and PedsQL/PEDQOL physical functioning scores in patients with osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: The available questionnaires for quality-of-life (QoL) assessments are age-group specific, limiting comparability and impeding longitudinal analyses. The comparability of measurements, however, is a necessary condition for gaining scientific evidence. To overcome this problem, we assessed the viability of harmonising data from paediatric and adult patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. METHOD: To this end, we linked physical functioning scores from the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the Paediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PEDQOL) to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for adults. Samples from the EURAMOS-1 QoL sub-study of 75 (PedsQL) and 112 (PEDQOL) adolescent osteosarcoma patients were concurrently administered both paediatric and adult questionnaires on 98 (PedsQL) and 156 (PEDQOL) occasions. We identified corresponding scores using the single-group equipercentile linking method. RESULTS: Linked physical functioning scores showed sufficient concordance to the EORTC QLQ-C30: Lin's ρ = 0.74 (PedsQL) and Lin's ρ = 0.64 (PEDQOL). CONCLUSION: Score linking provides clinicians and researchers with a common metric for assessing QoL with PRO measures across the entire lifespan of patients.

Adolescents and young adults with rhabdomyosarcoma treated in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocols: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma often have poorer outcomes than do children. We aimed to compare the findings of adolescent and young adult patients with children enrolled in two prospective clinical protocols. METHODS: This retrospective observational analysis was based on data from the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) rhabdomyosarcoma 2005 trial (phase 3 randomised trial for localised rhabdomyosarcoma, open from April, 2006, to December, 2016) and the EpSSG MTS 2008 protocol (prospective, observational, single-arm study for metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma, open from June, 2010, to December, 2016), which involved 108 centres from 14 different countries in total. For this analysis, patients were categorised according to their age into children (age 0-14 years) and adolescents and young adults (age 15-21 years). For the analysis of adherence to treatment and toxicity, only patients with high-risk localised rhabdomyosarcoma included in the randomised part of the rhabdomyosarcoma 2005 study were considered. The primary outcome of event-free survival (assessed in all participants) was defined as the time from diagnosis to the first event (eg, tumour progression, relapse) or to the latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, response to chemotherapy, and toxicity. FINDINGS: Our analysis included 1977 patients, 1720 children (median age 4·7 years; IQR 2·6-8·4) and 257 adolescents and young adults (16·6 years; 15·8-18·0). 1719 patients were from the EpSSG rhabdomyosarcoma 2005 study (1523 aged <15 years and 196 aged 15-21 years) and 258 patients were from the EPSSG MTS 2008 study (197 aged <15 years and 61 aged 15-21 years). Adolescent and young adult patients were more likely than were children to have metastatic tumours (61 [23·7%] of 257 vs 197 [11·5%] of 1720; p<0·0001), unfavourable histological subtypes (119 [46·3%] vs 451 [26·2%]; p<0·0001), tumours larger than 5 cm (177 [68·9%] vs 891 [51·8%]; p<0·0001), and regional lymph node involvement (109 [42·4%] vs 339 [19·7%]; p<0·0001). Adolescent and young adult patients had lower 5-year event-free survival (52·6% [95% CI 46·3-58·6] vs 67·8% [65·5-70·0]; p<0·0001) and lower 5-year overall survival (57·1% [50·4-63·1] vs 77·9% [75·8-79·8]; p<0·0001) than did children. The multivariable analysis confirmed the inferior prognosis of patients aged 15-21 years (hazard ratios 1·48 [95% CI 1·20-1·83; p=0·0002] for poorer event-free survival and 1·73 [1·37-2·19; p<0·0001] for poorer overall survival). Modifications of administered chemotherapy occurred in 13 (15·3%) of 85 adolescents and young adults, and in 161 (21·4%) of 754 children. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and infection were observed more frequently in children than in adolescent and young adult patients. INTERPRETATION: This study found better outcomes for adolescent and young adult patients than those reported in epidemiological studies (eg, the EUROCARE-5 study reported 5-year overall survival of 39·6% for patients aged 15-19 years in the 2000-07 study period), suggesting that adolescent and young adult patients, at least up to age 21 years, can be treated with intensive paediatric therapies with no major tolerability issues and should be included in paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma trials. However, the inferior outcomes in adolescent and young adult patients compared with those in children, despite receiving similar therapy, suggest that a tailored and intensive treatment strategy might be warranted for these patients. FUNDING: Fondazione Città della Speranza.

Therapy and prognostic significance of regional lymph node involvement in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: Regional lymph node disease (N1) is a component of the risk-based treatment stratification in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of nodal disease to the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic embryonal RMS (ERMS) and analyse their outcome by treatment received. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, 1294 children with ERMS were enrolled in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 protocol, 143 patients with N1. Treatment comprised 9 cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine and dactinomycin. Some patients also received doxorubicin and/or maintenance if enrolled in the randomised studies. Local treatment was planned after 4 cycles of chemotherapy and included surgery to remove macroscopic residual tumour and/or radiotherapy (primary tumour and involved nodes). RESULTS: N1 patients were older and presented with tumours of unfavourable size, invasiveness, site and resectability. Unlike alveolar RMS, nodal involvement was more frequent in the head and neck area and rare in extremity sites. The 5-year event-free and overall survival were 75.5% and 86.3% for patients with N0, and 65.2% and 70.7% for patients with N1, respectively. The nodal involvement and the result of surgery at diagnosis (Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study group) were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. Considering only patients with N1 ERMS, we were not able to identify any treatment variables which correlated with the outcome. CONCLUSION: In the case of nodal involvement, patients with ERMS present different characteristics and a better outcome than alveolar RMS. Regional nodal involvement is an independent prognostic factor in ERMS, therefore it is appropriate to include this population in the high-risk category.

Perianal/perineal rhabdomyosarcoma: Results of the SIOP MMT 95, Italian RMS 96, and EpSSG RMS 2005 studies.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Rhabdomyosarcoma of the perianal/perineal region (PRMS) is rare, with poor survival and limited understanding of the functional consequences of treatment. DESIGN/METHODS: International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) malignant mesenchymal tumor (MMT) 95, Italian RMS 96, and European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 studies were interrogated to identify factors that impact survival; in RMS 2005, functional outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty patients (nonmetastatic) were identified, median age 6.4 years (range: 0.1-19.6): 29 male, 21 female. Tumors were >5 cm in 33 patients. Histopathological subtype was alveolar in 35. Lymph nodes were involved in 23 patients. In RMS 2005, 16/21 (76%) tested alveolar tumors had positive FOXO1 fusion status. Diagnostic biopsy was performed in 37. Primary resection (13) was complete (R0) in one. Delayed primary excision (16) was complete in three. Radiotherapy (RT) in 34/50 patients included external beam (28), brachytherapy (3), and both (3). Nodal RT was given in 16/23 N1 patients (70%). Median follow-up of alive patients (29) was 84.1 months (range: 3.6-221.1). Relapse or progression occurred in 24 patients (48%), 87% were fatal and most events (63%) were locoregional. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) was 47.8 (95% CI: 32.8-61.3), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 52.6 (95% CI: 36.7-66.2), with age ≥10 years and tumor size >5 cm impacting 5-year EFS and OS (p < .05). Functional outcome data showed bowel, genito-urinary, and psychological issues; fecal incontinence in four of 21 survivors, and urinary symptoms in two of 21. CONCLUSIONS: About 60% of patients with nonmetastatic PRMS survive; older patients and those with large tumors have the worst outcomes. Biopsy should be the initial procedure, and definitive local therapy individualized. Quality-of-life and functional studies are needed to better understand the consequences of treatment.

Localised rhabdomyosarcoma in infants (<12 months) and young children (12-36 months of age) treated on the EpSSG RMS 2005 study.

BACKGROUND: Infants (<12 months) with rhabdomyosarcoma have historically had poorer outcome than the older age groups. We present outcomes for infants and young children aged 12-36 months with localised rhabdomyosarcoma with a particular emphasis on infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All children less than 36 months of age enrolled on the EpSSG RMS 2005 study for localised disease are included. Treatment comprised chemotherapy, local surgery and/or radiation therapy adapted to risk group and age. Main outcome measures were event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 485/490 patients aged less than 36 months, 110 were infants. Infants received chemotherapy according to the risk group with no toxic deaths. Radiotherapy was delivered to 33.6% of infants and 63.5% of 12-36 months old, with respectively 41.7% and 22.2% receiving brachytherapy. Radical surgery was performed in 62% of infants and 57.1% of 12-36 months old. Median follow up for patients who are alive (n = 393) was 72.7 months (range 6.9-158.2). Five-year OS for infants was 88.4% (95%CI 80.3-93.2), which is significantly better than the OS in 12-36 months old patients of 78.0% (95%CI 73.2-82.0; p = 0.0204). Five-year EFS for infants was 72.5% (95%CI 62.8-80.0) compared with 66.1% (95%CI 61.0-70.7; p = 0.2663) for 12-36 months old. CONCLUSION: Infants treated on RMS 2005 achieved excellent EFS and OS. The EpSSG RMS 2005 chemotherapy regimen, combined with an increase in the application of adequate local therapy, improvements in imaging and supportive care and potentially favourable patients' characteristics may have contributed to these results.

Genomic Classification and Clinical Outcome in Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From an International Consortium.

PURPOSE: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood. Despite aggressive therapy, the 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic or recurrent disease remains poor, and beyond PAX-FOXO1 fusion status, no genomic markers are available for risk stratification. We present an international consortium study designed to determine the incidence of driver mutations and their association with clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor samples collected from patients enrolled on Children's Oncology Group trials (1998-2017) and UK patients enrolled on malignant mesenchymal tumor and RMS2005 (1995-2016) trials were subjected to custom-capture sequencing. Mutations, indels, gene deletions, and amplifications were identified, and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: DNA from 641 patients was suitable for analyses. A median of one mutation was found per tumor. In FOXO1 fusion-negative cases, mutation of any RAS pathway member was found in > 50% of cases, and 21% had no putative driver mutation identified. BCOR (15%), NF1 (15%), and TP53 (13%) mutations were found at a higher incidence than previously reported and TP53 mutations were associated with worse outcomes in both fusion-negative and FOXO1 fusion-positive cases. Interestingly, mutations in RAS isoforms predominated in infants < 1 year (64% of cases). Mutation of MYOD1 was associated with histologic patterns beyond those previously described, older age, head and neck primary site, and a dismal survival. Finally, we provide a searchable companion database (ClinOmics), containing all genomic variants, and clinical annotation including survival data. CONCLUSION: This is the largest genomic characterization of clinically annotated rhabdomyosarcoma tumors to date and provides prognostic genetic features that refine risk stratification and will be incorporated into prospective trials.

Non-parameningeal head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults: Experience of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) - RMS2005 study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to analyse and evaluate the impact of different local treatments on the pattern of relapse in children with primary head and neck non-parameningeal (HNnPM) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), treated in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study. The secondary aim was to assess whether current risk stratification is valid for this specific site. DESIGN/METHODS: This study includes all patients with localised HNnPM RMS enrolled in the RMS2005 study between 2005 and 2016. Treatment comprised chemotherapy adapted to risk group, with local surgery and/or radiation therapy. The main outcome measures were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were identified; the median age was 6.4 years (range, 0.1-25). The most common tumour sites were cheek/chin (22%) and nasal ala/nasolabial fold (20%). Histology was unfavourable for 40%, and regional nodal involvement present in 26%. Local therapy included surgery (58%) and/or radiotherapy (72%) to primary tumour and/or regional lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 6-158), 42 patients experienced an event, and 17 are still alive. Tumour events were frequent in oral primary (36%), parotid site (26%), cheek/chin (24%), and nasal ala/nasolabial fold (24%) and included locoregional failure in 84% of cases. The 5-year EFS and OS were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.3-81.2) and 84.9% (95% CI: 77.5-89.7), respectively. Favourable histology was associated with a better EFS (82.3% versus 64.6%; p = 0.02) and nodal spread with a worse OS (88.6% versus 76.1%; p = 0.04). Different sublocations within the HNnPM primary did not have significant impact on outcome. CONCLUSION: Locoregional relapse/progression is the main tumour failure event in this site. Despite frequent unfavourable risk factors, HNnPM RMS remains a favourable location in the context of a risk-adapted strategy.

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma completely resected at diagnosis: The European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group RMS2005 experience.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common form of soft tissue sarcoma in children. We report the results of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study, which prospectively evaluated the reduction of chemotherapy in patients with embryonal RMS (ERMS) after initial surgery. METHODS: Between October 2005 and December 2016, all patients with localised ERMS with an initial microscopically complete resection (IRS group I) with lymph node-negative (N0) were prospectively enrolled in the low-risk (n = 70, subgroup A; age < 10 years and tumour size ≤ 5 cm) or standard-risk group (n = 108, subgroup B; age ≥ 10 years or tumour size > 5 cm. Subgroup A received 8 courses of vincristine and dactinomycin (VA) for 22 weeks; subgroup B received 4 courses of VA with ifosfamide (IVA) and 5 courses of VA for 25 weeks. RESULTS: The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.0-94.4) and 95.7% (95% CI: 90.5-98.1), respectively (n = 178). The EFS and OS were 95.5% (95% CI: 86.8-98.5) and 100% (subgroupA), and 87.8% (95% CI: 79.3-93.0) and 93.0% (95% CI: 84.8-96.8)(subgroup B), respectively. Bearman stage 2 veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in 4 very young patients. CONCLUSION: VA treatment for 8 courses was effective and well tolerated by the subgroup of patients with low-risk ERMS (group A). Four courses of IVA and 5 courses of VA instead of 9 courses of IVA also has very good results. Careful monitoring for liver toxicity is important in very young patients. European union drug regulating authorities clinical trials EUDRACT No. 2005-000217-35.

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with regional nodal involvement: Results of a combined analysis from two cooperative groups.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of children and adolescents with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) and regional nodal involvement (N1) have been approached differently by North American and European cooperative groups. In order to define a better therapeutic strategy, we analyzed two studies conducted between 2005 and 2016 by the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) and Children's Oncology Group (COG). METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with ARMS N1 enrolled in either EpSSG RMS2005 or in COG ARST0531. Chemotherapy in RMS2005 comprised ifosfamide + vincristine + dactinomycin + doxorubicin (IVADo), IVA and maintenance (vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide); in ARST0531, it consisted of either vincristine + dactinomycin + cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine + irinotecan (VI). Local treatment was similar in both protocols. RESULTS: The analysis of the clinical characteristics of 239 patients showed some differences between study groups: in RMS2005, advanced Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) and large tumors predominated. There were no differences in outcomes between the two groups: 5-year event-free survival (EFS), 49% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39-59) and 44% (95% CI: 30-58), and overall survival (OS), 51% (95% CI: 41-61) and 53.6% (95% CI: 40-68) in RMS2005 and ARST0531, respectively. In RMS2005, EFS of patients with FOXO1-positive tumors was significantly inferior to those with FOXO1-negative (49.3% vs 73%, P = .034). In contrast, in ARST0531, EFS of patients with FOXO1-positive tumors was 45% compared with 43.8% for those with FOXO1-negative. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of patients with ARMS N1 was similar in both protocols. However, patients with FOXO1 fusion-negative tumors enrolled in RMS2005 showed a significantly better outcome, suggesting that different strategies of chemotherapy may have an impact in the outcome of this subgroup of patients.