Refining gastric cancer staging: examining the interplay between number and anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes - a retrospective multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: The current gastric cancer staging system relies on the number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for nodal stage determination. However, incorporating additional information such as topographic status may help address uncertainties. This study evaluated the appropriateness of the current staging system and relative significance of MLNs based on their anatomical location. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2000 and 2019 at six Catholic Medical Center-affiliated hospitals were included. Lymph node-positive patients were classified into the perigastric (stations 1-6, group P) or extragastric (stations 7-12) groups. The extragastric group was further subdivided into the near-extragastric (stations 7-9, group NE) and far-extragastric (stations 10-12, group FE) groups. RESULTS: We analyzed the data of 3,591 patients with positive lymph node metastases. No significant survival differences were found between group P and the extragastric group in each N stage. However, in N1 and N2, group FE showed significantly worse survival than the other groups (p = 0.013 for N1, p < 0.001 for N2), but not in N3. In the subgroup analysis, group FE had a significantly lower overall survival in N2, regardless of the cancer location. CONCLUSIONS: Our large-scale multi-institutional big data analysis confirmed the superiority of the current numerical nodal staging system for gastric cancer. Nonetheless, in N1 and N2 in which there is an upper limit on metastatic nodes, attention should be paid to the potential significance of topographic information for specific nodal stations.

Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Robotic Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Review of Lymphadenectomy Outcomes for Gastric Cancer.

Radical gastrectomy is essential for gastric cancer treatment. While guidelines advise dissecting at least 16 lymph nodes, some research suggests over 30 nodes might be beneficial. This study assessed ICG-guided robotic gastrectomy's effectiveness in thorough lymph node dissection. We analyzed data from 393 stage II or III gastric cancer patients treated at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from 2016-2022. Patients were categorized into conventional laparoscopy (G1, n = 288), ICG-guided laparoscopy (G2, n = 61), and ICG-guided robotic surgery (G3, n = 44). Among 391 patients, 308 (78.4%) achieved proper lymphadenectomy. The ICG-robotic group (G3) showed the highest success rate at 90.9%. ICG-guided robotic surgery was a significant predictor for achieving proper lymphadenectomy, with an odds ratio of 3.151. In conclusion, ICG-robotic gastrectomy improves lymphadenectomy outcomes in selected gastric cancer cases, indicating a promising surgical approach for the future.

Predictive model for long-term weight recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an introduction to a web calculator.

BACKGROUND: Weight changes after gastrectomy affect not only quality of life but also prognosis and survival. However, it remains challenging to predict the weight changes of individual patients. Using clinicopathological variables, we built a user-friendly tool to predict weight change after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 984 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify variables predictive of postoperative weight change. A nomogram was developed and verified via bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Age, sex, performance status, body mass index, extent of resection, pathological stage, and postoperative weight change significantly influenced postoperative weight recovery. Postoperative levels of hemoglobin, albumin, ferritin and total iron-binding capacity were significant covariates. The nomogram performed well (concordance index = 0.637); calibration curves indicated appropriate levels of agreement. We developed an online weight prediction calculator based on the nomogram ( http://gc-weightchange.com/en/front/ ). CONCLUSIONS: The novel, Web-calculator based on the predictive model allows surgeons to explore patient weight patterns quickly. The model identifies patients at high risk for weight loss after gastrectomy; such patients require multidisciplinary medical support.

Impact of postoperative NSAIDs (IV-PCA) use on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for the patients of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Further data are necessary to evaluate the risk of complications associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively. This study aimed to determine the correlation between the use of NSAIDs in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted. The study population comprised 2150 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer treatment. They were divided into two groups: non-NSAIDs (n = 1215) and NSAIDs (n = 935) according to their use of the drugs. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days, risk factors for complications, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 2150 patients, 935 (43.49%) used NSAIDs. The overall complication rate showed no significant difference between the NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (22.7% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.280), while the rates of anastomotic leakage and duodenal leakage were higher in the NSAID group (2.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.002 and 1.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.007, respectively). The rates of intra-abdominal bleeding and intra-abdominal abscess were significantly higher in the NSAID group (2.1% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.005 and 1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.008, respectively). However, postoperative ileus occurred more frequently in the non-NSAID group (3.0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, NSAID use was an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications (1.303 [1.042-1.629], p = 0.020). Meanwhile, the NSAID group showed no differences in overall survival at each pathological stage. CONCLUSION: Postoperative NSAID use by IV-PCA is associated with anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, intra-abdominal bleeding, and intra-abdominal abscess in patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Caution is advised when NSAIDs are used peri-operatively.

The First Systematic Gastroscopy Training Program for Surgeons in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic evaluation of the stomach is essential for preoperative planning and post-surgical surveillance for various diseases of the stomach, including malignancy. The gastroscopy education program for surgeons is currently in its infancy and is not systematically organized in Korea. This study aimed to introduce the first systematic gastroscopy education program for surgeons in Korea. METHODS: The gastroscopy education program entitled "Gastroscopy School for Surgeons (GSS)" comprised of theoretical education, dry lab hands-on training, and clinical practice. All participants were beginners without any gastroscopy experience. Clinical practice started after the completion of the theoretical and dry lab training. The gastroscopy practices utilized simple luminal observation, biopsy, localization using clips or dye injection, and limited therapeutic gastroscopy. The educational performances and surveys from 33 participants were analyzed. RESULTS: The participants consisted of surgical residents, general surgeons, gastrointestinal-specialized surgeons, and physicians. Participants performed a total of 2,272 gastroscopies, 2,008 of which were post-gastrectomy cases. Currently, of the 33 participants, 7 (21.2%) of the participants performed gastroscopy regularly, and 7 (21.2%) occasionally. According to the self-reported survey, one participant assessed their current gastroscopic technique to be at the expert level, and 25 (75.8%) at a proficient level. All participants considered gastroscopy education for surgeons to be necessary, and 28 (84.8%) stated that systematic education is not currently provided in Korea. CONCLUSION: We introduced the first systematic gastroscopy education program for surgeons in Korea, namely the GSS, which is practical and meets clinical needs. More training centers are needed to expand gastroscopy training among Korean surgeons.

Determination of the extent of dissection in early gastric cancer based on lymph node station power index.

BACKGROUND: The relative prognostic value of each lymph node (LN) station remains undefined in the treatment of gastric cancer. This study aimed to develop a new method to evaluate LN station ranking and define the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical and histopathological information from patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between 1989 and 2018 was reviewed. The LN station power index (LNPI) of each station was estimated using a LN retrieval frequency and the 5-year overall survival of patients with absence of LN at each station. External validation was conducted to evaluate the relevance of the LNPI. RESULTS: A training set was developed from examination of 7009 patient records. For most nodal stations, the absence of LN was significantly associated with a poor prognosis. For the perigastric stations, the prognostic value assessed using the LNPI was in the following order: LN 4 (LNPI = 19.68), LN 3 (LNPI = 17.58), LN 6 (LNPI = 15.16), LN 1 (LNPI = 6.71), LN 2 (LNPI = 4.64) and LN 5 (LNPI = 2.86). The value rank of the extra-gastric stations was in the following order: LN 8a (LNPI = 12.93), LN 7 (LNPI = 10.51) and LN 9 (LNPI = 9.70), but the index of LN 12a (LNPI = 4.79) was higher than that of LN 11 (LNPI = 4.78). These trends in the LNPI were similar in the validation patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The LNPI is a simple tool to rank the priority of each LN station dissection. The optimal extent of D1 + lymphadenectomy using LNPI was determined to be D1 with LNs 7, 8a and 9.

Association between Vascular Calcification and Esophagojejunal Anastomotic Complications after Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Study.

Esophagojejunal anastomosis (EJA) complications after total gastrectomy are related to significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between arterial calcifications and EJA complications such as leak and stricture for gastric cancer. Between January 2014 and October 2019, 30 patients with EJA complications after total gastrectomy were enrolled and matched to 30 patients without complications through retrospective data review. Arterial calcification grade on preoperative computed tomography (CT) was reported in the abdominal aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as "absent", "minor", or "major", and in the jejunal vascular arcade (JVA) and left inferior phrenic artery (LIPA) as "absent" or "present". A Chi-square test was used to compare the variables between the two groups. p-Value < 0.050 was considered statistically significant. Among 30 patients, the numbers of patients with leak and stricture were 23 and seven, respectively. Aortic calcifications were not associated with EJA complications regardless of their grade (p = 0.440). Only major SMA calcifications were associated with EJA complications, as they were present in five patients (16.7%) in the complication group and absent in the non-complication group (p = 0.020). Major SMA calcifications were more related to anastomotic stricture than leak. Three (13.0%) out of 23 patients with leak and two (28.6%) out of seven with stricture had major SMA calcifications (p = 0.028). No calcifications were detected in the JVA or LIPA in any of the 60 patients. Major SMA calcifications were found to be associated with EJA complications, especially in stricture.

Chronological trends in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in Korea: a nationwide health insurance claims study.

Purpose: The incidence of gallstone disease and cholecystectomy is increasing worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine trends in the incidence of cholecystectomy in Korea. Methods: The National Health Insurance Services database was used to determine patterns in proportion of cholecystectomy and cholecystostomy in the total population of Korea from 2003 to 2017. The age-standardized rate (ASR) was calculated to compare the cholecystectomy and cholecystostomy according to changes in the population structure over time. The ASR was investigated according to patient age, sex, socioeconomic status, use of computed tomography, and type of hospital to identify trends. Results: The ASR per 100,000 based on the 2010 population of cholecystectomy cases increased markedly from 67.7 to 211.4 between 2003 and 2017. The ASR was consistently higher in female than male (71.9 vs. 63.6 in 2003, 221.8 vs. 201.8 in 2017). Furthermore, the ASR for cholecystectomy increased with age, and surgery for gallstone disease was performed more often at a specialized center than at other medical facilities. The length of hospital stay of cholecystectomy decreased steadily from 10.6 days in 2003 to 6.9 days in 2017. Conclusion: This study shows that the incidence of cholecystectomy and cholecystostomy has steadily increased over the years in Korea, with a trend toward older age and higher socioeconomic status in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Increasing use of computed tomography investigations could be a primary cause for this trend. An integrated strategy is needed to manage the increase in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy and shorten their hospital stay with medical safety.

Prediction of risk of osteoporosis after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: There are few guidelines for screening of osteoporosis in patients who have undergone gastrectomy. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the risk of osteoporosis after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Bone densitometry results for 522 patients with gastric cancer and 2088 individuals from a health-promotion centre were compared using propensity score matching to develop a nomogram to predict osteoporosis after gastrectomy. External validation was performed using an independent data set. RESULTS: In the 10 years after gastrectomy 53.5 per cent of patients developed osteoporosis. In multivariable analysis, the odds ratios of subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy were 5.46 and 8.69 (P < 0.001 for both). Seven risk factors (type of gastrectomy, age, sex, BMI, and serum levels of albumin, creatinine and phosphorus) were incorporated into the nomogram. The prediction accuracy of the nomogram in the development set was 0.830 (area under the curve (AUC)); (95 per cent c.i. 0.812 to 0.848). In the validation set, the AUC was 0.807 (95 per cent c.i. 0.741 to 0.873). CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy was a risk factor for osteoporosis, and its incidence in the first 10 years after surgery was high. This nomogram can help clinicians to identify patients with gastric cancer most at risk of developing osteoporosis after surgery.

Hybrid Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: The benefits of robotic gastrectomy remain controversial. We designed this study to elucidate the advantages of a hybrid robot and laparoscopic gastrectomy over conventional laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 176 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included in this study. We compared 88 patients treated with hybrid robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy (HRLG) and 88 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy (CLG). In HRLG, suprapancreatic lymph node (LN) dissection was performed in a robotic setting. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and short-term outcomes were analyzed for the patients. RESULTS: The number of LNs retrieved from the suprapancreatic area was significantly greater in the HRLG group (11.27±5.46 vs. 9.17±5.19, P=0.010). C-reactive protein levels were greater in the CLG group on both postoperative day (POD) 1 (5.11±2.64 vs. 4.29±2.38, P=0.030) and POD 5 (9.86±6.51 vs. 7.75±5.17, P=0.019). In addition, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly greater in the CLG group on both POD 1 (7.44±4.72 vs. 6.16±2.91, P=0.031) and POD 5 (4.87±3.75 vs. 3.81±1.87, P=0.020). Pulmonary complications occurred only in the CLG group (4/88 [4.5%] vs. 0/88 [0%], P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: HRLG is superior to CLG in terms of suprapancreatic LN dissection and postoperative inflammatory response.

A Novel Approach for Gastric Cancer Staging in Elderly Patients Based on the Lymph Node Ratio.

PURPOSE: To date, no studies have been performed on staging based on the lymph node ratio (LNR) in elderly patients with gastric cancer who may require limited lymph node (LN) dissection due to morbidity and tissue fragility. We aimed to develop a new N staging system using the LNR in elderly patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study included patients aged over 75 years who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 1989 and December 2018. Clinicopathological data including the number of retrieved and metastatic LNs were collected and the LNR values were obtained (LNR = the number of metastatic LNs/the number of retrieved LNs). Eleven LNR groups with intervals of 0.1 were divided into four stages based on the inflection points at which the hazard ratio (HR) increased. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR. RESULTS: The four LNR stages included LNR0 (n=364), LNR1 (n=128), LNR2 (n=103), and LNR3 (n=10). In the multivariate analysis, both N staging and LNR staging exhibited significant prognostic values for predicting survival outcomes. However, the incremental change in the hazard ratio (HR) between consecutive stages was greater for the LNR staging than for the N staging (HRs: 1.607, 2.758, and 3.675 for N staging; 1.583, 3.514, and 10.261 for LNR staging). CONCLUSIONS: LNR staging is more useful than N staging in predicting the prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer and may be used as a complement or alternative to N staging.

Modified controlling nutritional status score: A refined prognostic indicator depending on the stage of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in predicting cancer survival remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the CONUT score and to develop a more appropriate scoring system beyond CONUT for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2009 and 2015. The CONUT and three modified scores with modified lipid components (L-CONUT: albumin/total lymphocyte count [TLC]/low density lipoprotein, H-CONUT: albumin/TLC/high density lipoprotein, and T-CONUT: albumin/TLC/triglyceride) were calculated. The predictive value of each scoring system on long-term survival was assessed. RESULTS: The values of the four nutritional scores were categorized into four groups (normal, light, moderate, and severe). The CONUT (P < 0.001), L-CONUT (P < 0.001), H-CONUT (P < 0.001), and T-CONUT (P < 0.001) scores showed significant differences in overall survival in between groups. Survival analysis according to the pathological stage showed that advanced age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, male sex, and moderate H-CONUT score (HR, 3.970; 95% CI, 1.826-8.633; P = 0.001) were independent worse prognostic factors for overall survival in the stage I group. In the stage II group, light CONUT score (HR, 2.230; 95% CI, 1.067-4.664; P = 0.033) and moderate CONUT score (HR, 5.077; 95% CI, 1.647-15.650; P = 0.005) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. In the stage III group, no scoring system showed significant results. CONCLUSION: In advanced gastric cancer (beyond stage II), the prognostic impact of the nutritional scoring system was uncertain. However, the H-CONUT score is a promising indicator of prognosis in stage I, and the CONUT score is useful for predicting long-term survival in stage II gastric cancer.

Operative safety of curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer - 1:2 propensity score matching analysis: A retrospective single-center study (cohort study).

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the operative safety and long-term outcomes of additional curative gastrectomy (ACG) after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as compared with standard gastrectomy (SG) without ESD in patients with early gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 101 patients receiving ACG after non-curative ESD (Post-ESD group) and 1080 patients after SG without ESD (Surgery-only group), between 2009 and 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between groups, using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, a total of 101 patients in the post-ESD group and 202 patients in the surgery-only group were analyzed. The post-ESD group had shorter operation times than did the surgery-only group (p = 0.005). Estimated blood loss and the incidence of postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups, and no differences were observed in pathologic outcomes, including N stage (p = 0.268). In addition, 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rates were not significantly different between groups (OS; 95.1% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.535, DSS; 98.2% vs. 98.7%, p = 0.956, and RFS; 98.6% vs. 98.9%, p = 0.757, respectively). CONCLUSION: ACG can be performed safely after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection, with good operative outcomes.

Indication for and Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIa (T3N0M0) Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIa colon cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing survival in patients with stage IIa colon cancer, the role of AC, and the indications for AC utilization by surgical oncologists. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2010, 736 patients with stage IIa colon cancer underwent curative resection in 1 of 6 participating hospitals. Factors related to survival were identified and analyzed according to whether AC was administered or not. After high- and low-risk groups were identified, their respective results were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage IIa colon cancer was 90.3%. With the exception of poorly differentiated histology, indications for AC did not include typical high-risk factors. The indications for AC were significantly younger patients, higher body mass index (BMI), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and higher histologic grade. BMI, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and harvested lymph node (LN) count were significant factors for disease-free survival, while BMI and ASA physical status classification were significant factors for OS in the chemotherapy group. In the high-risk group, AC was associated with increased OS in univariate analysis. BMI and harvested LN count were statistically significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Surgical oncologists consider the patient's condition and postoperative course rather than high-risk factors to determine use of AC. Regardless of AC use, both the extent of surgery and the patient's subsequent status affected the survival rate in the high-risk group. None of the factors identified influenced survival rate in the low-risk group.