Novel Antireflux "RELIEF" Stent to Prevent Vesicoureteral Reflux.

OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy, comfort, and symptoms of a novel ureteral stent (RELIEF) substituting the distal semirigid coil of a traditional double-J for a floating, monofilament tether allowing coaptation of the ureteral orifice. Ureteral instrumentation notoriously cause discomfort, urgency, frequency, dysuria, and hematuria; prolonged morbidity is likely related to stent-associated vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We hypothesized this design would eliminate VUR, be safe and provide comfort following intervention. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients within a single institution were enrolled. Passive cystography was performed pre- and post-stent placement assessing VUR. Patients completed Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaires (USSQ) before placement (baseline), postop day 1, and day of removal. RESULTS: Twenty RELIEF stents were placed (11 female and 9 male). 95% demonstrated no VUR following placement. No unexpected adverse complications occurred; 1 patient opted for early stent removal for significant discomfort. Average total USSQ scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement between first and third surveys (P < .001). Statistically significant improvement in body pain, general health, and work performance scores were noted as well (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The RELIEF stent eliminates VUR with similar stent-related morbidity and overall well-tolerance. RELIEF-associated USSQ scores were below published mean symptom scores for standard double-J stents and appear safe in this preliminary clinical trial.

Trends over 20 years of antimicrobial prophylaxis for artificial urinary sphincter surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial for prevention of prosthesis and patient morbidity after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. While antibiotic guidelines exist for many urologic procedures, adoption patterns for AUS surgery are unclear. We aimed to assess trends in antibiotic prophylaxis for AUS and outcomes relative to American Urological Association (AUA) Best Practice guidelines. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried from 2000 to 2020. Encounters involving AUS insertion, revision/removal, and associated complications were identified via ICD and CPT codes. Premier charge codes were used to identify antibiotics used during the insertion encounter. AUS-related complication events were found using patient hospital identifiers. Univariable analysis between hospital/patient characteristics and use of guideline-adherent antibiotics was done via chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A multivariable logistic mixed effects model was used to assess factors related to the odds of complication, specifically the use of guideline-adherent versus nonadherent regimens. RESULTS: Of 9775 patients with primary AUS surgery, 4310 (44.1%) received guideline-adherent antibiotics. The odds of guideline-adherent regimen use increased 7.7% per year with 53.0% (830/1565) receiving guideline-adherent antibiotics by the end of the study period. Patients with guideline-adherent regimens had a decreased risk of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.93) and surgical revision (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96) within 3 months; however, no significant difference in infection within was noted (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.68-1.17) within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to AUA antimicrobial guidelines for AUS surgery appears to have increased over the last two decades. While guideline-adherent regimens were associated with decreased risk of any complication and surgical intervention, no significant association was found with risk of infection. Surgeons appear to be increasingly following AUA recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis for AUS surgery, however, further level 1 evidence should be obtained to demonstrate conclusive benefit of these regimens.

National Adherence to Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

PURPOSE: The sentinel reference for antibiotic prophylaxis for radical cystectomy with ileal conduit in the AUA Guidelines reports data from 2003-2013 and has not been updated in the interim. Here, we assess adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines among patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit for bladder cancer using a large national database. As a secondary objective, we assess the association between antimicrobial use and postoperative infection during the index admission following cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for all patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit with diagnosis of bladder cancer between 2015 and 2020. Antibiotics used and the duration of use was determined by charge codes and grouped as guidelines-based or not according to 2019 AUA Guidelines. Association with infectious complications was assessed by logistic mixed effects regression models. RESULTS: Among 6,708 patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit, only 28% (1,843/6,708) were given prophylaxis according to AUA guidelines; 1.8% (121/6,708) of patients received an antifungal and 37% (2,482/6,708) received extended duration prophylaxis beyond postoperative day 1. Patients who received guidelines-based prophylaxis were less likely to be diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (21% vs 24%, P = .04), pyelonephritis (5.1% vs 7.7%, P < .001), bacterial infection (24% vs 27%, P = .03), or pneumonia (12% vs 17%, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in clostridium difficile infection between guidelines-based and nonguidelines-based prophylaxis (3.2% vs 3.7%, P = .32). In a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, race, insurance, and hospital and provider characteristics, nonguideline antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 1.27 [1.12, 1.43], P < .001) was associated with an increased odds of infectious events, whereas a robotic approach (OR 0.82 [0.73, 0.92], P < .001) was associated with lower odds. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-three percent of patients fail to receive guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis when undergoing radical cystectomy with conduit, which was largely driven by extended duration antibiotic use. Despite the shorter duration of antibiotics, we found that guideline-based prophylaxis was associated with a 25% decrease in the odds of infectious complications. While residual confounding is possible, these data support current AUA guidelines and suggest a need for outreach to improve guideline adherence.

Impact of Music on Postoperative Pain, Anxiety, and Narcotic Use After Robotic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Music is a safe and cost-effective intervention that can reduce postoperative pain and anxiety. We investigated the effects of music therapy on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Methods: Subjects were males 18 years and older undergoing RALP at a single tertiary care institution. Patients were randomized to music or control groups. The music group received 30 minutes of music in the recovery area and on postoperative day (POD) 1, while the control group was not provided postoperative music. Inpatient narcotic use (morphine milligram equivalent, or MME) and outpatient narcotic use were measured, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) survey was completed on POD 1 and POD 7 by an inpatient advanced practitioner (AP). T-test and Chi-square were used to compare the groups. Linear regression was used to adjust for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME. Results: A total of 40 patients were prospectively recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the hourly MME (2.06 [0.71-3.17] vs. 1.55 [0.83-3.37]) or total MME (49.52 [17-76] vs. 37.25 [20-69]) used in the music vs. non-music arms, respectively. Evaluation of STAI questionnaire revealed no overall differences in anxiety levels among the two groups on POD 1 or POD 7. After adjusting for age, blood loss, and inpatient MME use, patients assigned to the music intervention had a 26% reduction in post-hospitalization use. Conclusion: Our prospective randomized study suggests that music can be an AP-driven adjunct to facilitate postoperative patient comfort and reduce narcotic use upon discharge in prostate cancer patients.

Sexual dysfunction damages: A legal database review.

INTRODUCTION: Procedural specialties are at higher risk for malpractice claims than non-procedural specialties. Previous studies have examined common damages and malpractice lawsuits resulting from specific procedures. Our goal was to analyze urological interventions that led to sexual dysfunction (SD) claims. METHODS: The Casetext legal research platform was queried using search terms for medical malpractice and common men's health procedures between 1993 and 2020. In total, 236 cases were found, and 21 cases met the inclusion criteria: malpractice cases against a urologist or urology group, clearly stated legal outcome, and allegation of sexual dysfunction from an intervention that directly caused damages. RESULTS: A total of 42 damages were cited in 21 lawsuits. The top three damages claimed were erectile dysfunction (ED) (14/42, 33.3%), genital pain syndrome (7/42, 16.7%), and urinary incontinence (5/42, 11.9%). The most commonly cited treatments were urinary catheter placement or removal (3/21, 14.3%), robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) (3/21, 14.3%), circumcision (3/21, 14.3%), and penile implant (3/21, 14.3%). In 19 of 21 suits (90.4%), the outcome favored the defendant. Two cases favored the plaintiff: penile implant (failure to prove the patient was permanently, organically impotent prior to the procedure; missed urethral injury at time of surgery, $300 000) and vasectomy (damage to vasculature resulting in loss of testicle, $300 000). CONCLUSIONS: Most suspected malpractice cases resulting in SD favored the defendant urologist. Interestingly, urinary catheter placement is as likely to result in litigation as other operative interventions, such as RALP, inflatable penile prosthesis, and circumcision. It is possible that thorough preoperative counselling and increased responsiveness to patients' postoperative concerns may have avoided litigation in several cases.

Redox activation of DUSP4 by N-acetylcysteine protects endothelial cells from Cd²âº-induced apoptosis.

Redox imbalance is a primary cause of endothelial dysfunction (ED). Under oxidant stress, many critical proteins regulating endothelial function undergo oxidative modifications that lead to ED. Cellular levels of glutathione (GSH), the primary reducing source in cells, can significantly regulate cell function via reversible protein thiol modification. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a precursor for GSH biosynthesis, is beneficial for many vascular diseases; however, the detailed mechanism of these benefits is still not clear. From HPLC analysis, NAC significantly increases both cellular GSH and tetrahydrobiopterin levels. Immunoblotting of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) and DUSP4, a dual-specificity phosphatase with a cysteine as its active residue, revealed that both enzymes are upregulated by NAC. EPR spin trapping further demonstrated that NAC enhances NO generation from cells. Long-term exposure to Cd(2+) contributes to DUSP4 degradation and the uncontrolled activation of p38 and ERK1/2, leading to apoptosis. Treatment with NAC prevents DUSP4 degradation and protects cells against Cd(2+)-induced apoptosis. Moreover, the increased DUSP4 expression can redox-regulate the p38 and ERK1/2 pathways from hyperactivation, providing a survival mechanism against the toxicity of Cd(2+). DUSP4 gene knockdown further supports the hypothesis that DUSP4 is an antioxidant gene, critical in the modulation of eNOS expression, and thus protects against Cd(2+)-induced stress. Depletion of intracellular GSH by buthionine sulfoximine makes cells more susceptible to Cd(2+)-induced apoptosis. Pretreatment with NAC prevents p38 overactivation and thus protects the endothelium from this oxidative stress. Therefore, the identification of DUSP4 activation by NAC provides a novel target for future drug design.