Adjunctive percutaneous ablation targeting epicardial arrhythmogenic structures in patients of atrial fibrillation with recurrence after multiple procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Repeat ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after multiple ablation procedures is known to be challenging. This study evaluated the insights of adjunctive ablation for epicardial arrhythmogenic substrates in those patients via a percutaneous epicardial approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence, who had two or more prior ablation procedures, were enrolled from September 2016 to December 2018. In addition to a standard endocardial approach, epicardial mapping and ablation were performed via a percutaneous subxiphoid access in the electrophysiology lab. Adjunctive epicardial ablations for left lateral ridge (LLR) were performed in 31 of 35 patients (88.6%) for efficient transmural lesions with pacing capture loss. Marshall Bundle (MB) potentials were documented on epicardial LLR in three patients and abolished by direct epicardial ablation. Bachmann's bundle (BB) was ablated as an epicardial conduction gap in four patients with a refractory anterior wall line. Two epicardial AT/AF triggers were detected followed by successful termination with epicardial ablation. No periprocedural complications occurred. About 23 of 35 patients (65.7%) remained free from AF/AT after 23.2 ± 9 months of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple failed prior AF procedures refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy might warrant a percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation strategy, with adjunctive therapy for targeting LLR/MB, BB, and underlying epicardial triggers in addition to a standard endocardial approach.

Impact of Anatomically Guided Ganglionated Plexus Ablation on Electrical Firing from Isolated Pulmonary Veins.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) effectiveness remain unclear. Ganglionated plexus (GPs) have been implicated in AF initiation and maintenance. In this study, we evaluated the impact of GP ablation in patients with pulmonary vein (PV) firing after PVI. METHODS: Patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy with PVI were screened. Among 840 cases over a 3.75-year period, 12 cases were identified with persistent PV firing (left = 4 and right = 8) after PVI was achieved and left atrial sinus rhythm restored. Adjacent GP ablation was performed anatomically and followed if necessary by additional PV ablation. RESULTS: In eight patients, PV firing was terminated during GP ablation outside of the circumferential ablation line. In one patient, additional PV ablation resulted in cessation of PV firing and in the remaining three patients, firing could not be terminated by GP ablation or additional PVI. CONCLUSION: GP ablation outside of wide antral circumferential line frequently results in the cessation of rapid firing from electrically isolated PVs. These observations suggest that interactions between left atrium and PV beyond electrical conduction warrant consideration in AF mechanisms.

Non-pulmonary vein foci induced before and after pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing ablation therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: incidence and clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and clinical outcome of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) plus isoproterenol (ISP)-induced non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci before and after circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) during index ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS: In 80 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for drug-refractory, symptomatic PAF at our hospital from April 2010 to January 2011, atrial fibrillation (AF) was provoked with ATP (20 mg) and ISP (20 µg/min) administration before and after CPVI. The spontaneous initiation of AF was mapped and recorded. RESULTS: Before ablation, AF mostly originating from PVs (PV vs. non-PV, 36/70 vs. 3/70; P<0.01) was induced in 39 patients with sinus rhythm. CPVI significantly suppressed AF inducibility; however, more non-PV foci were provoked (post-CPVI vs. pre-CPVI, 13/76 vs. 3/70; P=0.016). Patients with pre- and post-CPVI induced AF (n=49) were divided according to non-PV foci being induced (group N, n=17) or not (group P, n=32). After mean (19.2±8.2) months follow-up, 88.2% (15/17) and 65.6% (21/32) of patients in groups N and P, respectively, were free from AF recurrence (P=0.088). CONCLUSIONS: ATP+ISP administration effectively provokes non-PV foci, especially after CPVI in PAF patients. Although in this study difference did not achieve statistical significance, supplementary ablation targeting non-PV foci might benefit clinical outcome.

Marked suppression of pulmonary vein firing after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is pulmonary vein firing an epiphenomenon?

INTRODUCTION: Rapid firing in pulmonary veins (PVs) is a leading cause of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We hypothesized that PV firing (PV-F) should continue after circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) because the PV tissue responsible for PV-F remains intact. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Group-1 (n = 92), isoproterenol (ISP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were co-administered to provoke PV-F before and after CPVI. The site of rapid focal discharge that initiated atrial fibrillation (AF) defined PV-F versus non-PV-F. Additional 17 patients with PV-F induced by ISP+ATP before CPVI were enrolled into Group-2 and various pacing maneuvers were used in conjunction to ISP+ATP to provoke PV-F after CPVI. In Group-1, AF was induced in 47/81 (58.0%) and 16/88 (18.2%) patients before and after CPVI, respectively (P < 0.01). Before CPVI, 43/47 (91.5%) of the rapid firing originated from PV. After successful CPVI, 88/92 patients were in sinus rhythm and non-PV-F was induced in 14/88 patients. PV-F was induced in 2/88 patients, which was eliminated by ganglionated plexus ablation outside the CPVI line. In Group-2, various pacing maneuvers with ISP+ATP only induced PV-F in 1/17 patients after CPVI. CONCLUSION: Marked suppression of PV-F after CPVI strongly suggests that the real source of PV-F is located in the atrium. PV-F may be an epiphenomenon.

Regional ganglionated plexus ablation eliminated rapid firing in an electrically isolated pulmonary vein.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) was initiated by rapid firing from left superior pulmonary vein (PV) by administration of isoproterenol (ISP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) before ablation. After successful isolation of all PVs, ISP and ATP were administered again. PVs were still isolated but an episode of rapid firing was observed inside the left PV isolation line during sinus rhythm. Radiofrequency energy was then delivered to the areas of superior left ganglionated plexus (GP) and inferior left GP. Then, PV firing could no longer be initiated. It suggests additional GP ablation may have additional benefit to circumferential PV isolation, to reduce the incidence of AF recurrence.

Dissociated pulmonary vein rhythm may predict the acute pulmonary vein reconnection post-isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Dissociated pulmonary vein rhythm (PVD) has been taken as a signal of PV isolation, but has been questioned recently; we assessed the relationship between PVD and acute PV reconnection after PV isolation in this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-five consecutive patients (52 males; mean age 59±11 years) were referred for catheter ablation of drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Following PV isolation, the presence and cycle length of PVD were recorded. Pulmonary veins were classified into veins with PVD (Group 1) and veins without PVD (Group 2). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was then injected during isoproterenol infusion to reveal dormant conduction gap(s), and PVs were further remapped at 30 min post-isolation. Totally, PVD was observed in 68% (58 of 85) of patients and 34.7% (112 of 323) of PVs. Seventy-nine (24.5%) PVs were found acutely reconnected, including 48 veins revealed by ATP induction [ATP(+)PV] and 64 veins by reassessment after 30 min post-isolation [Time(+)PV]. Time(+)PVs were observed more frequently in Group 1 than those in Group 2 (31.3 vs. 13.7%, P<0.01), but no significant difference was found in the occurrence of ATP(+)PVs between Group 1 and Group 2 (17.9 vs. 13.3%, P=0.27). The sequences of the PVD and the acutely reconnected PV potential were similar in 87.5% of veins. After PV re-isolation, 70% (28 of 40) of previously documented PVD disappeared. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of PVD after PV isolation was closely related to the acute PV reconnection after 30 min post-isolation.

ATP revealed extra pulmonary vein source of atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.

Noninducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) by additional electrograms-guided ablation may benefit the clinical outcome. This report illustrates the effect of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) injection on AF inducibility after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. AF was triggered twice by ATP without PV reconnection. Meanwhile, complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) were observed, and ablation targets on these sites appeared to be essential to the AF elimination. It suggests that CFAEs may contribute to the initiation of some AF. ATP may be useful to induce AF after proven PV isolation, and further ablation might be necessary to ensure efficacy after circumferential PV isolation.

Early detection of pulmonary vein reconnection after isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparison of ATP-induction and reassessment at 30 minutes postisolation.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF (PAF) is limited by an unacceptable recurrence rate, mainly due to pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection. Strategies to minimize reconnection include adenosine infusion and also a waiting period of 30 minutes after PV isolation. The aim of the present study was to assess whether these two strategies revealed the same conduction gap. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 88 consecutive patients (54 males, mean age of 60 years) with drug refractory PAF underwent circumferential PV isolation (CPVI). After isolation of ipsilateral PVs, with entry and exit block checked using a circular mapping catheter, 20 mg ATP was injected during isoproterenol infusion to reveal dormant conduction gap(s). Unless the reconnection revealed by ATP persisted, PVs were further remapped with the circular mapping catheter at 30 minutes postisolation. Totally, PV reconnection was observed in 56 (64%) patients. 24.3% veins (80/329) were found reconnected. Reassessment at 30 minutes postablation was more efficient as compared to ATP induction (19.8% vs 14.6% for ATP). The agreement between these 2 methods is moderate (kappa value = 0.50). In veins that transiently reconnected after ATP administration and later observed at 30 minutes postablation, 94% (17 of 19) of them were found being reconnected with the same gap. CONCLUSION: Acute PV reconnection is common, occurring in 64% of patients, as detected by adenosine infusion and waiting time. Each shows a unique quality as compared to one another. The combined use of these 2 methods may reduce the AF recurrence rate after CPVI.