Combination clomiphene citrate and anastrozole duotherapy improves semen parameters in a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort of infertile men.

In men with impaired semen parameters, empiric medical therapies such as clomiphene citrate, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and anastrozole, a selective aromatase inhibitor, are often employed. The effects of jointly administering these agents on semen parameters are not well understood. Here, we describe the findings of our multi-center, retrospective cohort study of men with idiopathic primary or secondary infertility. Twenty-one men were treated with combination therapy (anastrozole and clomiphene) and 69 men were treated with monotherapy (anastrozole). Patients with pre-treatment normozoospermia and recent or current exogenous testosterone therapy were excluded. Baseline and post-treatment semen and sex hormone parameters were compared among groups. The median follow-up duration was 91 days [interquartile range (IQR), 64-117 days]. Following treatment, 43% of men in the combination therapy group demonstrated normozoospermia, compared to 25% in the monotherapy group. Furthermore, men in the combined group demonstrated marked improvements in total motile sperm count (TMSC) [11.3 vs. 2.1 million (M), P=0.03]. There were no significant differences in hormone levels among the two groups following treatment. Combination therapy with clomiphene citrate and anastrozole was associated with modest benefits in post-treatment semen parameters, when compared to anastrozole monotherapy. These benefits may contribute to improvements in pregnancy outcomes with less invasive assisted reproductive technologies, such as intrauterine insemination (IUI). Future investigations with larger sample sizes and prospective study designs are necessary.

Contemporary Evaluation of Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Radiotherapy Dose, Field Size, and Use of Hormone Therapy.

Studies have provided high-level evidence on various aspects of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, including field design, dose and fractionation, and additional hormonal therapy regimens. For patients with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at SRT, addition of hormonal therapy and pelvic nodal radiation will improve PSA-based endpoints. By contrast, dose escalation is not supported by level 1 evidence in this setting.

The role of adaptive planning in margin-reduced, MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate bed following radical prostatectomy: Post-hoc analysis of a phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We examined the interfractional variations of clinical target volumes (CTVs), planning target volumes (PTVs), and organs-at-risk (OARs) in patients receiving MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the prostate bed and evaluated the potential role of adaptive planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients received 30-34 Gy in five fractions to the prostate bed on a phase II clinical trial. OARs, CTVs, and PTVs were retrospectively contoured on daily pretreatment MRIs (n = 155). Geometric comparisons were made between initial planning contours and daily pretreatment contours. Predicted treatment plans for each fraction were evaluated using the following constraints: CTV V95%>93%, PTV V95%>90%, bladder Dmax < 36.7 Gy, bladder V32.5 Gy < 35%, rectum Dmax < 36.7 Gy, rectum V27.5 Gy < 45%, rectum 32.5 Gy < 30%, and rectal wall V24Gy < 50%. Adaptive planning was simulated for all fractions that failed to meet these criteria. Plans were then re-evaluated. RESULTS: Median change in volume was 0.48% for CTV, -24.5% for bladder, and 6.95% for rectum. Median DSC was 0.89 for CTV, 0.79 for bladder, and 0.76 for rectum. 145/155 fractions (93.5%) met CTV V95%>93%. 75/155 fractions (48.4%) failed at least one OAR dose constraint. Overall, 83/155 fractions (53.5%) met criteria for adapting planning. This affected 24/31 patients (77.4%). Following adaptive planning, all fractions met CTV V95%>93% and PTV V95%>90% and 120/155 fractions (77.4%) met all OAR constraints. CONCLUSION: Due to significant interfractional variations in anatomy, a majority of fractions failed to meet both target volume and OAR constraints. However, adaptive planning was effective in overcoming these anatomic changes. Adaptive planning should be routinely considered in prostate bed SBRT.

Multimodality Therapies for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multimodality therapy including radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy are frequently deployed in the management of localized prostate cancer. We sought to perform a critical appraisal of the most contemporary literature focusing on the multimodality management of localized prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Men who are ideal candidates for multimodality therapy include those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, high-risk disease, and very high-risk disease. Enhancements in both systemic agents (including second-generation antiandrogens) as well as localized therapies (such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and brachytherapy) are refining the optimal balance between the use of systemic and local therapies for localized prostate cancer. Genomic predictors are emerging as critical tools for more precisely allocating treatment intensification with multimodality therapies as well as treatment de-intensification. Close collaboration among medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists will be critical for coordinating evidence-based multimodality therapies when clearly indicated and for supporting shared decision-making in areas where the evidence is mixed.

Temporal Changes of Clomiphene on Testosterone Levels and Semen Parameters in Subfertile Men.

PURPOSE: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is prescribed off-label in men to improve testosterone and sperm parameters, but the duration of treatment needed to reach maximal benefit remains unclear. Our objective was to examine temporal effects of CC on total testosterone (TT) and semen analysis (SA) using longitudinal follow-up data in treated men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed an IRB-approved database of men treated with CC (25 mg q.d. or 50 mg q.o.d.) from January 2016 through May 2021. We identified patients with 3, 6, 9, and 12 month follow-up data for TT and 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up SA. Mean absolute changes in TT and sperm concentration compared to baseline were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals. Men with prior genitourinary procedures or hormone therapy were excluded. Paired t-tests were used to compare TT and sperm concentration at each time point to baseline (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: One hundered thirty-four men received CC, mean age 37.7 years (SD 6.7, range 24-52). TT at all follow-ups (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) were available for 25 men, and SA at 3, 6, and 9 months for 26 men. Baseline TT was 358±145 ng/dL and sperm concentration was 13±17.2 M/mL. Significant improvement in TT was identified at 3 months (62.7 ng/dL, 95% CI: 0.49-125.0, p=0.048), additional benefit at 6 months (181.8 ng/dL, 95% CI: 114.1-249.5, p<0.01), and plateau at 9 and 12 months. Improvement in sperm concentration was first observed at 9 months (20.7 M/mL, 95% CI: 10.2-31.2, p<0.01). Semen volume and sperm motility did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of treatment with clomiphene may impact testosterone and sperm concentration, and the historical 3 month milestone may be insufficient for clinical and research evaluation. Men taking CC may experience plateau in TT at 6 months and first benefit in sperm concentration at 9 months.

Initial gonadotropin levels and sperm parameters differentiate the response to clomiphene citrate in subfertile men.

Background: Efficacy of clomiphene citrate (CC) in the treatment of male subfertility remains unclear, with inconsistent results in the literature and limited guidance from professional organizations. We sought to stratify the response to clomiphene in men based on their initial gonadotropins and semen parameters. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 234 patients from an academic center who took CC for subfertility. Patients with pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up total testosterone (TT) and semen analyses were included. Patients with previous hormone therapy, genitourinary surgery, prior success in conceiving pregnancy, or only one semen analysis were excluded. Primary outcomes were magnitudes of improvement in TT and semen parameters at 3 months. Student's t-test (alpha =0.05) was used for univariate analyses; multivariable linear regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four percent of patients experienced improvement in sperm concentration after 3 months of CC treatment, 13% decreased, and 53% showed no change. Using a pre-treatment TT cutoff of 300 ng/dL and gonadotropin thresholds of 7 miU/mL, initial TT did not affect magnitude of improvement in semen parameters, while lower initial gonadotropins showed statistical improvement across all outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed pre-treatment follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was inversely correlated with improvement in TT [odds ratio (OR): 2.64e-05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32e-09 to 5.28e-01, P=0.04] and sperm concentration (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 5.70e-02 to 8.48e-01, P=0.03). We also provide initial gonadotropin cutoffs that suggest statistical benefit from CC use. Conclusions: Men with lower gonadotropin levels may expect greater degree of improvement in both hormone and semen parameters with use of CC. Men with azoospermia do not benefit based on semen analyses alone. Degree of non-azoospermia does not affect magnitude of improvement. CC had decreasing efficacy at higher initial gonadotropin levels. These data may provide guidance in stratifying and counseling men for CC treatment.

Interplay Between Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without a Brachytherapy Boost for Optimal Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Patient-Level Data Analysis of 3 Cohorts.

IMPORTANCE: Radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard of care for high-risk prostate cancer. However, the interplay between radiotherapy dose and the required minimum duration of ADT is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the specific ADT duration threshold that provides a distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) benefit in patients with high-risk prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or EBRT with a brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BT). DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cohort study of 3 cohorts assembled from a multicenter retrospective study (2000-2013); a post hoc analysis of the Randomized Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy 03/04 (RADAR; 2003-2007) randomized clinical trial (RCT); and a cross-trial comparison of the RADAR vs the Deprivación Androgénica y Radio Terapía (Androgen Deprivation and Radiation Therapy; DART) 01/05 RCT (2005-2010). In all, the study analyzed 1827 patients treated with EBRT and 1108 patients treated with EBRT+BT from the retrospective cohort; 181 treated with EBRT and 203 with EBRT+BT from RADAR; and 91 patients treated with EBRT from DART. The study was conducted from October 15, 2020, to July 1, 2021, and the data analyses, from January 5 to June 15, 2021. EXPOSURES: High-dose EBRT or EBRT+BT for an ADT duration determined by patient-physician choice (retrospective) or by randomization (RCTs). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was DMFS; secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Natural cubic spline analysis identified minimum thresholds (months). RESULTS: This cohort study of 3 studies totaling 3410 men (mean age [SD], 68 [62-74] years; race and ethnicity not collected) with high-risk prostate cancer found a significant interaction between the treatment type (EBRT vs EBRT+BT) and ADT duration (binned to <6, 6 to <18, and ≥18 months). Natural cubic spline analysis identified minimum duration thresholds of 26.3 months (95% CI, 25.4-36.0 months) for EBRT and 12 months (95% CI, 4.9-36.0 months) for EBRT+BT for optimal effect on DMFS. In RADAR, the prolongation of ADT for patients receiving only EBRT was not associated with significant improvements in DMFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.65-1.57); however, for patients receiving EBRT+BT, a longer duration was associated with improved DMFS (DMFS HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P = .01). For patients receiving EBRT alone (DART), 28 months of ADT was associated with improved DMFS compared with 18 months (RADAR HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.80; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These cohort study findings suggest that the optimal minimum ADT duration for treatment with high-dose EBRT alone is more than 18 months; and for EBRT+BT, it is 18 months or possibly less. Additional studies are needed to determine more precise minimum durations.

Radiation therapy dose and androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer: a meta-regression of 5-year outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While multiple randomized trials have evaluated the benefit of radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation and the use and prolongation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, few studies have evaluated the relative benefit of either form of treatment intensification with each other. Many trials have included treatment strategies that incorporate either high or low dose RT, or short-term or long-term ADT (STADT or LTADT), in one or more trial arms. We sought to compare different forms of treatment intensification of RT in the context of localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Using preferred reporting items for systemic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we collected over 40 phases III clinical trials comparing different forms of RT for localized prostate cancer. We performed a meta-regression of 40 individual trials with 21,429 total patients to allow a comparison of the rates and cumulative proportions of 5-year overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and distant metastasis (DM) for each treatment arm of every trial. RESULTS: Dose-escalation either in the absence or presence of STADT failed to significantly improve any 5-year outcome. In contrast, adding LTADT to low dose RT significantly improved 5-year PCSM (Odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.54, p < 0.001) and DM (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.63. p < 0.001) over low dose RT alone. Adding STADT also significantly improved 5-year PCSM over low dose RT alone (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.75, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While limited by between-study heterogeneity and a lack of individual patient data, this meta-analysis suggests that adding ADT, versus increasing RT dose alone, offers a more consistent improvement in clinical endpoints.

3D-printed phantoms to quantify accuracy and variability of goniometric and volumetric assessment of Peyronie's disease deformities.

Characterization of Peyronie's disease (PD) involves manual goniometry and penile length measurement. These techniques neglect volume loss or hourglass deformities. Inter-provider variability complicates accuracy. Using 3D-printed models, we aimed to evaluate measurement accuracy and variability and establish computational assessment workflows. Five digital phantoms were created: 13.0 cm cylinder, 13.0 cm hourglass cylinder, 15.0 cm cylinder with 40° angulation, 12.0 cm straight penis, and 12.9 cm PD penis with 68° angulation and hourglass. Lengths, volumes, and angles were determined computationally. Each phantom was 3D-printed. Ten urology providers determined lengths, angles, and volumes with measuring tape, goniometer, and volume calculator. Provider versus computational measurements were compared to determine accuracy using t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. No significant differences were observed between manual assessment of length of penile models and designed length in penile models. Average curvature angles from providers for bent cylinder and PD phantoms were 38.3° ± 3.9° (p = 0.25) and 57.5°â€†±â€†7.2° (p = 0.006), respectively. When assessing for volume, hourglass cylinder and bent cylinder showed significant differences between designed volume and provider averages. All assessments of length, angle, and volume showed significant provider variability. Our results suggest manual measurements suffer from inaccuracy and variability. Computational workflows are useful for improved accuracy and volume assessment.

Inhibition of MET Signaling with Ficlatuzumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Refractory AML: Clinical Outcomes and High-Dimensional Analysis.

Acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory to induction therapy or relapsed within one year have poor outcomes. Autocrine production of hepatocyte growth factor by myeloid blasts drives leukemogenesis in pre-clinical models. A phase Ib trial evaluated ficlatuzumab, a first-in-class anti-HGF antibody, in combination with cytarabine in this high-risk population. Dose-limiting toxicities were not observed, and 20 mg/kg was established as the recommended phase II dose. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was febrile neutropenia. Among 17 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 53%, all complete remissions. Phospho-proteomic mass cytometry showed potent on-target suppression of p-MET after ficlatuzumab treatment and that attenuation of p-S6 was associated with clinical response. Multiplexed single cell RNA sequencing using prospectively acquired patient specimens identified interferon response genes as adverse predictive factors. The ficlatuzumab and cytarabine combination is well-tolerated with favorable efficacy. High-dimensional analyses at single-cell resolution represent promising approaches for identifying biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance in prospective clinical studies.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate (SHARP) Consortium: Analysis of 344 Prospectively Treated Patients.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) in a consortium of 7 institutional phase 2 trials and prospective registries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Individual patient data were pooled for 344 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using a Kaplan-Meier framework. Fine and Gray competing risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to assess the association between time to BCR and time to distant metastasis and prespecified variables of interest. Logistic regression models were developed to evaluate associations between acute and late grade ≥2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal and the following a priori-specified variables: age, dose per fraction, ADT use, and nodal radiation therapy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49.5 months. Seventy-two percent of patients received ADT, with a median duration of 9 months, and 19% received elective nodal radiation therapy. Estimated 4-year BCRFS and DMFS rates were 81.7% (95% CI, 77.2%-86.5%) and 89.1% (95% CI, 85.3%-93.1%). The crude incidences of late grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity were 2.3% and 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile for SBRT for HRPCa. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the optimal dose and target volume in the context of SBRT for HRPCa.

Dose-response with stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional analysis of prostate-specific antigen kinetics and biochemical control.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal dose for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is still unknown. This study evaluated the dose-response relationships for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decay and biochemical recurrence (BCR) among 4 SBRT dose regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1908 men with low-risk (50.0%), favorable intermediate-risk (30.9%), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (19.1%) prostate cancer treated with prostate SBRT across 8 institutions from 2003 to 2018, we examined 4 regimens (35 Gy/5 fractions [35/5, n = 265, 13.4%], 36.25 Gy/5 fractions [36.25/5, n = 711, 37.3%], 40 Gy/5 fractions [40/5, n = 684, 35.8%], and 38 Gy/4 fractions [38/4, n = 257, 13.5%]). Between dose groups, we compared PSA decay slope, nadir PSA (nPSA), achievement of nPSA ≤0.2 and ≤0.5 ng/mL, and BCR-free survival (BCRFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 72.3 months. Median nPSA was 0.01 ng/mL for 38/4, and 0.17-0.20 ng/mL for 5-fraction regimens (p < 0.0001). The 38/4 cohort demonstrated the steepest PSA decay slope and greater odds of nPSA ≤0.2 ng/mL (both p < 0.0001 vs. all other regimens). BCR occurred in 6.25%, 6.75%, 3.95%, and 8.95% of men treated with 35/5, 36.25/5, 40/5, and 38/4, respectively (p = 0.12), with the highest BCRFS after 40/5 (vs. 35/5 hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, p = 0.026; vs. 36.25/5 HR 0.42, p = 0.0005; vs. 38/4 HR 0.55, p = 0.037) including the entirety of follow-up, but not for 5-year BCRFS (≥93% for all regimens, p ≥ 0.21). CONCLUSION: Dose-escalation was associated with greater prostate ablation and PSA decay. Dose-escalation to 40/5, but not beyond, was associated with improved BCRFS. Biochemical control remains excellent, and prospective studies will provide clarity on the benefit of dose-escalation.