Current practices in nutrition therapy in cardiac surgery patients: An international multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery patients with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk for acquired malnutrition. Medical nutrition therapy practices for cardiac surgery patients are unknown. The objective of this study is to describe the current nutrition practices in critically ill cardiac surgery patients worldwide. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in 13 international ICUs involving mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients with an ICU stay of at least 72 h. Collected data included the energy and protein prescription, type of and time to the initiation of nutrition, and actual quantity of energy and protein delivered (maximum: 12 days). RESULTS: Among 237 enrolled patients, enteral nutrition (EN) was started, on average, 45 h after ICU admission (range, 0-277 h; site average, 53 [range, 10-79 h]). EN was prescribed for 187 (79%) patients and combined EN and parenteral nutrition in 33 (14%). Overall, patients received 44.2% (0.0%-117.2%) of the prescribed energy and 39.7% (0.0%-122.8%) of the prescribed protein. At a site level, the average nutrition adequacy was 47.5% (30.5%-78.6%) for energy and 43.6% (21.7%-76.6%) for protein received from all nutrition sources. CONCLUSION: Critically ill cardiac surgery patients with prolonged ICU stay experience significant delays in starting EN and receive low levels of energy and protein. There exists tremendous variability in site performance, whereas achieving optimal nutrition performance is doable.

Short Graphic Values History Tool for decision making during serious illness.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a values clarification tool, the Short Graphic Values History Tool (GVHT), designed to support person-centred decision making during serious illness. METHODS: The development phase included input from experts and laypersons and assessed acceptability with patients/family members. In the validation phase, we recruited additional participants into a before-after study. Our primary validation hypothesis was that the tool would reduce scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) at 1-2 weeks of follow-up. Our secondary validation hypotheses were that the tool would improve values clarity (reduce scores) more than other DCS subscales and increase engagement in advance care planning (ACP) processes related to identification and discussion of one's values. RESULTS: In the development phase, the tool received positive overall ratings from 22 patients/family members in hospital (mean score 4.3; 1=very poor; 5=very good) and family practice (mean score 4.5) settings. In the validation phase, we enrolled 157 patients (mean age 71.8 years) from family practice, cancer clinic and hospital settings. After tool completion, decisional conflict decreased (-6.7 points, 95% CI -11.1 to -2.3, p=0.003; 0-100 scale; N=100), with the most improvement seen in the values clarity subscale (-10.0 points, 95% CI -17.3 to -2.7, p=0.008; N=100), and the ACP-Values process score increased (+0.4 points, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.6, p=0.001; 1-5 scale; N=61). CONCLUSIONS: The Short GVHT is acceptable to end users and has some measure of validity. Further study to evaluate its impact on decision making during serious illness is warranted.

Identification of Raf-Like Kinases B Subfamily Genes in Gossypium Species Revealed GhRAF42 Enhanced Salt Tolerance in Cotton.

Salinity is a critical abiotic factor that significantly reduces agricultural production. Cotton is an important fiber crop and a pioneer on saline soil, hence genetic architecture that underpins salt tolerance should be thoroughly investigated. The Raf-like kinase B-subfamily (RAF) genes were discovered to regulate the salt stress response in cotton plants. However, understanding the RAFs in cotton, such as Enhanced Disease Resistance 1 and Constitutive Triple Response 1 kinase, remains a mystery. This study obtained 29, 28, 56, and 54 RAF genes from G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, and G. barbadense, respectively. The RAF gene family described allopolyploidy and hybridization events in allotetraploid cotton evolutionary connections. Ka/Ks analysis advocates that cotton evolution was subjected to an intense purifying selection of the RAF gene family. Interestingly, integrated analysis of synteny and gene collinearity suggested dispersed and segmental duplication events involved in the extension of RAFs in cotton. Transcriptome studies, functional validation, and virus-induced gene silencing on salt treatments revealed that GhRAF42 is engaged in salt tolerance in upland cotton. This research might lead to a better understanding of the role of RAFs in plants and the identification of suitable candidate salt-tolerant genes for cotton breeding.

Application of the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score to nutritional risk stratification of trauma victims: A multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score was developed to identify patients most likely to benefit from nutritional therapies and to stratify or select study subjects for clinical trials. The score is not validated in trauma victims in whom adequate nutritional support is important and difficult to achieve. We sought to determine whether a higher mNUTRIC score was associated with worse outcomes and whether caloric and protein intake improved outcome more in patients classified as high risk relative to those classified as low risk. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients from intensive care units globally. The primary outcome was 60-day hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was time to discharge alive. We compared outcomes between high and low mNUTRIC score groups and also tested whether the association between outcome and nutrition intake was modified by the mNUTRIC score. RESULTS: A total of 771 trauma patients were included. Most (585; 76%) had a low-risk mNUTRIC (0-4) score, and 186 (24%) had a high-risk (5-9) mNUTRIC score. The overall 60-day mortality was 13%. Patients in the high mNUTRIC group had a higher risk of death than those in the low mNUTRIC group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.2). Overall, there was no relationship between caloric or protein intake and clinical outcomes. However, patients in the high mNUTRIC group fared better with increasing caloric and protein intake, whereas subjects in the low mNUTRIC score group did not (p values for interaction with the mNUTRIC score for time to discharge alive was p = 0.014 for calories and was p = 0.004 for protein). CONCLUSION: A high mNUTRIC score identifies trauma patients at higher risk for poor outcomes and those who may benefit from higher caloric and protein intake. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological/Prognostic, level III.

Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey.

BACKGROUND: Medical orders for the use of life-supports should be informed by patients' values and treatment preferences. The purpose of this study was to explore the internal consistency of patients' (or their family members') stated values, and the relationship between these values and expressed preferences. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 12 acute care hospitals in Canada. We administered a questionnaire to elderly patients and their family members about their values related to end-of-life (EOL) care, treatment preferences and decisional conflict. RESULTS: Of 513 patients and 366 family members approached, 278 patients (54%) and 225 family members (61%) consented to participate. Participants' most important stated values were to be comfortable and suffer as little as possible, to have more time with family, to avoid being attached to machines and tubes and that death not be prolonged. The least important stated value was that life be preserved. Based on prespecified expected associations between the various values measured, there were inconsistencies in participants' expressed value statements. With few exceptions, participants' expressed values were not associated with expected corresponding treatment preferences. Of the 109 (40%) patients and 95 (42%) family members who had made decisions about use of life-supports, 68 (56%) patients and 60 (59%) family members had decisional conflict. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making regarding medical treatments at the EOL is inadequate. To reduce decisional conflict, patients and their families need more support to clarify their values and ensure that their preferences are grounded in adequate understanding of their illness and treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01362855.

Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients Who Have Advanced Heart Failure: Results of a Multicenter Survey of Hospital-Based Cardiology Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Conversations about goals of care in hospital are important to patients who have advanced heart failure (HF). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter survey of cardiology nurses, fellows, and cardiologists at 8 Canadian teaching hospitals. The primary outcome was the importance of barriers to goals-of-care discussions in hospital (1 = extremely unimportant; 7 = extremely important). We also elicited perspectives on roles of different practitioners in having these conversations. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 770/1024 (75.2%) eligible clinicians. The most important perceived barriers were: family members' and patients' difficulty in accepting a poor prognosis (mean [SD] score 5.9 [1.1] and 5.7 [1.2], respectively), family members' and patients' lack of understanding about the limitations and harms of life-sustaining treatments (5.8 [1.1] and 5.7 [1.2], respectively), and lack of agreement among family members about goals of care (5.8 [1.2]). Interprofessional team members were viewed as having different but important roles in goals-of-care discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiology clinicians perceive family and patient-related factors as the most important barriers to goals-of-care discussions in hospital. Many members of the interprofessional team were viewed as having important roles in addressing goals of care. These findings can inform the design of future interventions to improve communication about goals of care in advanced HF.

Evaluation of Persistent Organ Dysfunction Plus Death As a Novel Composite Outcome in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Validated composite outcomes after complicated cardiac surgery are poorly established. Therefore, the authors evaluated a novel composite endpoint, persistent organ dysfunction (POD)+death, which is defined as any need for life-sustaining therapies or death at any time within 28 days from surgery. DESIGN: Secondary analysis extracted from a large-scale prospective randomized trial of critically ill cardiac surgery patients. SETTING: Multi-institutional, university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five cardiac surgery patients with complicated postoperative courses. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At 28 days following surgery, the prevalence of POD was 15%, and 23% of patients had died (POD+death = 38%). Patients alive with POD at day 28 exhibited a significantly higher extent of organ injury and longer ICU (33 v 7 days; p<0.001) and hospital lengths of stay (49 v 21 days; p<0.001) compared to patients without POD at day 28. At 3 and 6 months, quality-of-life scores (by Short Form 36 questionnaire) showed a significantly reduced rating for most components in patients with POD at day 28 compared to those without POD. The 6-month mortality rate was 21% among patients alive with POD at day 28 compared to 5% among patients alive without POD (p = 0.05). The calculated number of patients needed per arm to detect a 25% relative risk reduction for mortality alone was 762 compared to 386 per arm for POD+ death. CONCLUSIONS: POD+death at day 28 following cardiac surgery may be a valid composite endpoint and offers statistical efficiencies in terms of sample size calculations for cardiac surgical trials.

The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: In the hospital setting, inadequate engagement between healthcare professionals and seriously ill patients and their families regarding end-of-life decisions is common. This problem may lead to medical orders for life-sustaining treatments that are inconsistent with patient preferences. The prevalence of this patient safety problem has not been previously described. METHODS: Using data from a multi-institutional audit, we quantified the mismatch between patients' and family members' expressed preferences for care and orders for life-sustaining treatments. We recruited seriously ill, elderly medical patients and/or their family members to participate in this audit. We considered it a medical error if a patient preferred not to be resuscitated and there were orders to undergo resuscitation (overtreatment), or if a patient preferred resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR) and there were orders not to be resuscitated (undertreatment). RESULTS: From 16 hospitals in Canada, 808 patients and 631 family members were included in this study. When comparing expressed preferences and documented orders for use of CPR, 37% of patients experienced a medical error. Very few patients (8, 2%) expressed a preference for CPR and had CPR withheld in their documented medical orders (Undertreatment). Of patients who preferred not to have CPR, 174 (35%) had orders to receive it (Overtreatment). There was considerable variability in overtreatment rates across sites (range: 14-82%). Patients who were frail were less likely to be overtreated; patients who did not have a participating family member were more likely to be overtreated. CONCLUSIONS: Medical errors related to the use of life-sustaining treatments are very common in internal medicine wards. Many patients are at risk of receiving inappropriate end-of-life care.

Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians.

IMPORTANCE: Seriously ill hospitalized patients have identified communication and decision making about goals of care as high priorities for quality improvement in end-of-life care. Interventions to improve care are more likely to succeed if tailored to existing barriers. OBJECTIVE: To determine, from the perspective of hospital-based clinicians, (1) barriers impeding communication and decision making about goals of care with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families and (2) their own willingness and the acceptability for other clinicians to engage in this process. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter survey of medical teaching units of nurses, internal medicine residents, and staff physicians from participating units at 13 university-based hospitals from 5 Canadian provinces. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Importance of 21 barriers to goals of care discussions rated on a 7-point scale (1 = extremely unimportant; 7 = extremely important). RESULTS: Between September 2012 and March 2013, questionnaires were returned by 1256 of 1617 eligible clinicians, for an overall response rate of 77.7% (512 of 646 nurses [79.3%], 484 of 634 residents [76.3%], 260 of 337 staff physicians [77.2%]). The following family member-related and patient-related factors were consistently identified by all 3 clinician groups as the most important barriers to goals of care discussions: family members' or patients' difficulty accepting a poor prognosis (mean [SD] score, 5.8 [1.2] and 5.6 [1.3], respectively), family members' or patients' difficulty understanding the limitations and complications of life-sustaining treatments (5.8 [1.2] for both groups), disagreement among family members about goals of care (5.8 [1.2]), and patients' incapacity to make goals of care decisions (5.6 [1.2]). Clinicians perceived their own skills and system factors as less important barriers. Participants viewed it as acceptable for all clinician groups to engage in goals of care discussions-including a role for advance practice nurses, nurses, and social workers to initiate goals of care discussions and be a decision coach. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hospital-based clinicians perceive family member-related and patient-related factors as the most important barriers to goals of care discussions. All health care professionals were viewed as playing important roles in addressing goals of care. These findings can inform the design of future interventions to improve communication and decision making about goals of care.

The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care.

CONTEXT: The recently developed Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire, which can be used to assess both patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care, takes 40-60 minutes to complete. The length of the interview may limit its uptake and clinical utility; a shorter version would make its use more feasible. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a shorter version of the CANHELP questionnaire. METHODS: Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey of patients with advanced medical diseases and their family members. Participants completed the long version of CANHELP, a global rating of satisfaction with care (GRS), the FAMCARE scale (family members only), and a quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire. We reduced the items on the long version based on their relationship to the GRS, the frequency of missing data, the distribution of responses, the redundancy of the items, and focus groups with frontline users. With the remaining items, we assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluated construct validity by describing the correlation of the new CANHELP Lite with the full version of CANHELP, GRS, FAMCARE, and the QOL questionnaire scores. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients and 193 family members participated in this study. The patient version was reduced from 37 items to 20 items and the caregiver version was reduced from 38 items to 21 items. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.68 to 0.93 for all domains of both the patient and caregiver questionnaires. We observed a high degree of correlation between CANHELP Lite domains and overall scores and the same domains and overall scores for the full version of CANHELP. In addition, we observed moderate to strong correlation between the CANHELP Lite overall satisfaction scores and the GRS questions. There was moderate correlation between the overall family member CANHELP Lite score and overall FAMCARE score (r = 0.45) and this was similar to the correlation between the full version of CANHELP and FAMCARE scores (r = 0.41). CANHELP Lite correlated more strongly with the QOL subscale on health care than the other QOL subscales. CONCLUSION: The CANHELP Lite questionnaire is a valid and internally consistent instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care.

Longitudinal changes in procalcitonin in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: The utility of procalcitonin for the diagnosis of infection in the critical care setting has been extensively investigated with conflicting results. Herein, we report procalcitonin values relative to baseline patient characteristics, presence of shock, intensive care unit time course, infectious status, and Gram stain of infecting organism. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit for >24 hrs. SETTING: Three tertiary care intensive care units. PATIENTS: All consenting patients admitted to three mixed medical-surgical intensive care units. Patients who had elective surgery, overdoses, and who were expected to stay <24 hrs were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were followed prospectively to ascertain the presence of prevalent (present at admission) or incident (developed during admission) infections and clinical outcomes. Procalcitonin levels were measured daily for 10 days and were analyzed as a function of the underlying patient characteristics, presence of shock, time of infection, and pathogen isolated. MAIN RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-eight patients were enrolled. Medical and surgical infected cohorts had similar baseline procalcitonin values (3.0 [0.7-15.3] vs. 3.7 [0.6-9.8], p=.68) and peak procalcitonin (4.5 [1.0-22.9] vs. 5.0 [0.9-16.0], p=.91). Infected patients were sicker than their noninfected counterparts (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 22.9 vs. 19.3, p<.001); those with infection at admission had a trend toward higher peak procalcitonin values than did those whose infection developed in the intensive care unit (4.9 vs. 1.4, p=.06). The presence of shock was significantly associated with elevations in procalcitonin in cohorts who were and were not infected (both groups p<.003 on days 1-5). CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin dynamics were similar between surgical and medical cohorts. Shock had an association with higher procalcitonin values independent of the presence of infection. Trends in differences in procalcitonin values were seen in patients who had incident vs. prevalent infections.

Optimizing end-of-life care on medical clinical teaching units using the CANHELP questionnaire and a nurse facilitator: a feasibility-study.

The purpose of this study was to pilot-test and evaluate the impact and feasibility of a nurse facilitator-led quality-improvement intervention using the Canadian Health Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire to improve end-of-life (EoL) care on medical teaching units. Of 123 patients approached, 67 consented to participate.The majority had cancer. The questionnaire was completed by patients with end-stage diseases and their family caregivers.The researchers identified care issues showing the widest gap between satisfaction and importance and targeted these in order to optimize EoL care. In a second cohort, they also screened for symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). In both cohorts, they evaluated outcomes 2 weeks post-discharge. The average satisfaction of priority items improved. Also, caregiver satisfaction improved significantly and ESAS scores improved. Using CANHELP, the nurse facilitator was able to identify opportunities for improving EoL care in patients on medical units and for making small improvements in satisfaction with care.

Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: To develop a scoring method for quantifying nutrition risk in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective, observational study of patients expected to stay > 24 hours. We collected data for key variables considered for inclusion in the score which included: age, baseline APACHE II, baseline SOFA score, number of comorbidities, days from hospital admission to ICU admission, Body Mass Index (BMI) < 20, estimated % oral intake in the week prior, weight loss in the last 3 months and serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Approximate quintiles of each variable were assigned points based on the strength of their association with 28 day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 597 patients were enrolled in this study. Based on the statistical significance in the multivariable model, the final score used all candidate variables except BMI, CRP, PCT, estimated percentage oral intake and weight loss. As the score increased, so did mortality rate and duration of mechanical ventilation. Logistic regression demonstrated that nutritional adequacy modifies the association between the score and 28 day mortality (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This scoring algorithm may be helpful in identifying critically ill patients most likely to benefit from aggressive nutrition therapy.

The relationship between Candida species cultured from the respiratory tract and systemic inflammation in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

PURPOSE: In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), the isolation of Candida species (spp.) in respiratory secretions has been associated with worse outcomes. It is unclear whether Candida colonization is causally related or is a marker of disease severity. The objective of this study was to compare systemic inflammatory markers in patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP with Candida in respiratory tract (RT) cultures vs patients who have bacteria and those with no pathogens. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in adults with a clinical suspicion of VAP who were enrolled within 24 hr of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients were divided into four groups according to RT cultures, i.e., bacterial pathogens only, Candida spp. only, culture negative, and a control group with no clinical suspicion of VAP. Clinical outcomes were collected and compared as were systemic inflammatory and coagulation markers, including procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6. RESULTS: The PCT, CRP, and IL-6 levels were similar in the Candida, bacterial pathogen, and culture negative groups but were significantly increased between the Candida group and the control group (P < 0.05). In the first 28 days, the number of ICU free days was significantly lower in the Candida group compared with the other groups, and mortality at 28 days was greater (Candida 42.9%, bacterial pathogen 25.0%, culture negative 19.8%, control 0.0%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP, the presence of Candida spp. only in the RT is associated with similar levels of inflammation and worse clinical outcomes compared with patients without Candida in RT secretions.

Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.

BACKGROUND: High-quality end-of-life care should be the right of every Canadian. The objective of this study was to identify aspects of end-of-life care that are high in priority as targets for improvement using feedback elicited from patients and their families. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional survey involving patients with advanced, life-limiting illnesses and their family caregivers. We administered the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire along with a global rating question to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care. We derived the relative importance of individual questions on the CANHELP questionnaire from their association with a global rating of satisfaction, as determined using Pearson correlation coefficients. To determine high-priority issues, we identified questions that had scores indicating high importance and low satisfaction. RESULTS: We approached 471 patients and 255 family members, of whom 363 patients and 193 family members participated, with response rates of 77% for patients and 76% for families. From the perspective of patients, high-priority areas needing improvement were related to feelings of peace, to assessment and treatment of emotional problems, to physician availability and to satisfaction that the physician took a personal interest in them, communicated clearly and consistently, and listened. From the perspective of family members, similar areas were identified as high in priority, along with the additional areas of timely information about the patient's condition and discussions with the doctor about final location of care and use of end-of-life technology. INTERPRETATION: End-of-life care in Canada may be improved for patients and their families by providing better psychological and spiritual support, better planning of care and enhanced relationships with physicians, especially in aspects related to communication and decision-making.

The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.

The purpose of this study was to further validate a novel instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care, called the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire. Data were collected by a cross-sectional survey of patients who had advanced, life-limiting illnesses and their family caregivers, and who completed CANHELP, a global rating of satisfaction, and a quality of life questionnaire. We conducted factor analysis, assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluated construct validity by describing the correlation amongst CANHELP, global rating of satisfaction and the quality of life questionnaire scores. There were 361 patient and 193 family questionnaires available for analysis. In the factor analysis, we identified six easily interpretable factors which explained 55.4% and 60.2% of the variance for the patient and caregiver questionnaire, respectively. For the patient version, the subscales derived from these factors were Relationship with Doctors, Illness Management, Communication, Decision-Making, Role of the Family, and Your Well-being. For the family questionnaire, the factors were Relationship with Doctors, Characteristics of Doctors and Nurses, Illness Management, Communication and Decision-Making, Your Involvement, and Your Well-being. Each subscale for each questionnaire had acceptable to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.69-0.94). We observed good correlations between the CANHELP overall satisfaction score and global rating of satisfaction (correlation coefficient 0.49 and 0.63 for patient and family, respectively) which was greater than the correlations between CANHELP and the quality of life instruments. We conclude that the CANHELP Questionnaire is a valid and internally consistent instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care.

Educating medical residents in end-of-life care: insights from a multicenter survey.

BACKGROUND: Physicians play a key role in the provision of quality end-of-life (EOL) care but often lack requisite knowledge and skills. Residency programs must ensure training in palliative/EOL care to address this gap. OBJECTIVE: To guide the development of curricula, we assessed internal medicine residents' attitudes, knowledge, perceived competence, and learning priorities in EOL care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered, descriptive survey using a convenience sample. SUBJECTS: Internal medicine residents at five universities across Canada. RESULTS: Of a total of 318 internal medicine residents, 185 (58%) participated in the survey. The majority (81.7%) agreed learning from dying patients was meaningful although 48.1% felt guilty, and 40.6% a failure at least sometimes after a patient's death. Two thirds had provided care to more than 10 dying patients. Most (73%) had conducted at least 3 family meetings; 26.7% were never observed. Mean self-assessed preparedness to provide EOL care was 6.1 +/- 2 (scale 0-10) and mean comfort level 3.2 +/- 0.8 (scale 0-5). Residents reported more than average competence in 50% of EOL competencies listed with record keeping highest (3.6 +/- 0.7) and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for pain lowest (2.2 +/- 0.8). Priority for learning was rated above average for all EOL competencies listed with use of opioids for management of pain highest (4.1 +/- 0.9) and discussing euthanasia lowest (3.1 +/- 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents value opportunities to learn from dying patients but often lack supervision and experience emotional distress. Comparing residents' attitudes, perceptions of competence, and learning priorities provide insights into why certain EOL competencies are more challenging to teach and can guide development of meaningful educational experiences.

The clinical significance of Candida colonization of respiratory tract secretions in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: Clinical uncertainty exists regarding the significance of colonization confined to respiratory tract secretions with Candida sp in critically ill patients. Our objectives were to describe such colonization, its associated risk factors, and to examine the clinical outcomes in patients with a clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia with isolated Candida colonization compared to those without. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the Canadian ventilator-associated pneumonia study, patients were divided into 2 groups according to the isolated presence or absence of Candida in the respiratory tract enrollment culture. We compared length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stay, and mortality outcomes between groups. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to determine factors independently associated with Candida colonization and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 639 eligible patients, 114 (17.8%) were colonized with Candida in the enrollment culture. A multivariate analysis identified female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.65), number of comorbidities (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.71), worsening or persistent infiltrate at randomization (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), antibiotics started within 3 days of randomization (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.71-5.83), and on antibiotics at randomization but all started more than 3 days before randomization (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.68-5.50) as variables associated with Candida respiratory tract colonization. A significant increase in median hospital stay (59.9 vs 38.6 days, P = .006) and hospital mortality (34.2% vs 21.0%, P = .003) was observed in patients with Candida colonization. In a multivariate model, Candida colonization of the respiratory tract was independently associated with hospital mortality (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.39-4.37). CONCLUSION: Respiratory tract Candida colonization is associated with worse clinical outcomes and is independently associated with increased hospital mortality. However, it is unclear whether Candida colonization is causally related to poor outcomes or whether it is a marker for increased morbidity and mortality.