The Efficacy and Tolerability of Irbesartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Whose Blood Pressure Were not Controlled by Irbesartan Monotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan (IRB) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) was not controlled by IRB monotherapy. METHODS: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies were conducted in Korea (the I-DUO 301 study and the I-DUO 302 study). After a 4-week run-in period with either 150 mg IRB (I-DUO 301 study) or 300 mg IRB (I-DUO 302 study), patients with uncontrolled BP (ie, mean sitting systolic BP [MSSBP] ≥140 mmHg to <180 mmHg and mean sitting diastolic BP <110 mmHg) were randomized to the placebo, AML 5 mg, or AML 10 mg group. A total of 428 participants were enrolled in the 2 I-DUO studies. In the I-DUO 301 study, 271 participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, or IRB 150 mg/placebo. In the I-DUO 302 study, 157 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive IRB/AML 300/5 mg or IRB 300 mg/placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in MSSBP from baseline to week 8. Tolerability was assessed according to the development of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinically significant changes in physical examination, laboratory tests, pulse, and 12-lead electrocardiography. FINDINGS: In I-DUO 301, the mean (SD) changes of MSSBP at week 8 from baseline were -14.78 (12.35) mmHg, -21.47 (12.78) mmHg, and -8.61 (12.19) mmHg in the IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, and IRB 150 mg/placebo groups, respectively. In I-DUO 302, the mean (SD) changes of MSSBP at week 8 from baseline were -13.30 (12.47) mmHg and -7.19 (15.37) mmHg in the IRB/AML 300/5 mg and IRB 300 mg/placebo groups, respectively. In both studies, all combination groups showed a significantly higher reduction in MSSBP than the IRB monotherapy groups (P < 0.001 for both). TEAEs occurred in 10.00%, 10.99%, and 12.22% of participants in the IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, and IRB 150 mg/placebo groups, respectively, in I-DUO 301 and in 6.33% and 10.67% of participants in the IRB/AML 300/5 mg and IRB 300 mg/placebo groups, respectively, in I-DUO 302, with no significant between-group differences. Overall, there was one serious adverse event throughout I-DUO study. IMPLICATIONS: The combination of IRB and AML has superior antihypertensive effects compared with IRB alone over an 8-week treatment period, with placebo-like tolerability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05476354 (I-DUO 301), NCT05475665 (I-DUO 302).

Evidence-Based Guideline for the Treatment of Smoking Cessation Provided by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea.

Although major countries, such as South Korea, have developed and disseminated national smoking cessation guidelines, these efforts have been limited to developing individual societies or specialized institution-based recommendations. Therefore, evidence-based clinical guidelines are essential for developing smoking cessation interventions and promoting effective smoking cessation treatments. This guideline targets frontline clinical practitioners involved in a smoking cessation treatment support program implemented in 2015 with the support of the National Health Insurance Service. The Guideline Development Group of 10 multidisciplinary smoking cessation experts employed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT approach to review recent domestic and international research and guidelines and to determine evidence levels using the GRADE methodology. The guideline panel formulated six strong recommendations and one conditional recommendation regarding pharmacotherapy choices among general and special populations (mental disorders and chronic obstructive lung disease [COPD]). Strong recommendations favor varenicline rather than a nicotine patch or bupropion, using varenicline even if they are not ready to quit, using extended pharmacotherapy (>12 weeks) rather than standard treatment (8-12 weeks), or using pharmacotherapy for individuals with mental disorders or COPD. The conditional recommendation suggests combining varenicline with a nicotine patch instead of using varenicline alone. Aligned with the Korean Society of Medicine's clinical guideline development process, this is South Korea's first domestic smoking cessation treatment guideline that follows standardized guidelines. Primarily focusing on pharmacotherapy, it can serve as a foundation for comprehensive future smoking cessation clinical guidelines, encompassing broader treatment topics beyond medications.

Comparison of Antiplatelet Monotherapies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Clinical, Ischemic, and Bleeding Risks.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel was superior to aspirin monotherapy in secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of clopidogrel across high-risk subgroups METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases-EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial that randomly assigned patients who were event free for 6 to 18 months post-PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. Two clinical risk scores were used for risk stratification: the DAPT score and the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) (the sum of age ≥75 years, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, and renal dysfunction). The primary composite endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission because of acute coronary syndrome, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥3) at 2 years after randomization. RESULTS: Among 5,403 patients, clopidogrel monotherapy showed a lower rate of the primary composite endpoint than aspirin monotherapy (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). The benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin was consistent regardless of TRS 2°P (high TRS 2°P [≥3] group: HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44-0.96]; and low TRS 2°P [<3] group: HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.60-0.99]) (P for interaction = 0.454) and regardless of DAPT score (high DAPT score [≥2] group: HR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.46-1.00]; and low DAPT score [<2] group: HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59-0.96]) (P for interaction = 0.662). The association was similar for the individual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin monotherapy was consistent regardless of clinical risk or relative ischemic and bleeding risks compared with aspirin monotherapy. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis- EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy [HOST-EXAM]; NCT02044250).

Fenofibrate Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality and Fewer Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: Results of 10,114 Patients From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the long-term clinical efficacy of fenofibrate use with regard to mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study using data of the South Korean National Health Insurance Service from 2003 to 2014. Of 63,727 participants with diabetes aged 40-79 years, 5,057 users of fenofibrate only were compared with 5,057 nonusers of fenofibrate and/or omega-3 fatty acid with 1:1 propensity matching. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, percutaneous coronary revascularization, and cardiac death for a median of 3 years. RESULTS: The primary end point was significantly lower in fenofibrate users compared with those using neither fenofibrate nor omega-3 fatty acid (13.4 vs. 15.5 per 1,000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.94; P = 0.010). Cardiac death (1.8 vs. 3.1 per 1,000 person-years; HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.352-0.987; P = 0.0446), all-cause death (7.6 vs. 15.3 per 1,000 person-years; HR 0.437; 95% CI 0.340-0.562; P < 0.0001), and stroke (6.5 vs. 8.6 per 1,000 person-years; HR 0.621; 95% CI 0.463-0.833; P = 0.0015) were significantly lower in the fenofibrate group. When the duration of fenofibrate use was stratified by quartile, the risk decreased in quartile 4, with an HR of 0.347 (95% CI 0.226-0.532; P < 0.0001). In subgroup analysis, the favorable effect of fenofibrate was sustained consistently across all subsets of patients, including those classified by LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. CONCLUSIONS: Use of fenofibrate was associated with a lower rate of total and cardiac mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes during a 3-year follow-up in real-world large populations.

Smoking may be more harmful to vasospastic angina patients who take antiplatelet agents due to the interaction: Results of Korean prospective multi-center cohort.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between smoking and the use of antiplatelet agents on the prognosis of vasospastic angina (VA) is rarely investigated. METHODS: VA-Korea is a nation-wide multi-center registry with prospective design (n = 1812). The primary endpoint was the composite occurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), symptomatic arrhythmia, and cardiac death. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were for statistical analysis. Also, we conducted interaction analysis in both additive and multiplicative scales between smoking and antiplatelet agents among VA patients. For additive scale interaction, relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) was calculated and for multiplicative scale interaction, the ratio of hazard ratio (HR) was calculated. All statistical analysis conducted by Stata Ver 16.1. RESULTS: Patients who were smoking and using antiplatelet agents had the highest incidence rate in the primary composite outcome. The incidence rate was 3.49 per 1,000 person-month (95% CI: 2.30-5.30, log-rank test for primary outcome p = 0.017) and HR of smoking and using antiplatelet agents was 1.66 (95%CI: 0.98-2.81). The adjusted RERI of smoking and using antiplatelet agents was 1.10 (p = 0.009), and the adjusted ratio of HR of smoking and using antiplatelet agents was 3.32 (p = 0.019). The current study observed the interaction between smoking and using antiplatelet agents in both additive and multiplicative scales. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking was associated with higher rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes among VA patients taking antiplatelet agents. This suggested that VA patients, especially those using antiplatelet agents should quit smoking.

Preoperative Cessation of Both Dual Anti-Platelet Agents Is Safe after 1 Year in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the atherothrombotic and bleeding risk of discontinuing both components of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before surgery in patients with an intracoronary stent after 1 year. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 212 patients who received an evaluation of perioperative cardiac risk and underwent surgery from March 2017 to March 2019. We divided them into 2 groups: the discontinuation of both antiplatelet agents group (DCAP, no use of any antiplatelet agent) and the continuation of at least 1 antiplatelet agent group (CAP). The primary composite endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death, angina, postoperative coronary angiography, stroke, and readmission within 30 days postoperatively. The second endpoint was bleeding requiring the transfusion of ≥2 packs of red blood cells (RBCs). RESULT: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study, with 68 in the DCAP group and 68 in the CAP group. The occurrence of MACE did not significantly differ between the groups (25% vs. 17.6%, p=0.295). The incidence of bleeding that required a transfusion was higher in the CAP group (16.2% vs. 30.9%, p=0.044). The postoperative change in hemoglobin levels (-1.9 g/dL vs. -1.8 g/dL, p=0.742), and the number of transfused packs of RBCs (3.5 vs. 5.3, p=0.347) were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative discontinuation of DAPT did not increase the risk of MACE. However, continuation of at least 1 antiplatelet agent increased the incidence of bleeding requiring RBC transfusion. Further research with a large cohort is warranted.

Inflammatory and metabolic mechanisms underlying the calcific aortic valve disease.

Although calcific aortic stenosis is a very common disease with major adverse cardiovascular events and healthcare costs, there are no effective medical interventions to delay or halt its progression. Cardiometabolic risk factors, including smoking and male sex, are linked to aortic stenosis. Emerging studies have identified important regulatory roles for immunological and inflammatory responses, including oxidized lipids, various cytokines, and biomineralization. Recent clinical and experimental studies in atherosclerosis and osteoporosis have demonstrated that oxidative stress and oxidized lipids decrease bone formation in the skeletal system while they increase bone formation in the cardiovascular system. Multidisciplinary factors contribute to vascular calcification, including inflammation and metabolic regulation of osteogenesis in the cardiovascular system via similar signaling pathways as bone formation. Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is no longer considered a simple passive process of calcium deposition that occurs with advanced age. Biomineralization in CAVD is a complex, regulated process that involves valvular, circulating, bone marrow-derived cells, macrophage heterogeneity and genetic factors along with biochemical and mechanical factors. The current review will discuss the recently discovered important role of inflammation, metabolic risk factors, and molecular and cellular mechanisms that promote CAVD, as well as the link between osteogenic signals in the skeletal and cardiovascular systems. This may inform future therapeutic strategies for CAVD progression.

A multicenter, randomized, and double-blind phase IV clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine orotate/valsartan 5/160 mg versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/12.5 mg in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled by valsartan 160 mg monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the effectiveness and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of amlodipine orotate/valsartan (AML/VAL) 5/160 mg are noninferior to those of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (VAL/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg in hypertensive patients with inadequate response to valsartan 160 mg monotherapy. METHODS: This 8-week, active-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled, and noninferiority trial was conducted at 17 cardiovascular centers in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients had mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥90 mm Hg despite monotherapy with valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC (AML/VAL) group or VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC (VAL/HCTZ) group once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 238 patients were enrolled (AML/VAL group, n = 121; VAL/HCTZ group, n = 117), of whom 228 completed the study. RESULTS: At 8 weeks after randomization, msDBP was significantly decreased in both groups (-9.44 ±â€Š0.69 mm Hg in the AML/VAL group and -7.47 ±â€Š0.71 mm Hg in the VAL/HCTZ group, both P < .001 vs baseline). Between group difference was -1.96 ±â€Š1.00 mm Hg, indicating that AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC was not inferior to VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC at primary efficacy endpoint. Control rate of BP defined as the percentage of patients achieving mean sitting SBP (msSBP) <140 mm Hg or msDBP <90 mm Hg (target BP) from baseline to week 8 was significantly higher in the AML/VAL group than that in the VAL/HCTZ group (84.3% [n = 102] in the AML/VAL group vs 71.3% [n = 82] in the VAL/HCTZ group, P = .016). At 8 weeks after randomization, mean uric acid level was significantly increased in the VAL/HCTZ group compared to that at baseline (0.64 ±â€Š0.08 mg/dL; P < .001). However, it was slightly decreased from baseline in the AML/VAL group (-0.12 ±â€Š0.08 mg/dL; P = .085). The intergroup difference was significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC are noninferior to those of VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by valsartan 160 mg monotherapy.

Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Autonomic Activity in Neurally Mediated Syncope.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate endothelial function and cardiovascular autonomic activity in patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS). METHODS: Patients with a typical history of NMS were divided according to the result of a head-up tilt (HUT) test. There were 25 patients each in the HUT-positive (HUT+), HUT-negative (HUT-) and control groups. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) were performed before the HUT tests. RESULTS: The HUT+ group had a significantly higher FMD than that of the HUT- group and the control group (8.8 ± 3.3 vs. 6.4 ± 2.9%, p = 0.006, and 8.8 ± 3.3 vs. 5.7 ± 2.2%, p = 0.001, respectively). On a 24-hour AECG, the parasympathetic indexes of time domain, such as rMSSD and the pNN50, were significantly higher in the HUT+ group than in the HUT- group (39.0 ± 9.6 vs. 31.6 ± 9.6 ms, p = 0.016, and 16.5 ± 8.1 vs. 10.2 ± 7.2%, p = 0.002, respectively) and the control group (39.0 ± 9.6 vs. 28.9 ± 9.6%, p = 0.001 and 16.5 ± 8.1 vs. 8.7 ± 6.7%, p = 0.001, respectively). High-frequency spectra (parasympathetic activity) of the frequency domain showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Not only parasympathetic activity, but also endothelial function may affect the results of HUT tests in patients with NMS.

The 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Positive or Intermediate Results in the Intracoronary Ergonovine Provocation Test.

OBJECTIVES: This study was an observational, multicenter registry to determine clinical characteristics and 24-month prognosis of patients who underwent intracoronary ergonovine provocation tests. BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients who underwent the ergonovine provocation for vasospastic angina were not fully elucidated. METHODS: A total of 2,129 patients in the VA-KOREA (Vasospastic Angina in Korea) registry were classified into positive (n = 454), intermediate (n = 982), and negative (n = 693) groups by intracoronary ergonovine provocation tests. The 24-month incidences of cardiac death, new-onset arrhythmia, and acute coronary syndrome were determined (mean 26.7 ± 8.8 months). RESULTS: The number of smokers, frequency of angina before angiography, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and triglyceride were higher in the positive group than in other groups. The clinical characteristics of the intermediate and the negative groups were very similar. In the positive group, the incidences of diffuse, focal, and mixed spasm were 65.9%, 23.6%, and 10.6%. Coronary spasm was more frequently provoked on atherosclerotic segments. The 24-month incidences of cardiac death, arrhythmia, and acute coronary syndrome were low (0.9%, 1.6%, and 1.9%, respectively) in the positive group, and there was no cardiac death in the intermediate group (p = 0.02). In the positive group, frequent angina, current smoking, and multivessel spasm were independent predictors for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-month prognosis of the positive group in the intracoronary ergonovine provocation test was relatively worse than that of the intermediate group. More intensive clinical attention should be paid to vasospastic angina patients with high-risk factors including frequent angina before angiography, current smoking, and multivessel spasm.

The impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade on contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of 12 studies with 4,493 patients.

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis investigated the impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on the occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). METHODS: Twelve studies comparing the use of RAAS blockade in a total of 4,493 patients undergoing a contrast-using procedure were included. The primary endpoint was the overall postprocedural incidence of CIN. RESULTS: In the overall pooled analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups, RAAS blockade 'used' versus 'not-used', in the incidence of postprocedural CIN in the random-effects model (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.77-2.11, p = 0.351, I(2) = 61.9%). In the stratified analysis, however, for chronic RAAS blockade users, the continuation of the drug was significantly associated with a higher incidence of CIN compared with discontinuation (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.62-2.61, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%). A hazard of continuation was marked in a subgroup of older patients or in patients with chronic kidney disease. For drug-naïve patients, however, administration of RAAS blockade before contrast procedures did not reduce the development of CIN significantly (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.23-1.16, p = 0.108, I2 = 34.2%). CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of RAAS blockade in chronic users is associated with a significantly lower incidence of CIN, whereas administration of RAAS blockade as a preventive measure for naïve patients did not show a significant effect on the incidence of CIN.

High-dose atorvastatin for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) occurrence in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS: We studied whether 80  mg atorvastatin loading and its subsequent use for 5 days (high-dose group) could prevent CIN as compared to those who received 10  mg atorvastatin (regular-dose group) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty. The primary endpoint was incidence of CIN, defined as an at least 25% or at least 0.5  mg/dl increase in baseline serum creatinine within 5 days after contrast administration. The secondary endpoint was an in-hospital 1 and 6-month renal function change, and a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, renal failure requiring dialysis, heart failure, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were allocated to high dose and 108 to regular dose from August 2007 to February 2009. CIN incidence was 5.5% (6/110) in the high-dose group and 10.2% (11/108) in the regular-dose group, which is a nonsignificant difference (P = 0.193). CIN occurred significantly less in the high-dose than in the regular-dose group in subgroups of renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance ≤60  ml/min) [0% (0/28) vs. 16.7% (5/30); P = 0.024] and in the elderly patients who were at least 70 years old [4% (1/25) and 23.1% (6/26); P = 0.048]. Serum creatinine level tended to decrease in the high-dose group and increase in the regular-dose group, but the change was not statistically different (P = 0.093). The composite of clinical outcomes at 6 months was comparable in the high-dose and regular-dose groups (7.9 and 13.1%; P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: High-dose atorvastatin pretreatment does not seem to prevent CIN in patients receiving primary angioplasty. However, it has the potential to lower CIN in patients with renal insufficiency and in the elderly.

Alpha-lipoic acid for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: the ALIVE study - a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: α-Lipoic acid (ALA) is widely used for diabetic neuropathy due to its antioxidant properties. We evaluated its potential for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of ALA in CIN prevention. Two hundred and two patients with basal renal insufficiency who received elective coronary angiography were randomized to the ALA group [ALA treatment for 2 days (600 mg orally three times a day before and after coronary catheterization, n = 100)] or the control group (n = 102). The primary end point was the maximum increase in serum creatinine (sCr) and the secondary end point was the incidence of CIN defined as an increase in sCr of either ≥ 25% or ≥ 44.2 µmol/l. RESULTS: Mean maximum increase in sCr was not different between the ALA and the control group (-1.32 ± 30.5 vs. -1.19 ± 30.1 µmol/l, respectively; p = 0.977). sCr did not significantly change from baseline (120.8 ± 69.8 vs. 122 ± 88.1 µmol/l) in the ALA group and the simple saline hydration group (108.2 ± 37.5 vs. 110 ± 49 µmol/l). There was a lower rate of CIN in the ALA group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3.0 vs. 6.9%, respectively; p = 0.332). CONCLUSION: ALA showed no benefit in CIN prevention.

Evaluation of Short-Term Use of N-Acetylcysteine as a Strategy for Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiomyopathy: EPOCH Trial - A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigate to determine whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) can prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized open label controlled trial. They are patients first diagnosed with breast cancer or lymphoma, who require chemotherapy, including anthracycline like adriamycine or epirubicine. Patients were randomized to the NAC group {n=50; 1200 mg orally every 8 hours starting before and ending after the intravenous infusion of anthracycline in all chemotherapy cycles (3-6)} or the control group (n=53). Primary outcome was the decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) absolutely ≥10% from the baseline and concomitantly <50% at 6-month. Composite of all-cause death, heart failure and readmission were compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome was not significantly different in the NAC and control groups {3/47 (6.4%) vs. 1/52 (1.9%), p=0.343}. The mean LVEF significantly decreased in both the NAC (from 64.5 to 60.8%, p=0.001) and control groups (from 64.1 to 61.3%, p<0.001) after the completion of whole chemotherapy. The mean LVEF change did not differ between the two groups (-3.64% in NAC vs. -2.78% in control group, p=0.502). Left ventricular (LV) end systolic dimension increased with higher trend in NAC by 3.08±4.56 mm as compared with 1.47±1.83 mm in the control group (p=0.064). LV end diastolic dimension did not change in each group and change does not differ in both. Peak E, A and E/A ratio change and cardiac enzymes were comparable in two groups. Cumulative 12-month event rate was 6% and 3.8% in the NAC group and the control group, respectively, with no difference (p=0.672). CONCLUSION: We cannot prove that NAC prevents anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy.

Effects of atorvastatin pretreatment on infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin pretreatment has been reported to reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to investigate the effect of atorvastatin pretreatment on infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomized to an atorvastatin group (80 mg before PCI and for 5 days after PCI [n = 89]) or a control group (10 mg daily after PCI [n = 84]). The primary end point was infarct size measured by technetium Tc 99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography between days 5 and 14. RESULTS: Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were not significantly different between groups except for age and current smoking status. There was no significant difference in infarct size (as a percentage of the left ventricle) between groups (22.2% ± 15.5% in the atorvastatin group vs 21.6% ± 15.4% in the control group, P = .79). The median infarct size was 19.0% (interquartile range 9.0-32.0) in the atorvastatin group and 18.0% (9.3-32.5) in the control group (P = .76). Achievement of myocardial blush grade 2/3 and complete ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes after PCI occurred with similar frequency (72.8% vs 81.9%, P = .33 and 43.2% vs 47.5%, P = .57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with high-dose atorvastatin followed by further treatment for 5 days did not reduce infarct size measured by single-photon emission computed tomography in patients undergoing primary PCI.

Rationale and design of STOP DVT study: rosuvastatin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total knee replacement arthroplasty--a prospective randomized open-label controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) frequently occurs in high-risk cardiovascular patients receiving orthopedic surgery, despite prophylactic measures for its prevention. Statins, a class of drugs used to lower cholesterol levels, have been reported to help prevent the development of DVT. METHODS: We will conduct a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of high-dose rosuvastatin plus a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, with conventional LMWH therapy in the prevention of DVT. Patients will be naive to both statins and anti-coagulants and then underwent total knee replacement arthroplasty (TKRA). In total, 180 patients will be randomized into two groups of 90, consisting of a LMWH group (40 mg enoxaparin subcutaneously beginning at 12h prior to surgery and continuing for 7 days every 24h after surgery) and a statin plus LMWH group (20mg rosuvastatin orally for 14 days, 7 days before and after surgery in combination with LMWH). All patients will undergo computed tomography angiography of both extremities 7 days after index surgery to assess the development of DVT. DISCUSSION: DVT remains prevalent despite the use of conventional prophylactic measures, in part because certain patients (particularly the elderly) are unable to receive preventive treatment because of a high risk of bleeding complications and co-morbidity. Statins have been shown to have beneficial effects in arterial atherothrombosis and are frequently administered to elderly patients to treat coronary artery. We hypothesize that peri-operative statin treatment may be beneficial in those patients restricted from the conventional prophylaxis for DVT.

N-acetylcysteine for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Narrative Review.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) affects in-hospital, short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. It also leads to prolonged hospital stay and increased medical cost. Given the potential clinical severity of CIN, there has been considerable interest in the development of preventative strategies to reduce the risk of contrast-induced renal deterioration in at-risk populations. A number of pharmacologic and mechanical preventive measures have been attempted, but no method other than adequate periprocedural hydration has been conclusively successful. Since its introduction in 2000, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been widely investigated, albeit with conflicting findings for its nephroprotection capability in patients receiving contrast media procedures. However, there is still virtually no definitive evidence of effectiveness of NAC. Although the exact mechanism responsible for the protective action of NAC from renal function deterioration remains unclear, the antioxidant and vasodilatory properties of NAC have been suggested as the main mechanisms. This review summarizes the current status of NAC as a potential agent to prevent renal functional deterioration and its limitations.

N-acetylcysteine versus AScorbic acid for preventing contrast-Induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography NASPI study-a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired renal failure and affects mortality and morbidity. There has been no study comparing the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and ascorbic acid that have potential for CIN prevention in patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 212 patients who had pre-existing renal impairment with basal creatinine clearance < or =60 mL/min and/or serum creatinine (SCr) level of > or =1.1 mg/dL, were randomized to have either high-dose NAC (1,200 mg orally twice a day before and on the day of coronary catheterization, n = 106) or ascorbic acid (3 g and 2 g orally before, and 2 g twice after coronary catheterization with a 12-hour interval, n = 106). The primary end point was the maximum increase of SCr level, and the secondary end point was the incidence of CIN. RESULTS: The maximum increase of SCr level was significantly lower in NAC group than in ascorbic acid group as follows: -0.03 +/- 0.18 mg/dL versus 0.04 +/- 0.20 mg/mL, respectively (P = .026). Patients with diabetes or who had received a high dose of contrast media experienced significantly less rise of SCr level with NAC than ascorbic acid; in diabetic subgroup, -0.05 +/- 0.22 mg/dL versus 0.09 +/- 0.29 mg/mL, respectively (P = .020); in patients with high dose of dye, -0.03 +/- 0.17 mg/dL versus 0.04 +/- 0.21 mg/mL, respectively (P = .032). The incidence of CIN, the secondary end point, tended to be in favor of NAC rather than ascorbic acid, 1.2% versus 4.4%, respectively (P = .370). Notably, among the diabetes patients, the NAC significantly lowered CIN rate than ascorbic acid, 0% (0/38) versus 12.5% (4/32), respectively (P = .039). CONCLUSION: High-dose NAC seems more beneficial than ascorbic acid in preventing contrast-induced renal function deterioration in patients, especially diabetic patients, with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography.

KLOTHO gene polymorphism is associated with coronary artery stenosis but not with coronary calcification in a Korean population.

Experimental studies have demonstrated KLOTHO gene polymorphism might be associated with vascular atherosclerosis and calcification. However, the impact of this genetic variant on human coronary arteries still remains to be elucidated. We investigated the effect of a KLOTHO gene variant on coronary artery stenosis and calcification. Four hundred and thirty-four patients referred for chest pain were enrolled. All the patients underwent coronary angiography and were investigated for polymorphism of the KLOTHO G395A gene. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as > or = 50% diameter stenosis in at least one coronary artery. The other patients were considered to be controls. Homozygotes or heterozygotes for G395A were significantly more common in the CAD patients than in the controls (30.2% versus 21.5%, P = 0.039). In the subgroup aged < 60 years, the G395A mutant was more frequent in CAD than in control (35.3% versus 18.8%, P = 0.016), but in patients > or = 60 years, there was no difference (28.0% versus 24.1%, P = 0.473). Using multivariate analysis, we identified the KLOTHO gene G395A mutant as an independent risk factor of CAD (OR 1.712, 95% CI [1.066-2.749], P = 0.026). The frequency of the KLOTHO gene G395A mutant was not different between the calcified and noncalcified coronary artery groups (25.7%, 26.4%, respectively, P = 0.861) and an A allele carrier state was not an independent risk factor of coronary artery calcification. In conclusion, the KLOTHO gene G395A allele carrier state may be associated with CAD but not with coronary artery calcification in this Korean population.