[MAVRIC study: when abdominal cerclage is preferable to vaginal cerclage]. / Étude MAVRIC: quand le cerclage par voie abdominale est préférable à la voie vaginale.

Vaginal cerclage can be used to treat cervical incompetence, thus reducing the risk of an unfavourable outcome. However, in some cases, it can be ineffective. One of the challenges for the gynaecologist-obstetrician is how to deal with a subsequent pregnancy after a failure of vaginal cerclage. The recently published MAVRIC study shows that performing abdominal cerclage prior or at the beginning of pregnancy reduces the rate of late miscarriage and premature delivery compared to vaginal cerclage. This implies a birth by caesarean section, and therefore a second surgery for the woman. However, it remains to determine the best surgical technique for abdominal cerclage. In the MAVIRC study, cerclage was done by laparotomy. It shall be elucidated whether this technique is superior to laparoscopy.

Le cerclage par voie vaginale permet de pallier une incompétence cervicale, diminuant ainsi le risque d'issues défavorables. Néanmoins, il peut s'avérer inefficace. Un des enjeux pour le gynécologue-obstétricien est de savoir quelle attitude adopter lors d'une grossesse suivante après échec de cerclage vaginal. L'étude MAVRIC, publiée récemment, apporte la preuve que la réalisation d'un cerclage par voie abdominale avant ou en début de grossesse permet une diminution du taux de fausse couche tardive et d'accouchement prématuré par rapport à la voie vaginale. Ceci implique une naissance par césarienne, et donc une deuxième intervention pour la femme. Il reste encore à déterminer le choix de la technique chirurgicale du cerclage abdominal. L'abord par laparotomie ayant été utilisé pour l'étude MAVRIC, il reste à montrer si cette approche est supérieure à la laparoscopie.

Prematurity and fetal lung response after tracheal occlusion in fetuses with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the independent association of fetal pulmonary response and prematurity to postnatal outcomes after fetal tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. METHODS: Fetal pulmonary response, prematurity (<37 weeks at delivery) and extreme prematurity (<32 weeks at delivery) were evaluated and compared between survivors and non-survivors at 6 months of life. Multivariable analysis was conducted with generalized linear mixed models for variables significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four infants were included, of whom 40 survived (47.6%) and 44 died (52.4%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that survival was associated with greater lung response (p=0.006), and the absence of extreme preterm delivery (p=0.044). In multivariable analysis, greater pulmonary response after FETO was an independent predictor of survival (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.08-3.33, p=0.023), whereas the presence of extreme prematurity was not statistically associated with mortality after controlling for fetal pulmonary response (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.12-2.30, p=0.367). CONCLUSION: Fetal pulmonary response after FETO is the most important factor associated with survival, independently from the gestational age at delivery.