Impact of hip fracture on all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased hip fracture risk. We investigated the relationship between hip fracture and all-cause death in patients with type 2 diabetes in comparison with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or end-stage renal disease (ERSD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 4,923 Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (mean age 65 years, 2,790 men, 2,133 women) were followed for a median of 5.3 years (follow-up rate 99.5%). We evaluated the associations between the presence of hip fracture (n = 110), upper limb fracture (n = 801), CVD (n = 1,344), ESRD (n = 104) and all-cause death by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 309 participants died during follow up. Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for all-cause mortality were significantly higher in participants with hip fractures than those without hip fractures (OR 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-4.41), whereas the ORs for upper limb fracture were not significant. The ORs for all-cause mortality were significantly higher in participants with CVD than those without CVD (OR 1.78, 95% CI, 1.39-2.70) and ESRD (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.32-4.05). The ORs for all-cause mortality of hip fracture were not affected by further adjustment for CVD and ESRD (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.58-4.54). The cause of death was infection (40.0%), malignant neoplasm (25.0%) and CVD (15.0%) among participants with hip fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fractures were associated with an increased risk of death among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, independently of CVD and ESRD.

Prospective study of cancer in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.

BACKGROUND: Although the association between type 2 diabetes and cancer has been reported, few epidemiological studies have been conducted in Japanese patients whose leading cause of death is cancer. We prospectively studied the incidence of site-specific cancer, risk factors for developing cancer, cancer death, and survival in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We followed 4923 participants (mean age, 65 years) with type 2 diabetes attending an outpatient diabetes clinic for a median of 5.3 years (follow-up rate, 99.0%). RESULTS: During the follow-up period, cancer occurred in 450 participants (incidence rate, 22.3/1000 person-years in men and 12.2/1000 person-years in women). In men, prostate cancer was the most common cancer (4.3/1000 person-years), colorectal cancer was the second (3.6/1000 person-years), and gastric cancer was the third (3.3/1000 person-years). In women, colorectal cancer was the most common cancer (2.6/1000 person-years), gastric cancer was the second (2.0/1000 person-years), and breast cancer was the third (1.4/1000 person-years). Smoking, male sex, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, family history of cancer, and reduced intake of isoflavone daidzein were significant risk factors for developing cancer using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The leading cancer death was lung cancer in men and pancreatic cancer in women. The survival was the best for prostate cancer and the worst for pancreatic cancer (2-year cancer-specific survival 95.4%, 30.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Since the leading cause of death in patients with type 2 diabetes is cancer in Japan, clinicians should be aware of epidemiological data regarding cancer besides diabetic complications.

The serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio predicts bone fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.

AIMS: Sarcopenia is involved in the pathogenesis of increased fracture risk associated with diabetes. The serum creatinine to cystatin C (Cr/CysC) ratio has been reported as a surrogate marker for muscle mass. We aimed to prospectively investigate the relationship between the Cr/CysC ratio and fracture risk. METHODS: We followed 1911 postmenopausal women and 2689 men with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 66 years) for a median of 5.3 years, and divided into Cr/CysC ratio quartiles by sex. The primary outcome was fragility fractures and the secondary outcome was any fracture. RESULTS: Fragility fractures occurred in 192 participants, and any fracture occurred in 645 participants. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for fragility fractures were 2.15 (1.19-3.88) (Q1), 1.63 (0.89-2.98) (Q2), 1.34 (0.72-2.51) (Q3) and 1.0 (ref.) (Q4) in postmenopausal women, and 1.75 (0.64-4.50) (Q1), 2.09 (0.83-5.26) (Q2), 1.56 (0.58-4.18) (Q3) and 1.0 (ref.) (Q4) in men. Those for any fracture were 1.46 (1.07-1.98) (Q1), 1.33 (0.98-1.81) (Q2), 1.40 (1.03-1.88) (Q3) and 1.0 (ref.) (Q4) in postmenopausal women, and 2.33 (1.54-3.54) (Q1), 2.02 (1.54-3.04) (Q2), 1.13 (0.71-1.78) (Q3) and 1.0 (ref.) (Q4) in men. CONCLUSIONS: A lower Cr/CysC ratio is a significant risk factor for fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Incidence of diabetic foot ulcer in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Fukuoka diabetes registry.

AIMS: Although diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a serious diabetic complication, there have been no large-scale epidemiological studies of DFU in Japan. We prospectively investigated the incidences of DFU and limb amputation, the risk for developing DFU, and mortality in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We followed 4870 participants (mean age, 65 years) with type 2 diabetes attending an outpatient diabetes clinic for a median of 5.3 years (follow-up rate, 97.7%). The primary outcome was the development of DFU. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, DFU occurred in 74 participants (incidence rate, 2.9/1000 person-years) and limb amputation in 12 (incidence rate, 0.47/1000 person-years). DFU recurrence was observed in 21.4% of participants with history of DFU. History of DFU, chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), depressive symptoms, and poor glycemic control were significant risk factors for developing DFU. Survival was significantly lower in participants with DFU and/or history of DFU compared with those without (5-year survival rates: with DFU, 87.7%, without DFU, 95.3%; P < .0001). The hazard ratio for death was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.73, P = .014) in those with DFU and/or history of DFU in a multi-adjusted model. The most common cause of death was cardiovascular disease among participants with DFU, whereas it was malignant neoplasm among those without. CONCLUSIONS: Incidences of DFU and limb amputation were 0.3% and 0.05% per year in this Japanese cohort, respectively. Mortality significantly increased approximately 2-fold in those with DFU and/or history of DFU compared with those without.