An analysis of publications originating from abstracts presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Meeting.

BACKGROUND: Research presentation has benefits, including CV building, networking, and collaboration. A measurable standard for achievement is publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Expectations regarding the likelihood of publication are unknown for studies presented at a national surgical scientific meeting. This study aims to evaluate predictors of manuscript publication arising from abstracts presented at a national surgical scientific meeting. METHODS: Abstracts presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Meeting 2019 were reviewed. Identification of published manuscripts was completed using MedLine, Embase, and Google Scholar 28 months after the presentation to allow for time for publication. Factors evaluated for association with publication included author and abstract measures. Descriptive analyses and multivariable statistics were performed. RESULTS: 724 abstracts (160 podiums, 564 posters) were included. Of the podium presentations, 128 (80%) were published in a median of 4 months after the presentation. On univariable and multivariable analyses, there was no association between publication and abstract topic, gender, degree, number of publications, or H-indices of first and senior authors. 154 (27.3%) poster presentations were published with a median of 13 months. On univariable analysis, there was a statistically significant difference regarding the abstract topic (p = 0.015) and senior author degree (p = 0.01) between published and unpublished posters. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that colorectal surgery (OR 2.52; CI 1.02-6.23) and metabolic/obesity (OR 2.53; CI 1.09-5.84) are associated with an increased odd of publication. There was an inverse association with female senior authors (OR 0.53; CI 0.29-0.98), while additional degrees (e.g., doctorate and/or master's degree) of the senior authors were associated with an increased publication rate (OR 1.80; CI 1.00-3.22). CONCLUSION: 80% of podiums but only 27% of posters were ultimately published. While some predictors of poster publication were noted, it is unclear if these are why these projects fail to publish. Future research is warranted to determine if there are effective strategies to increase poster publication rates.

Factors Associated with Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer remain unclear, but it is recommended for high-risk stage II disease. Which patients receive chemotherapy and its impact on survival remains undetermined. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was surveyed between 2004 and 2016 for stage II colon cancer patients. Patients were categorized as high- or average-risk as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The demographic characteristics of high- and average-risk patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. The survival of high- and average-risk patients was compared based on receipt of chemotherapy with Cox hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, 84,424 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 34,868 patients were high-risk and 49,556 were average-risk. In high-risk patients, the risk factors for not receiving chemotherapy included increasing age, distance from the treatment facility, Charlson-Deyo score, and lack of insurance. In average-risk patients, factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy were decreasing age, distance from the treatment facility, Charlson-Deyo score, and non-academic association of the treatment facility. In both, chemotherapy was significantly associated with increased survival on the Kaplan-Meier curve. In the Cox hazard ratio, only high-risk patients benefited from chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1.183, confidence interval 1.116-1.254). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with not receiving chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancers included increasing age, medical comorbidities, increasing distance from the treatment facility, and lack of insurance. Chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in high-risk patients.

Cleft Palate Fistula: A Review.

Background: The development of postoperative oronasal fistulae (ONF) is a complication that plagues all cleft surgeons to varying degrees. There is extensive literature discussing the incidence, functional impact, and treatment of ONF. The goal of this article is to provide an extensive review of the literature discussing the incidence, causative factors, functional impact, classification systems, and treatment of ONF. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed using the Medical Subject Heading terms "cleft palate" AND "fistula" OR "palatal fistula" OR "oronasal fistula". After review, a total of 356 articles were deemed relevant for this study. Results: Information regarding ONF care, prevention, and management in patients with cleft palate was collected from the articles included in this review. Treatment of ONF remains a challenging problem as there is not a consensus in the available literature on the best palatoplasty techniques for their prevention and treatment. A myriad of reconstructive options and adjunctive therapies exist, and their use is guided by the size and location of the fistula. Conclusions: Fistula treatment should be tailored to the specific needs of the patient, and consideration must be given to not only the ONF itself but also the patient's stage of growth and development. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed in which ONF are described using standardized nomenclature, and improved outcomes reporting is necessary to better define an algorithm for a truly holistic approach to palate surgery and reduce the incidence of palatal fistula.

The Incidence of Thromboembolic Events During Hospitalizations Following Surgical Resection of Lower Extremity Sarcomas in Children: Utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System Database.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent occurrence during treatment for adults with sarcoma. The incidence and underlying risk factors of postsurgical VTE in children and adolescents undergoing resection of sarcoma are unknown. METHODS: Using International Classification of Disease revision-9 diagnostic and procedure codes, the Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients aged 18 years and younger, discharged from 2004 to 2015 with a diagnosis of lower extremity malignant neoplasm who had a tumor resection or amputation performed during the encounter. Malignant neoplasms of the pelvic bones and soft tissues were categorized as "pelvis tumors", whereas malignant neoplasms of bone and soft tissues of the lower limbs were categorized as "lower limb tumors". Hospitalizations were evaluated for the occurrence of VTE. Demographic characteristics (age at admission, sex, race, and race/ethnicity) and incidence of VTE were reported. RESULTS: There were 2400 patients identified. Of these, 19 experienced VTE (0.79%) during their surgical hospitalization encounter. By anatomic group, the rate of VTE was 1.4% (CI: 0.5%-3.2%) for tumors in the pelvis and 0.6% (CI: 0.3%-1.0%) in lower limb tumors. Categorizing by age, the incidence of VTE was 1.2% in patients aged zero to 5, 0.3% in patients 6 to 13, and 1.2% in patients 14 to 18 years old. (Table 1). The extremely low rate of VTE occurrence precluded further analysis of risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, postsurgical VTE during hospitalization after pelvic and lower extremity sarcoma resection was an uncommon event in children and adolescents. There seemed to be an increased incidence of postsurgical VTE in pelvic tumors when compared with lower limb tumors, however, the rarity of all events precluded formal statistical analysis. A more robust data set would be required to determine if there are subsets of children and adolescents with sarcoma at higher risk of VTE that could benefit from thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Standardized Letter of Recommendation: Can Everyone Be Awesome?

OBJECTIVE: Standardized letters of recommendation (SLOR) are hypothesized to decrease bias and provide consistent domains for evaluation. However, their ability to differentiate among applicants is unknown. The utilization and functionality of SLOR and the impact of SLOR domain rating on matching for colon and rectal surgery (CRS) residency applicants have yet to be assessed. DESIGN: Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were employed. Applicants were categorized into 3 groups; Top-tier(TT): applicants rated 100% Excellent/Very Good; Mid-Tier(MT) applicants rated 80-99% Excellent/Very Good; and Non-Top Tier(NTT) applicants rated <80% Excellent/Very Good. SETTING: University of Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: SLORs submitted to a single colorectal surgery residency in 2019 were analyzed RESULTS: A total of 101 applicants were included, 54 (53.5%) of the applicants were male. 75 (74.2%) applicants who applied to our residency matched into a CRS residency, compared to the national rate of 66%. Of the 101 applicants with SLOR, 54 (53.5%) were categorized as TT, 26 (25.7%) as MT, and 21(20.8%) as NTT. The univariable analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in research experience (p=0.029) and match status (p=0.01) between applicant tiers. There were no statistically significant differences between applicant-tier and demographics, foreign medical graduates (FMG), H-indices, ABSITE scores, type of residency, preliminary year, completing an unaccredited CRS, and applicants with an additional degree. On multivariable analysis age (OR=0.65; CI=0.48-0.87) and FMG applicants (OR=0.05; CI=0.01-0.44) were inversely associated with successfully matching. Compared to TT applicants, MT (OR=0.07; CI=0.01-0.57) and NTT (OR=0.04; CI=0.01-0.34) applicants were inversely associated with a successful match. Individuals who completed research prior to residency but after medical school was associated with successfully matching (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of MT and NTT ratings is associated with failure to match and may represent an area of concern for CRS programs rather than a tool to discern differences between candidates.

Laryngoscopy Grade Improvement and Difficult Airway Resolution in Infants With Robin Sequence Undergoing Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) aims to relieve tongue-based airway obstruction in Robin Sequence (RS). We investigated direct laryngoscopy grade (DLG) improvement and difficult airway (DA) resolution following MDO. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Three tertiary care institutions. PATIENTS: Sixty-four infants with RS who underwent a single MDO procedure in their first year of life were identified from January 2010 to January 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was DLG pre- and post-MDO. Secondary outcomes included DA designation, pre- and post-MDO polysomnographic assessment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), length of stay, need for gastrostomy, and major/minor adverse events. RESULTS: Median DLG improved from II pre-MDO to I at the time of distractor removal (n = 43, P < .001). No significant change was seen in patients with a third recorded time point (eg, palatoplasty; n = 78, P = .52). Twenty-six (47%) of 55 patients were designated as DA pre-MDO, and 10 (18%) of 55 patients retained the label post-MDO (P < .01). Five (50%) of these 10 patients appeared to be inappropriately retained. Median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index improved from 38.6 (range 31.2-62.8) pre-MDO to 2.9 (range 1-3.9) post-MDO (n = 12; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis allowed for DLG improvement that was stably maintained as well as functional improvement in OSA, with minimal morbidity. Difficult airway designation persisted in the electronic record of some infants despite clinical resolution.

Factors Influencing Timely Preparation of Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Survey of the ACPA.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are commonly felt to impact a team's ability to ensure patients are orthodontically and dentally prepared for alveolar bone grafting at the appropriate time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved multidisciplinary cleft teams. PARTICIPANTS: Cleft team coordinators. INTERVENTIONS: Cleft team coordinators were asked to complete the survey. RESULTS: Fifty-three team coordinators from the 167 ACPA-certified cleft teams completed the survey (response rate = 32%). The majority (83.02%) of cleft teams feel having a case manager increases or would increase the rate of timely bone graft preparation. Orthodontic and dental coverage varied greatly between teams with university/hospital employed dentists and volunteer private practice orthodontists representing the most frequent models. The reported percentage of patients seeking regular dental and orthodontic care with providers affiliated with the team did not correlate with the likelihood of timely bone graft preparation (P = .17; P = .43). Great variability was noted in the manner and frequency of team communication with families during orthodontic bone graft preparation. The presence of a designated case manager on the team was not significantly associated with the percentage of patients who were reported to be orthodontically prepared for bone graft surgery (P = .25). CONCLUSION: Within our survey data, there is great variability noted in factors that may potentially impact orthodontic bone graft preparation. The majority of teams felt that a case manager did or would help with this process, however, our study does not support this fact. Significant recall bias concerning the success of bone graft preparation may affect these results.

Le Fort 1 and Bimaxillary Osteotomies Increase the Length of Stay but not Postoperative Morbidity Compared to Mandibular Osteotomies and Single Jaw Procedures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the association between type of facial osteotomies performed during orthognathic surgery and postoperative outcomes including complications, length of stay, and readmission. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthognathic surgery cases from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database from 2004 to 2014 was undertaken. Osteotomy procedures were classified as Le Fort 1 (LF 1), Mandibular osteotomy, Genioplasty or their combinations. Primary outcome variable was major complications. Secondary outcomes included postoperative LOS > 1 day and 90-day readmission. Random-intercept logistic regression models were utilized to assess the association between the type of osteotomy performed and the outcomes. Bonferroni approach was used to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: The sample included 5413 patients, with a mean age of 17.1 ±â€Š1.68 years and 60.65% were female. The most common procedures were LF1 (39.4%), followed by bimaxillary surgery (23%). Major complications occurred in 8.57% of patients, postoperative LOS > 1 day in 52.4% and 90-day all-cause readmission in 11.16%. In adjusted analyses comparing LF1 compared to mandibular osteotomies, there were no significant differences for major complications (OR = 0.78), 90-day readmission rate (OR = 0.98). However, LF1 was associated with an increased odds for LOS compared to mandibular osteotomies (OR = 1.42). Addition of osteotomies is associated with a significant increase in LOS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery demonstrated increased length of stay for LF1 or bimaxillary osteotomies. Osteotomy type did not impact the odds of readmission or complications. The trends revealed should be helpful for patient counseling.

Maxillomandibular Advancement for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Normal or Class I Malocclusion.

BACKGROUND: Maxillomandibular advancement is an effective surgical option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that achieves enlargement of the upper airway by physically expanding the facial skeleton. The authors sought to determine whether an advancement of 10 mm predicts surgical success and if any correlation existed between the magnitude of mandibular/maxillary advancement and improvement in polysomnography metrics using aggregated individual patient data from multiple studies. METHODS: A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify relevant articles that included preoperative and postoperative polysomnography data and measurements of the advancement of both the maxillary and mandibular portions of the face in patients with normal or class I malocclusion. Each patient was stratified into "Success" or "Failure" groups based on criteria defining a "Success" as a 50% preoperative to post-operative decrease in AHI or RDI and a post-operative AHI or RDI <20. RESULTS: A review of the PubMed database yielded 162 articles. Review of these resulted in 9 manuscripts and a total of 109 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of anterior advancement of either the mandible (P = 0.96) or the maxilla (P = 0.23) between the "Success" or "Failure" groups. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a paucity of individual data available, the current data does not support an ideal amount of maxillary or mandibular advancement that is required to obtain a surgical success in the treatment of OSA. Until a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial is performed, surgical planning should be tailored to patient-specific anatomy to achieve the desired result.

Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.

INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR) have been the standard tool used for cephalometric analysis in craniofacial surgery. Over the past decade, a three-dimensional (3D) revolution in cephalometric analysis and surgical planning has been underway. To date, research has not validated whether cephalometric measurements taken from two-dimensional (2D) and 3D data sources are equivalent and interchangeable. The authors sought to compare angular cephalometric measurements taken with 2D and 3D modalities. METHODS: Sixty-two head CT scans (36 females, 26 males) with an average age of 63 ±â€Š20 years were studied. Twelve cephalometric angular measurements were taken from 3D reconstructed skulls using the software package Mimics 19.0 (Materialize; Leuven, Belgium). These same facial angles were measured from 2D lateral cephalograms reconstructed from the original CT scans using Dolphin 11.9. Measurements taken with both techniques were compared for agreement using a paired t test. Intra-class correlation coefficient assessment was used to determine inter-rater reliability. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Five of the 12 angular measurements (SNA, SNB, MP-FH, U1-SN, and U1-L1) demonstrated statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the 2D and 3D analyses. All of these differences were less than the standard deviations for the respective measure. CONCLUSION: The differences between angular cephalometric values obtained from 2D LCRs and 3D CT reconstructions are small. This supports the practices of using 2D and 3D cephalometric data interchangeably in most applications. Clinicians must be selective in which measures they employ to maximize accuracy and care must be taken when measuring dental inclination with lateral cephalograms.

The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics before Primary Palatoplasty Is Not Associated with Lower Fistula Rates: An Outcome Study Using the Pediatric Health Information System Database.

BACKGROUND: Previous attempts to study the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on the outcomes of cleft palate surgery have been hampered by the need for a very large sample size to provide adequate power to discern a potentially small therapeutic effect. This limitation can be overcome by querying large databases created by health care governing bodies. METHODS: Data from the Pediatric Health Information System database were used for this analysis. Patients, aged 6 to 18 months, who had undergone primary palatoplasty (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 27.62) between 2004 and 2009 were included. Subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula between 2004 and 2015 was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure code 21.82. Pharmacy billing records were used to determine antibiotic administration. Associations between antibiotic administration and fistula repair were assessed using random-intercept logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, race, and cleft type. RESULTS: Seven thousand one hundred sixty patients were available for analysis; of these, 460 (6.4 percent) had a subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula. Fistula rates were 5.9, 11.4, and 5.2 percent among patients given preoperative antibiotics, only postoperative antibiotics, and no antibiotics, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis results showed that the odds of having an oronasal fistula among patients who were administered preoperative antibiotics did not differ significantly (statistically) from patients who did not receive antibiotics (OR, 0.88; 95 percent CI, 0.59 to 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment goal of primary palatoplasty is the successful repair of the cleft without an oronasal fistula. Administration of preoperative antibiotics did not significantly reduce the odds of subsequent fistula repair within the same Pediatric Health Information System institution following primary palatoplasty. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma: Case demonstrating principles for uncommon vascular lesions.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is an uncommon malignancy that may present in a manner similar to benign vascular tumors. METHODS: A 6-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder was referred to the Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital vascular anomalies clinic for the evaluation of a tongue mass. RESULTS: Prior to the presentation, at 5 years of age, neck computed tomography (CT) was performed. This showed a well circumscribed, enhancing mass at the anterior aspect of the tongue. The radiologic impression was that this lesion was most likely a hemangioma. Two years later, the patient was evaluated in the vascular anomalies clinic. At that examination a 2-3 cm swelling was noted on the dorsal aspect of the tongue. The mass was fleshy and firm with discrete borders. Handheld Doppler examination indicated a high-flow lesion. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy. The lesion was identified as an alveolar soft-part sarcoma based on pathologic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with common vascular tumors and malformations allows providers to diagnose the majority of these lesions on a combination of clinical history and physical examination. Atypical and combined lesions do benefit from imaging to help characterize and aid in the differential diagnosis. Biopsy enables definitive diagnosis but is necessary in the minority of cases. When in doubt, referral to a specialized, multidisciplinary vascular anomalies clinic will ensure that these patients receive management for this challenging collection of conditions.

Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are among the common birth defects in the United States. Management is complex and may be difficult for parents and patients to understand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability of online educational material provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) websites regarding cleft lip and palate and to assess parents' comprehension. METHODS: Parents of children younger than 10 years of age presenting to the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital for conditions other than cleft lip and palate were recruited for participation. Parents were given the literature published on the ASPS and ACPA web sites to review and were asked to complete a 5-question test specifically targeted to the content of the passage they reviewed. We tested the readability of the 2 online passages using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software Solutions Ltd). RESULTS: Sixty parents completed the study. Across all groups, the mean score was 4.35 of a possible 5. The mean score was 4.4 for the ASPS web site and 4.29 for the ACPA web site. Fifty-three percent of participants answered all questions correctly. No significant difference in scores was noted between web sites (P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Despite containing content of varying reading-level difficulty, the literature posted on the ACPA and ASPS web sites concerning cleft lip and palate conveyed information equally well to the target parent demographic with high levels of comprehension.

Laser ablation of embryonic veins in children.

BACKGROUND: Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS) and related overgrowth syndromes are rare conditions that often present to academic pediatric units and multidisciplinary vascular anomaly clinics. These conditions are commonly associated with abnormalities of the superficial and deep venous structures and carry an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed of all patients treated at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital with endovenous laser ablation therapy (EVLT) for management of dilated embryonic veins in the setting of limb overgrowth. RESULTS: Three patients with limb overgrowth underwent EVLT between 2015 and 2017. All patients had successful occlusion of the targeted veins on post-procedure imaging. One patient developed a cellulitis successfully treated with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Endovenous laser ablation therapy is a well-tolerated and safe procedure for prophylactic closure of abnormal superficial embryonic veins. This study supports the use of this technique in managing increased thromboembolic risk in this unique patient population and recognizes the need for a long-term study to determine its efficacy.

Outcomes of Primary Palatoplasty: An Analysis Using the Pediatric Health Information System Database.

BACKGROUND: Previous attempts at reporting oronasal fistula development and secondary speech surgery following cleft palate surgery have been limited to single-center case series. This limitation can be overcome by querying large databases created by health care governing bodies or health care alliances. The authors examined the effect of cleft type and demographic variables on the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data from the Pediatric Health Information System database were queried for patients, aged 6 to 18 months, who had undergone primary palatoplasty between 2004 and 2009. Subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula and/or secondary speech surgery between 2004 and 2015 was identified by procedure codes. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between cleft type with oronasal fistula and with secondary speech surgery. RESULTS: Seven thousand three hundred twenty-five patients were identified, and 6.4 percent (n = 468) had a subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula and 18.5 percent (n = 1355) had a secondary speech operation. Adjusted for age, sex, and race, patients with cleft lip and palate have increased odds of oronasal fistula (OR, 5.60; 95 percent CI, 4.44 to 7.07) and secondary speech surgery (OR, 2.32; 95 percent CI, 2.05 to 2.63). CONCLUSIONS: Using a large, multi-institution billing database, the authors were able to estimate the prevalence of oronasal fistula and surgically treated velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary palatoplasty in the United States. In addition, the authors demonstrated that patients with isolated cleft palate develop fewer oronasal fistulas and require less secondary speech surgery than patients with cleft lip and palate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Cleft and Craniofacial Team Orthodontic Care in the United States: A Survey of the ACPA.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the capacity for orthodontic care, service features, and finances among members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: ACPA-approved multidisciplinary cleft teams. PARTICIPANTS: Cleft team coordinators. INTERVENTIONS: Coordinators were asked to complete the survey working together with their orthodontists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Model for orthodontic care. RESULTS: Coordinators from 82 out of 167 teams certified by ACPA completed the survey (response rate = 49.1%). Most orthodontists were private practice volunteers (48%) followed by university/hospital employed (22.8%). Care was often delivered in community private practice facilities (44.2%) or combination of university and private practice facilities (39.0%). Half of teams reported offering presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO), with nasoalveolar molding being the most common. Cleft/craniofacial patients typically comprise 25% or less of the orthodontists' practices. The presence of a university/hospital-based orthodontist was associated with higher rates of offering PSIO (P < .001) and an increased percentage dedication of their practice to cleft/craniofacial care (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Orthodontic models across ACPA-certified teams are highly varied. The employment of full-time craniofacial orthodontists is less common but is highly correlated with a practice with a high percentage of cleft care and the offering of advanced services such as PSIO. Future work should focus on how to effectively promote such roles for orthodontists to ensure high-level care for cleft/craniofacial patients requiring treatment from infancy through skeletal maturity.

Craniometric Analysis of Endoscopic Suturectomy for Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic suturectomy and helmeting represents a successful first-line surgical treatment for bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Its effect on cranial morphology has not been previously described. METHODS: Patients were identified who had bilateral coronal craniosynostosis treated with endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmeting at Boston Children's Hospital between 2005 and 2013 and who underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography. Two normative patient populations were identified from our trauma registry with computed tomographic scans completed at the same age as our pretreatment and posttreatment scans. Craniometric indices were used to quantify the effect of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified who underwent bilateral coronal suturectomy. Twelve patients had preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic studies. Eight patients (66.7 percent) were syndromic. The average ages for preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scan were 1.1 months (range, 0.03 to 2.6 months) and 19.6 months (range, 10.8 to 37.5 months). Thirteen patients with an average age of 1.1 months (range, 0.5 to 1.6 months) were identified as a preoperative control group. Fourteen patients with an average age of 18.5 months (range, 15.5 to 22.9 months) were identified as a postoperative control group. The anterior cranial height stabilized with treatment and the anterior cranial base length increased. The anterior cranial height-to-anterior cranial base length ratio significantly decreased with treatment (p = 0.128). Frontal bossing normalized with endoscopic suturectomy (craniosynostosis versus control: preoperatively, p = 0.001; postoperatively, p = 0.8). Cephalic indices also normalized with treatment (craniosynostosis versus control: preoperatively, p = 0.02; postoperatively, p = 0.13). No cases of hydrocephalus were observed. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic suturectomy and helmeting improves anterior turricephaly and corrects frontal bossing and brachycephaly in patients with bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Anthropometric Evaluation of Periorbital Region and Facial Projection Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry.

INTRODUCTION: Direct anthropometric and three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry measurements have been used extensively in cleft/craniofacial surgery to assess morphological changes and surgical outcomes. Craniofacial procedures alter the sagittal projection of periorbital bony prominences. Mulliken described a method of measuring their projection relative to the corneal plane but is impractical in clinical practice. Three-dimensional photogrammetry may offer a solution; however, the cornea is not visualized on this. The authors propose to develop new normative measurements of facial projection relative to the pupil. METHODS: Five 3D photographs were taken of 5 individuals using Vectra M5 camera. Facial projection measurements were taken of the sagittal projection of the bilateral periorbital landmarks and nasal radix relative to the pupil using Mirror 3D analysis. Standard deviations (SD) were determined for each subject and laterality. Chi-square tests confirmed all SD <1 mm. Intra and inter-rater reliability were confirmed with an intraclass correlation coefficient assessment. RESULTS: Three male and 2 female subjects were photographed with 5 unique images. Standard deviations of repeat measures of all landmarks were <0.5 mm. Chi-square tests confirmed with statistical significance that SD for all values except for the radix was <1 mm (P<0.05). Intrarater reliability was high for all landmarks (intraclass correlation coefficient coefficients 0.93-0.99). Inter-rater reliability was good for the lateral canthi and excellent for all others. CONCLUSION: This technique demonstrates repeatability with high reliability on serial photographs and is applicable to measuring surgery effects and growth on facial projection. Establishment of age-specific normative values for landmark projection will refine usage applicability in operative planning.