Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 94(6): 863-869, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37218039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unanticipated changes in health status and worsening of chronic conditions often prompt the need to consider emergency general surgery (EGS). Although discussions about goals of care may promote goal-concordant care and reduce patient and caregiver depression and anxiety, these conversations, as well as standardized documentation, remain infrequent for EGS patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from patients admitted to an EGS service at a tertiary academic center to determine the prevalence of clinically meaningful advance care planning (ACP) documentation (conversations and legal ACP forms) during the EGS hospitalization. Multivariable regression was performed to identify patient, clinician, and procedural factors associated with the lack of ACP. RESULTS: Among 681 patients admitted to the EGS service in 2019, only 20.1% had ACP documentation in the electronic health record at any time point during their hospitalization (of those, 75.5% completed before and 24.5% completed during admission). Two thirds (65.8%) of the total cohort had surgery during their admission, but none of them had a documented ACP conversation with the surgical team preoperatively. Patients with ACP documentation tended to have Medicare insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-12.23; p < 0.001) and had greater burden of comorbid conditions (adjusted odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.55-6.88; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adults experiencing a significant, often abrupt change in health status leading to an EGS admission are infrequently engaged in ACP conducted by the surgical team. This is a critical missed opportunity to promote patient-centered care and to communicate patients' care preferences to the surgical and other inpatient medical teams. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Medicare , Idoso , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Crônica , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Documentação
3.
J Surg Res ; 264: 30-36, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744775

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to the postponement of low-acuity surgical procedures in an effort to conserve resources and ensure patient safety. This study aimed to characterize patient-reported concerns about undergoing surgical procedures during the pandemic. METHODS: We administered a cross-sectional survey to patients who had their general and plastic surgical procedures postponed at the onset of the pandemic, asking about barriers to accessing surgical care. Questions addressed dependent care, transportation, employment and insurance status, as well as perceptions of and concerns about COVID-19. Mixed methods and inductive thematic analyses were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were interviewed. We identified the following patient concerns: contracting COVID-19 in the hospital (46%), being alone during hospitalization (40%), facing financial stressors (29%), organizing transportation (28%), experiencing changes to health insurance coverage (25%), and arranging care for dependents (18%). Nonwhite participants were 5 and 2.5 times more likely to have concerns about childcare and transportation, respectively. Perceptions of decreased hospital safety and the consequences of possible COVID-19 infection led to delay in rescheduling. Education about safety measures and communication about scheduling partially mitigated concerns about COVID-19. However, uncertainty about timeline for rescheduling and resolution of the pandemic contributed to ongoing concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Providing effective surgical care during this unprecedented time requires both awareness of societal shifts impacting surgical patients and system-level change to address new barriers to care. Eliciting patients' perspectives, adapting processes to address potential barriers, and effectively educating patients about institutional measures to minimize in-hospital transmission of COVID-19 should be integrated into surgical care.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , COVID-19/transmissão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/psicologia , Medo , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Incerteza
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA