A novel approach to prevent post-operative ileus after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with postoperative ileus (POI), a common post-surgical event, experience intense discomfort. Various treatments targeting prevention of POI have shown to have an unpredictable effect. We introduced a novel postoperative bowel management protocol in patients implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). The effect of this protocol on POI was evaluated. METHODS: Patients receiving an old bowel management protocol (OBMP; 01/2007-03/2009) were compared with those receiving a new bowel management protocol (NBMP; 04/2009-12/2013). The OBMP consisted of advancing the diet as tolerated, bisacodyl suppositories and enemas with the goal of a bowel movement (BM) every 3 days. The NBMP consisted of clear liquids until first BM is achieved, then full liquids until the second BM, then advancing to goal diet. Docusate is given on postoperative day (POD) 1 and bisacodyl PR on POD2 with enemas if ileus develops. Enemas are added POD3 if no BM has occurred. Polyethylene glycol is considered daily for patients prone to constipation. The goal is a BM every 2 days. Patients were made nil per os (NPO) with any signs of ileus. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were implanted with CF-LVADs during the study period. The incidence of ileus significantly decreased from 19% in the OBMP group to 4% percent in the NBMP group (p < 0.05). In-hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (6% vs. 2% p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: A novel postoperative bowel management protocol successfully decreased the incidence of POI following CF-LVAD implant surgery at our institution.

The potential of cardiac allografts from donors after cardiac death at the University of Wisconsin Organ Procurement Organization.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential availability of hearts from adult donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors within an acceptable hypoxic period. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a donor database from the University of Wisconsin Organ Procurement Organization Donor Tracking System between 2004 and 2006. The DCD population (n=78) was screened using our inclusion criteria for DCD cardiac donor suitability, including warm ischaemic time (WIT) limit of 30 min. In the same period, 70 hearts were donated from brain-dead donors. RESULTS: Of 78 DCD donors, 12 (15%) met our proposed DCD cardiac donor criteria. The mean WIT of these 12 DCD donors was 21 min (range 14-29 min). When inclusion criteria are further narrowed to (1) age <30 years, (2) WIT <20 min and (3) male gender, only two out of 12 met the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our proposed DCD cardiac donor criteria, the potential application of DCD cardiac donors would represent an increase in cardiac donation of 17% (12/70) during the 3-year period. When the criteria were narrowed to the initial 'ideal' case, only two donors met such criteria, suggesting that such 'ideal' DCD donors are rare but they do exist.

Multidisciplinary approach decreases length of stay and reduces cost for ventricular assist device therapy.

High implantation costs and long postoperative length of stay (LOS) in debilitated patients complicate ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. Between July 2000 and February 2005, 30 patients received a VAD at our institution. Of those, 20 patients were successfully discharged from the hospital with VADs. In August 2003, a multidisciplinary team was formed consisting of all services for VAD patients to replace a single-discipline (cardiac surgery) system. This team evaluated potential VAD candidates and identified optimal timing for implantation. These 20 VAD patients were divided into two groups according to the initiation of multidisciplinary team; the traditional group (n=7, July 2000-July 2003) and the multidisciplinary group (n=13, August 2003-February 2005). Patient demographics were not different. The LOS decreased from 61 to 15 days (P<0.01), especially LOS on the floor decreased from 35 to 7 days (P=0.03). The floor cost was significantly reduced ($47,111 vs. $8742, P<0.01), leading to a decrease in total postoperative cost ($202,238 vs. $161,744, P<0.01). The 30-day readmission rate decreased (5/7 patients vs. 1/13 patients, P<0.01). A multidisciplinary approach significantly decreased LOS and cost after VAD therapy, mostly by decreasing the cost of routine non-ICU care, without increasing the readmission rate.

Improved survival in patients with ventricular assist device therapy: the University of Wisconsin experience.

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been implanted since 1990 in our institution, becoming an increasingly common treatment for end-stage heart failure. Beginning in 1997, VAD patients were discharged home when feasible. In August 2003, a dedicated multidisciplinary VAD team (cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, VAD coordinators, nurses, rehabilitation specialists, nutrition experts, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, and administrators) was created to optimize the management of VAD patients. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of these changes in care at our center over the last 17 years. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 107 consecutive VAD recipients between June 1990 and August 2006. VADs were implanted as bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant and destination therapy. The cohort was divided by care plans into early (n=37, June 1990-1996), mid (n=32, 1997-July 2003), and late groups (n=38, August 2003-August 2006). Demographic profile, survival and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Patient demographics tended to show an increased severity of illness over time. Post-VAD survival rate significantly improved in the late group (post-VAD 1- and 3-year survival rates; early: 54.1% and 40.5%; mid: 51.6% and 41.9%; late: 86.8% and 82.5%, p<0.001, respectively). The incidence of complications including re-operation, major bleeding and major infection, significantly decreased in the late group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes have improved dramatically in recent VAD patients, despite an increasingly high-risk patient population. These data suggest that advances in device technology and medical therapies, as well as a multidisciplinary approach, have improved survival on VAD therapy.

A novel use of the implantable ventricular assist device for isolated right heart failure.

Isolated right heart failure after cardiac surgery is uncommon and the prognosis remains poor. Additionally, managements for these patients are difficult. Profound postcardiotomy right heart failure developed in a 45-year-old woman after aortic root replacement for critical aortic stenosis with small aortic root. Although maximum medical therapy, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenator were attempted, severe right heart failure remained. Finally, an implantable right ventricular assist device (RVAD) was utilized because an immediate myocardial recovery was unlikely. The patient was discharged from the hospital at 17 days after the RVAD implantation. After 79 days of support, right ventricular function had recovered, the fully rehabilitated patient was successfully weaned from the RVAD, and the RVAD was explanted. The patient has no recurrence of heart failure 668 days after RVAD explantation.

When is retransplantation a viable option?

As the number of recipients of heart transplantation grows over time and they survive longer, more are at risk for developing severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy and allograft dysfunction, which might lead to consideration for retransplantation. Clearly, outcomes following cardiac retransplantation are compromised, and with donor shortage, the selection of candidates must be judicious. Retransplantation appears most appropriate for those patients more than 6 months following original heart transplantation, who have severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy and associated left ventricular dysfunction, or allograft dysfunction and progressive symptoms of heart failure in the absence of acute rejection. Relative contraindications to transplantation (ie, advanced age, comorbidities, psychosocial issues) require thorough assessment when retransplantation is being considered.