Return to Cycling After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) candidates become younger, patients' expectations continue to expand. We surveyed our patient population to determine rates of return to cycling after TJA so that we could provide more accurate counseling on performance and safety. METHODS: At our single institution, an online survey was generated and sent out to patients who had at least 3 months of follow-up. Patients were split into 4 categories based on surgery type: single total hip arthroplasty (THA), single total knee arthroplasty (TKA), multiple TJA, and revision TJA. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 surveys fit the inclusion criteria. The average age of the patient population was 69 years, with an average of 4.08 years from their time of most recent TJA surgery (maximum follow-up of 18.61 years). Nearly all those who were able to bike prior to surgery were able to return to cycling, with only 6% not being able to do so. There were 41.8% who returned to cycling less than 3 months after surgery. Most cyclists were able to return to their previous level. Patients who had a revision TJA had significantly lower rates of returning to cycling in comparison to single TKA, single THA, and multi-TJA (37.3%, 60.3%, 61.9%, and 60.3%, respectively, P < .005). Patients who never returned to cycling had higher revision rates in comparison to those who were able to get back on a bike (14.4 versus 9.2%, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients who had prior cycling experience were able to return to bike riding within 3 to 6 months after TJA. Individuals who had revision TJA had lower rates of return to cycling in comparison to single TKA, single THA, and multi-TJA. Returning to cycling did not result in higher rates of revision.

Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite its limitations, a culture remains the "gold standard" for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: This retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Perioperative Sleep Quality Disturbances in Total Joint Arthroplasty is Multifactorial.

BACKGROUND: Sleep quality following arthroplasty procedures is important for patient recovery and satisfaction, but remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to report risk factors for sleep disturbances in the perioperative period in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty procedures. METHODS: Sleep surveys were prospectively collected on 751 consecutive patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at our institution between June 2019 and February 2021 at their preoperative and postoperative visits (2 and 6 weeks). Data were collected on patient demographics, opioid use (preoperatively and postoperatively) as well as tobacco and alcohol use, and specific medical diagnosis that may influence sleep patterns (ie, depression). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-tests and 1-way analysis of variances. RESULTS: For both total hip and total knee patients, worse sleep patterns preoperatively were found in patients who used opioids prior to surgery (P < .001), were current smokers (P < .001), and were aged less than 65 years (P < .001). Postoperative persistent opioid use (more than 3 months) was seen in patients who had worse reported sleep quality preoperatively (P < .001). In comparison to total hip arthroplasty, patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were more likely to report less sleep in the postoperative period. Patients who were current smokers (compared to nonsmokers or previous smokers) (P = .014) had worse sleep quality at all time points that persisted at 6 weeks, although these differences were seen more in total hip patients than in total knee patients (P = .006 versus P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality disturbances around the time of surgery appear to be multifactorial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Self-Reported Cannabis Use Is Associated With a Lower Rate of Persistent Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Legalization of cannabis, along with concern over prescription opiate use, has garnered interest in cannabis for adjuvant pain control. This study examines the relationship between cannabis and opioid consumption after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Methods: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA with minimum 6-month follow-up who self-reported cannabis use were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 210 patients (128 TKAs and 82 THAs) were matched by age; gender; type of arthroplasty; Charlson Comorbidity Index; and use of nicotine, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients who did not self-report cannabis use. Patients receiving an opioid prescription after 90 days postoperatively were classified as persistent opioid users (POUs). Duration of opioid use (DOU) was calculated for non-POU patients as the time between surgery and their last opioid prescription. Differences in inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), outpatient MMEs, POU, and DOU were analyzed. Results: Cannabis users required equivalent inpatient and outpatient MMEs. There was no difference in DOU. There was a significant difference in POU between cannabis users and matched controls (1.4% [n = 3] vs 9.5% [n = 20], P < .001, respectively). Grouping patients by TKA or THA, there remained a difference in POU for TKA (1.5% [n = 2] vs 10.9% [n = 14], P = .002) and THA (1.2% [n = 1] vs 7.3% [n = 6], P = .04). There was no difference in inpatient or outpatient MMEs or DOU for THA and TKA patients. Conclusions: There is a reduced rate of POU in patients who self-report perioperative cannabis use. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of cannabis as an adjunct to perioperative pain control.

Evaluation of Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Opioid Pathway in Opioid-Naïve Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging. Tramadol is a weak opioid with potentially lower side effects and risk for dependency than stronger opioids. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of tramadol after TKA in opioid-naïve patients compared with stronger opioids. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary TKA was performed. In September 2018, opioid-naïve patients were prescribed tramadol instead of oxycodone. Patients receiving tramadol (low-opioid group) were matched to patients discharged with oxycodone before this transition (high-opioid group). We compared morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption and outcomes up to 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Two-hundred and five patients underwent TKA, with 126 receiving tramadol. Fourteen patients were converted to stronger opioid (11.2% conversion rate). Seventy patients from the low-opioid group were matched to 70 patients in the high-opioid group. Average daily inpatient MME consumption was higher in the high-opioid group (40.0 ± 27.4 vs 16.3 ± 10.9, P = .000). Outpatient prescribed MME was significantly higher in the high-opioid group (135.5 ± 71.5 vs 75.3 ± 51.3, P = .000) along with a higher number of refills (0.53 ± 1.1 vs 0.886 ± 0.94, P = .041). Knee range of motion was not statistically different at any timepoint postoperatively. There was higher adverse event rate in the low-opioid group (8.6% vs 5.7%) but not statically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Low opioid regimen following TKA showed lower MME consumption than high opioid regimen with no effect on outcomes up to 3 months. Use of low opioid regimen should be considered for TKA surgery.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Orthostasis After Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative orthostatic intolerance can limit mobilization after hip and knee arthroplasty. The literature is lacking on the incidence and risk factors associated with orthostatic intolerance after elective arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of primary total hip, total knee, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients was conducted. Patients with orthostatic events were identified, and potential demographic and perioperative risk factors were recorded. Orthostatic intolerance was defined as postoperative syncope, lightheadedness, or dizziness, limiting ambulation and/or requiring medical treatment. Statistical analysis was completed using Pearson's chi-square test for categorical data and t-tests for continuous data. Binary logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 500 consecutive patients were included. The overall incidence of orthostatic intolerance was 18%; 25% in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 11% in total knee arthroplasty. On univariate analysis, significant risk factors for developing postoperative orthostatic intolerance include older age, female gender, THA surgery, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class, absence of recreational drug use, lower estimated blood volume, lower preoperative diastolic blood pressure, spinal with monitored anesthesia care (MAC), posterior approach for THA, bupivacaine use in spinal, percent of blood loss, postoperative oxycodone or tramadol use, higher postoperative intravenous fluid volume, and lower postoperative hemoglobin. Multivariate analysis demonstrated persistent significance of female gender, THA surgery, spinal with MAC, bupivacaine use in spinal, and more intravenous fluid administered postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Orthostatic intolerance affects a significant number of arthroplasty patients. Awareness of risk factors and modification of perioperative variables linked to orthostatic intolerance may assist the surgeon in choosing the appropriate surgical setting, educating patients, and improving early postoperative recovery.

Incidence and Predictive Risk Factors of Postoperative Urinary Retention After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may cause urologic injury and delay patient discharge. This study measures the incidence of POUR and identifies predictive risk factors. METHODS: Two-hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were prospectively enrolled. Bladder scans were performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and every four hours thereafter. POUR was defined as >400cc with inability to void and was treated with catheterization. Patient demographics, urologic history, operative data, perioperative medications, and bladder scanner volumes were investigated with the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (20%) developed POUR. Compared with non-POUR patients, PACU bladder scan volumes were greater in patients who developed POUR (344cc vs 120cc, P < .001). POUR patients had lower BMI (27.8 vs 29.4, P = .03), longer operative duration (83.9 vs 76.0 minutes, P = .002), and lower ASA scores (2.2 vs 2.4, P = .02). Total intravenous fluid was equivalent between groups (1134cc vs 1185cc, P = .41). POUR patients received less narcotics measured by morphine milligram equivalents (16.1 vs 23.9, P < .001). Fifteen variables including spinal type (bupivacaine and ropivacaine) and paralytic use were not predictive of POUR. Potentially predictive variables included anesthetic types administered (spinal, general, regional, and combination) and perioperative administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glycopyrrolate, and muscle relaxants. The multivariate analysis showed that NSAIDs (P = .05) and glycopyrrolate (P = .04) were significant predictors. CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of patients develop POUR after TKA. Select patient demographics and PACU bladder scanning may identify those at risk. Appropriate pain control and judicious use of perioperative NSAIDs and glycopyrrolate may help minimize the risk of POUR.

Alpha-Defensin Is Not Superior to Traditional Diagnostic Methods for Detection of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid alpha-defensin (AD) may improve diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty but is only available as send-out test. This study evaluated laboratory result accuracy between send-out test vs hospital labs and if AD made a difference in treatment plan. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 152 consecutive patients with a TKA or THA joint aspiration for painful or clinically concerning joint. Synovial fluid was sent to our institution (hospital-based labs, HBL) and send-out immunoassay laboratory (Synovasure). Patients were scored with specific criteria from validated scoring system for PJI using HBL and Synovasure results. The score with and without AD test was compared to determine if AD impacted patient management. RESULTS: Overall, there was strong agreement between institutions for PJI diagnosis (Cohen's kappa score 0.96). Twenty-nine patients had PJI diagnosis (score ≥6), of which 28 (97%) had positive AD with 1 false-negative result. Sixty-three patients had inconclusive score (between 2 and 5) and 60 patients had negative PJI diagnosis (score ≤1). Of these patients, 5 underwent surgery for infection. Two patients had surgery for positive AD, 2 for positive culture, and 1 because of elevated HBL results. The AD test changed the PJI diagnosis and influenced decision for surgery in only 1.3% (2/152) of patients. CONCLUSION: Minimal differences were found in laboratory values between institutions. The addition of AD may be useful in cases of equivocal laboratory results but does not appear to be necessary for routine diagnosis of PJI after TKA/THA. LEVEL EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient Perception Regarding Potential Effectiveness of Cannabis for Pain Management.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported cannabis use has increased since its recent legalization in many states. The primary objective of this study is to describe patients' beliefs regarding the potential effectiveness of cannabis and gauge patient acceptance of these compounds if prescribed by a physician. METHODS: Five hundred fifty-five consecutive new patients in a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) practice completed a questionnaire at their new patient or preoperative encounter. Questions regarding their beliefs about the potential effectiveness of cannabis for pain management were presented to the patient. Each question was scored in accordance to the agreement of the patient. Data were also collected on patient demographics, and current cannabis, tobacco, and/or alcohol use. RESULTS: Current cannabis use was reported in 20.2% (112/555) of respondents. Patients were interested in using cannabis if prescribed by a physician for acute (75.3%, 418/515) and chronic (74.4%, 415/555) pain. Seventy-seven percent (428/555) of patients believe (strongly agree or agree) that cannabis should be legalized for medical use, whereas only 39% (217/555) strongly agree or agree that cannabis should be legalized for recreational use. Patients strongly agree or agree that cannabis can help with sleep or anxiety, 44.9% (249/555) and 49.4% (274/555) respectively. Most patients had never smoked (53%, 294/555) and drink one or less alcoholic beverage per week (52.1%, 299/555). CONCLUSION: Patients believe that cannabis may be helpful for pain management after TJA and are willing to use if prescribed by their orthopedic provider. Further research is warranted to determine if cannabis is a helpful adjunct to pain management in this patient population.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Traditional Intravenous Fluid vs. Oral Fluid Administration in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimal perioperative fluid management has not been established in patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures. Our purpose was to investigate the effects of perioperative fluid management (ie, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: One hundred thirty patients who met inclusion criteria undergoing primary unilateral TKA were prospectively randomized into traditional (TFG) vs oral (OFG) perioperative fluid management groups. The primary outcome was change in body weight (BW). Secondary outcome measures included knee motion, leg girth, bioelectrical impendence, quadriceps activation, functional outcomes testing, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score JR, VR-12, laboratory values, vital signs, patient satisfaction, pain scores, and adverse events. RESULTS: The TFG had increased BW the evening of surgery (7.0 ± 4.3 vs 3.0 ± 3.9, P < .0001), postoperative day (POD) #1 (9.1 ± 4.3 vs 4.7 ± 3.9, P < .0001), and POD #2 (6.2 ± 5.0 vs 4.4 ± 4.0, P = .032). Bioelectrical impedance showed less limb edema in the OFG (4.2 ± 29.7 vs 17.8 ± 30.3, P < .0001) on POD #1. Urine specific gravity differences were seen preoperatively between groups (OFG, more hydrated, P = .002). Systolic blood pressure decrease from the baseline was greater in the OFG on arrival to the floor (19.4 ± 13.5 vs 10.6 ± 12.8, P < .0001) and 8 (23.4 ± 13.3 vs 17.0 ± 12.9, P = .006) and 16 (25.8 ± 13.8 vs 25.8 ± 13.8, P = .046) hours after floor arrival. The TFG had more urine output on POD #1 (3369 mL ± 1343 mL vs 2435 mL ± 1151 mL, P < .0001). The OFG were more likely to go home on POD #1 than the TFG (63 vs 56, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Oral fluid intake with IVF restriction in the perioperative period after TKA may offer short-term benefits with swelling and BW fluctuations. The authors continue to limit perioperative IVFs and encourage patient initiated fluid intake.

Has Self-reported Marijuana Use Changed in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty After the Legalization of Marijuana?

BACKGROUND: Marijuana use has become more accessible since its recent legalization in several states. However, its use in a total joint arthroplasty population to our knowledge has not been reported, and the implications of its use in this setting remain unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We report (1) the self-reported use of marijuana in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty both before and after its legalization; and (2) clinical and demographic factors associated with marijuana use in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: One thousand records of patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (500 consecutive before and 500 consecutive after the legalization of the commercial sale of marijuana in Colorado) were included for analysis. Preoperative medical history and physicals were retrospectively reviewed for self-reported and reasons (medicinal versus recreational) for use. Additionally, patient records were used to determine insurance type, age, gender, smoking status, history of substance abuse, preoperative narcotic use, alcohol intake, and the type of arthroplasty performed. RESULTS: Self-reported use after legalization dramatically increased from 1% (four of 500) to 11% (55 of 500) (odds ratio [OR], 15.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.5-42.6]; p < 0.001) after legalization. For those reporting use after legalization, 46% (25 of 55) of patients reported recreational use, 26% (14 of 55) medicinal use, 27% (15 of 55) did not report a reason for use, and 2% (one of 55) reported both recreational and medicinal use. Factors associated with use included younger age (with a 10-year mean difference between the groups [p < 0.001]), male gender (36 of 59 users [61%] versus 411 of 941 nonusers [44%]; OR, 2.02; p < 0.01), current smokers (22 of 59 users [37%] versus 54 of 941 [6%] nonusers; OR, 0.09; p < 0.01), a history of substance abuse (eight of 59 users [14%] versus 18 of 941 nonusers [2%]; OR, 8.04; p < 0.001), insurance type (Medicaid only, 28 of 59 [48%] users versus 56 of 941 [6%] nonusers; OR, 20.45; p < 0.01), and preoperative narcotic use (eight of 59 users [14%] versus 17 of 941 nonusers [2%]; OR, 2.4; p < 0.001). We did not find differences with regard to alcohol use, amount of alcohol consumption, or insurance types other than Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the legalization of marijuana has led to either more users or more patients who are willing to report its use given the lack of legal ramifications. Despite these findings, the evidence to date precludes the use of marijuana postoperatively in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Further investigation, ideally in a prospective randomized manner, should focus on opioid consumption, nausea, sleep patterns, and outcomes in patients using marijuana who are undergoing total joint arthroplasty before recommendations can be made for its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.