Carmofur prevents cell cycle progression by reducing E2F8 transcription in temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma cells.

Sphingolipid metabolism is dysregulated in many cancers, allowing cells to evade apoptosis through increased sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and decreased ceramides. Ceramidases hydrolyze ceramides to sphingosine, which is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinases to generate S1P. The S1P allows cells to evade apoptosis by shifting the equilibrium away from ceramides, which favor cell death. One tumor type that exhibits a shift in the sphingolipid balance towards S1P is glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive brain tumor. GBMs almost always recur despite surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). Understanding sphingolipid metabolism in GBM is still limited, and currently, there are no approved treatments to target dysregulation of sphingolipid metabolism in GBM. Carmofur, a derivative of 5-fluorouracil, inhibits acid ceramidase (ASAH1), a key enzyme in the production of S1P, and is in use outside the USA to treat colorectal cancer. We find that the mRNA for ASAH1, but not other ceramidases, is elevated in recurrent GBM. When TMZ-resistant GBM cells were treated with carmofur, decreased cell growth and increased apoptosis were observed along with cell cycle perturbations. RNA-sequencing identified decreases in cell cycle control pathways that were specific to TMZ-resistant cells. Furthermore, the transcription factor and G1 to S phase regulator, E2F8, was upregulated in TMZ-resistant versus parental GBM cells and inhibited by carmofur treatment in TMZ-resistant GBM cells, specifically. These data suggest a possible role for E2F8 as a mediator of carmofur effects in the context of TMZ resistance. These data suggest the potential utility of normalizing the sphingolipid balance in the context of recurrent GBM.

Tumor Treating Fields Alter the Kinomic Landscape in Glioblastoma Revealing Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.

Treatment for the deadly brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) has been improved through the non-invasive addition of alternating electric fields, called tumor treating fields (TTFields). Improving both progression-free and overall survival, TTFields are currently approved for treatment of recurrent GBMs as a monotherapy and in the adjuvant setting alongside TMZ for newly diagnosed GBMs. These TTFields are known to inhibit mitosis, but the full molecular impact of TTFields remains undetermined. Therefore, we sought to understand the ability of TTFields to disrupt the growth patterns of and induce kinomic landscape shifts in TMZ-sensitive and -resistant GBM cells. We determined that TTFields significantly decreased the growth of TMZ-sensitive and -resistant cells. Kinomic profiling predicted kinases that were induced or repressed by TTFields, suggesting possible therapy-specific vulnerabilities. Serving as a potential pro-survival mechanism for TTFields, kinomics predicted the increased activity of platelet-derived growth-factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα). We demonstrated that the addition of the PDGFR inhibitor, crenolanib, to TTFields further reduced cell growth in comparison to either treatment alone. Collectively, our data suggest the efficacy of TTFields in vitro and identify common signaling responses to TTFields in TMZ-sensitive and -resistant populations, which may support more personalized medicine approaches.

Targeting Acid Ceramidase Inhibits Glioblastoma Cell Migration through Decreased AKT Signaling.

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive cancers, partially due to its ability to migrate into the surrounding brain. The sphingolipid balance, or the balance between ceramides and sphingosine-1-phosphate, contributes to the ability of GBM cells to migrate or invade. Of the ceramidases which hydrolyze ceramides, acid ceramidase (ASAH1) is highly expressed in GBM samples compared to non-tumor brain. ASAH1 expression also correlates with genes associated with migration and focal adhesion. To understand the role of ASAH1 in GBM migration, we utilized shRNA knockdown and observed decreased migration that did not depend upon changes in growth. Next, we inhibited ASAH1 using carmofur, a clinically utilized small molecule inhibitor. Inhibition of ASAH1 by carmofur blocks in vitro migration of U251 (GBM cell line) and GBM cells derived from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). RNA-sequencing suggested roles for carmofur in MAPK and AKT signaling. We found that carmofur treatment decreases phosphorylation of AKT, but not of MAPK. The decrease in AKT phosphorylation was confirmed by shRNA knockdown of ASAH1. Our findings substantiate ASAH1 inhibition using carmofur as a potential clinically relevant treatment to advance GBM therapeutics, particularly due to its impact on migration.

Regulation of NKG2D Stress Ligands and Its Relevance in Cancer Progression.

Under cellular distress, multiple facets of normal homeostatic signaling are altered or disrupted. In the context of the immune landscape, external and internal stressors normally promote the expression of natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) ligands that allow for the targeted recognition and killing of cells by NKG2D receptor-bearing effector populations. The presence or absence of NKG2D ligands can heavily influence disease progression and impact the accessibility of immunotherapy options. In cancer, tumor cells are known to have distinct regulatory mechanisms for NKG2D ligands that are directly associated with tumor progression and maintenance. Therefore, understanding the regulation of NKG2D ligands in cancer will allow for targeted therapeutic endeavors aimed at exploiting the stress response pathway. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of regulatory mechanisms controlling the induction and repression of NKG2D ligands in cancer. Additionally, we highlight current therapeutic endeavors targeting NKG2D ligand expression and offer our perspective on considerations to further enhance the field of NKG2D ligand biology.

A role for GLUT3 in glioblastoma cell invasion that is not recapitulated by GLUT1.

The multifaceted roles of metabolism in invasion have been investigated across many cancers. The brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly invasive and metabolically plastic tumor with an inevitable recurrence. The neuronal glucose transporter 3 (GLUT3) was previously reported to correlate with poor glioma patient survival and be upregulated in GBM cells to promote therapeutic resistance and survival under restricted glucose conditions. It has been suggested that the increased glucose uptake mediated by GLUT3 elevation promotes survival of circulating tumor cells to facilitate metastasis. Here we suggest a more direct role for GLUT3 in promoting invasion that is not dependent upon changes in cell survival or metabolism. Analysis of glioma datasets demonstrated that GLUT3, but not GLUT1, expression was elevated in invasive disease. In human xenograft derived GBM cells, GLUT3, but not GLUT1, elevation significantly increased invasion in transwell assays, but not growth or migration. Further, there were no changes in glycolytic metabolism that correlated with invasive phenotypes. We identified the GLUT3 C-terminus as mediating invasion: substituting the C-terminus of GLUT1 for that of GLUT3 reduced invasion. RNA-seq analysis indicated changes in extracellular matrix organization in GLUT3 overexpressing cells, including upregulation of osteopontin. Together, our data suggest a role for GLUT3 in increasing tumor cell invasion that is not recapitulated by GLUT1, is separate from its role in metabolism and survival as a glucose transporter, and is likely broadly applicable since GLUT3 expression correlates with metastasis in many solid tumors.

Glioma stem cells and their roles within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment.

Tumor microenvironments are the result of cellular alterations in cancer that support unrestricted growth and proliferation and result in further modifications in cell behavior, which are critical for tumor progression. Angiogenesis and therapeutic resistance are known to be modulated by hypoxia and other tumor microenvironments, such as acidic stress, both of which are core features of the glioblastoma microenvironment. Hypoxia has also been shown to promote a stem-like state in both non-neoplastic and tumor cells. In glial tumors, glioma stem cells (GSCs) are central in tumor growth, angiogenesis, and therapeutic resistance, and further investigation of the interplay between tumor microenvironments and GSCs is critical to the search for better treatment options for glioblastoma. Accordingly, we summarize the impact of hypoxia and acidic stress on GSC signaling and biologic phenotypes, and potential methods to inhibit these pathways.

Hospital mortality rates: how is palliative care taken into account?

CONTEXT: Using mortality rates to measure hospital quality presumes that hospital deaths are medical failures. To be a fair measure of hospital quality, hospital mortality measures must take patient-level factors, such as goals of care, into account. OBJECTIVES: To answer questions about how hospital mortality rates are computed and how the involvement of hospice or palliative care (PC) are recognized and handled. METHODS: We analyzed the methods of four entities: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services "Hospital Compare;" U.S. News & World Report "Best Hospitals;" Thomson-Reuters "100 TopHospitals;" and HealthGrades. RESULTS: All entities reviewed rely on Medicare data, compute risk-adjusted mortality rates, and use "all-cause" mortality. They vary considerably in their recognition and handling of cases that involved hospice care or PC. One entity excludes cases with prior hospice care and another excludes those discharged to hospice at the end of the index hospitalization. Two entities exclude some or all cases that were coded with the V66.7 "Palliative Care Encounter" International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. CONCLUSION: Proliferation of, and variability among, hospital mortality measures creates a challenge for hospital administrators. PC and hospice leaders need to educate themselves and their hospital administrators about the extent to which these mortality rates take end-of-life care into account. At the national level, PC and hospice leaders should take advantage of opportunities to engage these mortality raters in conversation about possible changes in their methods and to conduct further research on this topic.