Ex-vivo study of flow dynamics and endothelial cell structure during extended hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers.

Liver transplantation is often the only effective treatment for end stage liver diseases resulting from cirrhosis, hepatitis, progressive jaundice, and biliary atresia. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) preservation may enhance donor pool by extending preservation time and reclaiming marginal donor livers including those from non-heart beating donors (NHBD), as demonstrated in the kidney. However, current HMP protocols have not been successful in improving extended preservation of livers and the major cause of preservation injury remains unknown. An intravital microscopy study was conducted to understand the flow dynamics of sinusoidal perfusion during 24h HMP with cold modified University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. Fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC) labeled albumin was utilized to visualize microvascular space and FITC labeled red blood cells (RBCs) were used to visualize flow dynamics during HMP. A heterogeneous flow pattern with regions of red cell stasis was observed after 24-h HMP. To examine the cause of red cell stasis, intravital and confocal microscopy studies of endothelial cells (ECs) structure labeled with DiI acetylated low-density lipoprotein (DiI acLDL) were conducted. These studies suggest that morphological changes in EC structures occurred during 24h HMP, which may cause obstruction to the sinusoidal flow. Histological findings confirm these results. As a result, heterogeneous flow pattern, red cell stasis, and edema occur, which may lead to the failure of these tissues following extended HMP.

Lack of donor hyporesponsiveness and donor chimerism after clinical transplantation of the hand.

BACKGROUND: Composite tissue allografts offer great potential in reconstructive surgery. However, the risks of immunosuppression and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after transplantation of vascularized bone in these grafts are significant. Transplantation of vascularized bone also may confer donor hematopoietic chimerism and, potentially, tolerance. We have followed two hand transplant recipients for more than 1 year to determine the level of chimerism and possible donor-specific tolerance, in addition to possible GVHD. METHODS: We performed kinetic studies on peripheral blood of two subjects after hand transplantation that included portions of the radius and ulna. We evaluated donor-specific reactivity, chimerism, and antibody production. RESULTS: Donor-specific tolerance did not develop clinically or in mixed lymphocyte reaction. The first subject recovered an excellent in vitro response to phytohemagglutinin, donor and third-party alloantigen, and by month 4 and at month 12 also recovered the ability to respond to Epstein-Barr virus. The second subject also demonstrated good in vitro proliferative responses, which were attenuated by immunosuppression. No phenotypic changes in mature hematopoietic lineages were detected by four-color flow cytometry other than those expected in response to immunosuppression. Donor chimerism was not detectable using four-color flow cytometry. Microchimerism (approximately 1:75,000 cells) was observed at the level of detection in some of the early posttransplantation specimens and was undetectable thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: In this particular transplantation and immunosuppressive regimen, the composite tissue allograft with vascularized bone marrow did not provide the immunologic benefit of tolerance induction nor cause GVHD.