Navigating the Complexities of Brain Metastases Management.

The management of brain metastases, a potentially devastating complication of advanced cancers, has become increasingly complex with advancements in local and systemic therapies. Improved outcomes and extended survival for patients with metastatic solid tumors have led to a surge in the prevalence and possibly incidence of brain metastases, affecting up to 40% of individuals with solid tumors. Enhanced imaging technologies contribute to more accurate and early detection, shaping the understanding of the intricate landscape of this condition. Traditionally, surgery and radiation stood as the mainstays of treatment because of the limited efficacy of systemic therapies within the brain. However, emerging clinical data, particularly in melanoma, lung, and breast cancers, reveal promising results with novel systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Despite the historical exclusion of patients with active brain metastases from clinical trials, a shift is occurring toward a more inclusive approach. This chapter delves into the multifaceted challenges associated with managing brain metastases, with a focus on the evolving landscape of systemic approaches as well as the intricacies of shared decision making, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state and future directions in navigating the complexities of brain metastases management.

Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based guidance to oncology clinicians, patients, nonprofessional caregivers, and palliative care clinicians to update the 2016 ASCO guideline on the integration of palliative care into standard oncology for all patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical, radiation, hematology-oncology, oncology nursing, palliative care, social work, ethics, advocacy, and psycho-oncology experts. The Panel conducted a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 2015-2023. Outcomes of interest included quality of life (QOL), patient satisfaction, physical and psychological symptoms, survival, and caregiver burden. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 52 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based recommendations address the integration of palliative care in oncology. Oncology clinicians should refer patients with advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies to specialized interdisciplinary palliative care teams that provide outpatient and inpatient care beginning early in the course of the disease, alongside active treatment of their cancer. For patients with cancer with unaddressed physical, psychosocial, or spiritual distress, cancer care programs should provide dedicated specialist palliative care services complementing existing or emerging supportive care interventions. Oncology clinicians from across the interdisciplinary cancer care team may refer the caregivers (eg, family, chosen family, and friends) of patients with cancer to palliative care teams for additional support. The Expert Panel suggests early palliative care involvement, especially for patients with uncontrolled symptoms and QOL concerns. Clinicians caring for patients with solid tumors on phase I cancer trials may also refer them to specialist palliative care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Factors Associated With and Characteristics of Patients Receiving Proton Therapy at the End of Life.

Purpose: To identify the characteristics, indications, and toxicities among patients receiving proton beam therapy (PBT) in the final year of life at an academic medical center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients who received PBT within the final 12 months of life was performed. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient and treatment details from 2010 to 2019. Patients were followed from the start of PBT until death or last follow-up. Acute (3 months) toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Imaging response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. The χ2 test was used to evaluate factors associated with palliative treatment. Simple logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with toxicity. Results: Bet299 patients were treated at the end of life (EOL) out of 5802 total patients treated with PBT (5.2%). Median age was 68 years (19-94 years), 58% male. The most common cancer was nonsmall cell lung cancer (27%). Patients were treated for symptom palliation alone (11%), durable control (57%), curative intent (16%), local recurrence (14%), or oligometastatic disease (2%). Forty-five percent received reirradiation. Median treatment time was 32 days (1-189 days). Acute toxicity was noted in 85% of the patients (31% G1, 53% G2, 15% G3). Thirteen patients (4%) experienced chronic toxicity. Breast and hematologic malignancy were associated with palliative intent χ2 (1, N = 14) = 17, P = .013; (χ2 (1, N = 14) = 18, P = .009). Conclusion: The number of patients treated with PBT at the EOL was low compared to all comers. Many of these patients received treatment with definitive doses and concurrent systemic therapy. Some patients spent a large portion of their remaining days on treatment. A prognostic indicator may better optimize patient selection for PBT at the EOL.

Stereotactic Radiation for Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Case-Based Review.

For decades, the distant progression of breast cancer has been the purview of systemic therapy alone or with low to moderate-dose radiation therapy intended for the palliation of symptomatic metastases. However, for decades there have been anecdotes of long-term disease-free survival with more aggressive local treatment of one or more metastases. The hypothesis of oligometastases is that the treatment of a clinically limited number of distant metastases can change the natural history of stage IV breast cancer. The advance in the technology of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) has made it more possible to offer a non-invasive, yet potentially disease-modifying, metastases-directed ablative treatment in place of surgery or a palliative radiation regimen. Although there are promising local control and survival outcomes in phase I/II trials, there is still a lack of phase III evidence of ablative SBRT results showing any change in the natural history of metastatic breast cancer. Limited oligometastases may call for an ablative approach with SBRT when definitive long-term local control is needed for the best palliation against symptomatic progression in challenging locations. Some oligometastases that have progression on a certain systemic regimen, while others remain stable or in remission, may also be treated with SBRT in the hopes of prolonging the use of that regimen. Whether SBRT should represent the standard management for stage IV breast cancer of a limited number or of limited progression requires confirmation by phase III data. This review will discuss the data from key clinical trials as it applies to decision making in typical clinical cases considered for potentially ablative SBRT for oligometastases or oligoprogression.

Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: What Is the Right Regimen for Palliation?

Purpose: To report objective response rates (ORR), time to local failure (TTLF), and overall survival (OS) among patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after salvage- or palliative-intent radiation therapy (RT) and to investigate whether outcomes differed with conventional versus hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT. Methods and Materials: A single-institution observational cohort study was performed for patients who completed a course of RT for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2020. Predictors of ORR, TTLF, and OS were calculated using univariable and multivariable regression models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTLF and OS, and log-rank analysis was used to compare outcomes. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated using an α/ß of 10. Results: One-hundred and sixty-nine patients were treated with 205 RT courses (73 [36%] salvage, 132 [64%] palliative), and hypofractionated RT was used in 100 RT courses (49%). Median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 8-60 Gy). ORR was 60% for the total cohort (53% and 69% for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 4 months, median OS in all patients was 5 months (3 and 22 months for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). No statistically significant differences in ORR, TTLF, and OS were observed with hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation. EQD2 ≥35 Gy was associated with improved ORR (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.19-12.03]; P = .024) and prolonged TTLF (0.39 [0.18-0.87]; P = .022), while double-hit receptor status (8.18 [1.08-62.05]; P = .042), cell of origin (3.87 [1.17-8.74]; P = .0012), and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm; 2.12 [1.18-3.81]; P = .012) were associated with inferior TTLF. In the palliative-only cohort, a low-dose regimen of 8 Gy in 2 fractions was associated with similar ORR compared with other fractionation schema but trended towards inferior TTLF (P = .36). Conclusions: Hypofractionation is not associated with differences in disease outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, while higher RT dose (EQD2 ≥35 Gy) may improve ORR and TTLF. Future work is warranted to elucidate the ideal dose and fractionation schema for such patients who will likely also undergo novel systemic agents and cellular therapies.

Serious Illness Communication Practices in Glioblastoma: An Institutional Perspective.

Background: Early, high-quality advance care planning discussions are essential for supporting goal-concordant care among glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Objective: Using mixed methods, we sought to characterize current serious illness (SI) communication practices at our institution. Methods: The electronic medical records of 240 deceased GBM patients cared for at the Abramson Cancer Center in Philadelphia, PA between 2017 and 2019 were systematically reviewed for documented SI conversations about four domains: prognosis, goals, end-of-life planning, and code status. Patient outcomes and SI conversation characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Standardized interviews about GBM care were held with five clinicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded-theory coding to identify emergent themes. Results: Nearly all patients (96%) had at least one documented SI conversation (median: 4, interquartile range [IQR] 2-7), mostly outpatient with medical oncology physicians. Median timing of first SI conversation was 360 days before death. SI conversations were not significantly associated with patient outcomes, including inpatient death and hospice enrollment. Seven themes emerged from clinician interviews: balancing hope and reality, anticipatory guidance, neglect of the "big picture," need for earlier conversations, care coordination, the role of clinical expertise, and communication training. Conclusion: SI conversations were documented early and often in our sample, but their quality was difficult to assess. Contrary to our quantitative findings, interviewees reported that SI conversations were late, infrequent, inadequate, and fragmented across specialties, failing to explore critical issues such as prognosis and functional decline.

Communication strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Unforeseen opportunities and drawbacks.

The current coronavirus pandemic has forced a dramatic shift in the way clinicians practice medicine, including the way we communicate with our patients. The pandemic has both facilitated and challenged serious illness conversations between providers and patients. Furthermore, telemedicine has emerged as a major practice across the globe. Benefits of which include greater involvement of supporting family members while drawbacks involve socioeconomic barriers that limit high quality interactions between provider and patient. This commentary aims to highlight the evolution of communication strategies over this unique time in hopes of promoting reflection and change to improve our communication strategies at the individual and institutional level.

Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: From Palliation to Ablation.

The management of patients with metastatic cancer is rapidly changing. Historically, radiotherapy was utilized for the treatment of localized disease or for palliation. While systemic therapy remains the mainstay of management for patients with metastatic cancer, radiotherapy is becoming increasingly important not only to palliate symptoms, but also to ablate oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease and improve local control in the primary site. There is emerging evidence in multiple solid malignancies that patients with low volume metastatic disease that undergo local ablative therapy to metastatic sites may have improved progression free survival and potentially overall survival. In addition, there is increasing evidence that select patients with metastatic disease may benefit from aggressive treatment of the primary site. Patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma have a poor overall prognosis. However, there may be opportunities in patients with low volume metastatic soft tissue sarcoma to improve outcomes with local therapy including surgery, ablation, embolization, and radiation therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a safe, convenient, precise, and non-invasive option for ablation of sites of metastases. In this review article, we explore the limited yet evolving role of radiotherapy to metastatic and primary sites for local control and palliation, particularly in the oligometastatic setting.

The Safety of Bridging Radiation with Anti-BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CART-BCMA) are a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (r/rMM). We evaluated the safety and feasibility of bridging radiation (RT) in subjects treated on a phase I trial of CART-BCMA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-five r/rMM subjects were treated in three cohorts with two doses of CART-BCMA cells ± cyclophosphamide. We retrospectively analyzed toxicity, response, and CART manufacturing data based on RT receipt. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects received no RT <1 year before CART infusion (Group A). Eight subjects received RT <1 year before CART infusion (Group B) with median time from RT to apheresis of 114 days (range 40-301). Four subjects received bridging-RT (Group C) with a median dose of 22 Gy and time from RT to infusion of 25 days (range 18-35). Group C had qualitatively lower rates of grade 4 (G4) hematologic toxicities (25%) versus A (61.5%) and B (62.5%). G3-4 neurotoxicity occurred in 7.7%, 25%, and 25% in Group A, B, and C, respectively. G3-4 cytokine release syndrome was observed in 38.5%, 25%, and 25% in Group A, B, and C, respectively. Partial response or better was observed in 54%, 38%, and 50% of Group A, B, and C, respectively. RT administered <1 year (P = 0.002) and <100 days (P = 0.069) before apheresis was associated with lower in vitro proliferation during manufacturing; however, in vivo CART-BCMA expansion appeared similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bridging-RT appeared safe and feasible with CART-BCMA therapy in our r/rMM patients, though larger future studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Radiation Therapy for Plasma Cell Disease of the Brain and Skull: Poor Palliation and Survival After Treatment for Central Nervous System Involvement.

PURPOSE: Myeloma lesions of the head can present with central nervous system (CNS) involvement (leptomeningeal disease or brain metastasis), cranial neuropathy (CN), or impending neurologic involvement (INI). We analyzed response and survival after palliative radiation therapy (RT) to the brain and/or skull for myeloma lesions to determine whether CNS involvement fared worse than other RT indications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 54 palliative RT courses administered at our institution from 2008 to 2019. Eleven courses were administered for CNS disease, 28 for CN, and 15 for INI. Demographic, disease, and RT variables were recorded as well as clinical response, radiographic response, and survival. Univariate analyses were performed for differences between groups, effects of clinical and RT treatment factors on response, as well as dose response. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: This heavily pretreated cohort received a median of 20 to 24 Gy, most often to the base of skull, orbit(s), calvarium, or whole brain. Any clinical response (partial or complete vs no response or progressive disease) was significantly more likely for patients with CN and INI when collectively compared with patients with CNS disease (P < .001). Dose response was significant for doses ≥15 and 20 Gy for the whole cohort (P = .026 and .005, respectively) and patients with CN/INI (P = .023 and .002, respectively). Additionally, patients with high-risk cytogenetics were less likely to clinically respond (P = .009). Patients with CNS disease had worse survival (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with leptomeningeal disease/brain metastasis have poor clinical response and survival after RT and their responses do not demonstrate a dose response. Given these poor outcomes, the potential benefit of RT may be limited for some patients who may be alternatively managed by supportive care or short RT courses. Patients with CN/INI have longer survival and better response rates and may benefit from RT courses ≥15 to 20 Gy.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Recent improvements in chemoimmunotherapies, targeted agents, hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and cellular therapies have revolutionized treatment paradigms for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Even in the relapsed or refractory setting, contemporary treatment options are delivered with curative intent and can lead to lasting remissions. Although such therapies have improved overall outcomes, they have increasingly led to a wide variety of presentations of recurrent tumors in need of palliation. Here, we review the use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliation of DLBCL. We draw particular attention to the evolving role for hypofractionated RT and low-dose RT for DLBCL. We review the available literature on these topics and focus on commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Advanced Cancers: Indications and Outcomes.

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is well-tolerated, effective treatment for pain, bleeding, obstruction, and other symptoms/complications of advanced cancer. It is an important component of multidisciplinary management. It should be considered even for patients with poor prognosis, because it can offer rapid symptomatic relief. Furthermore, expanding indications for treatment of noncurable disease have shown that PRT can extend survival for select patients. For those with good prognosis, advanced PRT techniques may improve the therapeutic ratio, maximizing tumor control while limiting toxicity. PRT referral should be considered for any patient with symptomatic or asymptomatic sites of disease where local control is desired.

Palliative Radiation Therapy for Metastatic, Persistent, or Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Efficacy in the Era of Modern Technology and Targeted Agents.

PURPOSE: Metastatic, persistent, or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (MPR-EOC) remains a significant threat to patient mortality despite advances in novel targeted agents. Radiation therapy (RT) is often used as a palliative option. We report outcomes of a large series of MPR-EOC patients treated with modern palliative RT (PRT) in an era of novel systemic therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted of women treated with PRT for MPR-EOC between 2007 and 2019 at an academic institution. Clinical response rates were recorded at <1 month, 1 to 3 months, and >3 months. Radiographic responses were categorized by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Overall response rate (ORR) was the sum of complete and partial response. Linear regression analyses of baseline characteristics were conducted for statistical testing. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with PMR-OC received 120 courses of palliative RT. Median follow-up was 8.6 months. Median age was 61 (range, 22-82). Thirty-six percent of women received central nervous system (CNS)-directed RT. In addition, 43% received targeted therapies before RT. Clinical ORR within 1 month and at last follow-up for non-CNS lesions was 79% and 61% (69% and 88% for CNS lesions, respectively). High-grade serous lesions were more likely to have clinical response (P = .04). Biologically effective doses (BED) >39 Gy were associated with improved clinical response in CNS lesions (P = .049). Bony sites were associated with worse clinical (P = .004) response in non-CNS lesions compared with soft tissue or nodal sites. Acute or late grade 3+ toxicities with bevacizumab were low (8.7%/4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: PRT offers excellent rates of response for symptomatic patients with MPR-EOC within 1 month of treatment, with durable responses beyond 3 months. High-grade serous lesions were associated with improved response in all patients. Higher BED and soft tissue or nodal sites were associated with improved response in CNS and non-CNS patients, respectively. Acute or late toxicities with bevacizumab and PRT were low. Prospective investigation is warranted to determine the optimal PRT regimen.

A Retrospective Study of Rapid Symptom Response in Bleeding Gynecologic Malignancies With Short Course Palliative Radiation Therapy: Less is More.

CONTEXT: Advanced gynecologic malignancies can cause significant vaginal bleeding. Radiotherapy (RT) is often used to palliate symptoms, but limited data exist concerning the optimal dose and expected time to bleeding hemostasis in this population. OBJECTIVES: 1) To investigate the overall hemostasis response and kinetics of hemostasis in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving palliative RT. 2) To compare the efficacy of short-course RT (SCRT, less than or equal to five fractions, >3.5 Gy per fraction) vs. conventionally fractionated long-course regimens (greater than five fractions). METHODS: We identified women receiving palliative RT for bleeding gynecologic malignancies. Initial and maximal hemostasis responses (IHR and MHR) were recorded and categorized as progressive bleeding (PD), stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR). Clinical variables were correlated with response or toxicity using binary logistic regression statistical methods. RESULTS: Thirty-three women (median age 63) were identified between 2010 and 2019. Median follow-up and survival after RT were 131 days. About 54.5% (18 of 33) received SCRT. Median time to IHR was five days (two-and-a-half days with SCRT) and 78.8% (26 of 33) responded during treatment. Median time to MHR was 13 days. About 100% achieved PR or CR at MHR. Rates of CR were similar between SCRT (83%) and conventionally fractionated schedules (87%). Average durability of hemostatic control was 5.4 months. Overall rate of rebleeding and Grade 3+ toxicity was 9.1% (3 of 33 each). CONCLUSION: Women receiving SCRT for bleeding gynecologic malignancies achieved rapid symptom control (often during treatment) with minimal rebleeding. In a population whose median survival is four months, SCRT effectively addresses symptomatic disease while minimizing patient burden and toxicity.

Contemporary treatment of keloids: A 10-year institutional experience with medical management, surgical excision, and radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluate a single center's, decade-long experience utilizing 3 approaches to keloid treatment: corticosteroid medical management (MM), surgical excision (SE), and surgical excision + radiation therapy (SE + RT). STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing keloid treatment were identified (2008-2017). Outcomes were symptomatology/cosmesis for MM, and recurrence and complications for SE and SE + RT. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with recurrence and complications. RESULTS: 284 keloids (95 MM, 94 SE, 95 S E + RT) corresponded to patients with a median age of 39.1 (IQR: 26.1-53), 68.1% Black, and followed-up for 15.4 months (IQR: 5.6-30.7). For MM, 84.6% and 72.5% reported improvement in cosmesis and symptoms, respectively. SE and SE + RT recurrence were 37.2 and 37.9%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, higher radiation doses were associated with decreased recurrence whereas male gender (OR 3.3) and postoperative steroids (OR 9.5) were associated with increased recurrence (p < 0.01). There were more complications in the SE + RT group. CONCLUSIONS: MM resulted in at least some improvement. Recurrence rates after SE and SE + RT were similar. Female sex is protective, race does not affect outcomes.

Making the Most of a Crisis: A Proposal for Network-Based Palliative Radiation Therapy to Reduce Travel Toxicity.

A multipronged model is proposed to improve the delivery of palliative radiotherapy by increasing access to care and reducing travel burden for patients.

Introducing Multidisciplinary Oncology Management to the Medical Student.

Despite the fact that a large portion of medical students pursue training in a cancer-related discipline, oncology is emphasized to a disproportionately lesser extent than are other disciplines in medical school. Medical students have wide gaps in their oncology-specific knowledge, and undergraduate medical education fails to address the multidisciplinary nature of oncology. To address these shortcomings and improve medical students' understanding of the multidisciplinary nature of oncology, we have instituted a clinical oncology elective for medical students: an optional, 2-day session held after classes and promoted by student interest groups. Day 1 comprised a series of short faculty lectures beginning with the concepts of and rationale for staging, an approach to breaking bad news, guideline-based management, and multidisciplinary tumor board discussion. Three multidisciplinary tumor boards were simulated on the second day, run by attending surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists with expertise in the cancer of interest, using real patient examples. Ultimately, the clinical oncology elective shows medical students how the oncology care team works together to care for cancer patients.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for Serious Illness in Pregnancy.

Palliative care (PC) teams are increasingly being called upon to provide care earlier and more remote from end of life. Because much of the field has grown out of hospice and geriatric care, most teams have little to no experience caring for pregnant women or their fetuses when serious or life-threatening illness strikes. This article, written by a team of oncologists (gynecologic, medical, and radiation) and PC providers, seeks to demystify the care of seriously ill pregnant women and their fetuses by exploring the diagnostic, treatment, prognostication, symptom management, and communication needs of these patients. Truly comprehensive PC extends throughout the life span, from conception to death, regardless of age. Accordingly, increased knowledge of the unique needs of these vulnerable groups will enhance our ability to provide care across this continuum.

Palliative Radiotherapy Education for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellows: A National Needs Assessment.

Background: Insufficient knowledge of palliative radiotherapy (PRT) among hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) physicians is thought to be a barrier to the provision of high-quality palliative care. Objective: To assess the need for PRT education in HPM fellowship. Design: A cross-sectional survey of HPM fellows was conducted in June 2018. Setting/Subjects: The survey was distributed to accredited HPM fellowship programs in the United States for distribution to enrolled fellows; 114 fellows responded to the survey. Results: Nearly all respondents agreed that the principles of PRT should be taught in HPM fellowship, yet 51% had received no PRT education and 35% had received only one or two hours. Only 25% of respondents rated their working knowledge of PRT as sufficient, 40% felt confident in identifying radiation oncology emergencies or managing radiotherapy side effects, and 52% felt confident in assessing which patients to refer for radiotherapy. More than 75% agreed that were they more knowledgeable about PRT, they would be more likely to consider referral to radiation oncology, to collaborate with radiation oncologists, and to advocate for a short course of treatment based on a patient's prognosis or goals or care. Fellows who received PRT education in fellowship had significantly greater knowledge of and more favorable attitudes toward the use of radiotherapy. This difference was the greatest among fellows who had received at least five hours of PRT education. Conclusion: There is a need for PRT education in HPM fellowship. Efforts to address this need may lead to more appropriate utilization of PRT for patients with advanced cancer.