The role of motion tracking in assessing technical skill acquisition using a neonatal 3D-printed thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula simulator.

INTRODUCTION: Acquiring the technical skills required for thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is challenging. A high-fidelity 3D-printed pediatric thoracoscopic EA/TEF simulator has been developed to address this issue. This study explored motion-tracking as an assessment tool to distinguish between surgeons of different expertise using the simulator. METHODS: Participants performed a single intracorporeal suture between the esophageal ends in EA with TEF. Total relative path lengths of the right and left surgical instruments were recorded during the task. Each video-recorded attempt was assessed by a blinded pediatric surgeon using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score. Data recorded as median (range) and statistical significance as p<0.05. RESULTS: The task was performed by 17 participants. The median OSATS scores identified a significant difference between experts and novices. A difference between left- and right-hands was only found in the mid-skill level group. Right-hand path length was greatest in novices and lowest in experts. Left-hand path length was greatest in novices and the mid-skill level group compared to experts. CONCLUSION: Experts had the lowest total path length for either hand, suggesting they had the greatest efficiency of movement. The similar high path lengths in both hands for novices indicate their relatively low level of skill with either hand. The difference between right- and left-hand path lengths in the mid-skill level group likely reflects the improved right-handed technical skills in contrast to the still developing left hand. Further focus on the left hand during simulation training may improve left-handed economy of movement.

Master and Apprentice or a Slave to Technology? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimal Access Surgery Simulation-Based Training Techniques.

Introduction: This study set out to assess the efficacy of three different approaches to simulation-based minimal access surgery (MAS) training using a three-dimensional printed neonatal thoracoscopic simulator and a virtual simulator. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trial of medical students (N = 32), as novices to MAS. The participants performed two construct validated tasks on a thoracoscopic simulator and were then randomly allocated into four intervention groups: (1) three consultant-led sessions on a thoracoscopic simulator; (2) three self-directed learning sessions on the same simulator; (3) self-directed "virtual training" on the "SimuSurg" application; and (4) control. Postintervention participants repeated both tasks. Videos of all task attempts were de-identified and marked by a blinded consultant pediatric surgeon. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) scores or demographics in any group. For the "ring transfer" task, Groups 1 and 2 showed significant improvement after intervention, with no significant change in Groups 3 or 4. There was no significant difference between Groups 1 or 2 in postintervention scores. For the "needle pass" task, no group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement after intervention. Conclusion: Practice on a physical simulator either consultant-led or self-directed led to improved scores for MAS novices compared with a virtual simulator or no intervention for a simple "ring transfer" task. This suggests that time on the physical simulator was the most important factor and implies that trainees could usefully practice simple tasks at their convenience rather than require consultant supervision. This improvement is not seen in more challenging tasks such as the "needle pass."