Synchronous Primary Adenocarcinoma of Distal Common Bile Duct and Gall bladder.

Synchronous primary cancer of the gall bladder and distal common bile duct is rare. There are only few case reports and case series available of these synchronous cancers. Management of this tumor is individualized in these case reports and series based upon the presentation. We present a case of a patient who had multifocal adenocarcinoma involving distal common bile duct and gall bladder. Keywords: Distal common bile duct cancer; gall bladder cancer; synchronous primary.

Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding.

INTRODUCTION: Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a frequently advised investigation for upper abdominal symptoms. Studies have questioned the appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and have shown that inappropriate indications range from 5% to 49%. The unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy expose patients to the risk. The number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is rising in our region and we assume so is the number of unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. With an aim to find out the appropriateness of the indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and compare its association with positive findings, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: All patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during study period were included in the study. Appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was defined as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria as "appropriate" and "inappropriate". Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were classified as "significant" and "insignificant" based on endoscopy findings. The extent of this association between appropriateness of indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings was expressed as the odds ratio of finding a relevant diagnosis in patients with an ''appropriate'' indication compared with those with an 'inappropriate'' indication. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Fifty- two (65.8%) of the indications were considered appropriate as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Thirty-three (63.5%) of the appropriate indications has clinically significant finding as compared to seven (25.9%) of inappropriate indication with an odds ratio of 4.962 (95% CI:1.773 - 13.890, P=0.002) which is statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate indications have significantly higher rates of clinically significant findings. Use of guidelines may decrease the number of unnecessary procedures.

Management of Severe Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries.

Severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries are rare and no surgeon and institute get enough number of cases to acquire expertise. Hence, the management of such injuries remains controversial. We report a case of 28 years male who sustained a severe pancreaticoduodenal injury and was managed with emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy with immediate reconstruction. Various approaches have been described in literature with variable outcome. Damage control strategy seems to be most useful approach and major resection should be a part of debridement whenever required. Immediate reconstruction can be carried out safely if patients remain hemodynamically and metabolically stable.