[Adjuvant contact radiotherapy for conjunctival malignancies: Preliminary results of a series of 14 patients treated with the Papillon 50 machine]. / Radiothérapie de contact adjuvante des tumeurs malignes de la conjonctive : résultats préliminaires d'une série de 14 patients traités avec l'appareil Papillon 50.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of an adjuvant contact irradiation using 50kV photons after resection of conjunctival malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From 2012 to 2014, 14 patients (male: nine; female: five) have been treated by contact irradiation after resection of a malignant tumor of the conjunctiva (melanoma: five patients; malignant fibrous histiocytoma: one patient; carcinoma: eight patients) The treatment was performed using the Papillon 50 machine (Ariane). Three to four sessions were delivered, each giving a dose of 10Gy. The median follow-up in survivors was 33 months. RESULTS: The tolerance was good. A cataract was seen in one patient, and a moderate eye dryness in one. There was no corneal ulcer. One patient died of intercurrent disease. One patient with carcinoma recurred locally. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant contact radiotherapy provides a good local control after resection of conjunctival malignancies (melanoma, malignant histiocytofibroma, carcinoma). Thanks to its precision, this technique is well tolerated with a low rate of complications. Furthermore, it is delivered on an ambulatory basis.

Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc™ device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc™ technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. RESULTS: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 ± 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 ± 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 ± 1.26 % and 98.59 ± 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 ± 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. CONCLUSION: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan.